Loading…
Price Fairness: Two-Stage Comparison of Conventional and Fairtrade Prices
Besides theoretical considerations of price fairness, the article compares food prices-fairtrade and conventional. The first stage comparison of fairtrade and conventional producer prices reveals that fairtrade producer prices are twice as high as the conventionally traded equivalent. On the second...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of international consumer marketing 2019-03, Vol.31 (2), p.86-97 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-1e8bf756df003ab2a36e0883cbbf2c1c0b734906c169e58175a95ce28585f51c3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-1e8bf756df003ab2a36e0883cbbf2c1c0b734906c169e58175a95ce28585f51c3 |
container_end_page | 97 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 86 |
container_title | Journal of international consumer marketing |
container_volume | 31 |
creator | Bissinger, Katharina |
description | Besides theoretical considerations of price fairness, the article compares food prices-fairtrade and conventional. The first stage comparison of fairtrade and conventional producer prices reveals that fairtrade producer prices are twice as high as the conventionally traded equivalent. On the second stage, prices are compared on producer and consumer level for three products. The analysis predicts a massive price markup in retail. Sometimes fairtrade retail prices are higher than retail prices for their conventional counterparts, even though price differences have not been all that great for producers. This may be justified by a lower trading volume of the niche market, implicitly entailing higher costs. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/08961530.2018.1482525 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_08961530_2018_1482525</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2211768035</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-1e8bf756df003ab2a36e0883cbbf2c1c0b734906c169e58175a95ce28585f51c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kFFLwzAUhYMoOKc_QSj43HpvsrSpT8pwOhgoOJ9DmibS0SUz6Rz797bbfPXpcuA7h8tHyC1ChiDgHkSZI2eQUUCR4URQTvkZGSGnIi0gF-dkNDDpAF2SqxhXAEhZKUZk_h4abZKZaoIzMT4ky51PPzr1ZZKpX29UaKJ3ibd9cj_GdY13qk2Uqw-VLqjaJIeJeE0urGqjuTndMfmcPS-nr-ni7WU-fVqkmpW8S9GIyhY8ry0AUxVVLDcgBNNVZalGDVXBJiXkGvPScIEFVyXXhgouuOWo2ZjcHXc3wX9vTezkym9D_1WUlCIWuQDGe4ofKR18jMFYuQnNWoW9RJCDNflnTQ7W5Mla33s89hpnfVirnQ9tLTu1b32wQTndRMn-n_gFWjJybA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2211768035</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Price Fairness: Two-Stage Comparison of Conventional and Fairtrade Prices</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate</source><source>Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection</source><creator>Bissinger, Katharina</creator><creatorcontrib>Bissinger, Katharina</creatorcontrib><description>Besides theoretical considerations of price fairness, the article compares food prices-fairtrade and conventional. The first stage comparison of fairtrade and conventional producer prices reveals that fairtrade producer prices are twice as high as the conventionally traded equivalent. On the second stage, prices are compared on producer and consumer level for three products. The analysis predicts a massive price markup in retail. Sometimes fairtrade retail prices are higher than retail prices for their conventional counterparts, even though price differences have not been all that great for producers. This may be justified by a lower trading volume of the niche market, implicitly entailing higher costs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0896-1530</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1528-7068</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/08961530.2018.1482525</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Routledge</publisher><subject>consumer prices ; Conventional prices ; fair prices ; Finished goods ; Prices ; producer prices</subject><ispartof>Journal of international consumer marketing, 2019-03, Vol.31 (2), p.86-97</ispartof><rights>2018 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 2018</rights><rights>2018 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-1e8bf756df003ab2a36e0883cbbf2c1c0b734906c169e58175a95ce28585f51c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-1e8bf756df003ab2a36e0883cbbf2c1c0b734906c169e58175a95ce28585f51c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7317-4349</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bissinger, Katharina</creatorcontrib><title>Price Fairness: Two-Stage Comparison of Conventional and Fairtrade Prices</title><title>Journal of international consumer marketing</title><description>Besides theoretical considerations of price fairness, the article compares food prices-fairtrade and conventional. The first stage comparison of fairtrade and conventional producer prices reveals that fairtrade producer prices are twice as high as the conventionally traded equivalent. On the second stage, prices are compared on producer and consumer level for three products. The analysis predicts a massive price markup in retail. Sometimes fairtrade retail prices are higher than retail prices for their conventional counterparts, even though price differences have not been all that great for producers. This may be justified by a lower trading volume of the niche market, implicitly entailing higher costs.</description><subject>consumer prices</subject><subject>Conventional prices</subject><subject>fair prices</subject><subject>Finished goods</subject><subject>Prices</subject><subject>producer prices</subject><issn>0896-1530</issn><issn>1528-7068</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kFFLwzAUhYMoOKc_QSj43HpvsrSpT8pwOhgoOJ9DmibS0SUz6Rz797bbfPXpcuA7h8tHyC1ChiDgHkSZI2eQUUCR4URQTvkZGSGnIi0gF-dkNDDpAF2SqxhXAEhZKUZk_h4abZKZaoIzMT4ky51PPzr1ZZKpX29UaKJ3ibd9cj_GdY13qk2Uqw-VLqjaJIeJeE0urGqjuTndMfmcPS-nr-ni7WU-fVqkmpW8S9GIyhY8ry0AUxVVLDcgBNNVZalGDVXBJiXkGvPScIEFVyXXhgouuOWo2ZjcHXc3wX9vTezkym9D_1WUlCIWuQDGe4ofKR18jMFYuQnNWoW9RJCDNflnTQ7W5Mla33s89hpnfVirnQ9tLTu1b32wQTndRMn-n_gFWjJybA</recordid><startdate>20190315</startdate><enddate>20190315</enddate><creator>Bissinger, Katharina</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7317-4349</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190315</creationdate><title>Price Fairness: Two-Stage Comparison of Conventional and Fairtrade Prices</title><author>Bissinger, Katharina</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-1e8bf756df003ab2a36e0883cbbf2c1c0b734906c169e58175a95ce28585f51c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>consumer prices</topic><topic>Conventional prices</topic><topic>fair prices</topic><topic>Finished goods</topic><topic>Prices</topic><topic>producer prices</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bissinger, Katharina</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of international consumer marketing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bissinger, Katharina</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Price Fairness: Two-Stage Comparison of Conventional and Fairtrade Prices</atitle><jtitle>Journal of international consumer marketing</jtitle><date>2019-03-15</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>86</spage><epage>97</epage><pages>86-97</pages><issn>0896-1530</issn><eissn>1528-7068</eissn><abstract>Besides theoretical considerations of price fairness, the article compares food prices-fairtrade and conventional. The first stage comparison of fairtrade and conventional producer prices reveals that fairtrade producer prices are twice as high as the conventionally traded equivalent. On the second stage, prices are compared on producer and consumer level for three products. The analysis predicts a massive price markup in retail. Sometimes fairtrade retail prices are higher than retail prices for their conventional counterparts, even though price differences have not been all that great for producers. This may be justified by a lower trading volume of the niche market, implicitly entailing higher costs.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/08961530.2018.1482525</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7317-4349</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0896-1530 |
ispartof | Journal of international consumer marketing, 2019-03, Vol.31 (2), p.86-97 |
issn | 0896-1530 1528-7068 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_08961530_2018_1482525 |
source | EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate; Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection |
subjects | consumer prices Conventional prices fair prices Finished goods Prices producer prices |
title | Price Fairness: Two-Stage Comparison of Conventional and Fairtrade Prices |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T18%3A45%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Price%20Fairness:%20Two-Stage%20Comparison%20of%20Conventional%20and%20Fairtrade%20Prices&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20international%20consumer%20marketing&rft.au=Bissinger,%20Katharina&rft.date=2019-03-15&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=86&rft.epage=97&rft.pages=86-97&rft.issn=0896-1530&rft.eissn=1528-7068&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/08961530.2018.1482525&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2211768035%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-1e8bf756df003ab2a36e0883cbbf2c1c0b734906c169e58175a95ce28585f51c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2211768035&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |