Loading…
What Do We Teach When We Teach the Learning Sciences? A Document Analysis of 75 Graduate Programs
The learning sciences, as an academic community investigating human learning, emerged more than 30 years ago. Since then, graduate learning sciences programs have been established worldwide. Little is currently known, however, about their disciplinary backgrounds and the topics and research methods...
Saved in:
Published in: | The Journal of the learning sciences 2018-01, Vol.27 (2), p.319-351 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-922cf6836abd48f592f59b984d73695f01b6ab08c56985a38853aa02e2d357a83 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-922cf6836abd48f592f59b984d73695f01b6ab08c56985a38853aa02e2d357a83 |
container_end_page | 351 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 319 |
container_title | The Journal of the learning sciences |
container_volume | 27 |
creator | Sommerhoff, Daniel Szameitat, Andrea Vogel, Freydis Chernikova, Olga Loderer, Kristina Fischer, Frank |
description | The learning sciences, as an academic community investigating human learning, emerged more than 30 years ago. Since then, graduate learning sciences programs have been established worldwide. Little is currently known, however, about their disciplinary backgrounds and the topics and research methods they address. In this document analysis of the websites of 75 international graduate learning sciences programs, we examine central concepts and research methods across institutions, compare the programs, and assess the homogeneity of different subgroups. Results reveal that the concepts addressed most frequently were real-world learning in formal and informal contexts, designing learning environments, cognition and metacognition, and using technology to support learning. Among research methods, design-based research (DBR), discourse and dialog analyses, and basic statistics stand out. Results show substantial differences between programs, yet programs focusing on DBR show the greatest similarity regarding the other concepts and methods they teach. Interpreting the similarity of the graduate programs using a community of practice perspective, there is a set of relatively coherent programs at the core of the learning sciences, pointing to the emergence of a discipline, and a variety of multidisciplinary and more heterogeneous programs “orbiting” the core in the periphery, shaping and innovating the field. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/10508406.2018.1440353 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_10508406_2018_1440353</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1175658</ericid><jstor_id>48541147</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>48541147</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-922cf6836abd48f592f59b984d73695f01b6ab08c56985a38853aa02e2d357a83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkMFuwjAMhqNpk8bYHgEpL1DmNHGbnCbEGNuEtElj4liZNKVF0E5JOfD2FMHgYNmW_8-Hj7GBgKEADc8CELSCZBiD0EOhFEiUN6wnUMZRqsHcdnOXiY6he_YQwhoAUIDpMVqU1PLXhi8cnzuyJV-Urr5uben4zJGvq3rFf2zlauvCCx91iN1tXd3yUU2bfagCbwqeIp96ynfUOv7tm5WnbXhkdwVtgns69z77fZvMx-_R7Gv6MR7NIiuVaiMTx7ZItExomStdoIm7Whqt8lQmBgsQy-4E2mJiNJLUGiURxC7OJaakZZ_h6a_1TQjeFdmfr7bk95mA7Ogp-_eUHT1lZ08dNzhxzlf2wkw-hUgxQX29r0Pb-EtAaVRCqFQeAHINa6I</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>What Do We Teach When We Teach the Learning Sciences? A Document Analysis of 75 Graduate Programs</title><source>ERIC</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals</source><source>Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection</source><creator>Sommerhoff, Daniel ; Szameitat, Andrea ; Vogel, Freydis ; Chernikova, Olga ; Loderer, Kristina ; Fischer, Frank</creator><creatorcontrib>Sommerhoff, Daniel ; Szameitat, Andrea ; Vogel, Freydis ; Chernikova, Olga ; Loderer, Kristina ; Fischer, Frank</creatorcontrib><description>The learning sciences, as an academic community investigating human learning, emerged more than 30 years ago. Since then, graduate learning sciences programs have been established worldwide. Little is currently known, however, about their disciplinary backgrounds and the topics and research methods they address. In this document analysis of the websites of 75 international graduate learning sciences programs, we examine central concepts and research methods across institutions, compare the programs, and assess the homogeneity of different subgroups. Results reveal that the concepts addressed most frequently were real-world learning in formal and informal contexts, designing learning environments, cognition and metacognition, and using technology to support learning. Among research methods, design-based research (DBR), discourse and dialog analyses, and basic statistics stand out. Results show substantial differences between programs, yet programs focusing on DBR show the greatest similarity regarding the other concepts and methods they teach. Interpreting the similarity of the graduate programs using a community of practice perspective, there is a set of relatively coherent programs at the core of the learning sciences, pointing to the emergence of a discipline, and a variety of multidisciplinary and more heterogeneous programs “orbiting” the core in the periphery, shaping and innovating the field.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1050-8406</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-7809</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/10508406.2018.1440353</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Taylor & Francis, Ltd</publisher><subject>Case Studies ; Communities of Practice ; Content Analysis ; Doctoral Programs ; Graduate Study ; Masters Programs ; Qualitative Research ; REPORTS AND REFLECTIONS ; Research Methodology ; Science Instruction ; Science Programs ; Scientific Concepts</subject><ispartof>The Journal of the learning sciences, 2018-01, Vol.27 (2), p.319-351</ispartof><rights>The Author(s)</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-922cf6836abd48f592f59b984d73695f01b6ab08c56985a38853aa02e2d357a83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-922cf6836abd48f592f59b984d73695f01b6ab08c56985a38853aa02e2d357a83</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0559-7120</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/48541147$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/48541147$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,58237,58470</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1175658$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sommerhoff, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Szameitat, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vogel, Freydis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chernikova, Olga</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loderer, Kristina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fischer, Frank</creatorcontrib><title>What Do We Teach When We Teach the Learning Sciences? A Document Analysis of 75 Graduate Programs</title><title>The Journal of the learning sciences</title><description>The learning sciences, as an academic community investigating human learning, emerged more than 30 years ago. Since then, graduate learning sciences programs have been established worldwide. Little is currently known, however, about their disciplinary backgrounds and the topics and research methods they address. In this document analysis of the websites of 75 international graduate learning sciences programs, we examine central concepts and research methods across institutions, compare the programs, and assess the homogeneity of different subgroups. Results reveal that the concepts addressed most frequently were real-world learning in formal and informal contexts, designing learning environments, cognition and metacognition, and using technology to support learning. Among research methods, design-based research (DBR), discourse and dialog analyses, and basic statistics stand out. Results show substantial differences between programs, yet programs focusing on DBR show the greatest similarity regarding the other concepts and methods they teach. Interpreting the similarity of the graduate programs using a community of practice perspective, there is a set of relatively coherent programs at the core of the learning sciences, pointing to the emergence of a discipline, and a variety of multidisciplinary and more heterogeneous programs “orbiting” the core in the periphery, shaping and innovating the field.</description><subject>Case Studies</subject><subject>Communities of Practice</subject><subject>Content Analysis</subject><subject>Doctoral Programs</subject><subject>Graduate Study</subject><subject>Masters Programs</subject><subject>Qualitative Research</subject><subject>REPORTS AND REFLECTIONS</subject><subject>Research Methodology</subject><subject>Science Instruction</subject><subject>Science Programs</subject><subject>Scientific Concepts</subject><issn>1050-8406</issn><issn>1532-7809</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkMFuwjAMhqNpk8bYHgEpL1DmNHGbnCbEGNuEtElj4liZNKVF0E5JOfD2FMHgYNmW_8-Hj7GBgKEADc8CELSCZBiD0EOhFEiUN6wnUMZRqsHcdnOXiY6he_YQwhoAUIDpMVqU1PLXhi8cnzuyJV-Urr5uben4zJGvq3rFf2zlauvCCx91iN1tXd3yUU2bfagCbwqeIp96ynfUOv7tm5WnbXhkdwVtgns69z77fZvMx-_R7Gv6MR7NIiuVaiMTx7ZItExomStdoIm7Whqt8lQmBgsQy-4E2mJiNJLUGiURxC7OJaakZZ_h6a_1TQjeFdmfr7bk95mA7Ogp-_eUHT1lZ08dNzhxzlf2wkw-hUgxQX29r0Pb-EtAaVRCqFQeAHINa6I</recordid><startdate>20180101</startdate><enddate>20180101</enddate><creator>Sommerhoff, Daniel</creator><creator>Szameitat, Andrea</creator><creator>Vogel, Freydis</creator><creator>Chernikova, Olga</creator><creator>Loderer, Kristina</creator><creator>Fischer, Frank</creator><general>Taylor & Francis, Ltd</general><general>Routledge</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0559-7120</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180101</creationdate><title>What Do We Teach When We Teach the Learning Sciences? A Document Analysis of 75 Graduate Programs</title><author>Sommerhoff, Daniel ; Szameitat, Andrea ; Vogel, Freydis ; Chernikova, Olga ; Loderer, Kristina ; Fischer, Frank</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-922cf6836abd48f592f59b984d73695f01b6ab08c56985a38853aa02e2d357a83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Case Studies</topic><topic>Communities of Practice</topic><topic>Content Analysis</topic><topic>Doctoral Programs</topic><topic>Graduate Study</topic><topic>Masters Programs</topic><topic>Qualitative Research</topic><topic>REPORTS AND REFLECTIONS</topic><topic>Research Methodology</topic><topic>Science Instruction</topic><topic>Science Programs</topic><topic>Scientific Concepts</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sommerhoff, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Szameitat, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vogel, Freydis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chernikova, Olga</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loderer, Kristina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fischer, Frank</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>The Journal of the learning sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sommerhoff, Daniel</au><au>Szameitat, Andrea</au><au>Vogel, Freydis</au><au>Chernikova, Olga</au><au>Loderer, Kristina</au><au>Fischer, Frank</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1175658</ericid><atitle>What Do We Teach When We Teach the Learning Sciences? A Document Analysis of 75 Graduate Programs</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of the learning sciences</jtitle><date>2018-01-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>319</spage><epage>351</epage><pages>319-351</pages><issn>1050-8406</issn><eissn>1532-7809</eissn><abstract>The learning sciences, as an academic community investigating human learning, emerged more than 30 years ago. Since then, graduate learning sciences programs have been established worldwide. Little is currently known, however, about their disciplinary backgrounds and the topics and research methods they address. In this document analysis of the websites of 75 international graduate learning sciences programs, we examine central concepts and research methods across institutions, compare the programs, and assess the homogeneity of different subgroups. Results reveal that the concepts addressed most frequently were real-world learning in formal and informal contexts, designing learning environments, cognition and metacognition, and using technology to support learning. Among research methods, design-based research (DBR), discourse and dialog analyses, and basic statistics stand out. Results show substantial differences between programs, yet programs focusing on DBR show the greatest similarity regarding the other concepts and methods they teach. Interpreting the similarity of the graduate programs using a community of practice perspective, there is a set of relatively coherent programs at the core of the learning sciences, pointing to the emergence of a discipline, and a variety of multidisciplinary and more heterogeneous programs “orbiting” the core in the periphery, shaping and innovating the field.</abstract><pub>Taylor & Francis, Ltd</pub><doi>10.1080/10508406.2018.1440353</doi><tpages>33</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0559-7120</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1050-8406 |
ispartof | The Journal of the learning sciences, 2018-01, Vol.27 (2), p.319-351 |
issn | 1050-8406 1532-7809 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_10508406_2018_1440353 |
source | ERIC; JSTOR Archival Journals; Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection |
subjects | Case Studies Communities of Practice Content Analysis Doctoral Programs Graduate Study Masters Programs Qualitative Research REPORTS AND REFLECTIONS Research Methodology Science Instruction Science Programs Scientific Concepts |
title | What Do We Teach When We Teach the Learning Sciences? A Document Analysis of 75 Graduate Programs |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T08%3A36%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=What%20Do%20We%20Teach%20When%20We%20Teach%20the%20Learning%20Sciences?%20A%20Document%20Analysis%20of%2075%20Graduate%20Programs&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20the%20learning%20sciences&rft.au=Sommerhoff,%20Daniel&rft.date=2018-01-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=319&rft.epage=351&rft.pages=319-351&rft.issn=1050-8406&rft.eissn=1532-7809&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/10508406.2018.1440353&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3E48541147%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-922cf6836abd48f592f59b984d73695f01b6ab08c56985a38853aa02e2d357a83%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1175658&rft_jstor_id=48541147&rfr_iscdi=true |