Loading…
Differences in competencies between doctoral students on-campus and at a distance
This article describes differences between on-campus and distance learners by knowledge, skills, and abilities. On-campus doctoral students at Texas A&M University were compared with doctoral students enrolled in a distance education program offered jointly with Texas Tech University. Student pe...
Saved in:
| Published in: | The American journal of distance education 2001-01, Vol.15 (2), p.25-40 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Subjects: | |
| Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c282t-730192412a725cb0b73010ae7b0974eff71bc320903d371cbdc92f4ff036505b3 |
|---|---|
| cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c282t-730192412a725cb0b73010ae7b0974eff71bc320903d371cbdc92f4ff036505b3 |
| container_end_page | 40 |
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 25 |
| container_title | The American journal of distance education |
| container_volume | 15 |
| creator | Lindner, James R. Dooley, Kim E. Murphy, Tim H. |
| description | This article describes differences between on-campus and distance learners by knowledge, skills, and abilities. On-campus doctoral students at Texas A&M University were compared with doctoral students enrolled in a distance education program offered jointly with Texas Tech University. Student perceptions of their competency levels were gathered using a mixed mailed/Internet questionnaire. On-campus and distance education students had different levels of competence. Competency models can serve faculty and administrators as an assessment tool for strategic decision making and development of courses and curricula. This study provides a model for benchmarking competencies and provides baseline data for making such changes. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1080/08923640109527082 |
| format | article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>eric_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_08923640109527082</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ641574</ericid><sourcerecordid>EJ641574</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c282t-730192412a725cb0b73010ae7b0974eff71bc320903d371cbdc92f4ff036505b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUF1LwzAUDaLgnP4AwYf8gepN0jYN-CJzfjEQQZ9LmiYQaZORZMz9ezMqvgzx6XLu-eDeg9AlgWsCDdxAIyirSyAgKsqhoUdoRirWFII29TGa7fkiC_gpOovxE4AwyvkMvd1bY3TQTumIrcPKj2udMrQZdzpttXa49yr5IAcc06bXLkXsXaHkuN5ELF2PZcIS9zYmmWPO0YmRQ9QXP3OOPh6W74unYvX6-Ly4WxWKNjQVnAERtCRUclqpDrr9AqTmHQheamM46RSjIID1jBPV9UpQUxoDrK6g6tgckSlXBR9j0KZdBzvKsGsJtPtO2oNOsudq8uhg1a9--VKXpOJlpvlEW2d8GOXWh6Fvk9wNPpiQn7PxMLRNXyk7b_91sr_v-gayQoKT</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Differences in competencies between doctoral students on-campus and at a distance</title><source>ERIC</source><source>Taylor and Francis:Jisc Collections:Taylor and Francis Read and Publish Agreement 2024-2025:Social Sciences and Humanities Collection (Reading list)</source><creator>Lindner, James R. ; Dooley, Kim E. ; Murphy, Tim H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lindner, James R. ; Dooley, Kim E. ; Murphy, Tim H.</creatorcontrib><description>This article describes differences between on-campus and distance learners by knowledge, skills, and abilities. On-campus doctoral students at Texas A&M University were compared with doctoral students enrolled in a distance education program offered jointly with Texas Tech University. Student perceptions of their competency levels were gathered using a mixed mailed/Internet questionnaire. On-campus and distance education students had different levels of competence. Competency models can serve faculty and administrators as an assessment tool for strategic decision making and development of courses and curricula. This study provides a model for benchmarking competencies and provides baseline data for making such changes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0892-3647</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1538-9286</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/08923640109527082</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Taylor & Francis Group</publisher><subject>College Planning ; Comparative Analysis ; Competence ; Competency Based Education ; Competency Models ; Conventional Instruction ; Course Development ; Curriculum Development ; Decision Making ; Distance Education ; Doctoral Programs ; Evaluation Methods ; Higher Education ; Intermode Differences ; Strategic Planning ; Student Attitudes ; Tables (Data) ; Texas A and M University</subject><ispartof>The American journal of distance education, 2001-01, Vol.15 (2), p.25-40</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 2001</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c282t-730192412a725cb0b73010ae7b0974eff71bc320903d371cbdc92f4ff036505b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c282t-730192412a725cb0b73010ae7b0974eff71bc320903d371cbdc92f4ff036505b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,27923,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ641574$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lindner, James R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dooley, Kim E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murphy, Tim H.</creatorcontrib><title>Differences in competencies between doctoral students on-campus and at a distance</title><title>The American journal of distance education</title><description>This article describes differences between on-campus and distance learners by knowledge, skills, and abilities. On-campus doctoral students at Texas A&M University were compared with doctoral students enrolled in a distance education program offered jointly with Texas Tech University. Student perceptions of their competency levels were gathered using a mixed mailed/Internet questionnaire. On-campus and distance education students had different levels of competence. Competency models can serve faculty and administrators as an assessment tool for strategic decision making and development of courses and curricula. This study provides a model for benchmarking competencies and provides baseline data for making such changes.</description><subject>College Planning</subject><subject>Comparative Analysis</subject><subject>Competence</subject><subject>Competency Based Education</subject><subject>Competency Models</subject><subject>Conventional Instruction</subject><subject>Course Development</subject><subject>Curriculum Development</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Distance Education</subject><subject>Doctoral Programs</subject><subject>Evaluation Methods</subject><subject>Higher Education</subject><subject>Intermode Differences</subject><subject>Strategic Planning</subject><subject>Student Attitudes</subject><subject>Tables (Data)</subject><subject>Texas A and M University</subject><issn>0892-3647</issn><issn>1538-9286</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUF1LwzAUDaLgnP4AwYf8gepN0jYN-CJzfjEQQZ9LmiYQaZORZMz9ezMqvgzx6XLu-eDeg9AlgWsCDdxAIyirSyAgKsqhoUdoRirWFII29TGa7fkiC_gpOovxE4AwyvkMvd1bY3TQTumIrcPKj2udMrQZdzpttXa49yr5IAcc06bXLkXsXaHkuN5ELF2PZcIS9zYmmWPO0YmRQ9QXP3OOPh6W74unYvX6-Ly4WxWKNjQVnAERtCRUclqpDrr9AqTmHQheamM46RSjIID1jBPV9UpQUxoDrK6g6tgckSlXBR9j0KZdBzvKsGsJtPtO2oNOsudq8uhg1a9--VKXpOJlpvlEW2d8GOXWh6Fvk9wNPpiQn7PxMLRNXyk7b_91sr_v-gayQoKT</recordid><startdate>20010101</startdate><enddate>20010101</enddate><creator>Lindner, James R.</creator><creator>Dooley, Kim E.</creator><creator>Murphy, Tim H.</creator><general>Taylor & Francis Group</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010101</creationdate><title>Differences in competencies between doctoral students on-campus and at a distance</title><author>Lindner, James R. ; Dooley, Kim E. ; Murphy, Tim H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c282t-730192412a725cb0b73010ae7b0974eff71bc320903d371cbdc92f4ff036505b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>College Planning</topic><topic>Comparative Analysis</topic><topic>Competence</topic><topic>Competency Based Education</topic><topic>Competency Models</topic><topic>Conventional Instruction</topic><topic>Course Development</topic><topic>Curriculum Development</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Distance Education</topic><topic>Doctoral Programs</topic><topic>Evaluation Methods</topic><topic>Higher Education</topic><topic>Intermode Differences</topic><topic>Strategic Planning</topic><topic>Student Attitudes</topic><topic>Tables (Data)</topic><topic>Texas A and M University</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lindner, James R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dooley, Kim E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murphy, Tim H.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>The American journal of distance education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lindner, James R.</au><au>Dooley, Kim E.</au><au>Murphy, Tim H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ641574</ericid><atitle>Differences in competencies between doctoral students on-campus and at a distance</atitle><jtitle>The American journal of distance education</jtitle><date>2001-01-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>25</spage><epage>40</epage><pages>25-40</pages><issn>0892-3647</issn><eissn>1538-9286</eissn><abstract>This article describes differences between on-campus and distance learners by knowledge, skills, and abilities. On-campus doctoral students at Texas A&M University were compared with doctoral students enrolled in a distance education program offered jointly with Texas Tech University. Student perceptions of their competency levels were gathered using a mixed mailed/Internet questionnaire. On-campus and distance education students had different levels of competence. Competency models can serve faculty and administrators as an assessment tool for strategic decision making and development of courses and curricula. This study provides a model for benchmarking competencies and provides baseline data for making such changes.</abstract><pub>Taylor & Francis Group</pub><doi>10.1080/08923640109527082</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0892-3647 |
| ispartof | The American journal of distance education, 2001-01, Vol.15 (2), p.25-40 |
| issn | 0892-3647 1538-9286 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_08923640109527082 |
| source | ERIC; Taylor and Francis:Jisc Collections:Taylor and Francis Read and Publish Agreement 2024-2025:Social Sciences and Humanities Collection (Reading list) |
| subjects | College Planning Comparative Analysis Competence Competency Based Education Competency Models Conventional Instruction Course Development Curriculum Development Decision Making Distance Education Doctoral Programs Evaluation Methods Higher Education Intermode Differences Strategic Planning Student Attitudes Tables (Data) Texas A and M University |
| title | Differences in competencies between doctoral students on-campus and at a distance |
| url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T03%3A43%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-eric_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Differences%20in%20competencies%20between%20doctoral%20students%20on-campus%20and%20at%20a%20distance&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20journal%20of%20distance%20education&rft.au=Lindner,%20James%20R.&rft.date=2001-01-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=25&rft.epage=40&rft.pages=25-40&rft.issn=0892-3647&rft.eissn=1538-9286&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/08923640109527082&rft_dat=%3Ceric_cross%3EEJ641574%3C/eric_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c282t-730192412a725cb0b73010ae7b0974eff71bc320903d371cbdc92f4ff036505b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ641574&rfr_iscdi=true |