Energy Consumption and Product Quality Interactions in Flame Spray Drying

The work presents the comparison of two spray drying techniques: conventional concurrent spray drying and novel spray drying technique; that is, flame spray drying (FSD) in terms of energy consumption and quality of final product. The amount of energy consumed to dry maltodextrin solutions showed th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Drying technology 2015-07, Vol.33 (9), p.1022-1028
Main Authors: Piatkowski, M, Taradaichenko, M, Zbicinski, I
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Bulk density
Combustion
Comparative analysis
Concurrent spray drying
Drying
energy
Energy consumption
Equivalence
Ethanol
Evaporation
Evaporation rate
Food preservation
FSD
Maltodextrin
maltodextrins
Moisture
Product quality
Spray drying
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c499t-cbda266f7e9f1cd16d626e65b9ace7d3171a8b1239fbb2b84ddf8cde41d2873e3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c499t-cbda266f7e9f1cd16d626e65b9ace7d3171a8b1239fbb2b84ddf8cde41d2873e3
container_end_page 1028
container_issue 9
container_start_page 1022
container_title Drying technology
container_volume 33
creator Piatkowski, M
Taradaichenko, M
Zbicinski, I
description The work presents the comparison of two spray drying techniques: conventional concurrent spray drying and novel spray drying technique; that is, flame spray drying (FSD) in terms of energy consumption and quality of final product. The amount of energy consumed to dry maltodextrin solutions showed that for similar moisture evaporation rate and equivalent operating parameters of the drying process, energy consumption was 5 to 30% lower in the FSD process. FSD produced lower bulk and apparent densities of maltodextrin powder and, due to shorter drying time, lower content of fractured particles in comparison with the classical spray drying process.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/07373937.2014.924137
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_07373937_2014_924137</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3708721731</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c499t-cbda266f7e9f1cd16d626e65b9ace7d3171a8b1239fbb2b84ddf8cde41d2873e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1q3DAUhU1oIOmkbxCIIJtsZqIr2fpZhTLJtAOBtKRZC1k_g4MtuZJN8NvXg1so2WSlC_rO4fLdorgEvAEs8C3mlFNJ-YZgKDeSlED5SXEOFSVrQjH-9N98VnzO-RVjLEBW58X-Ibh0mNA2hjx2_dDEgHSw6EeKdjQD-jnqthkmtA-DS9oc_zNqAtq1unPouU96QvdpasLhojj1us3uy993VbzsHn5tv68fn77tt18f16aUclib2mrCmOdOejAWmGWEOVbVUhvHLQUOWtRAqPR1TWpRWuuFsa4ESwSnjq6Km6W3T_H36PKguiYb17Y6uDhmBRwDACNEzOj1O_Q1jinM2ylgggnMq5LOVLlQJsWck_OqT02n06QAq6Nf9c-vOvpVi985drfEmuBj6vRbTK1Vg57amHzSwTRZ0Q8arpYGr6PShzQHXp5ngM3XqUBIQf8AtBuKZA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1686807543</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Energy Consumption and Product Quality Interactions in Flame Spray Drying</title><source>Taylor and Francis Science and Technology Collection</source><creator>Piatkowski, M ; Taradaichenko, M ; Zbicinski, I</creator><creatorcontrib>Piatkowski, M ; Taradaichenko, M ; Zbicinski, I</creatorcontrib><description>The work presents the comparison of two spray drying techniques: conventional concurrent spray drying and novel spray drying technique; that is, flame spray drying (FSD) in terms of energy consumption and quality of final product. The amount of energy consumed to dry maltodextrin solutions showed that for similar moisture evaporation rate and equivalent operating parameters of the drying process, energy consumption was 5 to 30% lower in the FSD process. FSD produced lower bulk and apparent densities of maltodextrin powder and, due to shorter drying time, lower content of fractured particles in comparison with the classical spray drying process.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1532-2300</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0737-3937</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-2300</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/07373937.2014.924137</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Philadelphia: Taylor &amp; Francis</publisher><subject>Bulk density ; Combustion ; Comparative analysis ; Concurrent spray drying ; Drying ; energy ; Energy consumption ; Equivalence ; Ethanol ; Evaporation ; Evaporation rate ; Food preservation ; FSD ; Maltodextrin ; maltodextrins ; Moisture ; Product quality ; Spray drying</subject><ispartof>Drying technology, 2015-07, Vol.33 (9), p.1022-1028</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Taylor &amp; Francis Group, LLC 2015</rights><rights>Copyright Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd. 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c499t-cbda266f7e9f1cd16d626e65b9ace7d3171a8b1239fbb2b84ddf8cde41d2873e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c499t-cbda266f7e9f1cd16d626e65b9ace7d3171a8b1239fbb2b84ddf8cde41d2873e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Piatkowski, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taradaichenko, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zbicinski, I</creatorcontrib><title>Energy Consumption and Product Quality Interactions in Flame Spray Drying</title><title>Drying technology</title><description>The work presents the comparison of two spray drying techniques: conventional concurrent spray drying and novel spray drying technique; that is, flame spray drying (FSD) in terms of energy consumption and quality of final product. The amount of energy consumed to dry maltodextrin solutions showed that for similar moisture evaporation rate and equivalent operating parameters of the drying process, energy consumption was 5 to 30% lower in the FSD process. FSD produced lower bulk and apparent densities of maltodextrin powder and, due to shorter drying time, lower content of fractured particles in comparison with the classical spray drying process.</description><subject>Bulk density</subject><subject>Combustion</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Concurrent spray drying</subject><subject>Drying</subject><subject>energy</subject><subject>Energy consumption</subject><subject>Equivalence</subject><subject>Ethanol</subject><subject>Evaporation</subject><subject>Evaporation rate</subject><subject>Food preservation</subject><subject>FSD</subject><subject>Maltodextrin</subject><subject>maltodextrins</subject><subject>Moisture</subject><subject>Product quality</subject><subject>Spray drying</subject><issn>1532-2300</issn><issn>0737-3937</issn><issn>1532-2300</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkc1q3DAUhU1oIOmkbxCIIJtsZqIr2fpZhTLJtAOBtKRZC1k_g4MtuZJN8NvXg1so2WSlC_rO4fLdorgEvAEs8C3mlFNJ-YZgKDeSlED5SXEOFSVrQjH-9N98VnzO-RVjLEBW58X-Ibh0mNA2hjx2_dDEgHSw6EeKdjQD-jnqthkmtA-DS9oc_zNqAtq1unPouU96QvdpasLhojj1us3uy993VbzsHn5tv68fn77tt18f16aUclib2mrCmOdOejAWmGWEOVbVUhvHLQUOWtRAqPR1TWpRWuuFsa4ESwSnjq6Km6W3T_H36PKguiYb17Y6uDhmBRwDACNEzOj1O_Q1jinM2ylgggnMq5LOVLlQJsWck_OqT02n06QAq6Nf9c-vOvpVi985drfEmuBj6vRbTK1Vg57amHzSwTRZ0Q8arpYGr6PShzQHXp5ngM3XqUBIQf8AtBuKZA</recordid><startdate>20150704</startdate><enddate>20150704</enddate><creator>Piatkowski, M</creator><creator>Taradaichenko, M</creator><creator>Zbicinski, I</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150704</creationdate><title>Energy Consumption and Product Quality Interactions in Flame Spray Drying</title><author>Piatkowski, M ; Taradaichenko, M ; Zbicinski, I</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c499t-cbda266f7e9f1cd16d626e65b9ace7d3171a8b1239fbb2b84ddf8cde41d2873e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Bulk density</topic><topic>Combustion</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Concurrent spray drying</topic><topic>Drying</topic><topic>energy</topic><topic>Energy consumption</topic><topic>Equivalence</topic><topic>Ethanol</topic><topic>Evaporation</topic><topic>Evaporation rate</topic><topic>Food preservation</topic><topic>FSD</topic><topic>Maltodextrin</topic><topic>maltodextrins</topic><topic>Moisture</topic><topic>Product quality</topic><topic>Spray drying</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Piatkowski, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taradaichenko, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zbicinski, I</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><jtitle>Drying technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Piatkowski, M</au><au>Taradaichenko, M</au><au>Zbicinski, I</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Energy Consumption and Product Quality Interactions in Flame Spray Drying</atitle><jtitle>Drying technology</jtitle><date>2015-07-04</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1022</spage><epage>1028</epage><pages>1022-1028</pages><issn>1532-2300</issn><issn>0737-3937</issn><eissn>1532-2300</eissn><abstract>The work presents the comparison of two spray drying techniques: conventional concurrent spray drying and novel spray drying technique; that is, flame spray drying (FSD) in terms of energy consumption and quality of final product. The amount of energy consumed to dry maltodextrin solutions showed that for similar moisture evaporation rate and equivalent operating parameters of the drying process, energy consumption was 5 to 30% lower in the FSD process. FSD produced lower bulk and apparent densities of maltodextrin powder and, due to shorter drying time, lower content of fractured particles in comparison with the classical spray drying process.</abstract><cop>Philadelphia</cop><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis</pub><doi>10.1080/07373937.2014.924137</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1532-2300
ispartof Drying technology, 2015-07, Vol.33 (9), p.1022-1028
issn 1532-2300
0737-3937
1532-2300
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_07373937_2014_924137
source Taylor and Francis Science and Technology Collection
subjects Bulk density
Combustion
Comparative analysis
Concurrent spray drying
Drying
energy
Energy consumption
Equivalence
Ethanol
Evaporation
Evaporation rate
Food preservation
FSD
Maltodextrin
maltodextrins
Moisture
Product quality
Spray drying
title Energy Consumption and Product Quality Interactions in Flame Spray Drying
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T22%3A07%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Energy%20Consumption%20and%20Product%20Quality%20Interactions%20in%20Flame%20Spray%20Drying&rft.jtitle=Drying%20technology&rft.au=Piatkowski,%20M&rft.date=2015-07-04&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1022&rft.epage=1028&rft.pages=1022-1028&rft.issn=1532-2300&rft.eissn=1532-2300&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/07373937.2014.924137&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3708721731%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c499t-cbda266f7e9f1cd16d626e65b9ace7d3171a8b1239fbb2b84ddf8cde41d2873e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1686807543&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true