Loading…
Can Local Ordinances Prevent Neighborhood Destabilization?
This article assesses the ability of local housing ordinances to prevent neighborhood destabilization, specifically that arising as a consequence of the most recent housing crisis. We evaluate the degree to which vacancy registrations and point-of-sale inspection requirements influenced housing mark...
Saved in:
Published in: | Housing policy debate 2016-05, Vol.26 (3), p.517-535 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-6578b791d59a74ef70905eb0f807406cbf5fe60514a4692c886aff6620ff185c3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-6578b791d59a74ef70905eb0f807406cbf5fe60514a4692c886aff6620ff185c3 |
container_end_page | 535 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 517 |
container_title | Housing policy debate |
container_volume | 26 |
creator | Fitzpatrick, Thomas J. Nelson, Lisa Richter, Francisca G.-C. Whitaker, Stephan |
description | This article assesses the ability of local housing ordinances to prevent neighborhood destabilization, specifically that arising as a consequence of the most recent housing crisis. We evaluate the degree to which vacancy registrations and point-of-sale inspection requirements influenced housing market outcomes during the housing crisis. With comprehensive real property data from Cuyahoga County, Ohio, we measure outcomes that characterize housing market distress including foreclosures, sales below the tax-assessed value, bulk sales, flipping, and property tax delinquency. We evaluate outcomes across properties in regulated and unregulated municipalities using matching procedures on linked data containing property, neighborhood, loan, and transaction characteristics. We find evidence that vacancy registrations substantially reduce foreclosures. In contrast, we find little evidence that point-of-sale inspections reduce undesirable transactions. Rather, properties in cities with inspection requirements displayed higher levels of foreclosure and tax delinquency relative to the control group during the study period. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/10511482.2015.1123754 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_10511482_2015_1123754</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4070779401</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-6578b791d59a74ef70905eb0f807406cbf5fe60514a4692c886aff6620ff185c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwCUiRWKfMOHHssAFUnlJFWYDEznIcm7pKY7BTUPl6ErVsWc3mzJ07h5BThAmCgHMEhpgLOqGAbIJIM87yPTKiyGgKDN72yWhg0gE6JEcxLgEozQQdkYupapOZ16pJ5qF2rWq1iclzMF-m7ZIn494XlQ8L7-vkxsROVa5xP6pzvr08JgdWNdGc7OaYvN7dvkwf0tn8_nF6PUt1xrFLC8ZFxUusWal4biyHEpipwArgORS6ssyaoq-Xq7woqRaiUNYWBQVrUTCdjcnZNvcj-M91X0Iu_Tq0_UmJvKQUsX-up9iW0sHHGIyVH8GtVNhIBDlokn-a5KBJ7jT1e1fbPddaH1bq24emlp3aND7Y0OtwUWb_R_wCf4hs1A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1792211105</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Can Local Ordinances Prevent Neighborhood Destabilization?</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection</source><creator>Fitzpatrick, Thomas J. ; Nelson, Lisa ; Richter, Francisca G.-C. ; Whitaker, Stephan</creator><creatorcontrib>Fitzpatrick, Thomas J. ; Nelson, Lisa ; Richter, Francisca G.-C. ; Whitaker, Stephan</creatorcontrib><description>This article assesses the ability of local housing ordinances to prevent neighborhood destabilization, specifically that arising as a consequence of the most recent housing crisis. We evaluate the degree to which vacancy registrations and point-of-sale inspection requirements influenced housing market outcomes during the housing crisis. With comprehensive real property data from Cuyahoga County, Ohio, we measure outcomes that characterize housing market distress including foreclosures, sales below the tax-assessed value, bulk sales, flipping, and property tax delinquency. We evaluate outcomes across properties in regulated and unregulated municipalities using matching procedures on linked data containing property, neighborhood, loan, and transaction characteristics. We find evidence that vacancy registrations substantially reduce foreclosures. In contrast, we find little evidence that point-of-sale inspections reduce undesirable transactions. Rather, properties in cities with inspection requirements displayed higher levels of foreclosure and tax delinquency relative to the control group during the study period.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1051-1482</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2152-050X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/10511482.2015.1123754</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Abingdon: Routledge</publisher><subject>City ordinances ; Delinquency ; Economic crisis ; Foreclosure ; Housing ; Housing ordinances ; neighborhood stabilization ; Neighborhoods ; propensity score matching ; Public housing ; Real estate sales ; Studies ; Vacancies</subject><ispartof>Housing policy debate, 2016-05, Vol.26 (3), p.517-535</ispartof><rights>2016 Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University 2016</rights><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Ltd. 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-6578b791d59a74ef70905eb0f807406cbf5fe60514a4692c886aff6620ff185c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-6578b791d59a74ef70905eb0f807406cbf5fe60514a4692c886aff6620ff185c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27865,27923,27924,33222</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fitzpatrick, Thomas J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nelson, Lisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richter, Francisca G.-C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whitaker, Stephan</creatorcontrib><title>Can Local Ordinances Prevent Neighborhood Destabilization?</title><title>Housing policy debate</title><description>This article assesses the ability of local housing ordinances to prevent neighborhood destabilization, specifically that arising as a consequence of the most recent housing crisis. We evaluate the degree to which vacancy registrations and point-of-sale inspection requirements influenced housing market outcomes during the housing crisis. With comprehensive real property data from Cuyahoga County, Ohio, we measure outcomes that characterize housing market distress including foreclosures, sales below the tax-assessed value, bulk sales, flipping, and property tax delinquency. We evaluate outcomes across properties in regulated and unregulated municipalities using matching procedures on linked data containing property, neighborhood, loan, and transaction characteristics. We find evidence that vacancy registrations substantially reduce foreclosures. In contrast, we find little evidence that point-of-sale inspections reduce undesirable transactions. Rather, properties in cities with inspection requirements displayed higher levels of foreclosure and tax delinquency relative to the control group during the study period.</description><subject>City ordinances</subject><subject>Delinquency</subject><subject>Economic crisis</subject><subject>Foreclosure</subject><subject>Housing</subject><subject>Housing ordinances</subject><subject>neighborhood stabilization</subject><subject>Neighborhoods</subject><subject>propensity score matching</subject><subject>Public housing</subject><subject>Real estate sales</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Vacancies</subject><issn>1051-1482</issn><issn>2152-050X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwCUiRWKfMOHHssAFUnlJFWYDEznIcm7pKY7BTUPl6ErVsWc3mzJ07h5BThAmCgHMEhpgLOqGAbIJIM87yPTKiyGgKDN72yWhg0gE6JEcxLgEozQQdkYupapOZ16pJ5qF2rWq1iclzMF-m7ZIn494XlQ8L7-vkxsROVa5xP6pzvr08JgdWNdGc7OaYvN7dvkwf0tn8_nF6PUt1xrFLC8ZFxUusWal4biyHEpipwArgORS6ssyaoq-Xq7woqRaiUNYWBQVrUTCdjcnZNvcj-M91X0Iu_Tq0_UmJvKQUsX-up9iW0sHHGIyVH8GtVNhIBDlokn-a5KBJ7jT1e1fbPddaH1bq24emlp3aND7Y0OtwUWb_R_wCf4hs1A</recordid><startdate>20160503</startdate><enddate>20160503</enddate><creator>Fitzpatrick, Thomas J.</creator><creator>Nelson, Lisa</creator><creator>Richter, Francisca G.-C.</creator><creator>Whitaker, Stephan</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160503</creationdate><title>Can Local Ordinances Prevent Neighborhood Destabilization?</title><author>Fitzpatrick, Thomas J. ; Nelson, Lisa ; Richter, Francisca G.-C. ; Whitaker, Stephan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-6578b791d59a74ef70905eb0f807406cbf5fe60514a4692c886aff6620ff185c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>City ordinances</topic><topic>Delinquency</topic><topic>Economic crisis</topic><topic>Foreclosure</topic><topic>Housing</topic><topic>Housing ordinances</topic><topic>neighborhood stabilization</topic><topic>Neighborhoods</topic><topic>propensity score matching</topic><topic>Public housing</topic><topic>Real estate sales</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Vacancies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fitzpatrick, Thomas J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nelson, Lisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richter, Francisca G.-C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whitaker, Stephan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Housing policy debate</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fitzpatrick, Thomas J.</au><au>Nelson, Lisa</au><au>Richter, Francisca G.-C.</au><au>Whitaker, Stephan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Can Local Ordinances Prevent Neighborhood Destabilization?</atitle><jtitle>Housing policy debate</jtitle><date>2016-05-03</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>517</spage><epage>535</epage><pages>517-535</pages><issn>1051-1482</issn><eissn>2152-050X</eissn><abstract>This article assesses the ability of local housing ordinances to prevent neighborhood destabilization, specifically that arising as a consequence of the most recent housing crisis. We evaluate the degree to which vacancy registrations and point-of-sale inspection requirements influenced housing market outcomes during the housing crisis. With comprehensive real property data from Cuyahoga County, Ohio, we measure outcomes that characterize housing market distress including foreclosures, sales below the tax-assessed value, bulk sales, flipping, and property tax delinquency. We evaluate outcomes across properties in regulated and unregulated municipalities using matching procedures on linked data containing property, neighborhood, loan, and transaction characteristics. We find evidence that vacancy registrations substantially reduce foreclosures. In contrast, we find little evidence that point-of-sale inspections reduce undesirable transactions. Rather, properties in cities with inspection requirements displayed higher levels of foreclosure and tax delinquency relative to the control group during the study period.</abstract><cop>Abingdon</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/10511482.2015.1123754</doi><tpages>19</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1051-1482 |
ispartof | Housing policy debate, 2016-05, Vol.26 (3), p.517-535 |
issn | 1051-1482 2152-050X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_10511482_2015_1123754 |
source | International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); PAIS Index; Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection |
subjects | City ordinances Delinquency Economic crisis Foreclosure Housing Housing ordinances neighborhood stabilization Neighborhoods propensity score matching Public housing Real estate sales Studies Vacancies |
title | Can Local Ordinances Prevent Neighborhood Destabilization? |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T08%3A18%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Can%20Local%20Ordinances%20Prevent%20Neighborhood%20Destabilization?&rft.jtitle=Housing%20policy%20debate&rft.au=Fitzpatrick,%20Thomas%20J.&rft.date=2016-05-03&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=517&rft.epage=535&rft.pages=517-535&rft.issn=1051-1482&rft.eissn=2152-050X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/10511482.2015.1123754&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4070779401%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-6578b791d59a74ef70905eb0f807406cbf5fe60514a4692c886aff6620ff185c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1792211105&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |