Loading…
What the analysis of extended meaning of terms can reveal about verb semantic frame structure
By disabling two traditional constraints on general-language one-verb sub-events, Goldberg shows that: (i) a verb can specify both manner and result or change of location; and (ii) the profiled event of one verb need not be causally related to the evoked background frame event. This study develops G...
Saved in:
Published in: | Australian journal of linguistics 2020-01, Vol.40 (1), p.1-21 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-22799b6b348444402b9fb8ee7733d65a1600453bdfa3267593be6877254565b63 |
container_end_page | 21 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | Australian journal of linguistics |
container_volume | 40 |
creator | Ureña Gómez-Moreno, José Manuel Faber, Pamela |
description | By disabling two traditional constraints on general-language one-verb sub-events, Goldberg shows that: (i) a verb can specify both manner and result or change of location; and (ii) the profiled event of one verb need not be causally related to the evoked background frame event. This study develops Goldberg's claims further to show that a single verb can meet (i) and (ii) at the same time. For this purpose, two polysemic terminological verbs and their arguments were analyzed as they occur in concordances extracted from a corpus of naturally running texts from the specialized knowledge domain of environmental science. The meanings of these verbs and of their arguments were formalized in the Environmental Event Frame as described by Faber et al. The basic senses of the verbs in ordinary language were compared with their extended terminological meanings to determine how meaning extension structures and constrains the event-based semantic frame evoked by each of the sub-senses of the verbs. Striking differences were found in the nature and composition of the semantic frames of the pairs of senses compared. This type of semantic frame asymmetry in polysemic verbs that satisfy criteria (i) and (ii) further enriches Goldberg's theory of verb semantics and event-structure construal. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/07268602.2019.1690423 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_07268602_2019_1690423</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3093826683</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-22799b6b348444402b9fb8ee7733d65a1600453bdfa3267593be6877254565b63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLxDAUhYMoOI7-BCHgumMebZrslMEXDLhRXElI2lunQ5uMSarOv7dlxq13c-FyzrmcD6FLShaUSHJNSiakIGzBCFULKhTJGT9CM5oLlTGlxDGaTZpsEp2isxg3hBCuOJ2h97e1STitARtnul1sI_YNhp8EroYa92Bc6z6mW4LQR1wZhwN8gemwsX5I-AuCxRF641Jb4SaYHnBMYajSEOAcnTSmi3Bx2HP0en_3snzMVs8PT8vbVVYxKVLGWKmUFZbnMh-HMKsaKwHKkvNaFIYKQvKC27oxnImyUNyCkGXJirwQhRV8jq72udvgPweISW_8EMZCUXOiuGRCSD6qir2qCj7GAI3ehrY3Yacp0RNJ_UdSTyT1geTou9n7Wtf40JtvH7paJ7PrfBgLu6od3_wf8Qs2ZnlH</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3093826683</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>What the analysis of extended meaning of terms can reveal about verb semantic frame structure</title><source>EBSCOhost MLA International Bibliography With Full Text</source><source>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</source><source>Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection</source><creator>Ureña Gómez-Moreno, José Manuel ; Faber, Pamela</creator><creatorcontrib>Ureña Gómez-Moreno, José Manuel ; Faber, Pamela</creatorcontrib><description>By disabling two traditional constraints on general-language one-verb sub-events, Goldberg shows that: (i) a verb can specify both manner and result or change of location; and (ii) the profiled event of one verb need not be causally related to the evoked background frame event. This study develops Goldberg's claims further to show that a single verb can meet (i) and (ii) at the same time. For this purpose, two polysemic terminological verbs and their arguments were analyzed as they occur in concordances extracted from a corpus of naturally running texts from the specialized knowledge domain of environmental science. The meanings of these verbs and of their arguments were formalized in the Environmental Event Frame as described by Faber et al. The basic senses of the verbs in ordinary language were compared with their extended terminological meanings to determine how meaning extension structures and constrains the event-based semantic frame evoked by each of the sub-senses of the verbs. Striking differences were found in the nature and composition of the semantic frames of the pairs of senses compared. This type of semantic frame asymmetry in polysemic verbs that satisfy criteria (i) and (ii) further enriches Goldberg's theory of verb semantics and event-structure construal.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0726-8602</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-2996</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/07268602.2019.1690423</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Abingdon: Routledge</publisher><subject>Concordances ; Construal ; Corpus analysis ; Event semantics ; Frame semantics ; frame-based terminological polysemy ; Manner and result/change of location verbs ; Meaning ; one-verb sub-event structure ; Polysemy ; semantic frame structure representation ; Semantics ; Verbs</subject><ispartof>Australian journal of linguistics, 2020-01, Vol.40 (1), p.1-21</ispartof><rights>2019 The Australian Linguistic Society 2019</rights><rights>2019 The Australian Linguistic Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-22799b6b348444402b9fb8ee7733d65a1600453bdfa3267593be6877254565b63</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0581-0005 ; 0000-0003-2165-9843</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,31246</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ureña Gómez-Moreno, José Manuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faber, Pamela</creatorcontrib><title>What the analysis of extended meaning of terms can reveal about verb semantic frame structure</title><title>Australian journal of linguistics</title><description>By disabling two traditional constraints on general-language one-verb sub-events, Goldberg shows that: (i) a verb can specify both manner and result or change of location; and (ii) the profiled event of one verb need not be causally related to the evoked background frame event. This study develops Goldberg's claims further to show that a single verb can meet (i) and (ii) at the same time. For this purpose, two polysemic terminological verbs and their arguments were analyzed as they occur in concordances extracted from a corpus of naturally running texts from the specialized knowledge domain of environmental science. The meanings of these verbs and of their arguments were formalized in the Environmental Event Frame as described by Faber et al. The basic senses of the verbs in ordinary language were compared with their extended terminological meanings to determine how meaning extension structures and constrains the event-based semantic frame evoked by each of the sub-senses of the verbs. Striking differences were found in the nature and composition of the semantic frames of the pairs of senses compared. This type of semantic frame asymmetry in polysemic verbs that satisfy criteria (i) and (ii) further enriches Goldberg's theory of verb semantics and event-structure construal.</description><subject>Concordances</subject><subject>Construal</subject><subject>Corpus analysis</subject><subject>Event semantics</subject><subject>Frame semantics</subject><subject>frame-based terminological polysemy</subject><subject>Manner and result/change of location verbs</subject><subject>Meaning</subject><subject>one-verb sub-event structure</subject><subject>Polysemy</subject><subject>semantic frame structure representation</subject><subject>Semantics</subject><subject>Verbs</subject><issn>0726-8602</issn><issn>1469-2996</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7T9</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtLxDAUhYMoOI7-BCHgumMebZrslMEXDLhRXElI2lunQ5uMSarOv7dlxq13c-FyzrmcD6FLShaUSHJNSiakIGzBCFULKhTJGT9CM5oLlTGlxDGaTZpsEp2isxg3hBCuOJ2h97e1STitARtnul1sI_YNhp8EroYa92Bc6z6mW4LQR1wZhwN8gemwsX5I-AuCxRF641Jb4SaYHnBMYajSEOAcnTSmi3Bx2HP0en_3snzMVs8PT8vbVVYxKVLGWKmUFZbnMh-HMKsaKwHKkvNaFIYKQvKC27oxnImyUNyCkGXJirwQhRV8jq72udvgPweISW_8EMZCUXOiuGRCSD6qir2qCj7GAI3ehrY3Yacp0RNJ_UdSTyT1geTou9n7Wtf40JtvH7paJ7PrfBgLu6od3_wf8Qs2ZnlH</recordid><startdate>20200102</startdate><enddate>20200102</enddate><creator>Ureña Gómez-Moreno, José Manuel</creator><creator>Faber, Pamela</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T9</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0581-0005</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2165-9843</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200102</creationdate><title>What the analysis of extended meaning of terms can reveal about verb semantic frame structure</title><author>Ureña Gómez-Moreno, José Manuel ; Faber, Pamela</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-22799b6b348444402b9fb8ee7733d65a1600453bdfa3267593be6877254565b63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Concordances</topic><topic>Construal</topic><topic>Corpus analysis</topic><topic>Event semantics</topic><topic>Frame semantics</topic><topic>frame-based terminological polysemy</topic><topic>Manner and result/change of location verbs</topic><topic>Meaning</topic><topic>one-verb sub-event structure</topic><topic>Polysemy</topic><topic>semantic frame structure representation</topic><topic>Semantics</topic><topic>Verbs</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ureña Gómez-Moreno, José Manuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faber, Pamela</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>Australian journal of linguistics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ureña Gómez-Moreno, José Manuel</au><au>Faber, Pamela</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>What the analysis of extended meaning of terms can reveal about verb semantic frame structure</atitle><jtitle>Australian journal of linguistics</jtitle><date>2020-01-02</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>21</epage><pages>1-21</pages><issn>0726-8602</issn><eissn>1469-2996</eissn><abstract>By disabling two traditional constraints on general-language one-verb sub-events, Goldberg shows that: (i) a verb can specify both manner and result or change of location; and (ii) the profiled event of one verb need not be causally related to the evoked background frame event. This study develops Goldberg's claims further to show that a single verb can meet (i) and (ii) at the same time. For this purpose, two polysemic terminological verbs and their arguments were analyzed as they occur in concordances extracted from a corpus of naturally running texts from the specialized knowledge domain of environmental science. The meanings of these verbs and of their arguments were formalized in the Environmental Event Frame as described by Faber et al. The basic senses of the verbs in ordinary language were compared with their extended terminological meanings to determine how meaning extension structures and constrains the event-based semantic frame evoked by each of the sub-senses of the verbs. Striking differences were found in the nature and composition of the semantic frames of the pairs of senses compared. This type of semantic frame asymmetry in polysemic verbs that satisfy criteria (i) and (ii) further enriches Goldberg's theory of verb semantics and event-structure construal.</abstract><cop>Abingdon</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/07268602.2019.1690423</doi><tpages>21</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0581-0005</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2165-9843</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0726-8602 |
ispartof | Australian journal of linguistics, 2020-01, Vol.40 (1), p.1-21 |
issn | 0726-8602 1469-2996 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_07268602_2019_1690423 |
source | EBSCOhost MLA International Bibliography With Full Text; Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA); Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection |
subjects | Concordances Construal Corpus analysis Event semantics Frame semantics frame-based terminological polysemy Manner and result/change of location verbs Meaning one-verb sub-event structure Polysemy semantic frame structure representation Semantics Verbs |
title | What the analysis of extended meaning of terms can reveal about verb semantic frame structure |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-23T21%3A21%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=What%20the%20analysis%20of%20extended%20meaning%20of%20terms%20can%20reveal%20about%20verb%20semantic%20frame%20structure&rft.jtitle=Australian%20journal%20of%20linguistics&rft.au=Ure%C3%B1a%20G%C3%B3mez-Moreno,%20Jos%C3%A9%20Manuel&rft.date=2020-01-02&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=21&rft.pages=1-21&rft.issn=0726-8602&rft.eissn=1469-2996&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/07268602.2019.1690423&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3093826683%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-22799b6b348444402b9fb8ee7733d65a1600453bdfa3267593be6877254565b63%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3093826683&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |