Loading…

NATO Security Burden Sharing, 1991-2020

In contrast to much of the extant literature, the paper devises a composite security burden measure for the NATO alliance that accounts for three different contributions by allies to their collective security: namely, military expenditure (ME), foreign assistance, and UN peacekeeping spending. Gener...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Defence and peace economics 2024-04, Vol.35 (3), p.265-280
Main Authors: Kim, Wukki, Sandler, Todd
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-23b0bf7bfcc6419b75e7494332ce54eb96ead32bf16f349f62c144c6491e32393
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-23b0bf7bfcc6419b75e7494332ce54eb96ead32bf16f349f62c144c6491e32393
container_end_page 280
container_issue 3
container_start_page 265
container_title Defence and peace economics
container_volume 35
creator Kim, Wukki
Sandler, Todd
description In contrast to much of the extant literature, the paper devises a composite security burden measure for the NATO alliance that accounts for three different contributions by allies to their collective security: namely, military expenditure (ME), foreign assistance, and UN peacekeeping spending. Generally, NATO defense burden sharing and free riding are judged solely based on ME even though foreign assistance and peacekeeping promote world prosperity, stabilize regimes, and quell conflicts that affect NATO's collective security. Our parametric tests for free riding apply a spatial-lag panel model, which addresses the interdependency issues, to a broader security-spending measure that accounts for allies' membership, contiguity, and inverse distance. In all spatial models, we uncover robust evidence of free riding where allies decrease their aggregate security spending in response to increases in the collective security spending of other allies. We apply a panel generalized method of moments (GMM) estimator to adjust for endogeneity concerns.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/10242694.2023.2230408
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_10242694_2023_2230408</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2931865187</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-23b0bf7bfcc6419b75e7494332ce54eb96ead32bf16f349f62c144c6491e32393</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kD1PwzAURS0EEqXwE5AiMbCQ4vfsOPFGqfiSKjq0zJbj2JCqTYqdCPXf46hlZXp3OPc-6RByDXQCtKD3QJGjkHyCFNkEkVFOixMyAp6LtECRn8YcmXSAzslFCGtKIRMZG5Hb9-lqkSyt6X3d7ZPH3le2SZZf2tfN510CUkIaZ-klOXN6E-zV8Y7Jx_PTavaazhcvb7PpPDUciy5FVtLS5aUzRnCQZZ7ZnEvOGBqbcVtKYXXFsHQgHOPSCTTAeWQlWIZMsjG5OezufPvd29Cpddv7Jr5UKBkUIoMij1R2oIxvQ_DWqZ2vt9rvFVA1OFF_TtTgRB2dxN7DoVc3rvVb_dP6TaU6vd-03nndmDoo9v_EL3gDY4Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2931865187</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>NATO Security Burden Sharing, 1991-2020</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection</source><creator>Kim, Wukki ; Sandler, Todd</creator><creatorcontrib>Kim, Wukki ; Sandler, Todd</creatorcontrib><description>In contrast to much of the extant literature, the paper devises a composite security burden measure for the NATO alliance that accounts for three different contributions by allies to their collective security: namely, military expenditure (ME), foreign assistance, and UN peacekeeping spending. Generally, NATO defense burden sharing and free riding are judged solely based on ME even though foreign assistance and peacekeeping promote world prosperity, stabilize regimes, and quell conflicts that affect NATO's collective security. Our parametric tests for free riding apply a spatial-lag panel model, which addresses the interdependency issues, to a broader security-spending measure that accounts for allies' membership, contiguity, and inverse distance. In all spatial models, we uncover robust evidence of free riding where allies decrease their aggregate security spending in response to increases in the collective security spending of other allies. We apply a panel generalized method of moments (GMM) estimator to adjust for endogeneity concerns.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1024-2694</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1476-8267</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/10242694.2023.2230408</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: Routledge</publisher><subject>Burden sharing ; Defense spending ; Endogeneity ; Method of moments ; NATO ; Peacekeeping ; Peacekeeping and foreign assistance ; Security ; Security burden sharing ; Spatial econometrics</subject><ispartof>Defence and peace economics, 2024-04, Vol.35 (3), p.265-280</ispartof><rights>2023 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor &amp; Francis Group 2023</rights><rights>2023 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor &amp; Francis Group</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-23b0bf7bfcc6419b75e7494332ce54eb96ead32bf16f349f62c144c6491e32393</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-23b0bf7bfcc6419b75e7494332ce54eb96ead32bf16f349f62c144c6491e32393</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9077-5915</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,33223</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kim, Wukki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sandler, Todd</creatorcontrib><title>NATO Security Burden Sharing, 1991-2020</title><title>Defence and peace economics</title><description>In contrast to much of the extant literature, the paper devises a composite security burden measure for the NATO alliance that accounts for three different contributions by allies to their collective security: namely, military expenditure (ME), foreign assistance, and UN peacekeeping spending. Generally, NATO defense burden sharing and free riding are judged solely based on ME even though foreign assistance and peacekeeping promote world prosperity, stabilize regimes, and quell conflicts that affect NATO's collective security. Our parametric tests for free riding apply a spatial-lag panel model, which addresses the interdependency issues, to a broader security-spending measure that accounts for allies' membership, contiguity, and inverse distance. In all spatial models, we uncover robust evidence of free riding where allies decrease their aggregate security spending in response to increases in the collective security spending of other allies. We apply a panel generalized method of moments (GMM) estimator to adjust for endogeneity concerns.</description><subject>Burden sharing</subject><subject>Defense spending</subject><subject>Endogeneity</subject><subject>Method of moments</subject><subject>NATO</subject><subject>Peacekeeping</subject><subject>Peacekeeping and foreign assistance</subject><subject>Security</subject><subject>Security burden sharing</subject><subject>Spatial econometrics</subject><issn>1024-2694</issn><issn>1476-8267</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kD1PwzAURS0EEqXwE5AiMbCQ4vfsOPFGqfiSKjq0zJbj2JCqTYqdCPXf46hlZXp3OPc-6RByDXQCtKD3QJGjkHyCFNkEkVFOixMyAp6LtECRn8YcmXSAzslFCGtKIRMZG5Hb9-lqkSyt6X3d7ZPH3le2SZZf2tfN510CUkIaZ-klOXN6E-zV8Y7Jx_PTavaazhcvb7PpPDUciy5FVtLS5aUzRnCQZZ7ZnEvOGBqbcVtKYXXFsHQgHOPSCTTAeWQlWIZMsjG5OezufPvd29Cpddv7Jr5UKBkUIoMij1R2oIxvQ_DWqZ2vt9rvFVA1OFF_TtTgRB2dxN7DoVc3rvVb_dP6TaU6vd-03nndmDoo9v_EL3gDY4Q</recordid><startdate>20240402</startdate><enddate>20240402</enddate><creator>Kim, Wukki</creator><creator>Sandler, Todd</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis LLC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9077-5915</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240402</creationdate><title>NATO Security Burden Sharing, 1991-2020</title><author>Kim, Wukki ; Sandler, Todd</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-23b0bf7bfcc6419b75e7494332ce54eb96ead32bf16f349f62c144c6491e32393</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Burden sharing</topic><topic>Defense spending</topic><topic>Endogeneity</topic><topic>Method of moments</topic><topic>NATO</topic><topic>Peacekeeping</topic><topic>Peacekeeping and foreign assistance</topic><topic>Security</topic><topic>Security burden sharing</topic><topic>Spatial econometrics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kim, Wukki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sandler, Todd</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Defence and peace economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kim, Wukki</au><au>Sandler, Todd</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>NATO Security Burden Sharing, 1991-2020</atitle><jtitle>Defence and peace economics</jtitle><date>2024-04-02</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>265</spage><epage>280</epage><pages>265-280</pages><issn>1024-2694</issn><eissn>1476-8267</eissn><abstract>In contrast to much of the extant literature, the paper devises a composite security burden measure for the NATO alliance that accounts for three different contributions by allies to their collective security: namely, military expenditure (ME), foreign assistance, and UN peacekeeping spending. Generally, NATO defense burden sharing and free riding are judged solely based on ME even though foreign assistance and peacekeeping promote world prosperity, stabilize regimes, and quell conflicts that affect NATO's collective security. Our parametric tests for free riding apply a spatial-lag panel model, which addresses the interdependency issues, to a broader security-spending measure that accounts for allies' membership, contiguity, and inverse distance. In all spatial models, we uncover robust evidence of free riding where allies decrease their aggregate security spending in response to increases in the collective security spending of other allies. We apply a panel generalized method of moments (GMM) estimator to adjust for endogeneity concerns.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/10242694.2023.2230408</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9077-5915</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1024-2694
ispartof Defence and peace economics, 2024-04, Vol.35 (3), p.265-280
issn 1024-2694
1476-8267
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_10242694_2023_2230408
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection
subjects Burden sharing
Defense spending
Endogeneity
Method of moments
NATO
Peacekeeping
Peacekeeping and foreign assistance
Security
Security burden sharing
Spatial econometrics
title NATO Security Burden Sharing, 1991-2020
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T17%3A42%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=NATO%20Security%20Burden%20Sharing,%201991-2020&rft.jtitle=Defence%20and%20peace%20economics&rft.au=Kim,%20Wukki&rft.date=2024-04-02&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=265&rft.epage=280&rft.pages=265-280&rft.issn=1024-2694&rft.eissn=1476-8267&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/10242694.2023.2230408&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2931865187%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-23b0bf7bfcc6419b75e7494332ce54eb96ead32bf16f349f62c144c6491e32393%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2931865187&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true