Loading…
A comparison of learning management systems in a school district: searching for the ideal personalized integrated educational system (PIES)
This study explored the use of several learning management systems (LMS), their benefits, and their limitations in relation to the desired characteristics of an ideal Personalized Integrated Educational System (PIES) for the information age. A qualitative research design was used. The participants o...
Saved in:
Published in: | Interactive learning environments 2014-11, Vol.22 (6), p.721-736 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-529cd65a21125bc32ec5599a893a7b9793bfcdecdd6e1db222e238d339c8518b3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-529cd65a21125bc32ec5599a893a7b9793bfcdecdd6e1db222e238d339c8518b3 |
container_end_page | 736 |
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 721 |
container_title | Interactive learning environments |
container_volume | 22 |
creator | Yildirim, Zahide Reigeluth, Charles M. Kwon, Seolim Kageto, Yuichi Shao, Zihang |
description | This study explored the use of several learning management systems (LMS), their benefits, and their limitations in relation to the desired characteristics of an ideal Personalized Integrated Educational System (PIES) for the information age. A qualitative research design was used. The participants of the study were teachers, administrators, and technology coordinators in a small suburban school district. The data were collected through interviews and were subjected to content analysis. The findings of the study indicated that each of the LMSs investigated in this study still has some significant limitations, for none of them provides all the information-age functions of PIES, and what an ideal PIES should possess as information-age functions can be categorized under students' learning, assessment and system-related preferences. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/10494820.2012.745423 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_10494820_2012_745423</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1046242</ericid><sourcerecordid>3502922131</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-529cd65a21125bc32ec5599a893a7b9793bfcdecdd6e1db222e238d339c8518b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1q3DAURkVoIOm0b9CAIJt24al-PVY2IYRJmxJIIO1ayNL1jIJtTSQNZfoKfenIOOmyK1245_t0OQh9omRJSUO-UiKUaBhZMkLZciWkYPwIndKVEJWkir4rc0GqiTlB71N6IoQKXotT9PcK2zDsTPQpjDh0uAcTRz9u8GBGs4EBxozTIWUYEvYjNjjZbQg9dj7l6G2-wKkk7HaKdCHivAXsHZge7yCWTtP7P-BKNMMmmlxGcHtrsp9Wr83488Pt-vHLB3TcmT7Bx9d3gX7drH9ef6_u7r_dXl_dVZYrkivJlHW1NIxSJlvLGVgplTKN4mbVqpXibWcdWOdqoK5ljAHjjeNc2UbSpuULdD737mJ43kPK-insYzknaVqzui6auCyUmCkbQ0oROr2LfjDxoCnRk3b9pl1P2vWsvcTO5hgUO_8i6x8FrlkBFuhy3vux6BrM7xB7p7M59CF20YzWJ83_-8MLl9OUaA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1626648235</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A comparison of learning management systems in a school district: searching for the ideal personalized integrated educational system (PIES)</title><source>ERIC</source><source>Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection</source><creator>Yildirim, Zahide ; Reigeluth, Charles M. ; Kwon, Seolim ; Kageto, Yuichi ; Shao, Zihang</creator><creatorcontrib>Yildirim, Zahide ; Reigeluth, Charles M. ; Kwon, Seolim ; Kageto, Yuichi ; Shao, Zihang</creatorcontrib><description>This study explored the use of several learning management systems (LMS), their benefits, and their limitations in relation to the desired characteristics of an ideal Personalized Integrated Educational System (PIES) for the information age. A qualitative research design was used. The participants of the study were teachers, administrators, and technology coordinators in a small suburban school district. The data were collected through interviews and were subjected to content analysis. The findings of the study indicated that each of the LMSs investigated in this study still has some significant limitations, for none of them provides all the information-age functions of PIES, and what an ideal PIES should possess as information-age functions can be categorized under students' learning, assessment and system-related preferences.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1049-4820</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1744-5191</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/10494820.2012.745423</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Abingdon: Routledge</publisher><subject>Administrators ; Age ; Comparative Analysis ; Content Analysis ; Coordinators ; customized learning ; Indiana ; information-age features ; Integrated Learning Systems ; Interactive learning ; learner-centered paradigm ; Learning Management Systems ; Management Systems ; Needs analysis ; Opinions ; personalized integrated educational system ; Preferences ; Qualitative Research ; Research Design ; School Districts ; Semi Structured Interviews ; Suburban Schools ; Teachers ; Technology Uses in Education ; Trends</subject><ispartof>Interactive learning environments, 2014-11, Vol.22 (6), p.721-736</ispartof><rights>2013 Taylor & Francis 2013</rights><rights>2013 Taylor & Francis</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-529cd65a21125bc32ec5599a893a7b9793bfcdecdd6e1db222e238d339c8518b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-529cd65a21125bc32ec5599a893a7b9793bfcdecdd6e1db222e238d339c8518b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1046242$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yildirim, Zahide</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reigeluth, Charles M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kwon, Seolim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kageto, Yuichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shao, Zihang</creatorcontrib><title>A comparison of learning management systems in a school district: searching for the ideal personalized integrated educational system (PIES)</title><title>Interactive learning environments</title><description>This study explored the use of several learning management systems (LMS), their benefits, and their limitations in relation to the desired characteristics of an ideal Personalized Integrated Educational System (PIES) for the information age. A qualitative research design was used. The participants of the study were teachers, administrators, and technology coordinators in a small suburban school district. The data were collected through interviews and were subjected to content analysis. The findings of the study indicated that each of the LMSs investigated in this study still has some significant limitations, for none of them provides all the information-age functions of PIES, and what an ideal PIES should possess as information-age functions can be categorized under students' learning, assessment and system-related preferences.</description><subject>Administrators</subject><subject>Age</subject><subject>Comparative Analysis</subject><subject>Content Analysis</subject><subject>Coordinators</subject><subject>customized learning</subject><subject>Indiana</subject><subject>information-age features</subject><subject>Integrated Learning Systems</subject><subject>Interactive learning</subject><subject>learner-centered paradigm</subject><subject>Learning Management Systems</subject><subject>Management Systems</subject><subject>Needs analysis</subject><subject>Opinions</subject><subject>personalized integrated educational system</subject><subject>Preferences</subject><subject>Qualitative Research</subject><subject>Research Design</subject><subject>School Districts</subject><subject>Semi Structured Interviews</subject><subject>Suburban Schools</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><subject>Technology Uses in Education</subject><subject>Trends</subject><issn>1049-4820</issn><issn>1744-5191</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM1q3DAURkVoIOm0b9CAIJt24al-PVY2IYRJmxJIIO1ayNL1jIJtTSQNZfoKfenIOOmyK1245_t0OQh9omRJSUO-UiKUaBhZMkLZciWkYPwIndKVEJWkir4rc0GqiTlB71N6IoQKXotT9PcK2zDsTPQpjDh0uAcTRz9u8GBGs4EBxozTIWUYEvYjNjjZbQg9dj7l6G2-wKkk7HaKdCHivAXsHZge7yCWTtP7P-BKNMMmmlxGcHtrsp9Wr83488Pt-vHLB3TcmT7Bx9d3gX7drH9ef6_u7r_dXl_dVZYrkivJlHW1NIxSJlvLGVgplTKN4mbVqpXibWcdWOdqoK5ljAHjjeNc2UbSpuULdD737mJ43kPK-insYzknaVqzui6auCyUmCkbQ0oROr2LfjDxoCnRk3b9pl1P2vWsvcTO5hgUO_8i6x8FrlkBFuhy3vux6BrM7xB7p7M59CF20YzWJ83_-8MLl9OUaA</recordid><startdate>20141102</startdate><enddate>20141102</enddate><creator>Yildirim, Zahide</creator><creator>Reigeluth, Charles M.</creator><creator>Kwon, Seolim</creator><creator>Kageto, Yuichi</creator><creator>Shao, Zihang</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141102</creationdate><title>A comparison of learning management systems in a school district: searching for the ideal personalized integrated educational system (PIES)</title><author>Yildirim, Zahide ; Reigeluth, Charles M. ; Kwon, Seolim ; Kageto, Yuichi ; Shao, Zihang</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-529cd65a21125bc32ec5599a893a7b9793bfcdecdd6e1db222e238d339c8518b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Administrators</topic><topic>Age</topic><topic>Comparative Analysis</topic><topic>Content Analysis</topic><topic>Coordinators</topic><topic>customized learning</topic><topic>Indiana</topic><topic>information-age features</topic><topic>Integrated Learning Systems</topic><topic>Interactive learning</topic><topic>learner-centered paradigm</topic><topic>Learning Management Systems</topic><topic>Management Systems</topic><topic>Needs analysis</topic><topic>Opinions</topic><topic>personalized integrated educational system</topic><topic>Preferences</topic><topic>Qualitative Research</topic><topic>Research Design</topic><topic>School Districts</topic><topic>Semi Structured Interviews</topic><topic>Suburban Schools</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><topic>Technology Uses in Education</topic><topic>Trends</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yildirim, Zahide</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reigeluth, Charles M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kwon, Seolim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kageto, Yuichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shao, Zihang</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Interactive learning environments</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yildirim, Zahide</au><au>Reigeluth, Charles M.</au><au>Kwon, Seolim</au><au>Kageto, Yuichi</au><au>Shao, Zihang</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1046242</ericid><atitle>A comparison of learning management systems in a school district: searching for the ideal personalized integrated educational system (PIES)</atitle><jtitle>Interactive learning environments</jtitle><date>2014-11-02</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>721</spage><epage>736</epage><pages>721-736</pages><issn>1049-4820</issn><eissn>1744-5191</eissn><abstract>This study explored the use of several learning management systems (LMS), their benefits, and their limitations in relation to the desired characteristics of an ideal Personalized Integrated Educational System (PIES) for the information age. A qualitative research design was used. The participants of the study were teachers, administrators, and technology coordinators in a small suburban school district. The data were collected through interviews and were subjected to content analysis. The findings of the study indicated that each of the LMSs investigated in this study still has some significant limitations, for none of them provides all the information-age functions of PIES, and what an ideal PIES should possess as information-age functions can be categorized under students' learning, assessment and system-related preferences.</abstract><cop>Abingdon</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/10494820.2012.745423</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1049-4820 |
ispartof | Interactive learning environments, 2014-11, Vol.22 (6), p.721-736 |
issn | 1049-4820 1744-5191 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_10494820_2012_745423 |
source | ERIC; Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection |
subjects | Administrators Age Comparative Analysis Content Analysis Coordinators customized learning Indiana information-age features Integrated Learning Systems Interactive learning learner-centered paradigm Learning Management Systems Management Systems Needs analysis Opinions personalized integrated educational system Preferences Qualitative Research Research Design School Districts Semi Structured Interviews Suburban Schools Teachers Technology Uses in Education Trends |
title | A comparison of learning management systems in a school district: searching for the ideal personalized integrated educational system (PIES) |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T13%3A51%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20comparison%20of%20learning%20management%20systems%20in%20a%20school%20district:%20searching%20for%20the%20ideal%20personalized%20integrated%20educational%20system%20(PIES)&rft.jtitle=Interactive%20learning%20environments&rft.au=Yildirim,%20Zahide&rft.date=2014-11-02&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=721&rft.epage=736&rft.pages=721-736&rft.issn=1049-4820&rft.eissn=1744-5191&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/10494820.2012.745423&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3502922131%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-529cd65a21125bc32ec5599a893a7b9793bfcdecdd6e1db222e238d339c8518b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1626648235&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1046242&rfr_iscdi=true |