Statistical Thinking and Methods in Quality Improvement: A Look to the Future

Much has been written recently concerning the future of statistics in business and industry (e.g., Technometrics 2008). In this expository article, the authors extend this discussion to focus specifically on the future of statistics and statisticians within the context of quality improvement. We arg...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Quality engineering 2010-07, Vol.22 (3), p.119-129
Main Authors: Hoerl, Roger W., Snee, Ron
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Arenas
Business
Communities
embedding
Future
lean six sigma
Profession
Quality improvement
Radicals
Roots
statistical engineering
Statistical methods
statistical science
Statistics
Studies
Total quality
Transitions
Voids
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Much has been written recently concerning the future of statistics in business and industry (e.g., Technometrics 2008). In this expository article, the authors extend this discussion to focus specifically on the future of statistics and statisticians within the context of quality improvement. We argue that though the problems our profession faces are well known and have been repeatedly identified in the literature, the underlying root causes of these problems have remained lurking under the surface of the discussion. In particular, though positive change is certainly taking place, we do not believe that the statistics community has fully accepted and come to grips with the radical changes in our environment over the past 20-40 years. In short, we believe that our environment has changed radically, whereas our own changes have been incremental in nature. One such change that seems particularly difficult for us to swallow is that our society needs us to function, especially in the quality arena, more as an engineering discipline, rather than primarily as a pure science. To the extent that we can make this transition, we believe that we will maintain and grow our vitality as a discipline. To the extent that we refuse to, or are unable to, make this transition, our vitality, influence, and impact may erode, as other disciplines fill the void we leave. We choose to view this situation as half full and therefore offer specific suggestions as to how we feel the profession can make the needed changes in order to secure a brighter future in quality improvement.
ISSN:0898-2112
1532-4222
DOI:10.1080/08982112.2010.481485