Loading…
Electric current perception of the general population including children and the elderly
Although the 50 Hz electric current perception threshold is a key parameter for limiting electric touch currents in electrical technology and for limiting indirect effects of external electromagnetic fields, the data available mainly reflect men's perception ability; with only sparse data for w...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of medical engineering & technology 2005-09, Vol.29 (5), p.215-218 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-8095f6368cf20a16a4324473ad985f60030ac33debf968abce12be8ac2b451c3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-8095f6368cf20a16a4324473ad985f60030ac33debf968abce12be8ac2b451c3 |
container_end_page | 218 |
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 215 |
container_title | Journal of medical engineering & technology |
container_volume | 29 |
creator | Leitgeb, N Schroettner, J Cech, R |
description | Although the 50 Hz electric current perception threshold is a key parameter for limiting electric touch currents in electrical technology and for limiting indirect effects of external electromagnetic fields, the data available mainly reflect men's perception ability; with only sparse data for women and almost none for children or the elderly. Measurements with 240 children aged 9 - 16 years, and 123 elderly people, allow this gap of knowledge to be filled. Taking into account the demographic age distribution, it was possible to generate a probability distribution representing the perception ability of the overall general population, and thus to provide a more established basis for deriving safety limits. The results show that the existing limit values for electric touch currents are considerably too high if compared with results derived from the new data with the same criteria. On the other hand, it appeared that children do not exhibit such a high sensitivity to electricity as assumed to date. Therefore, former rule-of-thumb estimates to account for higher sensitivities of children lie on the safe side. The presented assessment of the general population's electric current perception ability should stimulate a critical review of the existing regulations. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/03091900412331291705 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>informahealthcare_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_03091900412331291705</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1080_03091900412331291705</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-8095f6368cf20a16a4324473ad985f60030ac33debf968abce12be8ac2b451c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtLw0AUhQdRbK3-A5H8gei8kiYbRUp9QMFNF92FycydZsp0JkwSpP_e6QNEEF3dxfnOufcehG4Jvie4wA-Y4ZKUGHNCGSO0JFOcnaEx4TlPM0pX52i8R9LI0BG66roNxphyii_RiOSE5llBxmg1tyD7YGQihxDA9UkLQULbG-8Sr5O-gWQNDoKwSevbwYqDYpy0gzJuncjGWBWNiXDqQINVEOzuGl1oYTu4Oc0JWr7Ml7O3dPHx-j57XqQyXt2nBS4znbO8kJpiQXLBGeV8yoQqiyjg-IKIpIJal3khagmE1lAISWueEckmiB9jZfBdF0BXbTBbEXYVwdW-p-q3nqLt7mhrh3oL6tt0KiYCT0fAOO3DVnz6YFXVi531QQfhpOkq9s-Kxx8JDQjbN1IEqDZ-CC6W8veNX0X7iow</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Electric current perception of the general population including children and the elderly</title><source>Taylor and Francis:Jisc Collections:Taylor and Francis Read and Publish Agreement 2024-2025:Medical Collection (Reading list)</source><creator>Leitgeb, N ; Schroettner, J ; Cech, R</creator><creatorcontrib>Leitgeb, N ; Schroettner, J ; Cech, R</creatorcontrib><description>Although the 50 Hz electric current perception threshold is a key parameter for limiting electric touch currents in electrical technology and for limiting indirect effects of external electromagnetic fields, the data available mainly reflect men's perception ability; with only sparse data for women and almost none for children or the elderly. Measurements with 240 children aged 9 - 16 years, and 123 elderly people, allow this gap of knowledge to be filled. Taking into account the demographic age distribution, it was possible to generate a probability distribution representing the perception ability of the overall general population, and thus to provide a more established basis for deriving safety limits. The results show that the existing limit values for electric touch currents are considerably too high if compared with results derived from the new data with the same criteria. On the other hand, it appeared that children do not exhibit such a high sensitivity to electricity as assumed to date. Therefore, former rule-of-thumb estimates to account for higher sensitivities of children lie on the safe side. The presented assessment of the general population's electric current perception ability should stimulate a critical review of the existing regulations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0309-1902</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1464-522X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/03091900412331291705</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16126581</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Informa UK Ltd</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Age Distribution ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Aging - physiology ; Austria - epidemiology ; Child ; Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation ; Electric perception threshold ; Electric safety ; Electric Stimulation - methods ; Electric touch currents ; Electromagnetic Fields ; Electrosensitivity ; Female ; Gender-specific differences ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Models, Biological ; Models, Statistical ; Perception - physiology ; Perception - radiation effects ; Radiation Dosage ; Risk Assessment - methods ; Risk Factors ; Sensory Thresholds - physiology ; Sensory Thresholds - radiation effects ; Sex Distribution</subject><ispartof>Journal of medical engineering & technology, 2005-09, Vol.29 (5), p.215-218</ispartof><rights>2005 Informa UK Ltd All rights reserved: reproduction in whole or part not permitted 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-8095f6368cf20a16a4324473ad985f60030ac33debf968abce12be8ac2b451c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-8095f6368cf20a16a4324473ad985f60030ac33debf968abce12be8ac2b451c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16126581$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Leitgeb, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schroettner, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cech, R</creatorcontrib><title>Electric current perception of the general population including children and the elderly</title><title>Journal of medical engineering & technology</title><addtitle>J Med Eng Technol</addtitle><description>Although the 50 Hz electric current perception threshold is a key parameter for limiting electric touch currents in electrical technology and for limiting indirect effects of external electromagnetic fields, the data available mainly reflect men's perception ability; with only sparse data for women and almost none for children or the elderly. Measurements with 240 children aged 9 - 16 years, and 123 elderly people, allow this gap of knowledge to be filled. Taking into account the demographic age distribution, it was possible to generate a probability distribution representing the perception ability of the overall general population, and thus to provide a more established basis for deriving safety limits. The results show that the existing limit values for electric touch currents are considerably too high if compared with results derived from the new data with the same criteria. On the other hand, it appeared that children do not exhibit such a high sensitivity to electricity as assumed to date. Therefore, former rule-of-thumb estimates to account for higher sensitivities of children lie on the safe side. The presented assessment of the general population's electric current perception ability should stimulate a critical review of the existing regulations.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Age Distribution</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Aging - physiology</subject><subject>Austria - epidemiology</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation</subject><subject>Electric perception threshold</subject><subject>Electric safety</subject><subject>Electric Stimulation - methods</subject><subject>Electric touch currents</subject><subject>Electromagnetic Fields</subject><subject>Electrosensitivity</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gender-specific differences</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>Models, Statistical</subject><subject>Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Perception - radiation effects</subject><subject>Radiation Dosage</subject><subject>Risk Assessment - methods</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Sensory Thresholds - physiology</subject><subject>Sensory Thresholds - radiation effects</subject><subject>Sex Distribution</subject><issn>0309-1902</issn><issn>1464-522X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkEtLw0AUhQdRbK3-A5H8gei8kiYbRUp9QMFNF92FycydZsp0JkwSpP_e6QNEEF3dxfnOufcehG4Jvie4wA-Y4ZKUGHNCGSO0JFOcnaEx4TlPM0pX52i8R9LI0BG66roNxphyii_RiOSE5llBxmg1tyD7YGQihxDA9UkLQULbG-8Sr5O-gWQNDoKwSevbwYqDYpy0gzJuncjGWBWNiXDqQINVEOzuGl1oYTu4Oc0JWr7Ml7O3dPHx-j57XqQyXt2nBS4znbO8kJpiQXLBGeV8yoQqiyjg-IKIpIJal3khagmE1lAISWueEckmiB9jZfBdF0BXbTBbEXYVwdW-p-q3nqLt7mhrh3oL6tt0KiYCT0fAOO3DVnz6YFXVi531QQfhpOkq9s-Kxx8JDQjbN1IEqDZ-CC6W8veNX0X7iow</recordid><startdate>200509</startdate><enddate>200509</enddate><creator>Leitgeb, N</creator><creator>Schroettner, J</creator><creator>Cech, R</creator><general>Informa UK Ltd</general><general>Taylor & Francis</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200509</creationdate><title>Electric current perception of the general population including children and the elderly</title><author>Leitgeb, N ; Schroettner, J ; Cech, R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-8095f6368cf20a16a4324473ad985f60030ac33debf968abce12be8ac2b451c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Age Distribution</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Aging - physiology</topic><topic>Austria - epidemiology</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation</topic><topic>Electric perception threshold</topic><topic>Electric safety</topic><topic>Electric Stimulation - methods</topic><topic>Electric touch currents</topic><topic>Electromagnetic Fields</topic><topic>Electrosensitivity</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gender-specific differences</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>Models, Statistical</topic><topic>Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Perception - radiation effects</topic><topic>Radiation Dosage</topic><topic>Risk Assessment - methods</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Sensory Thresholds - physiology</topic><topic>Sensory Thresholds - radiation effects</topic><topic>Sex Distribution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Leitgeb, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schroettner, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cech, R</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of medical engineering & technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Leitgeb, N</au><au>Schroettner, J</au><au>Cech, R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Electric current perception of the general population including children and the elderly</atitle><jtitle>Journal of medical engineering & technology</jtitle><addtitle>J Med Eng Technol</addtitle><date>2005-09</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>215</spage><epage>218</epage><pages>215-218</pages><issn>0309-1902</issn><eissn>1464-522X</eissn><abstract>Although the 50 Hz electric current perception threshold is a key parameter for limiting electric touch currents in electrical technology and for limiting indirect effects of external electromagnetic fields, the data available mainly reflect men's perception ability; with only sparse data for women and almost none for children or the elderly. Measurements with 240 children aged 9 - 16 years, and 123 elderly people, allow this gap of knowledge to be filled. Taking into account the demographic age distribution, it was possible to generate a probability distribution representing the perception ability of the overall general population, and thus to provide a more established basis for deriving safety limits. The results show that the existing limit values for electric touch currents are considerably too high if compared with results derived from the new data with the same criteria. On the other hand, it appeared that children do not exhibit such a high sensitivity to electricity as assumed to date. Therefore, former rule-of-thumb estimates to account for higher sensitivities of children lie on the safe side. The presented assessment of the general population's electric current perception ability should stimulate a critical review of the existing regulations.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Informa UK Ltd</pub><pmid>16126581</pmid><doi>10.1080/03091900412331291705</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0309-1902 |
ispartof | Journal of medical engineering & technology, 2005-09, Vol.29 (5), p.215-218 |
issn | 0309-1902 1464-522X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_03091900412331291705 |
source | Taylor and Francis:Jisc Collections:Taylor and Francis Read and Publish Agreement 2024-2025:Medical Collection (Reading list) |
subjects | Adolescent Age Distribution Aged Aged, 80 and over Aging - physiology Austria - epidemiology Child Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation Electric perception threshold Electric safety Electric Stimulation - methods Electric touch currents Electromagnetic Fields Electrosensitivity Female Gender-specific differences Humans Male Middle Aged Models, Biological Models, Statistical Perception - physiology Perception - radiation effects Radiation Dosage Risk Assessment - methods Risk Factors Sensory Thresholds - physiology Sensory Thresholds - radiation effects Sex Distribution |
title | Electric current perception of the general population including children and the elderly |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T12%3A32%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-informahealthcare_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Electric%20current%20perception%20of%20the%20general%20population%20including%20children%20and%20the%20elderly&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20medical%20engineering%20&%20technology&rft.au=Leitgeb,%20N&rft.date=2005-09&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=215&rft.epage=218&rft.pages=215-218&rft.issn=0309-1902&rft.eissn=1464-522X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/03091900412331291705&rft_dat=%3Cinformahealthcare_cross%3E10_1080_03091900412331291705%3C/informahealthcare_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-8095f6368cf20a16a4324473ad985f60030ac33debf968abce12be8ac2b451c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/16126581&rfr_iscdi=true |