Loading…

Personality Profiles of Users Sharing Animal-related Content on Social Media

Animal preferences are thought to be linked with more salient psychological traits of people, and most research examining owner personality as a differentiating factor has obtained mixed results. The rise in usage of social networks offers users a new medium in which they can broadcast their prefere...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Anthrozoös 2017-10, Vol.30 (4), p.671-680
Main Authors: Hagan, Courtney, Carpenter, Jordan, Ungar, Lyle, Preotiuc-Pietro, Daniel
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c310t-be0cecbd7d83fba7e6ef639c80f52e2b529c0e3c220bceb515f9f30d5a582da73
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c310t-be0cecbd7d83fba7e6ef639c80f52e2b529c0e3c220bceb515f9f30d5a582da73
container_end_page 680
container_issue 4
container_start_page 671
container_title Anthrozoös
container_volume 30
creator Hagan, Courtney
Carpenter, Jordan
Ungar, Lyle
Preotiuc-Pietro, Daniel
description Animal preferences are thought to be linked with more salient psychological traits of people, and most research examining owner personality as a differentiating factor has obtained mixed results. The rise in usage of social networks offers users a new medium in which they can broadcast their preferences and activities, including about animals. In two studies, the first on Facebook status updates and the second on images shared on Twitter, we revisited the link between Big Five personality traits and animal preference, specifically focusing on cats and dogs. We used automatic content analysis of text and images to unobtrusively measure preference for animals online using large datasets. In study 1, a dataset of Facebook status updates (n = 72,559) were analyzed and it was found that those who mentioned ownership of a cat (by using the phrase "my cat" (n = 5,053)) in their status updates were more open to experience, introverted, neurotic, and less conscientious when compared with the general population. Users mentioning ownership of a dog (by using "my dog" (n = 8,045)) were only less conscientious compared with the rest of the population. In study 2, a dataset of Twitter images was analyzed and revealed that users who featured either cat (n = 1,036) or dog (n = 1,499) images in their tweets were more neurotic, less conscientious, and less agreeable than those who did not. In addition, posting images containing cats was specific to users higher in openness, while posting images featuring dogs was associated with users higher in extraversion. These findings taken together align with some previous findings on the relationship between owner personality and animal preference, additionally highlighting some social media-specific behaviors.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/08927936.2017.1370235
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_08927936_2017_1370235</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1080_08927936_2017_1370235</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c310t-be0cecbd7d83fba7e6ef639c80f52e2b529c0e3c220bceb515f9f30d5a582da73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtKAzEYhYMoWKuPIOQFZvyTkMnMzlK8QcVC7TpkMn80kiaSDEjf3g6tW1dncS4cPkJuGdQMWriDtuOqE03NgamaCQVcyDMyY0qKCoRS52Q2ZaopdEmuSvkCkAJ4MyOrNeaSogl-3NN1Ts4HLDQ5ui0Hg24-Tfbxgy6i35lQZQxmxIEuUxwxjjRFuknWm0BfcfDmmlw4EwrenHROto8P78vnavX29LJcrCorGIxVj2DR9oMaWuF6o7BB14jOtuAkR95L3llAYTmH3mIvmXSdEzBII1s-GCXmRB53bU6lZHT6Ox_-5b1moCck-g-JnpDoE5JD7_7Y89GlvDM_KYdBj2YfUnbZROuLFv9P_AKHPWl2</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Personality Profiles of Users Sharing Animal-related Content on Social Media</title><source>Taylor &amp; Francis</source><creator>Hagan, Courtney ; Carpenter, Jordan ; Ungar, Lyle ; Preotiuc-Pietro, Daniel</creator><creatorcontrib>Hagan, Courtney ; Carpenter, Jordan ; Ungar, Lyle ; Preotiuc-Pietro, Daniel</creatorcontrib><description>Animal preferences are thought to be linked with more salient psychological traits of people, and most research examining owner personality as a differentiating factor has obtained mixed results. The rise in usage of social networks offers users a new medium in which they can broadcast their preferences and activities, including about animals. In two studies, the first on Facebook status updates and the second on images shared on Twitter, we revisited the link between Big Five personality traits and animal preference, specifically focusing on cats and dogs. We used automatic content analysis of text and images to unobtrusively measure preference for animals online using large datasets. In study 1, a dataset of Facebook status updates (n = 72,559) were analyzed and it was found that those who mentioned ownership of a cat (by using the phrase "my cat" (n = 5,053)) in their status updates were more open to experience, introverted, neurotic, and less conscientious when compared with the general population. Users mentioning ownership of a dog (by using "my dog" (n = 8,045)) were only less conscientious compared with the rest of the population. In study 2, a dataset of Twitter images was analyzed and revealed that users who featured either cat (n = 1,036) or dog (n = 1,499) images in their tweets were more neurotic, less conscientious, and less agreeable than those who did not. In addition, posting images containing cats was specific to users higher in openness, while posting images featuring dogs was associated with users higher in extraversion. These findings taken together align with some previous findings on the relationship between owner personality and animal preference, additionally highlighting some social media-specific behaviors.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0892-7936</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1753-0377</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/08927936.2017.1370235</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Routledge</publisher><subject>Big Five ; cat people ; dog people ; Facebook ; social media ; Twitter</subject><ispartof>Anthrozoös, 2017-10, Vol.30 (4), p.671-680</ispartof><rights>2017 ISAZ 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c310t-be0cecbd7d83fba7e6ef639c80f52e2b529c0e3c220bceb515f9f30d5a582da73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c310t-be0cecbd7d83fba7e6ef639c80f52e2b529c0e3c220bceb515f9f30d5a582da73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hagan, Courtney</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carpenter, Jordan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ungar, Lyle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Preotiuc-Pietro, Daniel</creatorcontrib><title>Personality Profiles of Users Sharing Animal-related Content on Social Media</title><title>Anthrozoös</title><description>Animal preferences are thought to be linked with more salient psychological traits of people, and most research examining owner personality as a differentiating factor has obtained mixed results. The rise in usage of social networks offers users a new medium in which they can broadcast their preferences and activities, including about animals. In two studies, the first on Facebook status updates and the second on images shared on Twitter, we revisited the link between Big Five personality traits and animal preference, specifically focusing on cats and dogs. We used automatic content analysis of text and images to unobtrusively measure preference for animals online using large datasets. In study 1, a dataset of Facebook status updates (n = 72,559) were analyzed and it was found that those who mentioned ownership of a cat (by using the phrase "my cat" (n = 5,053)) in their status updates were more open to experience, introverted, neurotic, and less conscientious when compared with the general population. Users mentioning ownership of a dog (by using "my dog" (n = 8,045)) were only less conscientious compared with the rest of the population. In study 2, a dataset of Twitter images was analyzed and revealed that users who featured either cat (n = 1,036) or dog (n = 1,499) images in their tweets were more neurotic, less conscientious, and less agreeable than those who did not. In addition, posting images containing cats was specific to users higher in openness, while posting images featuring dogs was associated with users higher in extraversion. These findings taken together align with some previous findings on the relationship between owner personality and animal preference, additionally highlighting some social media-specific behaviors.</description><subject>Big Five</subject><subject>cat people</subject><subject>dog people</subject><subject>Facebook</subject><subject>social media</subject><subject>Twitter</subject><issn>0892-7936</issn><issn>1753-0377</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtKAzEYhYMoWKuPIOQFZvyTkMnMzlK8QcVC7TpkMn80kiaSDEjf3g6tW1dncS4cPkJuGdQMWriDtuOqE03NgamaCQVcyDMyY0qKCoRS52Q2ZaopdEmuSvkCkAJ4MyOrNeaSogl-3NN1Ts4HLDQ5ui0Hg24-Tfbxgy6i35lQZQxmxIEuUxwxjjRFuknWm0BfcfDmmlw4EwrenHROto8P78vnavX29LJcrCorGIxVj2DR9oMaWuF6o7BB14jOtuAkR95L3llAYTmH3mIvmXSdEzBII1s-GCXmRB53bU6lZHT6Ox_-5b1moCck-g-JnpDoE5JD7_7Y89GlvDM_KYdBj2YfUnbZROuLFv9P_AKHPWl2</recordid><startdate>20171002</startdate><enddate>20171002</enddate><creator>Hagan, Courtney</creator><creator>Carpenter, Jordan</creator><creator>Ungar, Lyle</creator><creator>Preotiuc-Pietro, Daniel</creator><general>Routledge</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20171002</creationdate><title>Personality Profiles of Users Sharing Animal-related Content on Social Media</title><author>Hagan, Courtney ; Carpenter, Jordan ; Ungar, Lyle ; Preotiuc-Pietro, Daniel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c310t-be0cecbd7d83fba7e6ef639c80f52e2b529c0e3c220bceb515f9f30d5a582da73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Big Five</topic><topic>cat people</topic><topic>dog people</topic><topic>Facebook</topic><topic>social media</topic><topic>Twitter</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hagan, Courtney</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carpenter, Jordan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ungar, Lyle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Preotiuc-Pietro, Daniel</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Anthrozoös</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hagan, Courtney</au><au>Carpenter, Jordan</au><au>Ungar, Lyle</au><au>Preotiuc-Pietro, Daniel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Personality Profiles of Users Sharing Animal-related Content on Social Media</atitle><jtitle>Anthrozoös</jtitle><date>2017-10-02</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>671</spage><epage>680</epage><pages>671-680</pages><issn>0892-7936</issn><eissn>1753-0377</eissn><abstract>Animal preferences are thought to be linked with more salient psychological traits of people, and most research examining owner personality as a differentiating factor has obtained mixed results. The rise in usage of social networks offers users a new medium in which they can broadcast their preferences and activities, including about animals. In two studies, the first on Facebook status updates and the second on images shared on Twitter, we revisited the link between Big Five personality traits and animal preference, specifically focusing on cats and dogs. We used automatic content analysis of text and images to unobtrusively measure preference for animals online using large datasets. In study 1, a dataset of Facebook status updates (n = 72,559) were analyzed and it was found that those who mentioned ownership of a cat (by using the phrase "my cat" (n = 5,053)) in their status updates were more open to experience, introverted, neurotic, and less conscientious when compared with the general population. Users mentioning ownership of a dog (by using "my dog" (n = 8,045)) were only less conscientious compared with the rest of the population. In study 2, a dataset of Twitter images was analyzed and revealed that users who featured either cat (n = 1,036) or dog (n = 1,499) images in their tweets were more neurotic, less conscientious, and less agreeable than those who did not. In addition, posting images containing cats was specific to users higher in openness, while posting images featuring dogs was associated with users higher in extraversion. These findings taken together align with some previous findings on the relationship between owner personality and animal preference, additionally highlighting some social media-specific behaviors.</abstract><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/08927936.2017.1370235</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0892-7936
ispartof Anthrozoös, 2017-10, Vol.30 (4), p.671-680
issn 0892-7936
1753-0377
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_08927936_2017_1370235
source Taylor & Francis
subjects Big Five
cat people
dog people
Facebook
social media
Twitter
title Personality Profiles of Users Sharing Animal-related Content on Social Media
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T15%3A11%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Personality%20Profiles%20of%20Users%20Sharing%20Animal-related%20Content%20on%20Social%20Media&rft.jtitle=Anthrozo%C3%B6s&rft.au=Hagan,%20Courtney&rft.date=2017-10-02&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=671&rft.epage=680&rft.pages=671-680&rft.issn=0892-7936&rft.eissn=1753-0377&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/08927936.2017.1370235&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref_infor%3E10_1080_08927936_2017_1370235%3C/crossref_infor%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c310t-be0cecbd7d83fba7e6ef639c80f52e2b529c0e3c220bceb515f9f30d5a582da73%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true