Loading…

Evaluation of techniques used in the assessment of subtidal epibiotic assemblage structure

A comparative study was carried out to evaluate the efficiency of a number of techniques commonly used for assessing the structure of subtidal epifaunal communities. Assessments were made of the epifaunal assemblages fouling two substrata: concrete and PVC plastic. Where possible, each technique was...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Biofouling (Chur, Switzerland) Switzerland), 2007-10, Vol.23 (5), p.343-356
Main Authors: Beaumont, J. C., Brown, C. J., Sayer, M. D. J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-e9c5be31ed32f4b3545404780875f5174b8d13385d8e959e0944a0cf0e964c743
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-e9c5be31ed32f4b3545404780875f5174b8d13385d8e959e0944a0cf0e964c743
container_end_page 356
container_issue 5
container_start_page 343
container_title Biofouling (Chur, Switzerland)
container_volume 23
creator Beaumont, J. C.
Brown, C. J.
Sayer, M. D. J.
description A comparative study was carried out to evaluate the efficiency of a number of techniques commonly used for assessing the structure of subtidal epifaunal communities. Assessments were made of the epifaunal assemblages fouling two substrata: concrete and PVC plastic. Where possible, each technique was undertaken in three ways, namely, in situ underwater, in the laboratory and using image analysis on photographs taken in situ. Comparisons were also made of biomass estimates made on samples taken in situ and in the laboratory. All method and technique combinations assessed detected differences in the epibiotic communities associated with the two fouling substrata. Sampling in situ, in the laboratory and using image analysis gave similar estimates of percent cover. However, there were significant differences in measurements made for most taxa with respect to abundance and frequency counts depending on how the technique was carried out. Laboratory-based sampling of abundance and frequency counts and biomass determinations, rather than in situ or image-analysis based sampling, are recommended for use in future studies of epifaunal fouling.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/08927010701492219
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_08927010701492219</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>68268495</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-e9c5be31ed32f4b3545404780875f5174b8d13385d8e959e0944a0cf0e964c743</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU9P3DAQxa0KVBbaD8Clyolb6PhvbKkXhGiphNQLXLhEjjPpGiXx1naA_fYk3ZV6QNUeRnOY33t6mkfIOYVLChq-gjasAgrzCMMYNR_IigIzJRNSHJHVci-X4wk5TekJACrF5EdyQistGSizIo83z7afbPZhLEJXZHTr0f-ZMBVTwrbwY5HXWNiUMKUBx7xAaWqyb21f4MY3PmTv_gJD09vfWKQcJ5eniJ_IcWf7hJ_3-4w8fL-5v74t7379-Hl9dVc6oVgu0TjZIKfYctaJhss5O4hKg65kJ2klGt1SzrVsNRppEIwQFlwHaJRwleBn5GLnu4lhSZ7rwSeHfW9HDFOqlWZKCyMPgpwCV1KpgyA182MVNTNId6CLIaWIXb2JfrBxW1Ool4rqdxXNmi9786kZsP2n2HcyA9UO8GMX4mBfQuzbOtttH2IX7eh8em9b59c8K78dVPL_J3sDL3Cw0g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>19892619</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of techniques used in the assessment of subtidal epibiotic assemblage structure</title><source>Taylor and Francis Science and Technology Collection</source><creator>Beaumont, J. C. ; Brown, C. J. ; Sayer, M. D. J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Beaumont, J. C. ; Brown, C. J. ; Sayer, M. D. J.</creatorcontrib><description>A comparative study was carried out to evaluate the efficiency of a number of techniques commonly used for assessing the structure of subtidal epifaunal communities. Assessments were made of the epifaunal assemblages fouling two substrata: concrete and PVC plastic. Where possible, each technique was undertaken in three ways, namely, in situ underwater, in the laboratory and using image analysis on photographs taken in situ. Comparisons were also made of biomass estimates made on samples taken in situ and in the laboratory. All method and technique combinations assessed detected differences in the epibiotic communities associated with the two fouling substrata. Sampling in situ, in the laboratory and using image analysis gave similar estimates of percent cover. However, there were significant differences in measurements made for most taxa with respect to abundance and frequency counts depending on how the technique was carried out. Laboratory-based sampling of abundance and frequency counts and biomass determinations, rather than in situ or image-analysis based sampling, are recommended for use in future studies of epifaunal fouling.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0892-7014</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1029-2454</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/08927010701492219</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17852069</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Taylor &amp; Francis</publisher><subject>abundance ; Animals ; Biodiversity ; Biomass ; Construction Materials ; epifauna ; fouling ; frequency ; Marine ; Marine Biology ; Oceans and Seas ; percent cover ; Polyvinyl Chloride ; Population Dynamics ; Technique evaluation</subject><ispartof>Biofouling (Chur, Switzerland), 2007-10, Vol.23 (5), p.343-356</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor &amp; Francis Group, LLC 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-e9c5be31ed32f4b3545404780875f5174b8d13385d8e959e0944a0cf0e964c743</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-e9c5be31ed32f4b3545404780875f5174b8d13385d8e959e0944a0cf0e964c743</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17852069$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Beaumont, J. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, C. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sayer, M. D. J.</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of techniques used in the assessment of subtidal epibiotic assemblage structure</title><title>Biofouling (Chur, Switzerland)</title><addtitle>Biofouling</addtitle><description>A comparative study was carried out to evaluate the efficiency of a number of techniques commonly used for assessing the structure of subtidal epifaunal communities. Assessments were made of the epifaunal assemblages fouling two substrata: concrete and PVC plastic. Where possible, each technique was undertaken in three ways, namely, in situ underwater, in the laboratory and using image analysis on photographs taken in situ. Comparisons were also made of biomass estimates made on samples taken in situ and in the laboratory. All method and technique combinations assessed detected differences in the epibiotic communities associated with the two fouling substrata. Sampling in situ, in the laboratory and using image analysis gave similar estimates of percent cover. However, there were significant differences in measurements made for most taxa with respect to abundance and frequency counts depending on how the technique was carried out. Laboratory-based sampling of abundance and frequency counts and biomass determinations, rather than in situ or image-analysis based sampling, are recommended for use in future studies of epifaunal fouling.</description><subject>abundance</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Construction Materials</subject><subject>epifauna</subject><subject>fouling</subject><subject>frequency</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>Marine Biology</subject><subject>Oceans and Seas</subject><subject>percent cover</subject><subject>Polyvinyl Chloride</subject><subject>Population Dynamics</subject><subject>Technique evaluation</subject><issn>0892-7014</issn><issn>1029-2454</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkU9P3DAQxa0KVBbaD8Clyolb6PhvbKkXhGiphNQLXLhEjjPpGiXx1naA_fYk3ZV6QNUeRnOY33t6mkfIOYVLChq-gjasAgrzCMMYNR_IigIzJRNSHJHVci-X4wk5TekJACrF5EdyQistGSizIo83z7afbPZhLEJXZHTr0f-ZMBVTwrbwY5HXWNiUMKUBx7xAaWqyb21f4MY3PmTv_gJD09vfWKQcJ5eniJ_IcWf7hJ_3-4w8fL-5v74t7379-Hl9dVc6oVgu0TjZIKfYctaJhss5O4hKg65kJ2klGt1SzrVsNRppEIwQFlwHaJRwleBn5GLnu4lhSZ7rwSeHfW9HDFOqlWZKCyMPgpwCV1KpgyA182MVNTNId6CLIaWIXb2JfrBxW1Ool4rqdxXNmi9786kZsP2n2HcyA9UO8GMX4mBfQuzbOtttH2IX7eh8em9b59c8K78dVPL_J3sDL3Cw0g</recordid><startdate>200710</startdate><enddate>200710</enddate><creator>Beaumont, J. C.</creator><creator>Brown, C. J.</creator><creator>Sayer, M. D. J.</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200710</creationdate><title>Evaluation of techniques used in the assessment of subtidal epibiotic assemblage structure</title><author>Beaumont, J. C. ; Brown, C. J. ; Sayer, M. D. J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-e9c5be31ed32f4b3545404780875f5174b8d13385d8e959e0944a0cf0e964c743</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>abundance</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Construction Materials</topic><topic>epifauna</topic><topic>fouling</topic><topic>frequency</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>Marine Biology</topic><topic>Oceans and Seas</topic><topic>percent cover</topic><topic>Polyvinyl Chloride</topic><topic>Population Dynamics</topic><topic>Technique evaluation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Beaumont, J. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, C. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sayer, M. D. J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Biofouling (Chur, Switzerland)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Beaumont, J. C.</au><au>Brown, C. J.</au><au>Sayer, M. D. J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of techniques used in the assessment of subtidal epibiotic assemblage structure</atitle><jtitle>Biofouling (Chur, Switzerland)</jtitle><addtitle>Biofouling</addtitle><date>2007-10</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>343</spage><epage>356</epage><pages>343-356</pages><issn>0892-7014</issn><eissn>1029-2454</eissn><abstract>A comparative study was carried out to evaluate the efficiency of a number of techniques commonly used for assessing the structure of subtidal epifaunal communities. Assessments were made of the epifaunal assemblages fouling two substrata: concrete and PVC plastic. Where possible, each technique was undertaken in three ways, namely, in situ underwater, in the laboratory and using image analysis on photographs taken in situ. Comparisons were also made of biomass estimates made on samples taken in situ and in the laboratory. All method and technique combinations assessed detected differences in the epibiotic communities associated with the two fouling substrata. Sampling in situ, in the laboratory and using image analysis gave similar estimates of percent cover. However, there were significant differences in measurements made for most taxa with respect to abundance and frequency counts depending on how the technique was carried out. Laboratory-based sampling of abundance and frequency counts and biomass determinations, rather than in situ or image-analysis based sampling, are recommended for use in future studies of epifaunal fouling.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis</pub><pmid>17852069</pmid><doi>10.1080/08927010701492219</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0892-7014
ispartof Biofouling (Chur, Switzerland), 2007-10, Vol.23 (5), p.343-356
issn 0892-7014
1029-2454
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_08927010701492219
source Taylor and Francis Science and Technology Collection
subjects abundance
Animals
Biodiversity
Biomass
Construction Materials
epifauna
fouling
frequency
Marine
Marine Biology
Oceans and Seas
percent cover
Polyvinyl Chloride
Population Dynamics
Technique evaluation
title Evaluation of techniques used in the assessment of subtidal epibiotic assemblage structure
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T21%3A45%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20techniques%20used%20in%20the%20assessment%20of%20subtidal%20epibiotic%20assemblage%20structure&rft.jtitle=Biofouling%20(Chur,%20Switzerland)&rft.au=Beaumont,%20J.%20C.&rft.date=2007-10&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=343&rft.epage=356&rft.pages=343-356&rft.issn=0892-7014&rft.eissn=1029-2454&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/08927010701492219&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68268495%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-e9c5be31ed32f4b3545404780875f5174b8d13385d8e959e0944a0cf0e964c743%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=19892619&rft_id=info:pmid/17852069&rfr_iscdi=true