Loading…

Informal care management after traumatic brain injury: perspectives on informal carer workload and capacity

Purpose: Much of the support required to live in the community post-traumatic brain injury (TBI) is provided by informal carers. Understanding the nature of caregiving work is important to better support informal carers. This study explored the work being performed by informal carers, and factors im...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Disability and rehabilitation 2020-03, Vol.42 (6), p.754-762
Main Authors: McIntyre, Michelle, Ehrlich, Carolyn, Kendall, Elizabeth
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-ecd2c3e03b8e323bdaa5684a5fa78947bd9c36d98541be1c147febdb09e1b7603
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-ecd2c3e03b8e323bdaa5684a5fa78947bd9c36d98541be1c147febdb09e1b7603
container_end_page 762
container_issue 6
container_start_page 754
container_title Disability and rehabilitation
container_volume 42
creator McIntyre, Michelle
Ehrlich, Carolyn
Kendall, Elizabeth
description Purpose: Much of the support required to live in the community post-traumatic brain injury (TBI) is provided by informal carers. Understanding the nature of caregiving work is important to better support informal carers. This study explored the work being performed by informal carers, and factors impacting on their capacity to manage the workload. Method: Participants comprised 21 dyads each consisting of an adult with moderate to severe TBI and a nominated carer. Thematic analysis was done on semi-structured interviews with injured participants and carers during the 12-month period post-discharge from hospital. Results: Results revealed two main themes and eight subcategories: (1) The nature of informal care: describing informal care management work, (personal assistant work; care provider work; family support work; and emotional self-regulation work), and (2) Mediating factors that impacted people's capacity to manage workload (carer intrinsic factors; injured person characteristics; family circumstances; and changes over time.) Conclusion: Rehabilitation providers supporting people following TBI need to focus on broad family contexts; understand the nature of work being undertaken, and carer capacity to carry out that work; and be aware of the unique and changing circumstances of families to better support informal carers. Implications for rehabilitation Rehabilitation services need to focus on broad family contexts rather than focus on the injured individual in isolation. Understanding the nature of the work being undertaken by informal carers, and their capacity to carry out that work is important when considering supports. Rehabilitation professionals need to consider and respond to the impact that changing circumstances have on the capacity of informal care networks to manage care workload.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/09638288.2018.1508511
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_09638288_2018_1508511</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2121487003</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-ecd2c3e03b8e323bdaa5684a5fa78947bd9c36d98541be1c147febdb09e1b7603</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1P3DAQhi3UCpaPnwDysZdsPbGTOJyoEC1ISL20Z2tsT1AgX9hO0f57Eu1S9dTTSK-emVfzMHYJYgtCi6-iLqXOtd7mAvQWCqELgCO2AVWqrICy-MQ2K5Ot0Ak7jfFZCAGyUsfsRAqZl1UpNuzlYWjG0GPHHQbiPQ74RD0NiWOTKPAUcO4xtY7bgO3A2-F5DrtrPlGIE7nU_qHIxzX_50zgb2N46Ub0HAe_RBO6Nu3O2ecGu0gXh3nGfn-_-3V7nz3-_PFw--0xcwpkysj53EkS0mqSubQesSi1wqLBSteqsr52svS1LhRYAgeqash6K2oCuzwlz9iX_d0pjK8zxWT6NjrqOhxonKPJIQelKyHkghZ71IUxxkCNmULbY9gZEGb1bD48m9WzOXhe9q4OFbPtyf_d-hC7ADd74CBmEdJ5k3DXjaEJOLg2Gvn_jneSf47I</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2121487003</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Informal care management after traumatic brain injury: perspectives on informal carer workload and capacity</title><source>Taylor and Francis:Jisc Collections:Taylor and Francis Read and Publish Agreement 2024-2025:Medical Collection (Reading list)</source><creator>McIntyre, Michelle ; Ehrlich, Carolyn ; Kendall, Elizabeth</creator><creatorcontrib>McIntyre, Michelle ; Ehrlich, Carolyn ; Kendall, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose: Much of the support required to live in the community post-traumatic brain injury (TBI) is provided by informal carers. Understanding the nature of caregiving work is important to better support informal carers. This study explored the work being performed by informal carers, and factors impacting on their capacity to manage the workload. Method: Participants comprised 21 dyads each consisting of an adult with moderate to severe TBI and a nominated carer. Thematic analysis was done on semi-structured interviews with injured participants and carers during the 12-month period post-discharge from hospital. Results: Results revealed two main themes and eight subcategories: (1) The nature of informal care: describing informal care management work, (personal assistant work; care provider work; family support work; and emotional self-regulation work), and (2) Mediating factors that impacted people's capacity to manage workload (carer intrinsic factors; injured person characteristics; family circumstances; and changes over time.) Conclusion: Rehabilitation providers supporting people following TBI need to focus on broad family contexts; understand the nature of work being undertaken, and carer capacity to carry out that work; and be aware of the unique and changing circumstances of families to better support informal carers. Implications for rehabilitation Rehabilitation services need to focus on broad family contexts rather than focus on the injured individual in isolation. Understanding the nature of the work being undertaken by informal carers, and their capacity to carry out that work is important when considering supports. Rehabilitation professionals need to consider and respond to the impact that changing circumstances have on the capacity of informal care networks to manage care workload.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0963-8288</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1464-5165</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2018.1508511</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30326760</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Taylor &amp; Francis</publisher><subject>burden of treatment ; caregiving ; Informal care ; qualitative study ; traumatic brain injury</subject><ispartof>Disability and rehabilitation, 2020-03, Vol.42 (6), p.754-762</ispartof><rights>2018 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor &amp; Francis Group 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-ecd2c3e03b8e323bdaa5684a5fa78947bd9c36d98541be1c147febdb09e1b7603</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-ecd2c3e03b8e323bdaa5684a5fa78947bd9c36d98541be1c147febdb09e1b7603</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2399-1460</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30326760$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>McIntyre, Michelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ehrlich, Carolyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kendall, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><title>Informal care management after traumatic brain injury: perspectives on informal carer workload and capacity</title><title>Disability and rehabilitation</title><addtitle>Disabil Rehabil</addtitle><description>Purpose: Much of the support required to live in the community post-traumatic brain injury (TBI) is provided by informal carers. Understanding the nature of caregiving work is important to better support informal carers. This study explored the work being performed by informal carers, and factors impacting on their capacity to manage the workload. Method: Participants comprised 21 dyads each consisting of an adult with moderate to severe TBI and a nominated carer. Thematic analysis was done on semi-structured interviews with injured participants and carers during the 12-month period post-discharge from hospital. Results: Results revealed two main themes and eight subcategories: (1) The nature of informal care: describing informal care management work, (personal assistant work; care provider work; family support work; and emotional self-regulation work), and (2) Mediating factors that impacted people's capacity to manage workload (carer intrinsic factors; injured person characteristics; family circumstances; and changes over time.) Conclusion: Rehabilitation providers supporting people following TBI need to focus on broad family contexts; understand the nature of work being undertaken, and carer capacity to carry out that work; and be aware of the unique and changing circumstances of families to better support informal carers. Implications for rehabilitation Rehabilitation services need to focus on broad family contexts rather than focus on the injured individual in isolation. Understanding the nature of the work being undertaken by informal carers, and their capacity to carry out that work is important when considering supports. Rehabilitation professionals need to consider and respond to the impact that changing circumstances have on the capacity of informal care networks to manage care workload.</description><subject>burden of treatment</subject><subject>caregiving</subject><subject>Informal care</subject><subject>qualitative study</subject><subject>traumatic brain injury</subject><issn>0963-8288</issn><issn>1464-5165</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1P3DAQhi3UCpaPnwDysZdsPbGTOJyoEC1ISL20Z2tsT1AgX9hO0f57Eu1S9dTTSK-emVfzMHYJYgtCi6-iLqXOtd7mAvQWCqELgCO2AVWqrICy-MQ2K5Ot0Ak7jfFZCAGyUsfsRAqZl1UpNuzlYWjG0GPHHQbiPQ74RD0NiWOTKPAUcO4xtY7bgO3A2-F5DrtrPlGIE7nU_qHIxzX_50zgb2N46Ub0HAe_RBO6Nu3O2ecGu0gXh3nGfn-_-3V7nz3-_PFw--0xcwpkysj53EkS0mqSubQesSi1wqLBSteqsr52svS1LhRYAgeqash6K2oCuzwlz9iX_d0pjK8zxWT6NjrqOhxonKPJIQelKyHkghZ71IUxxkCNmULbY9gZEGb1bD48m9WzOXhe9q4OFbPtyf_d-hC7ADd74CBmEdJ5k3DXjaEJOLg2Gvn_jneSf47I</recordid><startdate>20200312</startdate><enddate>20200312</enddate><creator>McIntyre, Michelle</creator><creator>Ehrlich, Carolyn</creator><creator>Kendall, Elizabeth</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2399-1460</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200312</creationdate><title>Informal care management after traumatic brain injury: perspectives on informal carer workload and capacity</title><author>McIntyre, Michelle ; Ehrlich, Carolyn ; Kendall, Elizabeth</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-ecd2c3e03b8e323bdaa5684a5fa78947bd9c36d98541be1c147febdb09e1b7603</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>burden of treatment</topic><topic>caregiving</topic><topic>Informal care</topic><topic>qualitative study</topic><topic>traumatic brain injury</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McIntyre, Michelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ehrlich, Carolyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kendall, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Disability and rehabilitation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McIntyre, Michelle</au><au>Ehrlich, Carolyn</au><au>Kendall, Elizabeth</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Informal care management after traumatic brain injury: perspectives on informal carer workload and capacity</atitle><jtitle>Disability and rehabilitation</jtitle><addtitle>Disabil Rehabil</addtitle><date>2020-03-12</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>754</spage><epage>762</epage><pages>754-762</pages><issn>0963-8288</issn><eissn>1464-5165</eissn><abstract>Purpose: Much of the support required to live in the community post-traumatic brain injury (TBI) is provided by informal carers. Understanding the nature of caregiving work is important to better support informal carers. This study explored the work being performed by informal carers, and factors impacting on their capacity to manage the workload. Method: Participants comprised 21 dyads each consisting of an adult with moderate to severe TBI and a nominated carer. Thematic analysis was done on semi-structured interviews with injured participants and carers during the 12-month period post-discharge from hospital. Results: Results revealed two main themes and eight subcategories: (1) The nature of informal care: describing informal care management work, (personal assistant work; care provider work; family support work; and emotional self-regulation work), and (2) Mediating factors that impacted people's capacity to manage workload (carer intrinsic factors; injured person characteristics; family circumstances; and changes over time.) Conclusion: Rehabilitation providers supporting people following TBI need to focus on broad family contexts; understand the nature of work being undertaken, and carer capacity to carry out that work; and be aware of the unique and changing circumstances of families to better support informal carers. Implications for rehabilitation Rehabilitation services need to focus on broad family contexts rather than focus on the injured individual in isolation. Understanding the nature of the work being undertaken by informal carers, and their capacity to carry out that work is important when considering supports. Rehabilitation professionals need to consider and respond to the impact that changing circumstances have on the capacity of informal care networks to manage care workload.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis</pub><pmid>30326760</pmid><doi>10.1080/09638288.2018.1508511</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2399-1460</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0963-8288
ispartof Disability and rehabilitation, 2020-03, Vol.42 (6), p.754-762
issn 0963-8288
1464-5165
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_09638288_2018_1508511
source Taylor and Francis:Jisc Collections:Taylor and Francis Read and Publish Agreement 2024-2025:Medical Collection (Reading list)
subjects burden of treatment
caregiving
Informal care
qualitative study
traumatic brain injury
title Informal care management after traumatic brain injury: perspectives on informal carer workload and capacity
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T18%3A05%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Informal%20care%20management%20after%20traumatic%20brain%20injury:%20perspectives%20on%20informal%20carer%20workload%20and%20capacity&rft.jtitle=Disability%20and%20rehabilitation&rft.au=McIntyre,%20Michelle&rft.date=2020-03-12&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=754&rft.epage=762&rft.pages=754-762&rft.issn=0963-8288&rft.eissn=1464-5165&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/09638288.2018.1508511&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2121487003%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-ecd2c3e03b8e323bdaa5684a5fa78947bd9c36d98541be1c147febdb09e1b7603%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2121487003&rft_id=info:pmid/30326760&rfr_iscdi=true