Analysing design and technology as an educational construct: an investigation into its curriculum position and pedagogical identity

The hierarchal status of academic disciplines, what defines valuable or legitimate knowledge and what should we teach our children is a topic of much debate. Amidst concerns of an academic decline, tackling the culture of low expectation and anti-intellectualism, the need to address social justice,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Curriculum journal (London, England) England), 2017-12, Vol.28 (4), p.539-558
Main Authors: Bell, Dawne, Wooff, David, McLain, Matt, Morrison-Love, David
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Academic disciplines
Anti Intellectualism
Classification
Curricula
Curriculum Development
curriculum theory
Design
design and technology
Education policy
Educational Policy
Foreign Countries
Higher Education
Intellectual Disciplines
Literature Reviews
Mathematics
pedagogic identity
Pedagogical Content Knowledge
Science and technology
Social justice
Social reproduction
STEM
STEM Education
Subcultures
subject knowledge
Teaching
Technology
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The hierarchal status of academic disciplines, what defines valuable or legitimate knowledge and what should we teach our children is a topic of much debate. Amidst concerns of an academic decline, tackling the culture of low expectation and anti-intellectualism, the need to address social justice, and its by-product of cultural reproduction, is the focus of current education policy. Set within the UK, this paper presents a critical review of the literature relating to disciplinary knowledge and teaching and learning regimes, specifically seeking to explore the subcultures which exist between design and technology and its associated curricula counterparts that combine to produce science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM). The purpose being to proffer an explanation that is supportive in developing an understanding as to why design and technology is perceived by many to be of less value than its STEM counterparts. Situation within a functionalist approach to STEM education policy, findings are discussed in relation to design and technology, which as a subject is caught between the identities of academic and vocational exponents, and it is from this perspective that complex nature and perceived value of design and technology is explored.
ISSN:0958-5176
1469-3704
DOI:10.1080/09585176.2017.1286995