Loading…
Evaluation of techniques used in the assessment of subtidal epibiotic assemblage structure
A comparative study was carried out to evaluate the efficiency of a number of techniques commonly used for assessing the structure of subtidal epifaunal communities. Assessments were made of the epifaunal assemblages fouling two substrata: concrete and PVC plastic. Where possible, each technique was...
Saved in:
Published in: | Biofouling (Chur, Switzerland) Switzerland), 2007-10, Vol.23 (5), p.343-356 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-e9c5be31ed32f4b3545404780875f5174b8d13385d8e959e0944a0cf0e964c743 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-e9c5be31ed32f4b3545404780875f5174b8d13385d8e959e0944a0cf0e964c743 |
container_end_page | 356 |
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 343 |
container_title | Biofouling (Chur, Switzerland) |
container_volume | 23 |
creator | Beaumont, J. C. Brown, C. J. Sayer, M. D. J. |
description | A comparative study was carried out to evaluate the efficiency of a number of techniques commonly used for assessing the structure of subtidal epifaunal communities. Assessments were made of the epifaunal assemblages fouling two substrata: concrete and PVC plastic. Where possible, each technique was undertaken in three ways, namely, in situ underwater, in the laboratory and using image analysis on photographs taken in situ. Comparisons were also made of biomass estimates made on samples taken in situ and in the laboratory. All method and technique combinations assessed detected differences in the epibiotic communities associated with the two fouling substrata. Sampling in situ, in the laboratory and using image analysis gave similar estimates of percent cover. However, there were significant differences in measurements made for most taxa with respect to abundance and frequency counts depending on how the technique was carried out. Laboratory-based sampling of abundance and frequency counts and biomass determinations, rather than in situ or image-analysis based sampling, are recommended for use in future studies of epifaunal fouling. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/08927010701492219 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_08927010701492219</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>68268495</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-e9c5be31ed32f4b3545404780875f5174b8d13385d8e959e0944a0cf0e964c743</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU9P3DAQxa0KVBbaD8Clyolb6PhvbKkXhGiphNQLXLhEjjPpGiXx1naA_fYk3ZV6QNUeRnOY33t6mkfIOYVLChq-gjasAgrzCMMYNR_IigIzJRNSHJHVci-X4wk5TekJACrF5EdyQistGSizIo83z7afbPZhLEJXZHTr0f-ZMBVTwrbwY5HXWNiUMKUBx7xAaWqyb21f4MY3PmTv_gJD09vfWKQcJ5eniJ_IcWf7hJ_3-4w8fL-5v74t7379-Hl9dVc6oVgu0TjZIKfYctaJhss5O4hKg65kJ2klGt1SzrVsNRppEIwQFlwHaJRwleBn5GLnu4lhSZ7rwSeHfW9HDFOqlWZKCyMPgpwCV1KpgyA182MVNTNId6CLIaWIXb2JfrBxW1Ool4rqdxXNmi9786kZsP2n2HcyA9UO8GMX4mBfQuzbOtttH2IX7eh8em9b59c8K78dVPL_J3sDL3Cw0g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>19892619</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of techniques used in the assessment of subtidal epibiotic assemblage structure</title><source>Taylor and Francis Science and Technology Collection</source><creator>Beaumont, J. C. ; Brown, C. J. ; Sayer, M. D. J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Beaumont, J. C. ; Brown, C. J. ; Sayer, M. D. J.</creatorcontrib><description>A comparative study was carried out to evaluate the efficiency of a number of techniques commonly used for assessing the structure of subtidal epifaunal communities. Assessments were made of the epifaunal assemblages fouling two substrata: concrete and PVC plastic. Where possible, each technique was undertaken in three ways, namely, in situ underwater, in the laboratory and using image analysis on photographs taken in situ. Comparisons were also made of biomass estimates made on samples taken in situ and in the laboratory. All method and technique combinations assessed detected differences in the epibiotic communities associated with the two fouling substrata. Sampling in situ, in the laboratory and using image analysis gave similar estimates of percent cover. However, there were significant differences in measurements made for most taxa with respect to abundance and frequency counts depending on how the technique was carried out. Laboratory-based sampling of abundance and frequency counts and biomass determinations, rather than in situ or image-analysis based sampling, are recommended for use in future studies of epifaunal fouling.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0892-7014</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1029-2454</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/08927010701492219</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17852069</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Taylor & Francis</publisher><subject>abundance ; Animals ; Biodiversity ; Biomass ; Construction Materials ; epifauna ; fouling ; frequency ; Marine ; Marine Biology ; Oceans and Seas ; percent cover ; Polyvinyl Chloride ; Population Dynamics ; Technique evaluation</subject><ispartof>Biofouling (Chur, Switzerland), 2007-10, Vol.23 (5), p.343-356</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-e9c5be31ed32f4b3545404780875f5174b8d13385d8e959e0944a0cf0e964c743</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-e9c5be31ed32f4b3545404780875f5174b8d13385d8e959e0944a0cf0e964c743</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17852069$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Beaumont, J. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, C. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sayer, M. D. J.</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of techniques used in the assessment of subtidal epibiotic assemblage structure</title><title>Biofouling (Chur, Switzerland)</title><addtitle>Biofouling</addtitle><description>A comparative study was carried out to evaluate the efficiency of a number of techniques commonly used for assessing the structure of subtidal epifaunal communities. Assessments were made of the epifaunal assemblages fouling two substrata: concrete and PVC plastic. Where possible, each technique was undertaken in three ways, namely, in situ underwater, in the laboratory and using image analysis on photographs taken in situ. Comparisons were also made of biomass estimates made on samples taken in situ and in the laboratory. All method and technique combinations assessed detected differences in the epibiotic communities associated with the two fouling substrata. Sampling in situ, in the laboratory and using image analysis gave similar estimates of percent cover. However, there were significant differences in measurements made for most taxa with respect to abundance and frequency counts depending on how the technique was carried out. Laboratory-based sampling of abundance and frequency counts and biomass determinations, rather than in situ or image-analysis based sampling, are recommended for use in future studies of epifaunal fouling.</description><subject>abundance</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Construction Materials</subject><subject>epifauna</subject><subject>fouling</subject><subject>frequency</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>Marine Biology</subject><subject>Oceans and Seas</subject><subject>percent cover</subject><subject>Polyvinyl Chloride</subject><subject>Population Dynamics</subject><subject>Technique evaluation</subject><issn>0892-7014</issn><issn>1029-2454</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkU9P3DAQxa0KVBbaD8Clyolb6PhvbKkXhGiphNQLXLhEjjPpGiXx1naA_fYk3ZV6QNUeRnOY33t6mkfIOYVLChq-gjasAgrzCMMYNR_IigIzJRNSHJHVci-X4wk5TekJACrF5EdyQistGSizIo83z7afbPZhLEJXZHTr0f-ZMBVTwrbwY5HXWNiUMKUBx7xAaWqyb21f4MY3PmTv_gJD09vfWKQcJ5eniJ_IcWf7hJ_3-4w8fL-5v74t7379-Hl9dVc6oVgu0TjZIKfYctaJhss5O4hKg65kJ2klGt1SzrVsNRppEIwQFlwHaJRwleBn5GLnu4lhSZ7rwSeHfW9HDFOqlWZKCyMPgpwCV1KpgyA182MVNTNId6CLIaWIXb2JfrBxW1Ool4rqdxXNmi9786kZsP2n2HcyA9UO8GMX4mBfQuzbOtttH2IX7eh8em9b59c8K78dVPL_J3sDL3Cw0g</recordid><startdate>200710</startdate><enddate>200710</enddate><creator>Beaumont, J. C.</creator><creator>Brown, C. J.</creator><creator>Sayer, M. D. J.</creator><general>Taylor & Francis</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200710</creationdate><title>Evaluation of techniques used in the assessment of subtidal epibiotic assemblage structure</title><author>Beaumont, J. C. ; Brown, C. J. ; Sayer, M. D. J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-e9c5be31ed32f4b3545404780875f5174b8d13385d8e959e0944a0cf0e964c743</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>abundance</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Construction Materials</topic><topic>epifauna</topic><topic>fouling</topic><topic>frequency</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>Marine Biology</topic><topic>Oceans and Seas</topic><topic>percent cover</topic><topic>Polyvinyl Chloride</topic><topic>Population Dynamics</topic><topic>Technique evaluation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Beaumont, J. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, C. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sayer, M. D. J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Biofouling (Chur, Switzerland)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Beaumont, J. C.</au><au>Brown, C. J.</au><au>Sayer, M. D. J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of techniques used in the assessment of subtidal epibiotic assemblage structure</atitle><jtitle>Biofouling (Chur, Switzerland)</jtitle><addtitle>Biofouling</addtitle><date>2007-10</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>343</spage><epage>356</epage><pages>343-356</pages><issn>0892-7014</issn><eissn>1029-2454</eissn><abstract>A comparative study was carried out to evaluate the efficiency of a number of techniques commonly used for assessing the structure of subtidal epifaunal communities. Assessments were made of the epifaunal assemblages fouling two substrata: concrete and PVC plastic. Where possible, each technique was undertaken in three ways, namely, in situ underwater, in the laboratory and using image analysis on photographs taken in situ. Comparisons were also made of biomass estimates made on samples taken in situ and in the laboratory. All method and technique combinations assessed detected differences in the epibiotic communities associated with the two fouling substrata. Sampling in situ, in the laboratory and using image analysis gave similar estimates of percent cover. However, there were significant differences in measurements made for most taxa with respect to abundance and frequency counts depending on how the technique was carried out. Laboratory-based sampling of abundance and frequency counts and biomass determinations, rather than in situ or image-analysis based sampling, are recommended for use in future studies of epifaunal fouling.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Taylor & Francis</pub><pmid>17852069</pmid><doi>10.1080/08927010701492219</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0892-7014 |
ispartof | Biofouling (Chur, Switzerland), 2007-10, Vol.23 (5), p.343-356 |
issn | 0892-7014 1029-2454 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_08927010701492219 |
source | Taylor and Francis Science and Technology Collection |
subjects | abundance Animals Biodiversity Biomass Construction Materials epifauna fouling frequency Marine Marine Biology Oceans and Seas percent cover Polyvinyl Chloride Population Dynamics Technique evaluation |
title | Evaluation of techniques used in the assessment of subtidal epibiotic assemblage structure |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T21%3A45%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20techniques%20used%20in%20the%20assessment%20of%20subtidal%20epibiotic%20assemblage%20structure&rft.jtitle=Biofouling%20(Chur,%20Switzerland)&rft.au=Beaumont,%20J.%20C.&rft.date=2007-10&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=343&rft.epage=356&rft.pages=343-356&rft.issn=0892-7014&rft.eissn=1029-2454&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/08927010701492219&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68268495%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-e9c5be31ed32f4b3545404780875f5174b8d13385d8e959e0944a0cf0e964c743%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=19892619&rft_id=info:pmid/17852069&rfr_iscdi=true |