Twenty years since the Herpetic Eye Disease Study: Lessons, developments and applications to clinical practice

• Published in: Clinical and experimental optometry 2021-04, Vol.104 (3), p.396-405
• Main Authors: Arshad, Sana, Petsoglou, Constantinos, Lee, Taehwan, Al-Tamimi, Abdullah, Carnt, Nicole A.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Antigens; Clinical medicine; Clinical trials; Eye diseases; Herpes simplex; Herpes simplex keratitis; herpes simplex virus; Herpetic Eye Disease Study; Keratitis; Latency; Rehabilitation; Risk factors; Serology; Uveitis; Viruses; Vision
• ISSN: 0816-4622; 1444-0938
• DOI: 10.1080/08164622.2021.1877531

Herpes Simplex Virus (HSV) is the most common virus that causes eye disease. Although around 60% of the world's population are seropositive for HSV antigens, fortunately, it is estimated that only 1% of seropositive individuals develop eye disease. The most common ocular manifestation of HSV is keratitis, while uveitis and retinal necrosis occur in a small number of cases. HSV keratitis is a debilitating disease, for several reasons: pain , photophobia, and vision loss in acute disease, latency of the virus which leads to infection reactivation from various triggers, scarring, and neovascularisation, leading to permanent vision loss with poor visual rehabilitation prospects. The Herpetic Eye Disease Study (HEDS) was a landmark series of randomised controlled trials in the 1990s that set the benchmark for evidence-based treatment guidelines for anterior eye herpetic disease. Since this time, there has been a change in the distribution of seroprevalence of herpes in the community, a simplified diagnostic classification, advances in treatment options, an emergence of new and a better understanding of risk factors, and discoveries in science that show promise for vaccine and novel future treatments. However, many of the principles of the HEDS study remain rightly entrenched in clinical practice. In this article, the HEDS study is revisited 20 years on through the lens of published literature, to determine current best practise and look towards the future.