Loading…

Price Fairness: Two-Stage Comparison of Conventional and Fairtrade Prices

Besides theoretical considerations of price fairness, the article compares food prices-fairtrade and conventional. The first stage comparison of fairtrade and conventional producer prices reveals that fairtrade producer prices are twice as high as the conventionally traded equivalent. On the second...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of international consumer marketing 2019-03, Vol.31 (2), p.86-97
Main Author: Bissinger, Katharina
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-1e8bf756df003ab2a36e0883cbbf2c1c0b734906c169e58175a95ce28585f51c3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-1e8bf756df003ab2a36e0883cbbf2c1c0b734906c169e58175a95ce28585f51c3
container_end_page 97
container_issue 2
container_start_page 86
container_title Journal of international consumer marketing
container_volume 31
creator Bissinger, Katharina
description Besides theoretical considerations of price fairness, the article compares food prices-fairtrade and conventional. The first stage comparison of fairtrade and conventional producer prices reveals that fairtrade producer prices are twice as high as the conventionally traded equivalent. On the second stage, prices are compared on producer and consumer level for three products. The analysis predicts a massive price markup in retail. Sometimes fairtrade retail prices are higher than retail prices for their conventional counterparts, even though price differences have not been all that great for producers. This may be justified by a lower trading volume of the niche market, implicitly entailing higher costs.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/08961530.2018.1482525
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_08961530_2018_1482525</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2211768035</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-1e8bf756df003ab2a36e0883cbbf2c1c0b734906c169e58175a95ce28585f51c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kFFLwzAUhYMoOKc_QSj43HpvsrSpT8pwOhgoOJ9DmibS0SUz6Rz797bbfPXpcuA7h8tHyC1ChiDgHkSZI2eQUUCR4URQTvkZGSGnIi0gF-dkNDDpAF2SqxhXAEhZKUZk_h4abZKZaoIzMT4ky51PPzr1ZZKpX29UaKJ3ibd9cj_GdY13qk2Uqw-VLqjaJIeJeE0urGqjuTndMfmcPS-nr-ni7WU-fVqkmpW8S9GIyhY8ry0AUxVVLDcgBNNVZalGDVXBJiXkGvPScIEFVyXXhgouuOWo2ZjcHXc3wX9vTezkym9D_1WUlCIWuQDGe4ofKR18jMFYuQnNWoW9RJCDNflnTQ7W5Mla33s89hpnfVirnQ9tLTu1b32wQTndRMn-n_gFWjJybA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2211768035</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Price Fairness: Two-Stage Comparison of Conventional and Fairtrade Prices</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate</source><source>Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection</source><creator>Bissinger, Katharina</creator><creatorcontrib>Bissinger, Katharina</creatorcontrib><description>Besides theoretical considerations of price fairness, the article compares food prices-fairtrade and conventional. The first stage comparison of fairtrade and conventional producer prices reveals that fairtrade producer prices are twice as high as the conventionally traded equivalent. On the second stage, prices are compared on producer and consumer level for three products. The analysis predicts a massive price markup in retail. Sometimes fairtrade retail prices are higher than retail prices for their conventional counterparts, even though price differences have not been all that great for producers. This may be justified by a lower trading volume of the niche market, implicitly entailing higher costs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0896-1530</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1528-7068</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/08961530.2018.1482525</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Routledge</publisher><subject>consumer prices ; Conventional prices ; fair prices ; Finished goods ; Prices ; producer prices</subject><ispartof>Journal of international consumer marketing, 2019-03, Vol.31 (2), p.86-97</ispartof><rights>2018 Taylor &amp; Francis Group, LLC 2018</rights><rights>2018 Taylor &amp; Francis Group, LLC</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-1e8bf756df003ab2a36e0883cbbf2c1c0b734906c169e58175a95ce28585f51c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-1e8bf756df003ab2a36e0883cbbf2c1c0b734906c169e58175a95ce28585f51c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7317-4349</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bissinger, Katharina</creatorcontrib><title>Price Fairness: Two-Stage Comparison of Conventional and Fairtrade Prices</title><title>Journal of international consumer marketing</title><description>Besides theoretical considerations of price fairness, the article compares food prices-fairtrade and conventional. The first stage comparison of fairtrade and conventional producer prices reveals that fairtrade producer prices are twice as high as the conventionally traded equivalent. On the second stage, prices are compared on producer and consumer level for three products. The analysis predicts a massive price markup in retail. Sometimes fairtrade retail prices are higher than retail prices for their conventional counterparts, even though price differences have not been all that great for producers. This may be justified by a lower trading volume of the niche market, implicitly entailing higher costs.</description><subject>consumer prices</subject><subject>Conventional prices</subject><subject>fair prices</subject><subject>Finished goods</subject><subject>Prices</subject><subject>producer prices</subject><issn>0896-1530</issn><issn>1528-7068</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kFFLwzAUhYMoOKc_QSj43HpvsrSpT8pwOhgoOJ9DmibS0SUz6Rz797bbfPXpcuA7h8tHyC1ChiDgHkSZI2eQUUCR4URQTvkZGSGnIi0gF-dkNDDpAF2SqxhXAEhZKUZk_h4abZKZaoIzMT4ky51PPzr1ZZKpX29UaKJ3ibd9cj_GdY13qk2Uqw-VLqjaJIeJeE0urGqjuTndMfmcPS-nr-ni7WU-fVqkmpW8S9GIyhY8ry0AUxVVLDcgBNNVZalGDVXBJiXkGvPScIEFVyXXhgouuOWo2ZjcHXc3wX9vTezkym9D_1WUlCIWuQDGe4ofKR18jMFYuQnNWoW9RJCDNflnTQ7W5Mla33s89hpnfVirnQ9tLTu1b32wQTndRMn-n_gFWjJybA</recordid><startdate>20190315</startdate><enddate>20190315</enddate><creator>Bissinger, Katharina</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7317-4349</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190315</creationdate><title>Price Fairness: Two-Stage Comparison of Conventional and Fairtrade Prices</title><author>Bissinger, Katharina</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-1e8bf756df003ab2a36e0883cbbf2c1c0b734906c169e58175a95ce28585f51c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>consumer prices</topic><topic>Conventional prices</topic><topic>fair prices</topic><topic>Finished goods</topic><topic>Prices</topic><topic>producer prices</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bissinger, Katharina</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of international consumer marketing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bissinger, Katharina</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Price Fairness: Two-Stage Comparison of Conventional and Fairtrade Prices</atitle><jtitle>Journal of international consumer marketing</jtitle><date>2019-03-15</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>86</spage><epage>97</epage><pages>86-97</pages><issn>0896-1530</issn><eissn>1528-7068</eissn><abstract>Besides theoretical considerations of price fairness, the article compares food prices-fairtrade and conventional. The first stage comparison of fairtrade and conventional producer prices reveals that fairtrade producer prices are twice as high as the conventionally traded equivalent. On the second stage, prices are compared on producer and consumer level for three products. The analysis predicts a massive price markup in retail. Sometimes fairtrade retail prices are higher than retail prices for their conventional counterparts, even though price differences have not been all that great for producers. This may be justified by a lower trading volume of the niche market, implicitly entailing higher costs.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/08961530.2018.1482525</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7317-4349</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0896-1530
ispartof Journal of international consumer marketing, 2019-03, Vol.31 (2), p.86-97
issn 0896-1530
1528-7068
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_08961530_2018_1482525
source EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate; Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection
subjects consumer prices
Conventional prices
fair prices
Finished goods
Prices
producer prices
title Price Fairness: Two-Stage Comparison of Conventional and Fairtrade Prices
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T18%3A45%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Price%20Fairness:%20Two-Stage%20Comparison%20of%20Conventional%20and%20Fairtrade%20Prices&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20international%20consumer%20marketing&rft.au=Bissinger,%20Katharina&rft.date=2019-03-15&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=86&rft.epage=97&rft.pages=86-97&rft.issn=0896-1530&rft.eissn=1528-7068&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/08961530.2018.1482525&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2211768035%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-1e8bf756df003ab2a36e0883cbbf2c1c0b734906c169e58175a95ce28585f51c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2211768035&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true