Interpreting Neuroscientific Facts

While neuropsychoanalysis, as a hybrid discipline, is formally in its third decade of existence, there has been a striking paucity of papers illustrating the clinical applications and relevance of neuroscientific findings for the practicing psychoanalyst. The contributions in this issue illustrate t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Psychoanalytic inquiry 2019-11, Vol.39 (8), p.596-606
Main Author: Sandberg, Larry S.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Ambition
Critical thinking
Interdisciplinary aspects
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:While neuropsychoanalysis, as a hybrid discipline, is formally in its third decade of existence, there has been a striking paucity of papers illustrating the clinical applications and relevance of neuroscientific findings for the practicing psychoanalyst. The contributions in this issue illustrate the challenges and possibilities of such an endeavor. Neuroscientific research may strengthen one's conviction in his/her theoretical orientation, create opportunities for offering 'neuroscientific interpretations,' stimulate new ways of thinking or, at its most ambitious, become the basis for a contemporary scientific metapsychology. Maintaining critical thinking, including an awareness of the role of interpretation of scientific facts, is necessary if this interdisciplinary effort is to be productive.
ISSN:0735-1690
1940-9133
DOI:10.1080/07351690.2019.1671124