Does Global Democracy Require a World State?

• Published in: Philosophical papers (Grahamstown) 2019-01, Vol.48 (1), p.123-153
• Main Author: Erman, Eva
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• ISSN: 0556-8641; 1996-8523; 1996-8523
• DOI: 10.1080/05568641.2019.1588153

The question of whether global democracy requires a world state has with few exceptions been answered with an unequivocal 'No'. A world state, it is typically argued, is neither feasible nor desirable. Instead, different forms of global governance arrangements have been suggested, involving non-hierarchical and multilayered models with dispersed authority. The overall aim of this paper is to addresses the question of whether global democracy requires a world state, adopting a so-called 'function-sensitive' approach. It is shown that such an approach is equipped to resist the predominant binary view of a world state (either accepting it or rejecting it) and offer a more differentiated and nuanced answer to this question. In brief, a basic presumption of a function-sensitive approach is that the content, justification and status of principles of democracy are dependent on the aim they are set out to achieve, what functions they are intended to regulate (e.g., decision-making, implementation, enforcement and evaluation), and the relationship between those functions. More specifically, within a function-sensitive framework, the paper sketches the contours of an account of global democracy consisting of five regulative principles and argues-utilizing the notion of 'sufficient stateness'-that it would require supranational legislative entities and perhaps supranational judicial entities but not necessarily supranational executive entities.