Loading…

Conceptualizing translation revision competence: a pilot study on the 'fairness and tolerance' attitudinal component

Although translation revision plays a crucial role in the production of high-quality translations, research into translation revision competence (TRC) is relatively new and underdeveloped compared with research into translation competence. This article addresses that gap by focusing on the validatio...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Perspectives, studies in translatology studies in translatology, 2018-01, Vol.26 (1), p.2-23
Main Authors: Robert, Isabelle S., Ureel, Jim J. J., Remael, Aline, Rigouts Terryn, Ayla
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-114b6cb80b0b04a9d9d8ab91bcc5faef46a4885a3ed4f338cc3084aae501be673
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-114b6cb80b0b04a9d9d8ab91bcc5faef46a4885a3ed4f338cc3084aae501be673
container_end_page 23
container_issue 1
container_start_page 2
container_title Perspectives, studies in translatology
container_volume 26
creator Robert, Isabelle S.
Ureel, Jim J. J.
Remael, Aline
Rigouts Terryn, Ayla
description Although translation revision plays a crucial role in the production of high-quality translations, research into translation revision competence (TRC) is relatively new and underdeveloped compared with research into translation competence. This article addresses that gap by focusing on the validation of the TRC model developed by Robert, Remael, and Ureel. Using questionnaires and revision tasks in a pretest-posttest experimental design, we investigated whether a course on revision and editing affected the degree of fairness and tolerance that participants showed when revising others' translations. Analyses of the results showed that the participants in the experimental group did not make fewer unnecessary changes after taking a course on revision and editing. In addition, the types and sizes of the unnecessary changes that they made were not influenced by taking the revision and editing course. However, when exposed to a revision task without clear instructions and context, participants who had taken the course on revision and editing were significantly less categorical when providing post-treatment answers, even though this behavior was not reflected in their attitudes in the revision tasks. These findings invite further research into the attitudinal component of TRC.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/0907676X.2017.1330894
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_0907676X_2017_1330894</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1993054817</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-114b6cb80b0b04a9d9d8ab91bcc5faef46a4885a3ed4f338cc3084aae501be673</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9LxDAQxYMouK5-BCHgYU9dk03app6UxX-w4EXBW5imqWbpJjVJlfXTm7rrVeYwA_Obx7yH0Dklc0oEuSQVKYuyeJ0vCC3nlDEiKn6AJrTkZVYUC3aIJiOTjdAxOglhTQgrF0U1QXHprNJ9HKAz38a-4ejBhg6icRZ7_WnCOCi36XXUibzCgHvTuYhDHJotTsv4rvGsBeOtDgGDbXB0nU4ySs8wxGgSaCx0vyrOahtP0VELXdBn-z5FL3e3z8uHbPV0_7i8WWWKiTxmlPK6ULUgdSoOVVM1AuqK1krlLeiWF8CFyIHphreMCaWScw6gc0JrXZRsii52ur13H4MOUa7d4NMrQdKqYiTngo5UvqOUdyF43cremw34raREjgHLv4DlGLDcB5zurnd3xrbOb-DL-a6REbad8-1o3wTJ_pf4AYK6hcg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1993054817</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Conceptualizing translation revision competence: a pilot study on the 'fairness and tolerance' attitudinal component</title><source>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</source><source>Taylor and Francis:Jisc Collections:Taylor and Francis Read and Publish Agreement 2024-2025:Social Sciences and Humanities Collection (Reading list)</source><creator>Robert, Isabelle S. ; Ureel, Jim J. J. ; Remael, Aline ; Rigouts Terryn, Ayla</creator><creatorcontrib>Robert, Isabelle S. ; Ureel, Jim J. J. ; Remael, Aline ; Rigouts Terryn, Ayla</creatorcontrib><description>Although translation revision plays a crucial role in the production of high-quality translations, research into translation revision competence (TRC) is relatively new and underdeveloped compared with research into translation competence. This article addresses that gap by focusing on the validation of the TRC model developed by Robert, Remael, and Ureel. Using questionnaires and revision tasks in a pretest-posttest experimental design, we investigated whether a course on revision and editing affected the degree of fairness and tolerance that participants showed when revising others' translations. Analyses of the results showed that the participants in the experimental group did not make fewer unnecessary changes after taking a course on revision and editing. In addition, the types and sizes of the unnecessary changes that they made were not influenced by taking the revision and editing course. However, when exposed to a revision task without clear instructions and context, participants who had taken the course on revision and editing were significantly less categorical when providing post-treatment answers, even though this behavior was not reflected in their attitudes in the revision tasks. These findings invite further research into the attitudinal component of TRC.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0907-676X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1747-6623</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/0907676X.2017.1330894</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Abingdon: Routledge</publisher><subject>'fairness and tolerance' attitudinal component ; Attitudes ; Editing ; psycho-physiological components ; revision interventions typology ; Translation ; Translation revision competence</subject><ispartof>Perspectives, studies in translatology, 2018-01, Vol.26 (1), p.2-23</ispartof><rights>2017 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor &amp; Francis Group 2017</rights><rights>2017 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor &amp; Francis Group</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-114b6cb80b0b04a9d9d8ab91bcc5faef46a4885a3ed4f338cc3084aae501be673</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-114b6cb80b0b04a9d9d8ab91bcc5faef46a4885a3ed4f338cc3084aae501be673</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,31246</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Robert, Isabelle S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ureel, Jim J. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Remael, Aline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rigouts Terryn, Ayla</creatorcontrib><title>Conceptualizing translation revision competence: a pilot study on the 'fairness and tolerance' attitudinal component</title><title>Perspectives, studies in translatology</title><description>Although translation revision plays a crucial role in the production of high-quality translations, research into translation revision competence (TRC) is relatively new and underdeveloped compared with research into translation competence. This article addresses that gap by focusing on the validation of the TRC model developed by Robert, Remael, and Ureel. Using questionnaires and revision tasks in a pretest-posttest experimental design, we investigated whether a course on revision and editing affected the degree of fairness and tolerance that participants showed when revising others' translations. Analyses of the results showed that the participants in the experimental group did not make fewer unnecessary changes after taking a course on revision and editing. In addition, the types and sizes of the unnecessary changes that they made were not influenced by taking the revision and editing course. However, when exposed to a revision task without clear instructions and context, participants who had taken the course on revision and editing were significantly less categorical when providing post-treatment answers, even though this behavior was not reflected in their attitudes in the revision tasks. These findings invite further research into the attitudinal component of TRC.</description><subject>'fairness and tolerance' attitudinal component</subject><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Editing</subject><subject>psycho-physiological components</subject><subject>revision interventions typology</subject><subject>Translation</subject><subject>Translation revision competence</subject><issn>0907-676X</issn><issn>1747-6623</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7T9</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE9LxDAQxYMouK5-BCHgYU9dk03app6UxX-w4EXBW5imqWbpJjVJlfXTm7rrVeYwA_Obx7yH0Dklc0oEuSQVKYuyeJ0vCC3nlDEiKn6AJrTkZVYUC3aIJiOTjdAxOglhTQgrF0U1QXHprNJ9HKAz38a-4ejBhg6icRZ7_WnCOCi36XXUibzCgHvTuYhDHJotTsv4rvGsBeOtDgGDbXB0nU4ySs8wxGgSaCx0vyrOahtP0VELXdBn-z5FL3e3z8uHbPV0_7i8WWWKiTxmlPK6ULUgdSoOVVM1AuqK1krlLeiWF8CFyIHphreMCaWScw6gc0JrXZRsii52ur13H4MOUa7d4NMrQdKqYiTngo5UvqOUdyF43cremw34raREjgHLv4DlGLDcB5zurnd3xrbOb-DL-a6REbad8-1o3wTJ_pf4AYK6hcg</recordid><startdate>20180102</startdate><enddate>20180102</enddate><creator>Robert, Isabelle S.</creator><creator>Ureel, Jim J. J.</creator><creator>Remael, Aline</creator><creator>Rigouts Terryn, Ayla</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180102</creationdate><title>Conceptualizing translation revision competence: a pilot study on the 'fairness and tolerance' attitudinal component</title><author>Robert, Isabelle S. ; Ureel, Jim J. J. ; Remael, Aline ; Rigouts Terryn, Ayla</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-114b6cb80b0b04a9d9d8ab91bcc5faef46a4885a3ed4f338cc3084aae501be673</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>'fairness and tolerance' attitudinal component</topic><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Editing</topic><topic>psycho-physiological components</topic><topic>revision interventions typology</topic><topic>Translation</topic><topic>Translation revision competence</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Robert, Isabelle S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ureel, Jim J. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Remael, Aline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rigouts Terryn, Ayla</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>Perspectives, studies in translatology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Robert, Isabelle S.</au><au>Ureel, Jim J. J.</au><au>Remael, Aline</au><au>Rigouts Terryn, Ayla</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Conceptualizing translation revision competence: a pilot study on the 'fairness and tolerance' attitudinal component</atitle><jtitle>Perspectives, studies in translatology</jtitle><date>2018-01-02</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>2</spage><epage>23</epage><pages>2-23</pages><issn>0907-676X</issn><eissn>1747-6623</eissn><abstract>Although translation revision plays a crucial role in the production of high-quality translations, research into translation revision competence (TRC) is relatively new and underdeveloped compared with research into translation competence. This article addresses that gap by focusing on the validation of the TRC model developed by Robert, Remael, and Ureel. Using questionnaires and revision tasks in a pretest-posttest experimental design, we investigated whether a course on revision and editing affected the degree of fairness and tolerance that participants showed when revising others' translations. Analyses of the results showed that the participants in the experimental group did not make fewer unnecessary changes after taking a course on revision and editing. In addition, the types and sizes of the unnecessary changes that they made were not influenced by taking the revision and editing course. However, when exposed to a revision task without clear instructions and context, participants who had taken the course on revision and editing were significantly less categorical when providing post-treatment answers, even though this behavior was not reflected in their attitudes in the revision tasks. These findings invite further research into the attitudinal component of TRC.</abstract><cop>Abingdon</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/0907676X.2017.1330894</doi><tpages>22</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0907-676X
ispartof Perspectives, studies in translatology, 2018-01, Vol.26 (1), p.2-23
issn 0907-676X
1747-6623
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_0907676X_2017_1330894
source Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA); Taylor and Francis:Jisc Collections:Taylor and Francis Read and Publish Agreement 2024-2025:Social Sciences and Humanities Collection (Reading list)
subjects 'fairness and tolerance' attitudinal component
Attitudes
Editing
psycho-physiological components
revision interventions typology
Translation
Translation revision competence
title Conceptualizing translation revision competence: a pilot study on the 'fairness and tolerance' attitudinal component
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-22T23%3A24%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Conceptualizing%20translation%20revision%20competence:%20a%20pilot%20study%20on%20the%20'fairness%20and%20tolerance'%20attitudinal%20component&rft.jtitle=Perspectives,%20studies%20in%20translatology&rft.au=Robert,%20Isabelle%20S.&rft.date=2018-01-02&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=2&rft.epage=23&rft.pages=2-23&rft.issn=0907-676X&rft.eissn=1747-6623&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/0907676X.2017.1330894&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1993054817%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-114b6cb80b0b04a9d9d8ab91bcc5faef46a4885a3ed4f338cc3084aae501be673%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1993054817&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true