Loading…

A comparison of learning management systems in a school district: searching for the ideal personalized integrated educational system (PIES)

This study explored the use of several learning management systems (LMS), their benefits, and their limitations in relation to the desired characteristics of an ideal Personalized Integrated Educational System (PIES) for the information age. A qualitative research design was used. The participants o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Interactive learning environments 2014-11, Vol.22 (6), p.721-736
Main Authors: Yildirim, Zahide, Reigeluth, Charles M., Kwon, Seolim, Kageto, Yuichi, Shao, Zihang
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-529cd65a21125bc32ec5599a893a7b9793bfcdecdd6e1db222e238d339c8518b3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-529cd65a21125bc32ec5599a893a7b9793bfcdecdd6e1db222e238d339c8518b3
container_end_page 736
container_issue 6
container_start_page 721
container_title Interactive learning environments
container_volume 22
creator Yildirim, Zahide
Reigeluth, Charles M.
Kwon, Seolim
Kageto, Yuichi
Shao, Zihang
description This study explored the use of several learning management systems (LMS), their benefits, and their limitations in relation to the desired characteristics of an ideal Personalized Integrated Educational System (PIES) for the information age. A qualitative research design was used. The participants of the study were teachers, administrators, and technology coordinators in a small suburban school district. The data were collected through interviews and were subjected to content analysis. The findings of the study indicated that each of the LMSs investigated in this study still has some significant limitations, for none of them provides all the information-age functions of PIES, and what an ideal PIES should possess as information-age functions can be categorized under students' learning, assessment and system-related preferences.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/10494820.2012.745423
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_10494820_2012_745423</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1046242</ericid><sourcerecordid>3502922131</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-529cd65a21125bc32ec5599a893a7b9793bfcdecdd6e1db222e238d339c8518b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1q3DAURkVoIOm0b9CAIJt24al-PVY2IYRJmxJIIO1ayNL1jIJtTSQNZfoKfenIOOmyK1245_t0OQh9omRJSUO-UiKUaBhZMkLZciWkYPwIndKVEJWkir4rc0GqiTlB71N6IoQKXotT9PcK2zDsTPQpjDh0uAcTRz9u8GBGs4EBxozTIWUYEvYjNjjZbQg9dj7l6G2-wKkk7HaKdCHivAXsHZge7yCWTtP7P-BKNMMmmlxGcHtrsp9Wr83488Pt-vHLB3TcmT7Bx9d3gX7drH9ef6_u7r_dXl_dVZYrkivJlHW1NIxSJlvLGVgplTKN4mbVqpXibWcdWOdqoK5ljAHjjeNc2UbSpuULdD737mJ43kPK-insYzknaVqzui6auCyUmCkbQ0oROr2LfjDxoCnRk3b9pl1P2vWsvcTO5hgUO_8i6x8FrlkBFuhy3vux6BrM7xB7p7M59CF20YzWJ83_-8MLl9OUaA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1626648235</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A comparison of learning management systems in a school district: searching for the ideal personalized integrated educational system (PIES)</title><source>ERIC</source><source>Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection</source><creator>Yildirim, Zahide ; Reigeluth, Charles M. ; Kwon, Seolim ; Kageto, Yuichi ; Shao, Zihang</creator><creatorcontrib>Yildirim, Zahide ; Reigeluth, Charles M. ; Kwon, Seolim ; Kageto, Yuichi ; Shao, Zihang</creatorcontrib><description>This study explored the use of several learning management systems (LMS), their benefits, and their limitations in relation to the desired characteristics of an ideal Personalized Integrated Educational System (PIES) for the information age. A qualitative research design was used. The participants of the study were teachers, administrators, and technology coordinators in a small suburban school district. The data were collected through interviews and were subjected to content analysis. The findings of the study indicated that each of the LMSs investigated in this study still has some significant limitations, for none of them provides all the information-age functions of PIES, and what an ideal PIES should possess as information-age functions can be categorized under students' learning, assessment and system-related preferences.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1049-4820</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1744-5191</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/10494820.2012.745423</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Abingdon: Routledge</publisher><subject>Administrators ; Age ; Comparative Analysis ; Content Analysis ; Coordinators ; customized learning ; Indiana ; information-age features ; Integrated Learning Systems ; Interactive learning ; learner-centered paradigm ; Learning Management Systems ; Management Systems ; Needs analysis ; Opinions ; personalized integrated educational system ; Preferences ; Qualitative Research ; Research Design ; School Districts ; Semi Structured Interviews ; Suburban Schools ; Teachers ; Technology Uses in Education ; Trends</subject><ispartof>Interactive learning environments, 2014-11, Vol.22 (6), p.721-736</ispartof><rights>2013 Taylor &amp; Francis 2013</rights><rights>2013 Taylor &amp; Francis</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-529cd65a21125bc32ec5599a893a7b9793bfcdecdd6e1db222e238d339c8518b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-529cd65a21125bc32ec5599a893a7b9793bfcdecdd6e1db222e238d339c8518b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1046242$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yildirim, Zahide</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reigeluth, Charles M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kwon, Seolim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kageto, Yuichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shao, Zihang</creatorcontrib><title>A comparison of learning management systems in a school district: searching for the ideal personalized integrated educational system (PIES)</title><title>Interactive learning environments</title><description>This study explored the use of several learning management systems (LMS), their benefits, and their limitations in relation to the desired characteristics of an ideal Personalized Integrated Educational System (PIES) for the information age. A qualitative research design was used. The participants of the study were teachers, administrators, and technology coordinators in a small suburban school district. The data were collected through interviews and were subjected to content analysis. The findings of the study indicated that each of the LMSs investigated in this study still has some significant limitations, for none of them provides all the information-age functions of PIES, and what an ideal PIES should possess as information-age functions can be categorized under students' learning, assessment and system-related preferences.</description><subject>Administrators</subject><subject>Age</subject><subject>Comparative Analysis</subject><subject>Content Analysis</subject><subject>Coordinators</subject><subject>customized learning</subject><subject>Indiana</subject><subject>information-age features</subject><subject>Integrated Learning Systems</subject><subject>Interactive learning</subject><subject>learner-centered paradigm</subject><subject>Learning Management Systems</subject><subject>Management Systems</subject><subject>Needs analysis</subject><subject>Opinions</subject><subject>personalized integrated educational system</subject><subject>Preferences</subject><subject>Qualitative Research</subject><subject>Research Design</subject><subject>School Districts</subject><subject>Semi Structured Interviews</subject><subject>Suburban Schools</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><subject>Technology Uses in Education</subject><subject>Trends</subject><issn>1049-4820</issn><issn>1744-5191</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM1q3DAURkVoIOm0b9CAIJt24al-PVY2IYRJmxJIIO1ayNL1jIJtTSQNZfoKfenIOOmyK1245_t0OQh9omRJSUO-UiKUaBhZMkLZciWkYPwIndKVEJWkir4rc0GqiTlB71N6IoQKXotT9PcK2zDsTPQpjDh0uAcTRz9u8GBGs4EBxozTIWUYEvYjNjjZbQg9dj7l6G2-wKkk7HaKdCHivAXsHZge7yCWTtP7P-BKNMMmmlxGcHtrsp9Wr83488Pt-vHLB3TcmT7Bx9d3gX7drH9ef6_u7r_dXl_dVZYrkivJlHW1NIxSJlvLGVgplTKN4mbVqpXibWcdWOdqoK5ljAHjjeNc2UbSpuULdD737mJ43kPK-insYzknaVqzui6auCyUmCkbQ0oROr2LfjDxoCnRk3b9pl1P2vWsvcTO5hgUO_8i6x8FrlkBFuhy3vux6BrM7xB7p7M59CF20YzWJ83_-8MLl9OUaA</recordid><startdate>20141102</startdate><enddate>20141102</enddate><creator>Yildirim, Zahide</creator><creator>Reigeluth, Charles M.</creator><creator>Kwon, Seolim</creator><creator>Kageto, Yuichi</creator><creator>Shao, Zihang</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141102</creationdate><title>A comparison of learning management systems in a school district: searching for the ideal personalized integrated educational system (PIES)</title><author>Yildirim, Zahide ; Reigeluth, Charles M. ; Kwon, Seolim ; Kageto, Yuichi ; Shao, Zihang</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-529cd65a21125bc32ec5599a893a7b9793bfcdecdd6e1db222e238d339c8518b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Administrators</topic><topic>Age</topic><topic>Comparative Analysis</topic><topic>Content Analysis</topic><topic>Coordinators</topic><topic>customized learning</topic><topic>Indiana</topic><topic>information-age features</topic><topic>Integrated Learning Systems</topic><topic>Interactive learning</topic><topic>learner-centered paradigm</topic><topic>Learning Management Systems</topic><topic>Management Systems</topic><topic>Needs analysis</topic><topic>Opinions</topic><topic>personalized integrated educational system</topic><topic>Preferences</topic><topic>Qualitative Research</topic><topic>Research Design</topic><topic>School Districts</topic><topic>Semi Structured Interviews</topic><topic>Suburban Schools</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><topic>Technology Uses in Education</topic><topic>Trends</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yildirim, Zahide</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reigeluth, Charles M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kwon, Seolim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kageto, Yuichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shao, Zihang</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Interactive learning environments</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yildirim, Zahide</au><au>Reigeluth, Charles M.</au><au>Kwon, Seolim</au><au>Kageto, Yuichi</au><au>Shao, Zihang</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1046242</ericid><atitle>A comparison of learning management systems in a school district: searching for the ideal personalized integrated educational system (PIES)</atitle><jtitle>Interactive learning environments</jtitle><date>2014-11-02</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>721</spage><epage>736</epage><pages>721-736</pages><issn>1049-4820</issn><eissn>1744-5191</eissn><abstract>This study explored the use of several learning management systems (LMS), their benefits, and their limitations in relation to the desired characteristics of an ideal Personalized Integrated Educational System (PIES) for the information age. A qualitative research design was used. The participants of the study were teachers, administrators, and technology coordinators in a small suburban school district. The data were collected through interviews and were subjected to content analysis. The findings of the study indicated that each of the LMSs investigated in this study still has some significant limitations, for none of them provides all the information-age functions of PIES, and what an ideal PIES should possess as information-age functions can be categorized under students' learning, assessment and system-related preferences.</abstract><cop>Abingdon</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/10494820.2012.745423</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1049-4820
ispartof Interactive learning environments, 2014-11, Vol.22 (6), p.721-736
issn 1049-4820
1744-5191
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_10494820_2012_745423
source ERIC; Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection
subjects Administrators
Age
Comparative Analysis
Content Analysis
Coordinators
customized learning
Indiana
information-age features
Integrated Learning Systems
Interactive learning
learner-centered paradigm
Learning Management Systems
Management Systems
Needs analysis
Opinions
personalized integrated educational system
Preferences
Qualitative Research
Research Design
School Districts
Semi Structured Interviews
Suburban Schools
Teachers
Technology Uses in Education
Trends
title A comparison of learning management systems in a school district: searching for the ideal personalized integrated educational system (PIES)
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T13%3A51%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20comparison%20of%20learning%20management%20systems%20in%20a%20school%20district:%20searching%20for%20the%20ideal%20personalized%20integrated%20educational%20system%20(PIES)&rft.jtitle=Interactive%20learning%20environments&rft.au=Yildirim,%20Zahide&rft.date=2014-11-02&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=721&rft.epage=736&rft.pages=721-736&rft.issn=1049-4820&rft.eissn=1744-5191&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/10494820.2012.745423&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3502922131%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-529cd65a21125bc32ec5599a893a7b9793bfcdecdd6e1db222e238d339c8518b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1626648235&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1046242&rfr_iscdi=true