An empirical comparison between gradient boosting methods and cox’s proportional hazards model for right-censored survival data

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Communications in statistics. Simulation and computation 2024-02, p.1-15
Main Authors: Li, Peizhi, Peng, Yingwei, Zheng, Jianing
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c201t-9dbd9df1e6718e2476ad7a24348d6e4d668396fbf4f9109d2f9feb5ab221ec233
container_end_page 15
container_issue
container_start_page 1
container_title Communications in statistics. Simulation and computation
container_volume
creator Li, Peizhi
Peng, Yingwei
Zheng, Jianing
description
doi_str_mv 10.1080/03610918.2024.2306541
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_03610918_2024_2306541</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1080_03610918_2024_2306541</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c201t-9dbd9df1e6718e2476ad7a24348d6e4d668396fbf4f9109d2f9feb5ab221ec233</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo10EtOwzAUhWELgUQpLAHJG0jwK64zrCpeUiUmMI6c-Lo1auzINuUxgmWwPVZCIsroTv57Bh9Cl5SUlChyRbikpKaqZISJknEiK0GP0IxWnBWCCnqMZlNTTNEpOkvpmRDClVAz9LX0GPrBRdfpHe5CP-joUvC4hfwK4PEmauPAZ9yGkLLzG9xD3gaTsPZmfHj7-fxOeIhhCDG74MeVrf7QcQz6YGCHbYg4us02Fx34FCIYnF7i3u3H0uisz9GJ1bsEF4c7R08314-ru2L9cHu_Wq6LjhGai9q0pjaWglxQBUwspDYLzQQXykgQRkrFa2lbK2w9ahhmawttpVvGKHSM8zmq_na7GFKKYJshul7H94aSZnJs_h2bybE5OPJfz9dqog</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>An empirical comparison between gradient boosting methods and cox’s proportional hazards model for right-censored survival data</title><source>Taylor and Francis Science and Technology Collection</source><creator>Li, Peizhi ; Peng, Yingwei ; Zheng, Jianing</creator><creatorcontrib>Li, Peizhi ; Peng, Yingwei ; Zheng, Jianing</creatorcontrib><identifier>ISSN: 0361-0918</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-4141</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/03610918.2024.2306541</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Communications in statistics. Simulation and computation, 2024-02, p.1-15</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c201t-9dbd9df1e6718e2476ad7a24348d6e4d668396fbf4f9109d2f9feb5ab221ec233</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Li, Peizhi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peng, Yingwei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Jianing</creatorcontrib><title>An empirical comparison between gradient boosting methods and cox’s proportional hazards model for right-censored survival data</title><title>Communications in statistics. Simulation and computation</title><issn>0361-0918</issn><issn>1532-4141</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo10EtOwzAUhWELgUQpLAHJG0jwK64zrCpeUiUmMI6c-Lo1auzINuUxgmWwPVZCIsroTv57Bh9Cl5SUlChyRbikpKaqZISJknEiK0GP0IxWnBWCCnqMZlNTTNEpOkvpmRDClVAz9LX0GPrBRdfpHe5CP-joUvC4hfwK4PEmauPAZ9yGkLLzG9xD3gaTsPZmfHj7-fxOeIhhCDG74MeVrf7QcQz6YGCHbYg4us02Fx34FCIYnF7i3u3H0uisz9GJ1bsEF4c7R08314-ru2L9cHu_Wq6LjhGai9q0pjaWglxQBUwspDYLzQQXykgQRkrFa2lbK2w9ahhmawttpVvGKHSM8zmq_na7GFKKYJshul7H94aSZnJs_h2bybE5OPJfz9dqog</recordid><startdate>20240202</startdate><enddate>20240202</enddate><creator>Li, Peizhi</creator><creator>Peng, Yingwei</creator><creator>Zheng, Jianing</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240202</creationdate><title>An empirical comparison between gradient boosting methods and cox’s proportional hazards model for right-censored survival data</title><author>Li, Peizhi ; Peng, Yingwei ; Zheng, Jianing</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c201t-9dbd9df1e6718e2476ad7a24348d6e4d668396fbf4f9109d2f9feb5ab221ec233</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Li, Peizhi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peng, Yingwei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Jianing</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Communications in statistics. Simulation and computation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Li, Peizhi</au><au>Peng, Yingwei</au><au>Zheng, Jianing</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An empirical comparison between gradient boosting methods and cox’s proportional hazards model for right-censored survival data</atitle><jtitle>Communications in statistics. Simulation and computation</jtitle><date>2024-02-02</date><risdate>2024</risdate><spage>1</spage><epage>15</epage><pages>1-15</pages><issn>0361-0918</issn><eissn>1532-4141</eissn><doi>10.1080/03610918.2024.2306541</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0361-0918
ispartof Communications in statistics. Simulation and computation, 2024-02, p.1-15
issn 0361-0918
1532-4141
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_03610918_2024_2306541
source Taylor and Francis Science and Technology Collection
title An empirical comparison between gradient boosting methods and cox’s proportional hazards model for right-censored survival data
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T15%3A23%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20empirical%20comparison%20between%20gradient%20boosting%20methods%20and%20cox%E2%80%99s%20proportional%20hazards%20model%20for%20right-censored%20survival%20data&rft.jtitle=Communications%20in%20statistics.%20Simulation%20and%20computation&rft.au=Li,%20Peizhi&rft.date=2024-02-02&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=15&rft.pages=1-15&rft.issn=0361-0918&rft.eissn=1532-4141&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/03610918.2024.2306541&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_1080_03610918_2024_2306541%3C/crossref%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c201t-9dbd9df1e6718e2476ad7a24348d6e4d668396fbf4f9109d2f9feb5ab221ec233%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true