Loading…

Luteal estradiol pretreatment of poor and normal responders during GnRH antagonist protocol

Luteal estradiol pretreatment (LEP) to IVF protocols designed to improve follicle synchronization and retrieval of mature oocytes. We conducted a retrospective study including women undergoing IVF program who were given a course of 4 mg oral estradiol-17β daily from day 20 of the same cycle until da...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Gynecological endocrinology 2019-12, Vol.35 (12), p.1067-1071
Main Authors: Sefrioui, Omar, Madkour, Aicha, Kaarouch, Ismail, Louanjli, Noureddine
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Luteal estradiol pretreatment (LEP) to IVF protocols designed to improve follicle synchronization and retrieval of mature oocytes. We conducted a retrospective study including women undergoing IVF program who were given a course of 4 mg oral estradiol-17β daily from day 20 of the same cycle until day 1 of their next cycle before starting an antagonist protocol, forming LEP-group but control-group started on day 3 a stimulation without pretreatment. A total is divided into 2 groups (poor (group 1, n = 148) and normal responders (group 2, n = 244)). Our findings show for group 1 a significant decrease in cancelation rate (3% vs 14%) and a significant improvement in clinical outcomes (clinical pregnancy per transfer and live birth rate respectively: 47% and 44% vs 12% and 11%). For group 2, this pretreatment could increase significantly the maturation rate (77% vs 68%). The rate of frozen embryos was improved in both groups: (group 1: 11% vs 2% and group 2: 53% vs 41%). LEP increases the frozen embryos rate whatever the nature of the ovarian response, but especially for normal responders it coordinates follicular recruitment increasing the maturation rate. In the case of poor responders, it affects positively clinical outcomes decreasing the canceled cycles.
ISSN:0951-3590
1473-0766
DOI:10.1080/09513590.2019.1622086