Loading…
Informal care management after traumatic brain injury: perspectives on informal carer workload and capacity
Purpose: Much of the support required to live in the community post-traumatic brain injury (TBI) is provided by informal carers. Understanding the nature of caregiving work is important to better support informal carers. This study explored the work being performed by informal carers, and factors im...
Saved in:
Published in: | Disability and rehabilitation 2020-03, Vol.42 (6), p.754-762 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-ecd2c3e03b8e323bdaa5684a5fa78947bd9c36d98541be1c147febdb09e1b7603 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-ecd2c3e03b8e323bdaa5684a5fa78947bd9c36d98541be1c147febdb09e1b7603 |
container_end_page | 762 |
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 754 |
container_title | Disability and rehabilitation |
container_volume | 42 |
creator | McIntyre, Michelle Ehrlich, Carolyn Kendall, Elizabeth |
description | Purpose: Much of the support required to live in the community post-traumatic brain injury (TBI) is provided by informal carers. Understanding the nature of caregiving work is important to better support informal carers. This study explored the work being performed by informal carers, and factors impacting on their capacity to manage the workload.
Method: Participants comprised 21 dyads each consisting of an adult with moderate to severe TBI and a nominated carer. Thematic analysis was done on semi-structured interviews with injured participants and carers during the 12-month period post-discharge from hospital.
Results: Results revealed two main themes and eight subcategories: (1) The nature of informal care: describing informal care management work, (personal assistant work; care provider work; family support work; and emotional self-regulation work), and (2) Mediating factors that impacted people's capacity to manage workload (carer intrinsic factors; injured person characteristics; family circumstances; and changes over time.)
Conclusion: Rehabilitation providers supporting people following TBI need to focus on broad family contexts; understand the nature of work being undertaken, and carer capacity to carry out that work; and be aware of the unique and changing circumstances of families to better support informal carers.
Implications for rehabilitation
Rehabilitation services need to focus on broad family contexts rather than focus on the injured individual in isolation.
Understanding the nature of the work being undertaken by informal carers, and their capacity to carry out that work is important when considering supports.
Rehabilitation professionals need to consider and respond to the impact that changing circumstances have on the capacity of informal care networks to manage care workload. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/09638288.2018.1508511 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_09638288_2018_1508511</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2121487003</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-ecd2c3e03b8e323bdaa5684a5fa78947bd9c36d98541be1c147febdb09e1b7603</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1P3DAQhi3UCpaPnwDysZdsPbGTOJyoEC1ISL20Z2tsT1AgX9hO0f57Eu1S9dTTSK-emVfzMHYJYgtCi6-iLqXOtd7mAvQWCqELgCO2AVWqrICy-MQ2K5Ot0Ak7jfFZCAGyUsfsRAqZl1UpNuzlYWjG0GPHHQbiPQ74RD0NiWOTKPAUcO4xtY7bgO3A2-F5DrtrPlGIE7nU_qHIxzX_50zgb2N46Ub0HAe_RBO6Nu3O2ecGu0gXh3nGfn-_-3V7nz3-_PFw--0xcwpkysj53EkS0mqSubQesSi1wqLBSteqsr52svS1LhRYAgeqash6K2oCuzwlz9iX_d0pjK8zxWT6NjrqOhxonKPJIQelKyHkghZ71IUxxkCNmULbY9gZEGb1bD48m9WzOXhe9q4OFbPtyf_d-hC7ADd74CBmEdJ5k3DXjaEJOLg2Gvn_jneSf47I</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2121487003</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Informal care management after traumatic brain injury: perspectives on informal carer workload and capacity</title><source>Taylor and Francis:Jisc Collections:Taylor and Francis Read and Publish Agreement 2024-2025:Medical Collection (Reading list)</source><creator>McIntyre, Michelle ; Ehrlich, Carolyn ; Kendall, Elizabeth</creator><creatorcontrib>McIntyre, Michelle ; Ehrlich, Carolyn ; Kendall, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose: Much of the support required to live in the community post-traumatic brain injury (TBI) is provided by informal carers. Understanding the nature of caregiving work is important to better support informal carers. This study explored the work being performed by informal carers, and factors impacting on their capacity to manage the workload.
Method: Participants comprised 21 dyads each consisting of an adult with moderate to severe TBI and a nominated carer. Thematic analysis was done on semi-structured interviews with injured participants and carers during the 12-month period post-discharge from hospital.
Results: Results revealed two main themes and eight subcategories: (1) The nature of informal care: describing informal care management work, (personal assistant work; care provider work; family support work; and emotional self-regulation work), and (2) Mediating factors that impacted people's capacity to manage workload (carer intrinsic factors; injured person characteristics; family circumstances; and changes over time.)
Conclusion: Rehabilitation providers supporting people following TBI need to focus on broad family contexts; understand the nature of work being undertaken, and carer capacity to carry out that work; and be aware of the unique and changing circumstances of families to better support informal carers.
Implications for rehabilitation
Rehabilitation services need to focus on broad family contexts rather than focus on the injured individual in isolation.
Understanding the nature of the work being undertaken by informal carers, and their capacity to carry out that work is important when considering supports.
Rehabilitation professionals need to consider and respond to the impact that changing circumstances have on the capacity of informal care networks to manage care workload.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0963-8288</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1464-5165</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2018.1508511</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30326760</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Taylor & Francis</publisher><subject>burden of treatment ; caregiving ; Informal care ; qualitative study ; traumatic brain injury</subject><ispartof>Disability and rehabilitation, 2020-03, Vol.42 (6), p.754-762</ispartof><rights>2018 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-ecd2c3e03b8e323bdaa5684a5fa78947bd9c36d98541be1c147febdb09e1b7603</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-ecd2c3e03b8e323bdaa5684a5fa78947bd9c36d98541be1c147febdb09e1b7603</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2399-1460</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30326760$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>McIntyre, Michelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ehrlich, Carolyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kendall, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><title>Informal care management after traumatic brain injury: perspectives on informal carer workload and capacity</title><title>Disability and rehabilitation</title><addtitle>Disabil Rehabil</addtitle><description>Purpose: Much of the support required to live in the community post-traumatic brain injury (TBI) is provided by informal carers. Understanding the nature of caregiving work is important to better support informal carers. This study explored the work being performed by informal carers, and factors impacting on their capacity to manage the workload.
Method: Participants comprised 21 dyads each consisting of an adult with moderate to severe TBI and a nominated carer. Thematic analysis was done on semi-structured interviews with injured participants and carers during the 12-month period post-discharge from hospital.
Results: Results revealed two main themes and eight subcategories: (1) The nature of informal care: describing informal care management work, (personal assistant work; care provider work; family support work; and emotional self-regulation work), and (2) Mediating factors that impacted people's capacity to manage workload (carer intrinsic factors; injured person characteristics; family circumstances; and changes over time.)
Conclusion: Rehabilitation providers supporting people following TBI need to focus on broad family contexts; understand the nature of work being undertaken, and carer capacity to carry out that work; and be aware of the unique and changing circumstances of families to better support informal carers.
Implications for rehabilitation
Rehabilitation services need to focus on broad family contexts rather than focus on the injured individual in isolation.
Understanding the nature of the work being undertaken by informal carers, and their capacity to carry out that work is important when considering supports.
Rehabilitation professionals need to consider and respond to the impact that changing circumstances have on the capacity of informal care networks to manage care workload.</description><subject>burden of treatment</subject><subject>caregiving</subject><subject>Informal care</subject><subject>qualitative study</subject><subject>traumatic brain injury</subject><issn>0963-8288</issn><issn>1464-5165</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1P3DAQhi3UCpaPnwDysZdsPbGTOJyoEC1ISL20Z2tsT1AgX9hO0f57Eu1S9dTTSK-emVfzMHYJYgtCi6-iLqXOtd7mAvQWCqELgCO2AVWqrICy-MQ2K5Ot0Ak7jfFZCAGyUsfsRAqZl1UpNuzlYWjG0GPHHQbiPQ74RD0NiWOTKPAUcO4xtY7bgO3A2-F5DrtrPlGIE7nU_qHIxzX_50zgb2N46Ub0HAe_RBO6Nu3O2ecGu0gXh3nGfn-_-3V7nz3-_PFw--0xcwpkysj53EkS0mqSubQesSi1wqLBSteqsr52svS1LhRYAgeqash6K2oCuzwlz9iX_d0pjK8zxWT6NjrqOhxonKPJIQelKyHkghZ71IUxxkCNmULbY9gZEGb1bD48m9WzOXhe9q4OFbPtyf_d-hC7ADd74CBmEdJ5k3DXjaEJOLg2Gvn_jneSf47I</recordid><startdate>20200312</startdate><enddate>20200312</enddate><creator>McIntyre, Michelle</creator><creator>Ehrlich, Carolyn</creator><creator>Kendall, Elizabeth</creator><general>Taylor & Francis</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2399-1460</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200312</creationdate><title>Informal care management after traumatic brain injury: perspectives on informal carer workload and capacity</title><author>McIntyre, Michelle ; Ehrlich, Carolyn ; Kendall, Elizabeth</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-ecd2c3e03b8e323bdaa5684a5fa78947bd9c36d98541be1c147febdb09e1b7603</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>burden of treatment</topic><topic>caregiving</topic><topic>Informal care</topic><topic>qualitative study</topic><topic>traumatic brain injury</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McIntyre, Michelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ehrlich, Carolyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kendall, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Disability and rehabilitation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McIntyre, Michelle</au><au>Ehrlich, Carolyn</au><au>Kendall, Elizabeth</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Informal care management after traumatic brain injury: perspectives on informal carer workload and capacity</atitle><jtitle>Disability and rehabilitation</jtitle><addtitle>Disabil Rehabil</addtitle><date>2020-03-12</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>754</spage><epage>762</epage><pages>754-762</pages><issn>0963-8288</issn><eissn>1464-5165</eissn><abstract>Purpose: Much of the support required to live in the community post-traumatic brain injury (TBI) is provided by informal carers. Understanding the nature of caregiving work is important to better support informal carers. This study explored the work being performed by informal carers, and factors impacting on their capacity to manage the workload.
Method: Participants comprised 21 dyads each consisting of an adult with moderate to severe TBI and a nominated carer. Thematic analysis was done on semi-structured interviews with injured participants and carers during the 12-month period post-discharge from hospital.
Results: Results revealed two main themes and eight subcategories: (1) The nature of informal care: describing informal care management work, (personal assistant work; care provider work; family support work; and emotional self-regulation work), and (2) Mediating factors that impacted people's capacity to manage workload (carer intrinsic factors; injured person characteristics; family circumstances; and changes over time.)
Conclusion: Rehabilitation providers supporting people following TBI need to focus on broad family contexts; understand the nature of work being undertaken, and carer capacity to carry out that work; and be aware of the unique and changing circumstances of families to better support informal carers.
Implications for rehabilitation
Rehabilitation services need to focus on broad family contexts rather than focus on the injured individual in isolation.
Understanding the nature of the work being undertaken by informal carers, and their capacity to carry out that work is important when considering supports.
Rehabilitation professionals need to consider and respond to the impact that changing circumstances have on the capacity of informal care networks to manage care workload.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Taylor & Francis</pub><pmid>30326760</pmid><doi>10.1080/09638288.2018.1508511</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2399-1460</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0963-8288 |
ispartof | Disability and rehabilitation, 2020-03, Vol.42 (6), p.754-762 |
issn | 0963-8288 1464-5165 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_09638288_2018_1508511 |
source | Taylor and Francis:Jisc Collections:Taylor and Francis Read and Publish Agreement 2024-2025:Medical Collection (Reading list) |
subjects | burden of treatment caregiving Informal care qualitative study traumatic brain injury |
title | Informal care management after traumatic brain injury: perspectives on informal carer workload and capacity |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T18%3A05%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Informal%20care%20management%20after%20traumatic%20brain%20injury:%20perspectives%20on%20informal%20carer%20workload%20and%20capacity&rft.jtitle=Disability%20and%20rehabilitation&rft.au=McIntyre,%20Michelle&rft.date=2020-03-12&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=754&rft.epage=762&rft.pages=754-762&rft.issn=0963-8288&rft.eissn=1464-5165&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/09638288.2018.1508511&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2121487003%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-ecd2c3e03b8e323bdaa5684a5fa78947bd9c36d98541be1c147febdb09e1b7603%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2121487003&rft_id=info:pmid/30326760&rfr_iscdi=true |