Loading…

What Do We Teach When We Teach the Learning Sciences? A Document Analysis of 75 Graduate Programs

The learning sciences, as an academic community investigating human learning, emerged more than 30 years ago. Since then, graduate learning sciences programs have been established worldwide. Little is currently known, however, about their disciplinary backgrounds and the topics and research methods...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of the learning sciences 2018-01, Vol.27 (2), p.319-351
Main Authors: Sommerhoff, Daniel, Szameitat, Andrea, Vogel, Freydis, Chernikova, Olga, Loderer, Kristina, Fischer, Frank
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-922cf6836abd48f592f59b984d73695f01b6ab08c56985a38853aa02e2d357a83
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-922cf6836abd48f592f59b984d73695f01b6ab08c56985a38853aa02e2d357a83
container_end_page 351
container_issue 2
container_start_page 319
container_title The Journal of the learning sciences
container_volume 27
creator Sommerhoff, Daniel
Szameitat, Andrea
Vogel, Freydis
Chernikova, Olga
Loderer, Kristina
Fischer, Frank
description The learning sciences, as an academic community investigating human learning, emerged more than 30 years ago. Since then, graduate learning sciences programs have been established worldwide. Little is currently known, however, about their disciplinary backgrounds and the topics and research methods they address. In this document analysis of the websites of 75 international graduate learning sciences programs, we examine central concepts and research methods across institutions, compare the programs, and assess the homogeneity of different subgroups. Results reveal that the concepts addressed most frequently were real-world learning in formal and informal contexts, designing learning environments, cognition and metacognition, and using technology to support learning. Among research methods, design-based research (DBR), discourse and dialog analyses, and basic statistics stand out. Results show substantial differences between programs, yet programs focusing on DBR show the greatest similarity regarding the other concepts and methods they teach. Interpreting the similarity of the graduate programs using a community of practice perspective, there is a set of relatively coherent programs at the core of the learning sciences, pointing to the emergence of a discipline, and a variety of multidisciplinary and more heterogeneous programs “orbiting” the core in the periphery, shaping and innovating the field.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/10508406.2018.1440353
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_10508406_2018_1440353</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1175658</ericid><jstor_id>48541147</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>48541147</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-922cf6836abd48f592f59b984d73695f01b6ab08c56985a38853aa02e2d357a83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkMFuwjAMhqNpk8bYHgEpL1DmNHGbnCbEGNuEtElj4liZNKVF0E5JOfD2FMHgYNmW_8-Hj7GBgKEADc8CELSCZBiD0EOhFEiUN6wnUMZRqsHcdnOXiY6he_YQwhoAUIDpMVqU1PLXhi8cnzuyJV-Urr5uben4zJGvq3rFf2zlauvCCx91iN1tXd3yUU2bfagCbwqeIp96ynfUOv7tm5WnbXhkdwVtgns69z77fZvMx-_R7Gv6MR7NIiuVaiMTx7ZItExomStdoIm7Whqt8lQmBgsQy-4E2mJiNJLUGiURxC7OJaakZZ_h6a_1TQjeFdmfr7bk95mA7Ogp-_eUHT1lZ08dNzhxzlf2wkw-hUgxQX29r0Pb-EtAaVRCqFQeAHINa6I</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>What Do We Teach When We Teach the Learning Sciences? A Document Analysis of 75 Graduate Programs</title><source>ERIC</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals</source><source>Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection</source><creator>Sommerhoff, Daniel ; Szameitat, Andrea ; Vogel, Freydis ; Chernikova, Olga ; Loderer, Kristina ; Fischer, Frank</creator><creatorcontrib>Sommerhoff, Daniel ; Szameitat, Andrea ; Vogel, Freydis ; Chernikova, Olga ; Loderer, Kristina ; Fischer, Frank</creatorcontrib><description>The learning sciences, as an academic community investigating human learning, emerged more than 30 years ago. Since then, graduate learning sciences programs have been established worldwide. Little is currently known, however, about their disciplinary backgrounds and the topics and research methods they address. In this document analysis of the websites of 75 international graduate learning sciences programs, we examine central concepts and research methods across institutions, compare the programs, and assess the homogeneity of different subgroups. Results reveal that the concepts addressed most frequently were real-world learning in formal and informal contexts, designing learning environments, cognition and metacognition, and using technology to support learning. Among research methods, design-based research (DBR), discourse and dialog analyses, and basic statistics stand out. Results show substantial differences between programs, yet programs focusing on DBR show the greatest similarity regarding the other concepts and methods they teach. Interpreting the similarity of the graduate programs using a community of practice perspective, there is a set of relatively coherent programs at the core of the learning sciences, pointing to the emergence of a discipline, and a variety of multidisciplinary and more heterogeneous programs “orbiting” the core in the periphery, shaping and innovating the field.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1050-8406</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-7809</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/10508406.2018.1440353</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Taylor &amp; Francis, Ltd</publisher><subject>Case Studies ; Communities of Practice ; Content Analysis ; Doctoral Programs ; Graduate Study ; Masters Programs ; Qualitative Research ; REPORTS AND REFLECTIONS ; Research Methodology ; Science Instruction ; Science Programs ; Scientific Concepts</subject><ispartof>The Journal of the learning sciences, 2018-01, Vol.27 (2), p.319-351</ispartof><rights>The Author(s)</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-922cf6836abd48f592f59b984d73695f01b6ab08c56985a38853aa02e2d357a83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-922cf6836abd48f592f59b984d73695f01b6ab08c56985a38853aa02e2d357a83</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0559-7120</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/48541147$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/48541147$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,58237,58470</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1175658$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sommerhoff, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Szameitat, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vogel, Freydis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chernikova, Olga</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loderer, Kristina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fischer, Frank</creatorcontrib><title>What Do We Teach When We Teach the Learning Sciences? A Document Analysis of 75 Graduate Programs</title><title>The Journal of the learning sciences</title><description>The learning sciences, as an academic community investigating human learning, emerged more than 30 years ago. Since then, graduate learning sciences programs have been established worldwide. Little is currently known, however, about their disciplinary backgrounds and the topics and research methods they address. In this document analysis of the websites of 75 international graduate learning sciences programs, we examine central concepts and research methods across institutions, compare the programs, and assess the homogeneity of different subgroups. Results reveal that the concepts addressed most frequently were real-world learning in formal and informal contexts, designing learning environments, cognition and metacognition, and using technology to support learning. Among research methods, design-based research (DBR), discourse and dialog analyses, and basic statistics stand out. Results show substantial differences between programs, yet programs focusing on DBR show the greatest similarity regarding the other concepts and methods they teach. Interpreting the similarity of the graduate programs using a community of practice perspective, there is a set of relatively coherent programs at the core of the learning sciences, pointing to the emergence of a discipline, and a variety of multidisciplinary and more heterogeneous programs “orbiting” the core in the periphery, shaping and innovating the field.</description><subject>Case Studies</subject><subject>Communities of Practice</subject><subject>Content Analysis</subject><subject>Doctoral Programs</subject><subject>Graduate Study</subject><subject>Masters Programs</subject><subject>Qualitative Research</subject><subject>REPORTS AND REFLECTIONS</subject><subject>Research Methodology</subject><subject>Science Instruction</subject><subject>Science Programs</subject><subject>Scientific Concepts</subject><issn>1050-8406</issn><issn>1532-7809</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkMFuwjAMhqNpk8bYHgEpL1DmNHGbnCbEGNuEtElj4liZNKVF0E5JOfD2FMHgYNmW_8-Hj7GBgKEADc8CELSCZBiD0EOhFEiUN6wnUMZRqsHcdnOXiY6he_YQwhoAUIDpMVqU1PLXhi8cnzuyJV-Urr5uben4zJGvq3rFf2zlauvCCx91iN1tXd3yUU2bfagCbwqeIp96ynfUOv7tm5WnbXhkdwVtgns69z77fZvMx-_R7Gv6MR7NIiuVaiMTx7ZItExomStdoIm7Whqt8lQmBgsQy-4E2mJiNJLUGiURxC7OJaakZZ_h6a_1TQjeFdmfr7bk95mA7Ogp-_eUHT1lZ08dNzhxzlf2wkw-hUgxQX29r0Pb-EtAaVRCqFQeAHINa6I</recordid><startdate>20180101</startdate><enddate>20180101</enddate><creator>Sommerhoff, Daniel</creator><creator>Szameitat, Andrea</creator><creator>Vogel, Freydis</creator><creator>Chernikova, Olga</creator><creator>Loderer, Kristina</creator><creator>Fischer, Frank</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis, Ltd</general><general>Routledge</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0559-7120</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180101</creationdate><title>What Do We Teach When We Teach the Learning Sciences? A Document Analysis of 75 Graduate Programs</title><author>Sommerhoff, Daniel ; Szameitat, Andrea ; Vogel, Freydis ; Chernikova, Olga ; Loderer, Kristina ; Fischer, Frank</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-922cf6836abd48f592f59b984d73695f01b6ab08c56985a38853aa02e2d357a83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Case Studies</topic><topic>Communities of Practice</topic><topic>Content Analysis</topic><topic>Doctoral Programs</topic><topic>Graduate Study</topic><topic>Masters Programs</topic><topic>Qualitative Research</topic><topic>REPORTS AND REFLECTIONS</topic><topic>Research Methodology</topic><topic>Science Instruction</topic><topic>Science Programs</topic><topic>Scientific Concepts</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sommerhoff, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Szameitat, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vogel, Freydis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chernikova, Olga</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loderer, Kristina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fischer, Frank</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>The Journal of the learning sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sommerhoff, Daniel</au><au>Szameitat, Andrea</au><au>Vogel, Freydis</au><au>Chernikova, Olga</au><au>Loderer, Kristina</au><au>Fischer, Frank</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1175658</ericid><atitle>What Do We Teach When We Teach the Learning Sciences? A Document Analysis of 75 Graduate Programs</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of the learning sciences</jtitle><date>2018-01-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>319</spage><epage>351</epage><pages>319-351</pages><issn>1050-8406</issn><eissn>1532-7809</eissn><abstract>The learning sciences, as an academic community investigating human learning, emerged more than 30 years ago. Since then, graduate learning sciences programs have been established worldwide. Little is currently known, however, about their disciplinary backgrounds and the topics and research methods they address. In this document analysis of the websites of 75 international graduate learning sciences programs, we examine central concepts and research methods across institutions, compare the programs, and assess the homogeneity of different subgroups. Results reveal that the concepts addressed most frequently were real-world learning in formal and informal contexts, designing learning environments, cognition and metacognition, and using technology to support learning. Among research methods, design-based research (DBR), discourse and dialog analyses, and basic statistics stand out. Results show substantial differences between programs, yet programs focusing on DBR show the greatest similarity regarding the other concepts and methods they teach. Interpreting the similarity of the graduate programs using a community of practice perspective, there is a set of relatively coherent programs at the core of the learning sciences, pointing to the emergence of a discipline, and a variety of multidisciplinary and more heterogeneous programs “orbiting” the core in the periphery, shaping and innovating the field.</abstract><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis, Ltd</pub><doi>10.1080/10508406.2018.1440353</doi><tpages>33</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0559-7120</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1050-8406
ispartof The Journal of the learning sciences, 2018-01, Vol.27 (2), p.319-351
issn 1050-8406
1532-7809
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_10508406_2018_1440353
source ERIC; JSTOR Archival Journals; Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection
subjects Case Studies
Communities of Practice
Content Analysis
Doctoral Programs
Graduate Study
Masters Programs
Qualitative Research
REPORTS AND REFLECTIONS
Research Methodology
Science Instruction
Science Programs
Scientific Concepts
title What Do We Teach When We Teach the Learning Sciences? A Document Analysis of 75 Graduate Programs
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T08%3A36%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=What%20Do%20We%20Teach%20When%20We%20Teach%20the%20Learning%20Sciences?%20A%20Document%20Analysis%20of%2075%20Graduate%20Programs&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20the%20learning%20sciences&rft.au=Sommerhoff,%20Daniel&rft.date=2018-01-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=319&rft.epage=351&rft.pages=319-351&rft.issn=1050-8406&rft.eissn=1532-7809&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/10508406.2018.1440353&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3E48541147%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-922cf6836abd48f592f59b984d73695f01b6ab08c56985a38853aa02e2d357a83%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1175658&rft_jstor_id=48541147&rfr_iscdi=true