On the Economic Constitution of Old Testament Religion: A Critique of Buchanan's Understanding of Religious Moral Precepts

When discussing social contract, James Buchanan distinguished two approaches for generating order and cooperation in society: A religiously inspired moral precepts approach, which he dismissed; and constitutional economics, which he favored. He associated the former with the irrational: spiritual, n...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Scandinavian journal of the Old Testament : SJOT 2022-01, Vol.36 (1), p.66-92
Main Author: Wagner-Tsukamoto, S.A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Bible
boundaries between religion and economics
Constitutions
Cooperation
Economics
economics of religion
Enlightenment
Ethics
Institutional economic foundations of Old Testament religion
Morality
Old Testament
Old Testament religion
rational religion
Religion
Social contract
Spirituality
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:When discussing social contract, James Buchanan distinguished two approaches for generating order and cooperation in society: A religiously inspired moral precepts approach, which he dismissed; and constitutional economics, which he favored. He associated the former with the irrational: spiritual, non-secular, pre-modern-theological-concept; whereas the latter set out in his understanding enlightened, modern and rational social contract, which he followed up in institutional economic terms. The paper casts doubt on this strict separation of religion from economics. It argues the thesis that Old Testament religion portrays, in addition to a spiritual dimension, a rational economic one also. The paper proposes a concept of "rational religion" that traces, in substance and nature, institutional economics into Old Testament-based religion. This contests the boundaries between economics and religion. Further implications result regarding the philosophical foundations of Buchanan: i.e. the Enlightenment's agenda of separating the ancient/ pre-modern from the modern; or indeed, traditional religion from rational ethics and science. The paper challenges such dualistic opposites that have separated religion from economics for so long.
ISSN:0901-8328
1502-7244
DOI:10.1080/09018328.2022.2085902