Loading…
Collective learning in clusters: Mechanisms and biases
Although collective learning has long been considered a core feature of successful clusters, many researchers have treated the concept of learning more as a metaphor than a construct that requires an understanding of the various processes and mechanisms involved. I draw on the cultural-evolutionary...
Saved in:
Published in: | Entrepreneurship and regional development 2009-09, Vol.21 (5-6), p.553-573 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c495t-c02763dc23d0d57cad14929d68d1af40e066ec779ef1312e0295ffbb5a9b06373 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c495t-c02763dc23d0d57cad14929d68d1af40e066ec779ef1312e0295ffbb5a9b06373 |
container_end_page | 573 |
container_issue | 5-6 |
container_start_page | 553 |
container_title | Entrepreneurship and regional development |
container_volume | 21 |
creator | Staber, Udo |
description | Although collective learning has long been considered a core feature of successful clusters, many researchers have treated the concept of learning more as a metaphor than a construct that requires an understanding of the various processes and mechanisms involved. I draw on the cultural-evolutionary perspective to argue that learning in clusters is an inherently biased process, with outcomes that can be both functional and dysfunctional. The cultural-evolutionary approach views learning as a process of imitation, treats beliefs as the unit of selection, and considers individuals as agents who are limited in their cognitive capabilities and social autonomy. Using interview data on 62 small business owners and 34 institutional actors in a textile and a surgical instruments cluster in South-west Germany, I show that the learning process can involve social biases which, in these cases, have the effect of reproducing a collective mindset built on distrust and rivalry. The findings provide an explanation for the fact that many studies of clusters have not been able to document the high levels of interfirm collaboration that cluster theory predicts. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/08985620802529526 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_08985620802529526</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1866225361</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c495t-c02763dc23d0d57cad14929d68d1af40e066ec779ef1312e0295ffbb5a9b06373</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1LxDAQhoMouK7-AG9FD56qmaRJG_Eii1-geNFzSNNUs6TpmrTq_nuzrCcX9TQD8zzDy4vQIeBTwBU-w5WoGCdpJYwIRvgWmkDBi5wBFNtosrrnCeC7aC_GOcZAKecTxGe9c0YP9t1kzqjgrX_JrM-0G-NgQjzPHox-Vd7GLmbKN1ltVTRxH-20ykVz8D2n6Pn66ml2m98_3tzNLu9zXQg25BqTktNGE9rghpVaNVAIIhpeNaDaAhvMudFlKUwLFIjBKXrb1jVTosaclnSKTtZ_F6F_G00cZGejNs4pb_oxyooKIFVJIJFHP8h5PwafwkkCDJigjCTo-DcIBGe4KisoEgVrSoc-xmBauQi2U2EpActV23Kj7eRcrB3r2z506qMPrpGDWro-tEF5baOkf-nlv_qGJYfPgX4BsqKUwQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1965087814</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Collective learning in clusters: Mechanisms and biases</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Business Source Ultimate</source><source>Taylor & Francis</source><source>EBSCOhost Econlit with Full Text</source><creator>Staber, Udo</creator><creatorcontrib>Staber, Udo</creatorcontrib><description>Although collective learning has long been considered a core feature of successful clusters, many researchers have treated the concept of learning more as a metaphor than a construct that requires an understanding of the various processes and mechanisms involved. I draw on the cultural-evolutionary perspective to argue that learning in clusters is an inherently biased process, with outcomes that can be both functional and dysfunctional. The cultural-evolutionary approach views learning as a process of imitation, treats beliefs as the unit of selection, and considers individuals as agents who are limited in their cognitive capabilities and social autonomy. Using interview data on 62 small business owners and 34 institutional actors in a textile and a surgical instruments cluster in South-west Germany, I show that the learning process can involve social biases which, in these cases, have the effect of reproducing a collective mindset built on distrust and rivalry. The findings provide an explanation for the fact that many studies of clusters have not been able to document the high levels of interfirm collaboration that cluster theory predicts.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0898-5626</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1464-5114</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/08985620802529526</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Abingdon: Routledge</publisher><subject>Autonomy ; Beliefs ; Bias ; Business management ; cluster ; Cluster analysis ; Clustering ; Cognitive style ; Collaboration ; Collective behaviour ; collective learning ; Cultural evolutionism ; Data analysis ; Enterprises ; evolutionary theory ; Germany ; Imitation ; Learning ; Organizational behaviour ; Organizational learning ; Owners ; Small and medium sized enterprises ; Small business ; Studies ; Western Europe</subject><ispartof>Entrepreneurship and regional development, 2009-09, Vol.21 (5-6), p.553-573</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 2009</rights><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC</rights><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Group Sep 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c495t-c02763dc23d0d57cad14929d68d1af40e066ec779ef1312e0295ffbb5a9b06373</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c495t-c02763dc23d0d57cad14929d68d1af40e066ec779ef1312e0295ffbb5a9b06373</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,33223,33224</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Staber, Udo</creatorcontrib><title>Collective learning in clusters: Mechanisms and biases</title><title>Entrepreneurship and regional development</title><description>Although collective learning has long been considered a core feature of successful clusters, many researchers have treated the concept of learning more as a metaphor than a construct that requires an understanding of the various processes and mechanisms involved. I draw on the cultural-evolutionary perspective to argue that learning in clusters is an inherently biased process, with outcomes that can be both functional and dysfunctional. The cultural-evolutionary approach views learning as a process of imitation, treats beliefs as the unit of selection, and considers individuals as agents who are limited in their cognitive capabilities and social autonomy. Using interview data on 62 small business owners and 34 institutional actors in a textile and a surgical instruments cluster in South-west Germany, I show that the learning process can involve social biases which, in these cases, have the effect of reproducing a collective mindset built on distrust and rivalry. The findings provide an explanation for the fact that many studies of clusters have not been able to document the high levels of interfirm collaboration that cluster theory predicts.</description><subject>Autonomy</subject><subject>Beliefs</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Business management</subject><subject>cluster</subject><subject>Cluster analysis</subject><subject>Clustering</subject><subject>Cognitive style</subject><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Collective behaviour</subject><subject>collective learning</subject><subject>Cultural evolutionism</subject><subject>Data analysis</subject><subject>Enterprises</subject><subject>evolutionary theory</subject><subject>Germany</subject><subject>Imitation</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Organizational behaviour</subject><subject>Organizational learning</subject><subject>Owners</subject><subject>Small and medium sized enterprises</subject><subject>Small business</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Western Europe</subject><issn>0898-5626</issn><issn>1464-5114</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1LxDAQhoMouK7-AG9FD56qmaRJG_Eii1-geNFzSNNUs6TpmrTq_nuzrCcX9TQD8zzDy4vQIeBTwBU-w5WoGCdpJYwIRvgWmkDBi5wBFNtosrrnCeC7aC_GOcZAKecTxGe9c0YP9t1kzqjgrX_JrM-0G-NgQjzPHox-Vd7GLmbKN1ltVTRxH-20ykVz8D2n6Pn66ml2m98_3tzNLu9zXQg25BqTktNGE9rghpVaNVAIIhpeNaDaAhvMudFlKUwLFIjBKXrb1jVTosaclnSKTtZ_F6F_G00cZGejNs4pb_oxyooKIFVJIJFHP8h5PwafwkkCDJigjCTo-DcIBGe4KisoEgVrSoc-xmBauQi2U2EpActV23Kj7eRcrB3r2z506qMPrpGDWro-tEF5baOkf-nlv_qGJYfPgX4BsqKUwQ</recordid><startdate>20090901</startdate><enddate>20090901</enddate><creator>Staber, Udo</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090901</creationdate><title>Collective learning in clusters: Mechanisms and biases</title><author>Staber, Udo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c495t-c02763dc23d0d57cad14929d68d1af40e066ec779ef1312e0295ffbb5a9b06373</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Autonomy</topic><topic>Beliefs</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Business management</topic><topic>cluster</topic><topic>Cluster analysis</topic><topic>Clustering</topic><topic>Cognitive style</topic><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Collective behaviour</topic><topic>collective learning</topic><topic>Cultural evolutionism</topic><topic>Data analysis</topic><topic>Enterprises</topic><topic>evolutionary theory</topic><topic>Germany</topic><topic>Imitation</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Organizational behaviour</topic><topic>Organizational learning</topic><topic>Owners</topic><topic>Small and medium sized enterprises</topic><topic>Small business</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Western Europe</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Staber, Udo</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Entrepreneurship and regional development</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Staber, Udo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Collective learning in clusters: Mechanisms and biases</atitle><jtitle>Entrepreneurship and regional development</jtitle><date>2009-09-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>5-6</issue><spage>553</spage><epage>573</epage><pages>553-573</pages><issn>0898-5626</issn><eissn>1464-5114</eissn><abstract>Although collective learning has long been considered a core feature of successful clusters, many researchers have treated the concept of learning more as a metaphor than a construct that requires an understanding of the various processes and mechanisms involved. I draw on the cultural-evolutionary perspective to argue that learning in clusters is an inherently biased process, with outcomes that can be both functional and dysfunctional. The cultural-evolutionary approach views learning as a process of imitation, treats beliefs as the unit of selection, and considers individuals as agents who are limited in their cognitive capabilities and social autonomy. Using interview data on 62 small business owners and 34 institutional actors in a textile and a surgical instruments cluster in South-west Germany, I show that the learning process can involve social biases which, in these cases, have the effect of reproducing a collective mindset built on distrust and rivalry. The findings provide an explanation for the fact that many studies of clusters have not been able to document the high levels of interfirm collaboration that cluster theory predicts.</abstract><cop>Abingdon</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/08985620802529526</doi><tpages>21</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0898-5626 |
ispartof | Entrepreneurship and regional development, 2009-09, Vol.21 (5-6), p.553-573 |
issn | 0898-5626 1464-5114 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_08985620802529526 |
source | International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Business Source Ultimate; Taylor & Francis; EBSCOhost Econlit with Full Text |
subjects | Autonomy Beliefs Bias Business management cluster Cluster analysis Clustering Cognitive style Collaboration Collective behaviour collective learning Cultural evolutionism Data analysis Enterprises evolutionary theory Germany Imitation Learning Organizational behaviour Organizational learning Owners Small and medium sized enterprises Small business Studies Western Europe |
title | Collective learning in clusters: Mechanisms and biases |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T17%3A12%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Collective%20learning%20in%20clusters:%20Mechanisms%20and%20biases&rft.jtitle=Entrepreneurship%20and%20regional%20development&rft.au=Staber,%20Udo&rft.date=2009-09-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=5-6&rft.spage=553&rft.epage=573&rft.pages=553-573&rft.issn=0898-5626&rft.eissn=1464-5114&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/08985620802529526&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1866225361%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c495t-c02763dc23d0d57cad14929d68d1af40e066ec779ef1312e0295ffbb5a9b06373%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1965087814&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |