Loading…

Collective learning in clusters: Mechanisms and biases

Although collective learning has long been considered a core feature of successful clusters, many researchers have treated the concept of learning more as a metaphor than a construct that requires an understanding of the various processes and mechanisms involved. I draw on the cultural-evolutionary...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Entrepreneurship and regional development 2009-09, Vol.21 (5-6), p.553-573
Main Author: Staber, Udo
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c495t-c02763dc23d0d57cad14929d68d1af40e066ec779ef1312e0295ffbb5a9b06373
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c495t-c02763dc23d0d57cad14929d68d1af40e066ec779ef1312e0295ffbb5a9b06373
container_end_page 573
container_issue 5-6
container_start_page 553
container_title Entrepreneurship and regional development
container_volume 21
creator Staber, Udo
description Although collective learning has long been considered a core feature of successful clusters, many researchers have treated the concept of learning more as a metaphor than a construct that requires an understanding of the various processes and mechanisms involved. I draw on the cultural-evolutionary perspective to argue that learning in clusters is an inherently biased process, with outcomes that can be both functional and dysfunctional. The cultural-evolutionary approach views learning as a process of imitation, treats beliefs as the unit of selection, and considers individuals as agents who are limited in their cognitive capabilities and social autonomy. Using interview data on 62 small business owners and 34 institutional actors in a textile and a surgical instruments cluster in South-west Germany, I show that the learning process can involve social biases which, in these cases, have the effect of reproducing a collective mindset built on distrust and rivalry. The findings provide an explanation for the fact that many studies of clusters have not been able to document the high levels of interfirm collaboration that cluster theory predicts.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/08985620802529526
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_08985620802529526</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1866225361</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c495t-c02763dc23d0d57cad14929d68d1af40e066ec779ef1312e0295ffbb5a9b06373</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1LxDAQhoMouK7-AG9FD56qmaRJG_Eii1-geNFzSNNUs6TpmrTq_nuzrCcX9TQD8zzDy4vQIeBTwBU-w5WoGCdpJYwIRvgWmkDBi5wBFNtosrrnCeC7aC_GOcZAKecTxGe9c0YP9t1kzqjgrX_JrM-0G-NgQjzPHox-Vd7GLmbKN1ltVTRxH-20ykVz8D2n6Pn66ml2m98_3tzNLu9zXQg25BqTktNGE9rghpVaNVAIIhpeNaDaAhvMudFlKUwLFIjBKXrb1jVTosaclnSKTtZ_F6F_G00cZGejNs4pb_oxyooKIFVJIJFHP8h5PwafwkkCDJigjCTo-DcIBGe4KisoEgVrSoc-xmBauQi2U2EpActV23Kj7eRcrB3r2z506qMPrpGDWro-tEF5baOkf-nlv_qGJYfPgX4BsqKUwQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1965087814</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Collective learning in clusters: Mechanisms and biases</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Business Source Ultimate</source><source>Taylor &amp; Francis</source><source>EBSCOhost Econlit with Full Text</source><creator>Staber, Udo</creator><creatorcontrib>Staber, Udo</creatorcontrib><description>Although collective learning has long been considered a core feature of successful clusters, many researchers have treated the concept of learning more as a metaphor than a construct that requires an understanding of the various processes and mechanisms involved. I draw on the cultural-evolutionary perspective to argue that learning in clusters is an inherently biased process, with outcomes that can be both functional and dysfunctional. The cultural-evolutionary approach views learning as a process of imitation, treats beliefs as the unit of selection, and considers individuals as agents who are limited in their cognitive capabilities and social autonomy. Using interview data on 62 small business owners and 34 institutional actors in a textile and a surgical instruments cluster in South-west Germany, I show that the learning process can involve social biases which, in these cases, have the effect of reproducing a collective mindset built on distrust and rivalry. The findings provide an explanation for the fact that many studies of clusters have not been able to document the high levels of interfirm collaboration that cluster theory predicts.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0898-5626</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1464-5114</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/08985620802529526</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Abingdon: Routledge</publisher><subject>Autonomy ; Beliefs ; Bias ; Business management ; cluster ; Cluster analysis ; Clustering ; Cognitive style ; Collaboration ; Collective behaviour ; collective learning ; Cultural evolutionism ; Data analysis ; Enterprises ; evolutionary theory ; Germany ; Imitation ; Learning ; Organizational behaviour ; Organizational learning ; Owners ; Small and medium sized enterprises ; Small business ; Studies ; Western Europe</subject><ispartof>Entrepreneurship and regional development, 2009-09, Vol.21 (5-6), p.553-573</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor &amp; Francis Group, LLC 2009</rights><rights>Copyright Taylor &amp; Francis Group, LLC</rights><rights>Copyright Taylor &amp; Francis Group Sep 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c495t-c02763dc23d0d57cad14929d68d1af40e066ec779ef1312e0295ffbb5a9b06373</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c495t-c02763dc23d0d57cad14929d68d1af40e066ec779ef1312e0295ffbb5a9b06373</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,33223,33224</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Staber, Udo</creatorcontrib><title>Collective learning in clusters: Mechanisms and biases</title><title>Entrepreneurship and regional development</title><description>Although collective learning has long been considered a core feature of successful clusters, many researchers have treated the concept of learning more as a metaphor than a construct that requires an understanding of the various processes and mechanisms involved. I draw on the cultural-evolutionary perspective to argue that learning in clusters is an inherently biased process, with outcomes that can be both functional and dysfunctional. The cultural-evolutionary approach views learning as a process of imitation, treats beliefs as the unit of selection, and considers individuals as agents who are limited in their cognitive capabilities and social autonomy. Using interview data on 62 small business owners and 34 institutional actors in a textile and a surgical instruments cluster in South-west Germany, I show that the learning process can involve social biases which, in these cases, have the effect of reproducing a collective mindset built on distrust and rivalry. The findings provide an explanation for the fact that many studies of clusters have not been able to document the high levels of interfirm collaboration that cluster theory predicts.</description><subject>Autonomy</subject><subject>Beliefs</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Business management</subject><subject>cluster</subject><subject>Cluster analysis</subject><subject>Clustering</subject><subject>Cognitive style</subject><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Collective behaviour</subject><subject>collective learning</subject><subject>Cultural evolutionism</subject><subject>Data analysis</subject><subject>Enterprises</subject><subject>evolutionary theory</subject><subject>Germany</subject><subject>Imitation</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Organizational behaviour</subject><subject>Organizational learning</subject><subject>Owners</subject><subject>Small and medium sized enterprises</subject><subject>Small business</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Western Europe</subject><issn>0898-5626</issn><issn>1464-5114</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1LxDAQhoMouK7-AG9FD56qmaRJG_Eii1-geNFzSNNUs6TpmrTq_nuzrCcX9TQD8zzDy4vQIeBTwBU-w5WoGCdpJYwIRvgWmkDBi5wBFNtosrrnCeC7aC_GOcZAKecTxGe9c0YP9t1kzqjgrX_JrM-0G-NgQjzPHox-Vd7GLmbKN1ltVTRxH-20ykVz8D2n6Pn66ml2m98_3tzNLu9zXQg25BqTktNGE9rghpVaNVAIIhpeNaDaAhvMudFlKUwLFIjBKXrb1jVTosaclnSKTtZ_F6F_G00cZGejNs4pb_oxyooKIFVJIJFHP8h5PwafwkkCDJigjCTo-DcIBGe4KisoEgVrSoc-xmBauQi2U2EpActV23Kj7eRcrB3r2z506qMPrpGDWro-tEF5baOkf-nlv_qGJYfPgX4BsqKUwQ</recordid><startdate>20090901</startdate><enddate>20090901</enddate><creator>Staber, Udo</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090901</creationdate><title>Collective learning in clusters: Mechanisms and biases</title><author>Staber, Udo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c495t-c02763dc23d0d57cad14929d68d1af40e066ec779ef1312e0295ffbb5a9b06373</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Autonomy</topic><topic>Beliefs</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Business management</topic><topic>cluster</topic><topic>Cluster analysis</topic><topic>Clustering</topic><topic>Cognitive style</topic><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Collective behaviour</topic><topic>collective learning</topic><topic>Cultural evolutionism</topic><topic>Data analysis</topic><topic>Enterprises</topic><topic>evolutionary theory</topic><topic>Germany</topic><topic>Imitation</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Organizational behaviour</topic><topic>Organizational learning</topic><topic>Owners</topic><topic>Small and medium sized enterprises</topic><topic>Small business</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Western Europe</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Staber, Udo</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Entrepreneurship and regional development</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Staber, Udo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Collective learning in clusters: Mechanisms and biases</atitle><jtitle>Entrepreneurship and regional development</jtitle><date>2009-09-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>5-6</issue><spage>553</spage><epage>573</epage><pages>553-573</pages><issn>0898-5626</issn><eissn>1464-5114</eissn><abstract>Although collective learning has long been considered a core feature of successful clusters, many researchers have treated the concept of learning more as a metaphor than a construct that requires an understanding of the various processes and mechanisms involved. I draw on the cultural-evolutionary perspective to argue that learning in clusters is an inherently biased process, with outcomes that can be both functional and dysfunctional. The cultural-evolutionary approach views learning as a process of imitation, treats beliefs as the unit of selection, and considers individuals as agents who are limited in their cognitive capabilities and social autonomy. Using interview data on 62 small business owners and 34 institutional actors in a textile and a surgical instruments cluster in South-west Germany, I show that the learning process can involve social biases which, in these cases, have the effect of reproducing a collective mindset built on distrust and rivalry. The findings provide an explanation for the fact that many studies of clusters have not been able to document the high levels of interfirm collaboration that cluster theory predicts.</abstract><cop>Abingdon</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/08985620802529526</doi><tpages>21</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0898-5626
ispartof Entrepreneurship and regional development, 2009-09, Vol.21 (5-6), p.553-573
issn 0898-5626
1464-5114
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_08985620802529526
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Business Source Ultimate; Taylor & Francis; EBSCOhost Econlit with Full Text
subjects Autonomy
Beliefs
Bias
Business management
cluster
Cluster analysis
Clustering
Cognitive style
Collaboration
Collective behaviour
collective learning
Cultural evolutionism
Data analysis
Enterprises
evolutionary theory
Germany
Imitation
Learning
Organizational behaviour
Organizational learning
Owners
Small and medium sized enterprises
Small business
Studies
Western Europe
title Collective learning in clusters: Mechanisms and biases
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T17%3A12%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Collective%20learning%20in%20clusters:%20Mechanisms%20and%20biases&rft.jtitle=Entrepreneurship%20and%20regional%20development&rft.au=Staber,%20Udo&rft.date=2009-09-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=5-6&rft.spage=553&rft.epage=573&rft.pages=553-573&rft.issn=0898-5626&rft.eissn=1464-5114&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/08985620802529526&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1866225361%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c495t-c02763dc23d0d57cad14929d68d1af40e066ec779ef1312e0295ffbb5a9b06373%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1965087814&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true