Loading…

Electric current perception of the general population including children and the elderly

Although the 50 Hz electric current perception threshold is a key parameter for limiting electric touch currents in electrical technology and for limiting indirect effects of external electromagnetic fields, the data available mainly reflect men's perception ability; with only sparse data for w...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of medical engineering & technology 2005-09, Vol.29 (5), p.215-218
Main Authors: Leitgeb, N, Schroettner, J, Cech, R
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-8095f6368cf20a16a4324473ad985f60030ac33debf968abce12be8ac2b451c3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-8095f6368cf20a16a4324473ad985f60030ac33debf968abce12be8ac2b451c3
container_end_page 218
container_issue 5
container_start_page 215
container_title Journal of medical engineering & technology
container_volume 29
creator Leitgeb, N
Schroettner, J
Cech, R
description Although the 50 Hz electric current perception threshold is a key parameter for limiting electric touch currents in electrical technology and for limiting indirect effects of external electromagnetic fields, the data available mainly reflect men's perception ability; with only sparse data for women and almost none for children or the elderly. Measurements with 240 children aged 9 - 16 years, and 123 elderly people, allow this gap of knowledge to be filled. Taking into account the demographic age distribution, it was possible to generate a probability distribution representing the perception ability of the overall general population, and thus to provide a more established basis for deriving safety limits. The results show that the existing limit values for electric touch currents are considerably too high if compared with results derived from the new data with the same criteria. On the other hand, it appeared that children do not exhibit such a high sensitivity to electricity as assumed to date. Therefore, former rule-of-thumb estimates to account for higher sensitivities of children lie on the safe side. The presented assessment of the general population's electric current perception ability should stimulate a critical review of the existing regulations.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/03091900412331291705
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>informahealthcare_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_03091900412331291705</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1080_03091900412331291705</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-8095f6368cf20a16a4324473ad985f60030ac33debf968abce12be8ac2b451c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtLw0AUhQdRbK3-A5H8gei8kiYbRUp9QMFNF92FycydZsp0JkwSpP_e6QNEEF3dxfnOufcehG4Jvie4wA-Y4ZKUGHNCGSO0JFOcnaEx4TlPM0pX52i8R9LI0BG66roNxphyii_RiOSE5llBxmg1tyD7YGQihxDA9UkLQULbG-8Sr5O-gWQNDoKwSevbwYqDYpy0gzJuncjGWBWNiXDqQINVEOzuGl1oYTu4Oc0JWr7Ml7O3dPHx-j57XqQyXt2nBS4znbO8kJpiQXLBGeV8yoQqiyjg-IKIpIJal3khagmE1lAISWueEckmiB9jZfBdF0BXbTBbEXYVwdW-p-q3nqLt7mhrh3oL6tt0KiYCT0fAOO3DVnz6YFXVi531QQfhpOkq9s-Kxx8JDQjbN1IEqDZ-CC6W8veNX0X7iow</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Electric current perception of the general population including children and the elderly</title><source>Taylor and Francis:Jisc Collections:Taylor and Francis Read and Publish Agreement 2024-2025:Medical Collection (Reading list)</source><creator>Leitgeb, N ; Schroettner, J ; Cech, R</creator><creatorcontrib>Leitgeb, N ; Schroettner, J ; Cech, R</creatorcontrib><description>Although the 50 Hz electric current perception threshold is a key parameter for limiting electric touch currents in electrical technology and for limiting indirect effects of external electromagnetic fields, the data available mainly reflect men's perception ability; with only sparse data for women and almost none for children or the elderly. Measurements with 240 children aged 9 - 16 years, and 123 elderly people, allow this gap of knowledge to be filled. Taking into account the demographic age distribution, it was possible to generate a probability distribution representing the perception ability of the overall general population, and thus to provide a more established basis for deriving safety limits. The results show that the existing limit values for electric touch currents are considerably too high if compared with results derived from the new data with the same criteria. On the other hand, it appeared that children do not exhibit such a high sensitivity to electricity as assumed to date. Therefore, former rule-of-thumb estimates to account for higher sensitivities of children lie on the safe side. The presented assessment of the general population's electric current perception ability should stimulate a critical review of the existing regulations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0309-1902</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1464-522X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/03091900412331291705</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16126581</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Informa UK Ltd</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Age Distribution ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Aging - physiology ; Austria - epidemiology ; Child ; Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation ; Electric perception threshold ; Electric safety ; Electric Stimulation - methods ; Electric touch currents ; Electromagnetic Fields ; Electrosensitivity ; Female ; Gender-specific differences ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Models, Biological ; Models, Statistical ; Perception - physiology ; Perception - radiation effects ; Radiation Dosage ; Risk Assessment - methods ; Risk Factors ; Sensory Thresholds - physiology ; Sensory Thresholds - radiation effects ; Sex Distribution</subject><ispartof>Journal of medical engineering &amp; technology, 2005-09, Vol.29 (5), p.215-218</ispartof><rights>2005 Informa UK Ltd All rights reserved: reproduction in whole or part not permitted 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-8095f6368cf20a16a4324473ad985f60030ac33debf968abce12be8ac2b451c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-8095f6368cf20a16a4324473ad985f60030ac33debf968abce12be8ac2b451c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16126581$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Leitgeb, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schroettner, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cech, R</creatorcontrib><title>Electric current perception of the general population including children and the elderly</title><title>Journal of medical engineering &amp; technology</title><addtitle>J Med Eng Technol</addtitle><description>Although the 50 Hz electric current perception threshold is a key parameter for limiting electric touch currents in electrical technology and for limiting indirect effects of external electromagnetic fields, the data available mainly reflect men's perception ability; with only sparse data for women and almost none for children or the elderly. Measurements with 240 children aged 9 - 16 years, and 123 elderly people, allow this gap of knowledge to be filled. Taking into account the demographic age distribution, it was possible to generate a probability distribution representing the perception ability of the overall general population, and thus to provide a more established basis for deriving safety limits. The results show that the existing limit values for electric touch currents are considerably too high if compared with results derived from the new data with the same criteria. On the other hand, it appeared that children do not exhibit such a high sensitivity to electricity as assumed to date. Therefore, former rule-of-thumb estimates to account for higher sensitivities of children lie on the safe side. The presented assessment of the general population's electric current perception ability should stimulate a critical review of the existing regulations.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Age Distribution</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Aging - physiology</subject><subject>Austria - epidemiology</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation</subject><subject>Electric perception threshold</subject><subject>Electric safety</subject><subject>Electric Stimulation - methods</subject><subject>Electric touch currents</subject><subject>Electromagnetic Fields</subject><subject>Electrosensitivity</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gender-specific differences</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>Models, Statistical</subject><subject>Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Perception - radiation effects</subject><subject>Radiation Dosage</subject><subject>Risk Assessment - methods</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Sensory Thresholds - physiology</subject><subject>Sensory Thresholds - radiation effects</subject><subject>Sex Distribution</subject><issn>0309-1902</issn><issn>1464-522X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkEtLw0AUhQdRbK3-A5H8gei8kiYbRUp9QMFNF92FycydZsp0JkwSpP_e6QNEEF3dxfnOufcehG4Jvie4wA-Y4ZKUGHNCGSO0JFOcnaEx4TlPM0pX52i8R9LI0BG66roNxphyii_RiOSE5llBxmg1tyD7YGQihxDA9UkLQULbG-8Sr5O-gWQNDoKwSevbwYqDYpy0gzJuncjGWBWNiXDqQINVEOzuGl1oYTu4Oc0JWr7Ml7O3dPHx-j57XqQyXt2nBS4znbO8kJpiQXLBGeV8yoQqiyjg-IKIpIJal3khagmE1lAISWueEckmiB9jZfBdF0BXbTBbEXYVwdW-p-q3nqLt7mhrh3oL6tt0KiYCT0fAOO3DVnz6YFXVi531QQfhpOkq9s-Kxx8JDQjbN1IEqDZ-CC6W8veNX0X7iow</recordid><startdate>200509</startdate><enddate>200509</enddate><creator>Leitgeb, N</creator><creator>Schroettner, J</creator><creator>Cech, R</creator><general>Informa UK Ltd</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200509</creationdate><title>Electric current perception of the general population including children and the elderly</title><author>Leitgeb, N ; Schroettner, J ; Cech, R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-8095f6368cf20a16a4324473ad985f60030ac33debf968abce12be8ac2b451c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Age Distribution</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Aging - physiology</topic><topic>Austria - epidemiology</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation</topic><topic>Electric perception threshold</topic><topic>Electric safety</topic><topic>Electric Stimulation - methods</topic><topic>Electric touch currents</topic><topic>Electromagnetic Fields</topic><topic>Electrosensitivity</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gender-specific differences</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>Models, Statistical</topic><topic>Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Perception - radiation effects</topic><topic>Radiation Dosage</topic><topic>Risk Assessment - methods</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Sensory Thresholds - physiology</topic><topic>Sensory Thresholds - radiation effects</topic><topic>Sex Distribution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Leitgeb, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schroettner, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cech, R</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of medical engineering &amp; technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Leitgeb, N</au><au>Schroettner, J</au><au>Cech, R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Electric current perception of the general population including children and the elderly</atitle><jtitle>Journal of medical engineering &amp; technology</jtitle><addtitle>J Med Eng Technol</addtitle><date>2005-09</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>215</spage><epage>218</epage><pages>215-218</pages><issn>0309-1902</issn><eissn>1464-522X</eissn><abstract>Although the 50 Hz electric current perception threshold is a key parameter for limiting electric touch currents in electrical technology and for limiting indirect effects of external electromagnetic fields, the data available mainly reflect men's perception ability; with only sparse data for women and almost none for children or the elderly. Measurements with 240 children aged 9 - 16 years, and 123 elderly people, allow this gap of knowledge to be filled. Taking into account the demographic age distribution, it was possible to generate a probability distribution representing the perception ability of the overall general population, and thus to provide a more established basis for deriving safety limits. The results show that the existing limit values for electric touch currents are considerably too high if compared with results derived from the new data with the same criteria. On the other hand, it appeared that children do not exhibit such a high sensitivity to electricity as assumed to date. Therefore, former rule-of-thumb estimates to account for higher sensitivities of children lie on the safe side. The presented assessment of the general population's electric current perception ability should stimulate a critical review of the existing regulations.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Informa UK Ltd</pub><pmid>16126581</pmid><doi>10.1080/03091900412331291705</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0309-1902
ispartof Journal of medical engineering & technology, 2005-09, Vol.29 (5), p.215-218
issn 0309-1902
1464-522X
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_03091900412331291705
source Taylor and Francis:Jisc Collections:Taylor and Francis Read and Publish Agreement 2024-2025:Medical Collection (Reading list)
subjects Adolescent
Age Distribution
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Aging - physiology
Austria - epidemiology
Child
Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation
Electric perception threshold
Electric safety
Electric Stimulation - methods
Electric touch currents
Electromagnetic Fields
Electrosensitivity
Female
Gender-specific differences
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Models, Biological
Models, Statistical
Perception - physiology
Perception - radiation effects
Radiation Dosage
Risk Assessment - methods
Risk Factors
Sensory Thresholds - physiology
Sensory Thresholds - radiation effects
Sex Distribution
title Electric current perception of the general population including children and the elderly
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T12%3A32%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-informahealthcare_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Electric%20current%20perception%20of%20the%20general%20population%20including%20children%20and%20the%20elderly&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20medical%20engineering%20&%20technology&rft.au=Leitgeb,%20N&rft.date=2005-09&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=215&rft.epage=218&rft.pages=215-218&rft.issn=0309-1902&rft.eissn=1464-522X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/03091900412331291705&rft_dat=%3Cinformahealthcare_cross%3E10_1080_03091900412331291705%3C/informahealthcare_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-8095f6368cf20a16a4324473ad985f60030ac33debf968abce12be8ac2b451c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/16126581&rfr_iscdi=true