Considering supervision measures: a commentary on Li et al.'s (2024) scoping review

This commentary on the Li et al. (2024) scoping review provides our perspectives on the strengths of this scoping review, challenges to scoping reviews in supervision research, future areas to build on this work, and suggests additional supervision measurement evaluation criteria. We hope our commen...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Clinical supervisor 2024-07, Vol.43 (2), p.243-247
Main Authors: Choy-Brown, Mimi, Sewell, Karen M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
commentary
measurement
Measures
Mental health services
Scoping review
Supervision
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This commentary on the Li et al. (2024) scoping review provides our perspectives on the strengths of this scoping review, challenges to scoping reviews in supervision research, future areas to build on this work, and suggests additional supervision measurement evaluation criteria. We hope our comments will spur further work building on this review to improve the feasibility and validity of supervision measures, to build an evidence-base for supervision, and crucially, to support supervisors and supervisees to deliver high-quality mental health care across the globe.
ISSN:0732-5223
1545-231X
DOI:10.1080/07325223.2024.2400190