Loading…

'What Is Good about the Japanese System of Governance?'-The Reception of Imperial Japanese Parliamentarism in Siamese/Thai Political Thought (1880s-1940s)

This article identifies the Meiji Constitution of 1889 and the Japanese Imperial Diet opened in 1890 as crucial reference points in the development of Siamese/Thai political ideas from the 1880 s to the 1940s. Before the Siamese revolution of 1932, which introduced a constitutional monarchy, critics...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International history review 2023-01, Vol.45 (1), p.48-62
Main Author: Malitz, David M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 62
container_issue 1
container_start_page 48
container_title International history review
container_volume 45
creator Malitz, David M.
description This article identifies the Meiji Constitution of 1889 and the Japanese Imperial Diet opened in 1890 as crucial reference points in the development of Siamese/Thai political ideas from the 1880 s to the 1940s. Before the Siamese revolution of 1932, which introduced a constitutional monarchy, critics of the Siamese absolute monarchy saw in the Japanese Empire the proof that constitutional and parliamentarian government were the necessary foundations of full national independence, progress, and economic development. But the Meiji Constitution would develop its most profound and persistent influence in Siam only after the revolution. At this junction, royalists discovered Japan as an exemplar of a constitutional monarchy with broad royal prerogatives, which they wished to enshrine in Siam as well. The constitutions most informed by Imperial Japan were thus the royalist constitutions of 1947 and 1949. While they were short-lived, the Japanese constitutional influence remains alive in Thailand today in the form of Article 6 of the Constitution of the Kingdom of 2017, which is a translation of Article 3 of the Constitution of the Empire of Japan, stipulating the sacrosanct status of the emperor, first adopted in Siam/Thailand in 1932.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/07075332.2022.2113552
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_07075332_2022_2113552</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2788132867</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-652118525d948ee2f20c1d67d43fd9eb682b06a791b314bcc72cc09bbd943c8f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kctO3DAUhi1UJKZDH6GSJRbTLgK-5OKs2mrEZdBIIJiqS8txTohREgfbA5pX4WlxNFTs2PjIOt9_7P_8CH2n5JQSQc5IQYqMc3bKCIsHpTzL2AGa0TItkzxLyRc0m5hkgo7QV-8fCcliN52h18W_VgW88vjS2hqrym4DDi3gazWqATzg-50P0GPbROIZ3KAGDb8WySYyd6BhDMYOU3fVj-CM6j6Ut8p1RvUwBOWM77EZ8P1093C2aZXBt7Yzwego2bR2-9AG_IMKQXwSv0b8z2N02KjOw7f3Okd_L843y6tkfXO5Wv5ZJ5qJPESD0bHIWFaXqQBgDSOa1nlRp7ypS6hywSqSq6KkFadppXXBtCZlVUWea9HwOTrZzx2dfdqCD_LRbqPPzktWCEF5fKaIVLantLPeO2jk6Eyv3E5SIqcY5P8Y5BSDfI8h6n7vdWZorOvVi3VdLYPaddY1Li7TeMk_H_EGP_ONqw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2788132867</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>'What Is Good about the Japanese System of Governance?'-The Reception of Imperial Japanese Parliamentarism in Siamese/Thai Political Thought (1880s-1940s)</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Taylor &amp; Francis</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><creator>Malitz, David M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Malitz, David M.</creatorcontrib><description>This article identifies the Meiji Constitution of 1889 and the Japanese Imperial Diet opened in 1890 as crucial reference points in the development of Siamese/Thai political ideas from the 1880 s to the 1940s. Before the Siamese revolution of 1932, which introduced a constitutional monarchy, critics of the Siamese absolute monarchy saw in the Japanese Empire the proof that constitutional and parliamentarian government were the necessary foundations of full national independence, progress, and economic development. But the Meiji Constitution would develop its most profound and persistent influence in Siam only after the revolution. At this junction, royalists discovered Japan as an exemplar of a constitutional monarchy with broad royal prerogatives, which they wished to enshrine in Siam as well. The constitutions most informed by Imperial Japan were thus the royalist constitutions of 1947 and 1949. While they were short-lived, the Japanese constitutional influence remains alive in Thailand today in the form of Article 6 of the Constitution of the Kingdom of 2017, which is a translation of Article 3 of the Constitution of the Empire of Japan, stipulating the sacrosanct status of the emperor, first adopted in Siam/Thailand in 1932.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0707-5332</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1949-6540</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/07075332.2022.2113552</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Toronto: Routledge</publisher><subject>Constitutional government ; Constitutional law ; Constitutional monarchies ; Constitutions ; Diet ; Economic development ; Governance ; Meiji constitution ; Monarchy ; National independence ; parliamentarism ; Parliamentary systems ; Political philosophy ; Siamese monarchy ; Siamese revolution ; Thai constitution ; Thai monarchy ; Translation</subject><ispartof>International history review, 2023-01, Vol.45 (1), p.48-62</ispartof><rights>2022 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor &amp; Francis Group 2022</rights><rights>2022 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor &amp; Francis Group</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27915,27916,33214</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Malitz, David M.</creatorcontrib><title>'What Is Good about the Japanese System of Governance?'-The Reception of Imperial Japanese Parliamentarism in Siamese/Thai Political Thought (1880s-1940s)</title><title>International history review</title><description>This article identifies the Meiji Constitution of 1889 and the Japanese Imperial Diet opened in 1890 as crucial reference points in the development of Siamese/Thai political ideas from the 1880 s to the 1940s. Before the Siamese revolution of 1932, which introduced a constitutional monarchy, critics of the Siamese absolute monarchy saw in the Japanese Empire the proof that constitutional and parliamentarian government were the necessary foundations of full national independence, progress, and economic development. But the Meiji Constitution would develop its most profound and persistent influence in Siam only after the revolution. At this junction, royalists discovered Japan as an exemplar of a constitutional monarchy with broad royal prerogatives, which they wished to enshrine in Siam as well. The constitutions most informed by Imperial Japan were thus the royalist constitutions of 1947 and 1949. While they were short-lived, the Japanese constitutional influence remains alive in Thailand today in the form of Article 6 of the Constitution of the Kingdom of 2017, which is a translation of Article 3 of the Constitution of the Empire of Japan, stipulating the sacrosanct status of the emperor, first adopted in Siam/Thailand in 1932.</description><subject>Constitutional government</subject><subject>Constitutional law</subject><subject>Constitutional monarchies</subject><subject>Constitutions</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>Economic development</subject><subject>Governance</subject><subject>Meiji constitution</subject><subject>Monarchy</subject><subject>National independence</subject><subject>parliamentarism</subject><subject>Parliamentary systems</subject><subject>Political philosophy</subject><subject>Siamese monarchy</subject><subject>Siamese revolution</subject><subject>Thai constitution</subject><subject>Thai monarchy</subject><subject>Translation</subject><issn>0707-5332</issn><issn>1949-6540</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kctO3DAUhi1UJKZDH6GSJRbTLgK-5OKs2mrEZdBIIJiqS8txTohREgfbA5pX4WlxNFTs2PjIOt9_7P_8CH2n5JQSQc5IQYqMc3bKCIsHpTzL2AGa0TItkzxLyRc0m5hkgo7QV-8fCcliN52h18W_VgW88vjS2hqrym4DDi3gazWqATzg-50P0GPbROIZ3KAGDb8WySYyd6BhDMYOU3fVj-CM6j6Ut8p1RvUwBOWM77EZ8P1093C2aZXBt7Yzwego2bR2-9AG_IMKQXwSv0b8z2N02KjOw7f3Okd_L843y6tkfXO5Wv5ZJ5qJPESD0bHIWFaXqQBgDSOa1nlRp7ypS6hywSqSq6KkFadppXXBtCZlVUWea9HwOTrZzx2dfdqCD_LRbqPPzktWCEF5fKaIVLantLPeO2jk6Eyv3E5SIqcY5P8Y5BSDfI8h6n7vdWZorOvVi3VdLYPaddY1Li7TeMk_H_EGP_ONqw</recordid><startdate>20230102</startdate><enddate>20230102</enddate><creator>Malitz, David M.</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230102</creationdate><title>'What Is Good about the Japanese System of Governance?'-The Reception of Imperial Japanese Parliamentarism in Siamese/Thai Political Thought (1880s-1940s)</title><author>Malitz, David M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-652118525d948ee2f20c1d67d43fd9eb682b06a791b314bcc72cc09bbd943c8f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Constitutional government</topic><topic>Constitutional law</topic><topic>Constitutional monarchies</topic><topic>Constitutions</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>Economic development</topic><topic>Governance</topic><topic>Meiji constitution</topic><topic>Monarchy</topic><topic>National independence</topic><topic>parliamentarism</topic><topic>Parliamentary systems</topic><topic>Political philosophy</topic><topic>Siamese monarchy</topic><topic>Siamese revolution</topic><topic>Thai constitution</topic><topic>Thai monarchy</topic><topic>Translation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Malitz, David M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>International history review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Malitz, David M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>'What Is Good about the Japanese System of Governance?'-The Reception of Imperial Japanese Parliamentarism in Siamese/Thai Political Thought (1880s-1940s)</atitle><jtitle>International history review</jtitle><date>2023-01-02</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>48</spage><epage>62</epage><pages>48-62</pages><issn>0707-5332</issn><eissn>1949-6540</eissn><abstract>This article identifies the Meiji Constitution of 1889 and the Japanese Imperial Diet opened in 1890 as crucial reference points in the development of Siamese/Thai political ideas from the 1880 s to the 1940s. Before the Siamese revolution of 1932, which introduced a constitutional monarchy, critics of the Siamese absolute monarchy saw in the Japanese Empire the proof that constitutional and parliamentarian government were the necessary foundations of full national independence, progress, and economic development. But the Meiji Constitution would develop its most profound and persistent influence in Siam only after the revolution. At this junction, royalists discovered Japan as an exemplar of a constitutional monarchy with broad royal prerogatives, which they wished to enshrine in Siam as well. The constitutions most informed by Imperial Japan were thus the royalist constitutions of 1947 and 1949. While they were short-lived, the Japanese constitutional influence remains alive in Thailand today in the form of Article 6 of the Constitution of the Kingdom of 2017, which is a translation of Article 3 of the Constitution of the Empire of Japan, stipulating the sacrosanct status of the emperor, first adopted in Siam/Thailand in 1932.</abstract><cop>Toronto</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/07075332.2022.2113552</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0707-5332
ispartof International history review, 2023-01, Vol.45 (1), p.48-62
issn 0707-5332
1949-6540
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_07075332_2022_2113552
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Taylor & Francis; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts
subjects Constitutional government
Constitutional law
Constitutional monarchies
Constitutions
Diet
Economic development
Governance
Meiji constitution
Monarchy
National independence
parliamentarism
Parliamentary systems
Political philosophy
Siamese monarchy
Siamese revolution
Thai constitution
Thai monarchy
Translation
title 'What Is Good about the Japanese System of Governance?'-The Reception of Imperial Japanese Parliamentarism in Siamese/Thai Political Thought (1880s-1940s)
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T22%3A37%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle='What%20Is%20Good%20about%20the%20Japanese%20System%20of%20Governance?'-The%20Reception%20of%20Imperial%20Japanese%20Parliamentarism%20in%20Siamese/Thai%20Political%20Thought%20(1880s-1940s)&rft.jtitle=International%20history%20review&rft.au=Malitz,%20David%20M.&rft.date=2023-01-02&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=48&rft.epage=62&rft.pages=48-62&rft.issn=0707-5332&rft.eissn=1949-6540&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/07075332.2022.2113552&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2788132867%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-652118525d948ee2f20c1d67d43fd9eb682b06a791b314bcc72cc09bbd943c8f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2788132867&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true