Loading…

Amplifying "Keep It in the Ground" First-Movers: Toward a Comparative Framework

This article offers a framework for analyzing and extending the recent wave of national "keep it in the ground" (KIIG) bans on fossil fuel exploration and production. We situate this discussion in new theoretical work on decarbonization acceleration and then present an overview of KIIG mov...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Published in:	Society & natural resources 2020-11, Vol.33 (11), p.1339-1358
Main Authors:	Carter, Angela V., McKenzie, Janetta
Format:	Article
Language:	English
Subjects:	Campaigns Climate policy Constituents Critical junctures Decarbonization Development policy energy governance Entrepreneurs Environmental policy Fossil fuels Frame analysis Global climate Neutrality Policy making supply-side policy
Citations:	Items that this one cites Items that cite this one
Online Access:	Get full text
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

cited_by	cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-bb00f0fe845b30518b65c28e0963a928a5483c07a2f338198817cddb5807ac9e3
cites	cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-bb00f0fe845b30518b65c28e0963a928a5483c07a2f338198817cddb5807ac9e3
container_end_page	1358
container_issue	11
container_start_page	1339
container_title	Society & natural resources
container_volume	33
creator	Carter, Angela V. McKenzie, Janetta
description	This article offers a framework for analyzing and extending the recent wave of national "keep it in the ground" (KIIG) bans on fossil fuel exploration and production. We situate this discussion in new theoretical work on decarbonization acceleration and then present an overview of KIIG movement and policy development. Next, drawing on the burgeoning supply side climate policy literature, we outline major barriers to constraining fossil fuel development, then focus on identifying conditions most conducive for KIIG policy. These include locally-rooted campaigns, the development of a pro-KIIG constituency that is horizontally dense and vertically integrated, resonant message framing, and support by well-placed norm entrepreneurs. We argue that early national efforts to keep fossil fuels in the ground demark a critical juncture in global climate policy. Understanding the trajectory of these bans is a first step in extending these initiatives as part of the pathway to carbon neutrality by 2050.
doi_str_mv	10.1080/08941920.2020.1772924
format	article
fullrecord	<record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_08941920_2020_1772924</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2458926865</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-bb00f0fe845b30518b65c28e0963a928a5483c07a2f338198817cddb5807ac9e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kFFPwjAQxxujiYh-BJMGn4fXdt06nyREkIjhBZ-bbmu1yNbZDgjf3i3gqy93yeX3v8v9ELonMCYg4BFEFpOMwphCV0ia0ozGF2hAOCURpJRdokHPRD10jW5C2AAAEzEdoNWkarbWHG39iUdvWjd40WJb4_ZL47l3u7oc4Zn1oY3e3V778ITX7qB8iRWeuqpRXrV2r_HMq0ofnP--RVdGbYO-O_ch-pi9rKev0XI1X0wny6hggrdRngMYMFrEPGfAicgTXlChIUuYyqhQPBasgFRRw5ggmRAkLcoy56KbFZlmQ_Rw2tt497PToZUbt_N1d1LSmIuMJiLhHcVPVOFdCF4b2XhbKX-UBGTvTv65k707eXbX5Z5POVsb5yvVfbYtZauOW-eNV3Vhg2T_r_gFP5Fzhg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2458926865</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Amplifying "Keep It in the Ground" First-Movers: Toward a Comparative Framework</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Taylor and Francis Science and Technology Collection</source><source>PAIS Index</source><creator>Carter, Angela V. ; McKenzie, Janetta</creator><creatorcontrib>Carter, Angela V. ; McKenzie, Janetta</creatorcontrib><description>This article offers a framework for analyzing and extending the recent wave of national "keep it in the ground" (KIIG) bans on fossil fuel exploration and production. We situate this discussion in new theoretical work on decarbonization acceleration and then present an overview of KIIG movement and policy development. Next, drawing on the burgeoning supply side climate policy literature, we outline major barriers to constraining fossil fuel development, then focus on identifying conditions most conducive for KIIG policy. These include locally-rooted campaigns, the development of a pro-KIIG constituency that is horizontally dense and vertically integrated, resonant message framing, and support by well-placed norm entrepreneurs. We argue that early national efforts to keep fossil fuels in the ground demark a critical juncture in global climate policy. Understanding the trajectory of these bans is a first step in extending these initiatives as part of the pathway to carbon neutrality by 2050.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0894-1920</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1521-0723</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/08941920.2020.1772924</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Philadelphia: Routledge</publisher><subject>Campaigns ; Climate policy ; Constituents ; Critical junctures ; Decarbonization ; Development policy ; energy governance ; Entrepreneurs ; Environmental policy ; Fossil fuels ; Frame analysis ; Global climate ; Neutrality ; Policy making ; supply-side policy</subject><ispartof>Society & natural resources, 2020-11, Vol.33 (11), p.1339-1358</ispartof><rights>2020 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 2020</rights><rights>2020 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-bb00f0fe845b30518b65c28e0963a928a5483c07a2f338198817cddb5807ac9e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-bb00f0fe845b30518b65c28e0963a928a5483c07a2f338198817cddb5807ac9e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27866,27924,27925,33223</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Carter, Angela V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McKenzie, Janetta</creatorcontrib><title>Amplifying "Keep It in the Ground" First-Movers: Toward a Comparative Framework</title><title>Society & natural resources</title><description>This article offers a framework for analyzing and extending the recent wave of national "keep it in the ground" (KIIG) bans on fossil fuel exploration and production. We situate this discussion in new theoretical work on decarbonization acceleration and then present an overview of KIIG movement and policy development. Next, drawing on the burgeoning supply side climate policy literature, we outline major barriers to constraining fossil fuel development, then focus on identifying conditions most conducive for KIIG policy. These include locally-rooted campaigns, the development of a pro-KIIG constituency that is horizontally dense and vertically integrated, resonant message framing, and support by well-placed norm entrepreneurs. We argue that early national efforts to keep fossil fuels in the ground demark a critical juncture in global climate policy. Understanding the trajectory of these bans is a first step in extending these initiatives as part of the pathway to carbon neutrality by 2050.</description><subject>Campaigns</subject><subject>Climate policy</subject><subject>Constituents</subject><subject>Critical junctures</subject><subject>Decarbonization</subject><subject>Development policy</subject><subject>energy governance</subject><subject>Entrepreneurs</subject><subject>Environmental policy</subject><subject>Fossil fuels</subject><subject>Frame analysis</subject><subject>Global climate</subject><subject>Neutrality</subject><subject>Policy making</subject><subject>supply-side policy</subject><issn>0894-1920</issn><issn>1521-0723</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kFFPwjAQxxujiYh-BJMGn4fXdt06nyREkIjhBZ-bbmu1yNbZDgjf3i3gqy93yeX3v8v9ELonMCYg4BFEFpOMwphCV0ia0ozGF2hAOCURpJRdokHPRD10jW5C2AAAEzEdoNWkarbWHG39iUdvWjd40WJb4_ZL47l3u7oc4Zn1oY3e3V778ITX7qB8iRWeuqpRXrV2r_HMq0ofnP--RVdGbYO-O_ch-pi9rKev0XI1X0wny6hggrdRngMYMFrEPGfAicgTXlChIUuYyqhQPBasgFRRw5ggmRAkLcoy56KbFZlmQ_Rw2tt497PToZUbt_N1d1LSmIuMJiLhHcVPVOFdCF4b2XhbKX-UBGTvTv65k707eXbX5Z5POVsb5yvVfbYtZauOW-eNV3Vhg2T_r_gFP5Fzhg</recordid><startdate>20201101</startdate><enddate>20201101</enddate><creator>Carter, Angela V.</creator><creator>McKenzie, Janetta</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20201101</creationdate><title>Amplifying "Keep It in the Ground" First-Movers: Toward a Comparative Framework</title><author>Carter, Angela V. ; McKenzie, Janetta</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-bb00f0fe845b30518b65c28e0963a928a5483c07a2f338198817cddb5807ac9e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Campaigns</topic><topic>Climate policy</topic><topic>Constituents</topic><topic>Critical junctures</topic><topic>Decarbonization</topic><topic>Development policy</topic><topic>energy governance</topic><topic>Entrepreneurs</topic><topic>Environmental policy</topic><topic>Fossil fuels</topic><topic>Frame analysis</topic><topic>Global climate</topic><topic>Neutrality</topic><topic>Policy making</topic><topic>supply-side policy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Carter, Angela V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McKenzie, Janetta</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Society & natural resources</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Carter, Angela V.</au><au>McKenzie, Janetta</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Amplifying "Keep It in the Ground" First-Movers: Toward a Comparative Framework</atitle><jtitle>Society & natural resources</jtitle><date>2020-11-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1339</spage><epage>1358</epage><pages>1339-1358</pages><issn>0894-1920</issn><eissn>1521-0723</eissn><abstract>This article offers a framework for analyzing and extending the recent wave of national "keep it in the ground" (KIIG) bans on fossil fuel exploration and production. We situate this discussion in new theoretical work on decarbonization acceleration and then present an overview of KIIG movement and policy development. Next, drawing on the burgeoning supply side climate policy literature, we outline major barriers to constraining fossil fuel development, then focus on identifying conditions most conducive for KIIG policy. These include locally-rooted campaigns, the development of a pro-KIIG constituency that is horizontally dense and vertically integrated, resonant message framing, and support by well-placed norm entrepreneurs. We argue that early national efforts to keep fossil fuels in the ground demark a critical juncture in global climate policy. Understanding the trajectory of these bans is a first step in extending these initiatives as part of the pathway to carbon neutrality by 2050.</abstract><cop>Philadelphia</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/08941920.2020.1772924</doi><tpages>20</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext	fulltext
identifier	ISSN: 0894-1920
ispartof	Society & natural resources, 2020-11, Vol.33 (11), p.1339-1358
issn	0894-1920 1521-0723
language	eng
recordid	cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_08941920_2020_1772924
source	International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Taylor and Francis Science and Technology Collection; PAIS Index
subjects	Campaigns Climate policy Constituents Critical junctures Decarbonization Development policy energy governance Entrepreneurs Environmental policy Fossil fuels Frame analysis Global climate Neutrality Policy making supply-side policy
title	Amplifying "Keep It in the Ground" First-Movers: Toward a Comparative Framework
url	http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T12%3A47%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Amplifying%20%22Keep%20It%20in%20the%20Ground%22%20First-Movers:%20Toward%20a%20Comparative%20Framework&rft.jtitle=Society%20&%20natural%20resources&rft.au=Carter,%20Angela%20V.&rft.date=2020-11-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1339&rft.epage=1358&rft.pages=1339-1358&rft.issn=0894-1920&rft.eissn=1521-0723&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/08941920.2020.1772924&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2458926865%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-bb00f0fe845b30518b65c28e0963a928a5483c07a2f338198817cddb5807ac9e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2458926865&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true