Loading…

Can Local Ordinances Prevent Neighborhood Destabilization?

This article assesses the ability of local housing ordinances to prevent neighborhood destabilization, specifically that arising as a consequence of the most recent housing crisis. We evaluate the degree to which vacancy registrations and point-of-sale inspection requirements influenced housing mark...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Housing policy debate 2016-05, Vol.26 (3), p.517-535
Main Authors: Fitzpatrick, Thomas J., Nelson, Lisa, Richter, Francisca G.-C., Whitaker, Stephan
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-6578b791d59a74ef70905eb0f807406cbf5fe60514a4692c886aff6620ff185c3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-6578b791d59a74ef70905eb0f807406cbf5fe60514a4692c886aff6620ff185c3
container_end_page 535
container_issue 3
container_start_page 517
container_title Housing policy debate
container_volume 26
creator Fitzpatrick, Thomas J.
Nelson, Lisa
Richter, Francisca G.-C.
Whitaker, Stephan
description This article assesses the ability of local housing ordinances to prevent neighborhood destabilization, specifically that arising as a consequence of the most recent housing crisis. We evaluate the degree to which vacancy registrations and point-of-sale inspection requirements influenced housing market outcomes during the housing crisis. With comprehensive real property data from Cuyahoga County, Ohio, we measure outcomes that characterize housing market distress including foreclosures, sales below the tax-assessed value, bulk sales, flipping, and property tax delinquency. We evaluate outcomes across properties in regulated and unregulated municipalities using matching procedures on linked data containing property, neighborhood, loan, and transaction characteristics. We find evidence that vacancy registrations substantially reduce foreclosures. In contrast, we find little evidence that point-of-sale inspections reduce undesirable transactions. Rather, properties in cities with inspection requirements displayed higher levels of foreclosure and tax delinquency relative to the control group during the study period.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/10511482.2015.1123754
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_10511482_2015_1123754</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4070779401</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-6578b791d59a74ef70905eb0f807406cbf5fe60514a4692c886aff6620ff185c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwCUiRWKfMOHHssAFUnlJFWYDEznIcm7pKY7BTUPl6ErVsWc3mzJ07h5BThAmCgHMEhpgLOqGAbIJIM87yPTKiyGgKDN72yWhg0gE6JEcxLgEozQQdkYupapOZ16pJ5qF2rWq1iclzMF-m7ZIn494XlQ8L7-vkxsROVa5xP6pzvr08JgdWNdGc7OaYvN7dvkwf0tn8_nF6PUt1xrFLC8ZFxUusWal4biyHEpipwArgORS6ssyaoq-Xq7woqRaiUNYWBQVrUTCdjcnZNvcj-M91X0Iu_Tq0_UmJvKQUsX-up9iW0sHHGIyVH8GtVNhIBDlokn-a5KBJ7jT1e1fbPddaH1bq24emlp3aND7Y0OtwUWb_R_wCf4hs1A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1792211105</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Can Local Ordinances Prevent Neighborhood Destabilization?</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection</source><creator>Fitzpatrick, Thomas J. ; Nelson, Lisa ; Richter, Francisca G.-C. ; Whitaker, Stephan</creator><creatorcontrib>Fitzpatrick, Thomas J. ; Nelson, Lisa ; Richter, Francisca G.-C. ; Whitaker, Stephan</creatorcontrib><description>This article assesses the ability of local housing ordinances to prevent neighborhood destabilization, specifically that arising as a consequence of the most recent housing crisis. We evaluate the degree to which vacancy registrations and point-of-sale inspection requirements influenced housing market outcomes during the housing crisis. With comprehensive real property data from Cuyahoga County, Ohio, we measure outcomes that characterize housing market distress including foreclosures, sales below the tax-assessed value, bulk sales, flipping, and property tax delinquency. We evaluate outcomes across properties in regulated and unregulated municipalities using matching procedures on linked data containing property, neighborhood, loan, and transaction characteristics. We find evidence that vacancy registrations substantially reduce foreclosures. In contrast, we find little evidence that point-of-sale inspections reduce undesirable transactions. Rather, properties in cities with inspection requirements displayed higher levels of foreclosure and tax delinquency relative to the control group during the study period.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1051-1482</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2152-050X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/10511482.2015.1123754</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Abingdon: Routledge</publisher><subject>City ordinances ; Delinquency ; Economic crisis ; Foreclosure ; Housing ; Housing ordinances ; neighborhood stabilization ; Neighborhoods ; propensity score matching ; Public housing ; Real estate sales ; Studies ; Vacancies</subject><ispartof>Housing policy debate, 2016-05, Vol.26 (3), p.517-535</ispartof><rights>2016 Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University 2016</rights><rights>Copyright Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd. 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-6578b791d59a74ef70905eb0f807406cbf5fe60514a4692c886aff6620ff185c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-6578b791d59a74ef70905eb0f807406cbf5fe60514a4692c886aff6620ff185c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27865,27923,27924,33222</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fitzpatrick, Thomas J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nelson, Lisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richter, Francisca G.-C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whitaker, Stephan</creatorcontrib><title>Can Local Ordinances Prevent Neighborhood Destabilization?</title><title>Housing policy debate</title><description>This article assesses the ability of local housing ordinances to prevent neighborhood destabilization, specifically that arising as a consequence of the most recent housing crisis. We evaluate the degree to which vacancy registrations and point-of-sale inspection requirements influenced housing market outcomes during the housing crisis. With comprehensive real property data from Cuyahoga County, Ohio, we measure outcomes that characterize housing market distress including foreclosures, sales below the tax-assessed value, bulk sales, flipping, and property tax delinquency. We evaluate outcomes across properties in regulated and unregulated municipalities using matching procedures on linked data containing property, neighborhood, loan, and transaction characteristics. We find evidence that vacancy registrations substantially reduce foreclosures. In contrast, we find little evidence that point-of-sale inspections reduce undesirable transactions. Rather, properties in cities with inspection requirements displayed higher levels of foreclosure and tax delinquency relative to the control group during the study period.</description><subject>City ordinances</subject><subject>Delinquency</subject><subject>Economic crisis</subject><subject>Foreclosure</subject><subject>Housing</subject><subject>Housing ordinances</subject><subject>neighborhood stabilization</subject><subject>Neighborhoods</subject><subject>propensity score matching</subject><subject>Public housing</subject><subject>Real estate sales</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Vacancies</subject><issn>1051-1482</issn><issn>2152-050X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwCUiRWKfMOHHssAFUnlJFWYDEznIcm7pKY7BTUPl6ErVsWc3mzJ07h5BThAmCgHMEhpgLOqGAbIJIM87yPTKiyGgKDN72yWhg0gE6JEcxLgEozQQdkYupapOZ16pJ5qF2rWq1iclzMF-m7ZIn494XlQ8L7-vkxsROVa5xP6pzvr08JgdWNdGc7OaYvN7dvkwf0tn8_nF6PUt1xrFLC8ZFxUusWal4biyHEpipwArgORS6ssyaoq-Xq7woqRaiUNYWBQVrUTCdjcnZNvcj-M91X0Iu_Tq0_UmJvKQUsX-up9iW0sHHGIyVH8GtVNhIBDlokn-a5KBJ7jT1e1fbPddaH1bq24emlp3aND7Y0OtwUWb_R_wCf4hs1A</recordid><startdate>20160503</startdate><enddate>20160503</enddate><creator>Fitzpatrick, Thomas J.</creator><creator>Nelson, Lisa</creator><creator>Richter, Francisca G.-C.</creator><creator>Whitaker, Stephan</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160503</creationdate><title>Can Local Ordinances Prevent Neighborhood Destabilization?</title><author>Fitzpatrick, Thomas J. ; Nelson, Lisa ; Richter, Francisca G.-C. ; Whitaker, Stephan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-6578b791d59a74ef70905eb0f807406cbf5fe60514a4692c886aff6620ff185c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>City ordinances</topic><topic>Delinquency</topic><topic>Economic crisis</topic><topic>Foreclosure</topic><topic>Housing</topic><topic>Housing ordinances</topic><topic>neighborhood stabilization</topic><topic>Neighborhoods</topic><topic>propensity score matching</topic><topic>Public housing</topic><topic>Real estate sales</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Vacancies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fitzpatrick, Thomas J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nelson, Lisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richter, Francisca G.-C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whitaker, Stephan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Housing policy debate</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fitzpatrick, Thomas J.</au><au>Nelson, Lisa</au><au>Richter, Francisca G.-C.</au><au>Whitaker, Stephan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Can Local Ordinances Prevent Neighborhood Destabilization?</atitle><jtitle>Housing policy debate</jtitle><date>2016-05-03</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>517</spage><epage>535</epage><pages>517-535</pages><issn>1051-1482</issn><eissn>2152-050X</eissn><abstract>This article assesses the ability of local housing ordinances to prevent neighborhood destabilization, specifically that arising as a consequence of the most recent housing crisis. We evaluate the degree to which vacancy registrations and point-of-sale inspection requirements influenced housing market outcomes during the housing crisis. With comprehensive real property data from Cuyahoga County, Ohio, we measure outcomes that characterize housing market distress including foreclosures, sales below the tax-assessed value, bulk sales, flipping, and property tax delinquency. We evaluate outcomes across properties in regulated and unregulated municipalities using matching procedures on linked data containing property, neighborhood, loan, and transaction characteristics. We find evidence that vacancy registrations substantially reduce foreclosures. In contrast, we find little evidence that point-of-sale inspections reduce undesirable transactions. Rather, properties in cities with inspection requirements displayed higher levels of foreclosure and tax delinquency relative to the control group during the study period.</abstract><cop>Abingdon</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/10511482.2015.1123754</doi><tpages>19</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1051-1482
ispartof Housing policy debate, 2016-05, Vol.26 (3), p.517-535
issn 1051-1482
2152-050X
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_10511482_2015_1123754
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); PAIS Index; Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection
subjects City ordinances
Delinquency
Economic crisis
Foreclosure
Housing
Housing ordinances
neighborhood stabilization
Neighborhoods
propensity score matching
Public housing
Real estate sales
Studies
Vacancies
title Can Local Ordinances Prevent Neighborhood Destabilization?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T08%3A18%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Can%20Local%20Ordinances%20Prevent%20Neighborhood%20Destabilization?&rft.jtitle=Housing%20policy%20debate&rft.au=Fitzpatrick,%20Thomas%20J.&rft.date=2016-05-03&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=517&rft.epage=535&rft.pages=517-535&rft.issn=1051-1482&rft.eissn=2152-050X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/10511482.2015.1123754&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4070779401%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-6578b791d59a74ef70905eb0f807406cbf5fe60514a4692c886aff6620ff185c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1792211105&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true