Loading…
Aligning seminars with Bologna requirements: reciprocal peer tutoring, the solo taxonomy and deep learning
Changes in public policy, such as the Bologna Process, require students to be equipped with multifunctional competencies to master relevant tasks in unfamiliar situations. Achieving this goal might imply a change in many curricula toward deeper learning. As a didactical means to achieve deep learnin...
Saved in:
Published in: | Studies in higher education (Dorchester-on-Thames) 2016-09, Vol.41 (9), p.1674-1691 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-3909b9930b25ef37252c515d5c978395c26b4ed8f8494275e7af0e6bda35d5aa3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-3909b9930b25ef37252c515d5c978395c26b4ed8f8494275e7af0e6bda35d5aa3 |
container_end_page | 1691 |
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 1674 |
container_title | Studies in higher education (Dorchester-on-Thames) |
container_volume | 41 |
creator | Lueg, Rainer Lueg, Klarissa Lauridsen, Ole |
description | Changes in public policy, such as the Bologna Process, require students to be equipped with multifunctional competencies to master relevant tasks in unfamiliar situations. Achieving this goal might imply a change in many curricula toward deeper learning. As a didactical means to achieve deep learning results, the authors suggest reciprocal peer tutoring (RPT); as a conceptual framework the authors suggest the SOLO (Structure of Observed Learning Outcomes) taxonomy and constructive alignment as suggested by Biggs and Tang. Our study presents results from the introduction of RPT in a large course. The authors find that RPT produces satisfying learning outcomes, active students, and ideal constructive alignments of the seminar content with the exam, the intended learning outcomes, and the requirements of the Bologna Process. Our data, which comprise surveys and evaluations from both faculty and students, suggest that RPT fosters deeper learning than does teacher-led instruction. Based on these findings, the authors also offer guidelines regarding how to implement RPT and how to overcome barriers. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/03075079.2014.1002832 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_03075079_2014_1002832</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1105841</ericid><sourcerecordid>4141577631</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-3909b9930b25ef37252c515d5c978395c26b4ed8f8494275e7af0e6bda35d5aa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFu1DAQhi0EEkvhESpZ4krasR2vE06UqlBQJS4gcbO8zmTrVWJvx161-_Y42sKRk2XP9_sffYydC7gQ0MElKDAaTH8hQbT1CWSn5Au2Eq2BRpj290u2WphmgV6zNznvAGBtunbFdldT2MYQtzzjHKKjzB9Dueef05S20XHCh0MgnDGW_LHefNhT8m7ie0Ti5VAS1fAHXu6R55rhxT2lmOYjd3HgA-KeT-hoaXjLXo1uyvju-Txjv77c_Ly-be5-fP12fXXXeLWG0qge-k3fK9hIjaMyUkuvhR60702neu3letPi0I1d27fSaDRuBFxvBqcq5Jw6Y-9P_9ZNHw6Yi92lA8VaaUVX7RiptKmUPlGeUs6Eo91TmB0drQC7aLV_tdpFq33WWnPnpxxS8P8yN9-FAN21os4_neYhjolm95hoGmxxxynRSC76kK36f8Ufy62I8Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1810072357</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Aligning seminars with Bologna requirements: reciprocal peer tutoring, the solo taxonomy and deep learning</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>ERIC</source><source>Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection</source><creator>Lueg, Rainer ; Lueg, Klarissa ; Lauridsen, Ole</creator><creatorcontrib>Lueg, Rainer ; Lueg, Klarissa ; Lauridsen, Ole</creatorcontrib><description>Changes in public policy, such as the Bologna Process, require students to be equipped with multifunctional competencies to master relevant tasks in unfamiliar situations. Achieving this goal might imply a change in many curricula toward deeper learning. As a didactical means to achieve deep learning results, the authors suggest reciprocal peer tutoring (RPT); as a conceptual framework the authors suggest the SOLO (Structure of Observed Learning Outcomes) taxonomy and constructive alignment as suggested by Biggs and Tang. Our study presents results from the introduction of RPT in a large course. The authors find that RPT produces satisfying learning outcomes, active students, and ideal constructive alignments of the seminar content with the exam, the intended learning outcomes, and the requirements of the Bologna Process. Our data, which comprise surveys and evaluations from both faculty and students, suggest that RPT fosters deeper learning than does teacher-led instruction. Based on these findings, the authors also offer guidelines regarding how to implement RPT and how to overcome barriers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0307-5079</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1470-174X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/03075079.2014.1002832</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Abingdon: Routledge</publisher><subject>Academic Degrees ; Alignment (Education) ; Bologna Process ; Case Studies ; Comparative Analysis ; Constructivism (Learning) ; Correlation ; Curricula ; deep learning ; Denmark ; educational expansion ; Europe ; Focus Groups ; Foreign Countries ; Higher Education ; Independent Study ; International Cooperation ; Learning ; Likert Scales ; Mixed Methods Research ; National Standards ; Outcomes of Education ; Peer Teaching ; Peer tutoring ; Public policy ; Questionnaires ; reciprocal peer tutoring ; Seminars ; student activation ; Student Surveys ; Taxonomy ; Teaching Methods ; Tutoring</subject><ispartof>Studies in higher education (Dorchester-on-Thames), 2016-09, Vol.41 (9), p.1674-1691</ispartof><rights>2015 Society for Research into Higher Education 2015</rights><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Ltd. 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-3909b9930b25ef37252c515d5c978395c26b4ed8f8494275e7af0e6bda35d5aa3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-3909b9930b25ef37252c515d5c978395c26b4ed8f8494275e7af0e6bda35d5aa3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27898,27899,33197</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1105841$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lueg, Rainer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lueg, Klarissa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lauridsen, Ole</creatorcontrib><title>Aligning seminars with Bologna requirements: reciprocal peer tutoring, the solo taxonomy and deep learning</title><title>Studies in higher education (Dorchester-on-Thames)</title><description>Changes in public policy, such as the Bologna Process, require students to be equipped with multifunctional competencies to master relevant tasks in unfamiliar situations. Achieving this goal might imply a change in many curricula toward deeper learning. As a didactical means to achieve deep learning results, the authors suggest reciprocal peer tutoring (RPT); as a conceptual framework the authors suggest the SOLO (Structure of Observed Learning Outcomes) taxonomy and constructive alignment as suggested by Biggs and Tang. Our study presents results from the introduction of RPT in a large course. The authors find that RPT produces satisfying learning outcomes, active students, and ideal constructive alignments of the seminar content with the exam, the intended learning outcomes, and the requirements of the Bologna Process. Our data, which comprise surveys and evaluations from both faculty and students, suggest that RPT fosters deeper learning than does teacher-led instruction. Based on these findings, the authors also offer guidelines regarding how to implement RPT and how to overcome barriers.</description><subject>Academic Degrees</subject><subject>Alignment (Education)</subject><subject>Bologna Process</subject><subject>Case Studies</subject><subject>Comparative Analysis</subject><subject>Constructivism (Learning)</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Curricula</subject><subject>deep learning</subject><subject>Denmark</subject><subject>educational expansion</subject><subject>Europe</subject><subject>Focus Groups</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>Higher Education</subject><subject>Independent Study</subject><subject>International Cooperation</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Likert Scales</subject><subject>Mixed Methods Research</subject><subject>National Standards</subject><subject>Outcomes of Education</subject><subject>Peer Teaching</subject><subject>Peer tutoring</subject><subject>Public policy</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>reciprocal peer tutoring</subject><subject>Seminars</subject><subject>student activation</subject><subject>Student Surveys</subject><subject>Taxonomy</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><subject>Tutoring</subject><issn>0307-5079</issn><issn>1470-174X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMFu1DAQhi0EEkvhESpZ4krasR2vE06UqlBQJS4gcbO8zmTrVWJvx161-_Y42sKRk2XP9_sffYydC7gQ0MElKDAaTH8hQbT1CWSn5Au2Eq2BRpj290u2WphmgV6zNznvAGBtunbFdldT2MYQtzzjHKKjzB9Dueef05S20XHCh0MgnDGW_LHefNhT8m7ie0Ti5VAS1fAHXu6R55rhxT2lmOYjd3HgA-KeT-hoaXjLXo1uyvju-Txjv77c_Ly-be5-fP12fXXXeLWG0qge-k3fK9hIjaMyUkuvhR60702neu3letPi0I1d27fSaDRuBFxvBqcq5Jw6Y-9P_9ZNHw6Yi92lA8VaaUVX7RiptKmUPlGeUs6Eo91TmB0drQC7aLV_tdpFq33WWnPnpxxS8P8yN9-FAN21os4_neYhjolm95hoGmxxxynRSC76kK36f8Ufy62I8Q</recordid><startdate>20160901</startdate><enddate>20160901</enddate><creator>Lueg, Rainer</creator><creator>Lueg, Klarissa</creator><creator>Lauridsen, Ole</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160901</creationdate><title>Aligning seminars with Bologna requirements: reciprocal peer tutoring, the solo taxonomy and deep learning</title><author>Lueg, Rainer ; Lueg, Klarissa ; Lauridsen, Ole</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-3909b9930b25ef37252c515d5c978395c26b4ed8f8494275e7af0e6bda35d5aa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Academic Degrees</topic><topic>Alignment (Education)</topic><topic>Bologna Process</topic><topic>Case Studies</topic><topic>Comparative Analysis</topic><topic>Constructivism (Learning)</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Curricula</topic><topic>deep learning</topic><topic>Denmark</topic><topic>educational expansion</topic><topic>Europe</topic><topic>Focus Groups</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>Higher Education</topic><topic>Independent Study</topic><topic>International Cooperation</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Likert Scales</topic><topic>Mixed Methods Research</topic><topic>National Standards</topic><topic>Outcomes of Education</topic><topic>Peer Teaching</topic><topic>Peer tutoring</topic><topic>Public policy</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>reciprocal peer tutoring</topic><topic>Seminars</topic><topic>student activation</topic><topic>Student Surveys</topic><topic>Taxonomy</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><topic>Tutoring</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lueg, Rainer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lueg, Klarissa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lauridsen, Ole</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Studies in higher education (Dorchester-on-Thames)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lueg, Rainer</au><au>Lueg, Klarissa</au><au>Lauridsen, Ole</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1105841</ericid><atitle>Aligning seminars with Bologna requirements: reciprocal peer tutoring, the solo taxonomy and deep learning</atitle><jtitle>Studies in higher education (Dorchester-on-Thames)</jtitle><date>2016-09-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1674</spage><epage>1691</epage><pages>1674-1691</pages><issn>0307-5079</issn><eissn>1470-174X</eissn><abstract>Changes in public policy, such as the Bologna Process, require students to be equipped with multifunctional competencies to master relevant tasks in unfamiliar situations. Achieving this goal might imply a change in many curricula toward deeper learning. As a didactical means to achieve deep learning results, the authors suggest reciprocal peer tutoring (RPT); as a conceptual framework the authors suggest the SOLO (Structure of Observed Learning Outcomes) taxonomy and constructive alignment as suggested by Biggs and Tang. Our study presents results from the introduction of RPT in a large course. The authors find that RPT produces satisfying learning outcomes, active students, and ideal constructive alignments of the seminar content with the exam, the intended learning outcomes, and the requirements of the Bologna Process. Our data, which comprise surveys and evaluations from both faculty and students, suggest that RPT fosters deeper learning than does teacher-led instruction. Based on these findings, the authors also offer guidelines regarding how to implement RPT and how to overcome barriers.</abstract><cop>Abingdon</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/03075079.2014.1002832</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0307-5079 |
ispartof | Studies in higher education (Dorchester-on-Thames), 2016-09, Vol.41 (9), p.1674-1691 |
issn | 0307-5079 1470-174X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_03075079_2014_1002832 |
source | International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); ERIC; Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection |
subjects | Academic Degrees Alignment (Education) Bologna Process Case Studies Comparative Analysis Constructivism (Learning) Correlation Curricula deep learning Denmark educational expansion Europe Focus Groups Foreign Countries Higher Education Independent Study International Cooperation Learning Likert Scales Mixed Methods Research National Standards Outcomes of Education Peer Teaching Peer tutoring Public policy Questionnaires reciprocal peer tutoring Seminars student activation Student Surveys Taxonomy Teaching Methods Tutoring |
title | Aligning seminars with Bologna requirements: reciprocal peer tutoring, the solo taxonomy and deep learning |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-25T23%3A31%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Aligning%20seminars%20with%20Bologna%20requirements:%20reciprocal%20peer%20tutoring,%20the%20solo%20taxonomy%20and%20deep%20learning&rft.jtitle=Studies%20in%20higher%20education%20(Dorchester-on-Thames)&rft.au=Lueg,%20Rainer&rft.date=2016-09-01&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1674&rft.epage=1691&rft.pages=1674-1691&rft.issn=0307-5079&rft.eissn=1470-174X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/03075079.2014.1002832&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4141577631%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-3909b9930b25ef37252c515d5c978395c26b4ed8f8494275e7af0e6bda35d5aa3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1810072357&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1105841&rfr_iscdi=true |