Loading…
Cross-sectional and longitudinal confirmatory factor models for the german test anxiety inventory: A construct validation
Construct validity of the German Test Anxiety Inventory (TAI-G) was tested in two respects. Firstly, the purported four-dimensional structure of the TAI-G (comprising subscales Emotionality, Worry, Interference, and Lack of Confidence) as well as relations of the test anxiety dimensions to self-effi...
Saved in:
Published in: | Anxiety, stress, and coping stress, and coping, 2003-09, Vol.16 (3), p.251-270 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-a37f1ddda94b4cc2ddb5d8a75c82e9c4a5bd4f1f399063ffa982541bb62c7e393 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 270 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 251 |
container_title | Anxiety, stress, and coping |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | Keith, Nina Hodapp, Volker Schermelleh-engel, Karin Moosbrugger, Helfried |
description | Construct validity of the German Test Anxiety Inventory (TAI-G) was tested in two respects. Firstly, the purported four-dimensional structure of the TAI-G (comprising subscales Emotionality, Worry, Interference, and Lack of Confidence) as well as relations of the test anxiety dimensions to self-efficacy were tested. Secondly, the trait conception of the TAI-G was tested within the framework of Latent State-Trait theory. The TAI-G was given to a student sample (N=302) on three occasions with a time interval of 2 weeks along with a study-specific self-efficacy scale on occasion 1. Dimensionality assumptions as well as relations with self-efficacy were tested using cross-sectional second-order confirmatory factor analysis. The trait conception was tested separately for TAI-G subscales by specifying longitudinal confirmatory factor models (Latent State-Trait models) and by calculating variance proportions of manifest variables (Latent State-Trait coefficients) referring to different sources of systematic variance (person, situation, and method) based on parameter estimates of the models. Results were supportive of both the purported four-dimensional structure and hypothesized relationships to self-efficacy (i.e., acceptable model fit) as well as of the trait conception of test anxiety (i.e., acceptable model fit and high proportion of variance due to person component). Implications for further validation studies were discussed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/1061580031000095416 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>crossref_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_1061580031000095416</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1080_1061580031000095416</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-a37f1ddda94b4cc2ddb5d8a75c82e9c4a5bd4f1f399063ffa982541bb62c7e393</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMlOAzEMhiMEEqXwBFzyAgNZZgsHpKpikypxgfPIk6UETROUpKXz9mRUjhX4Ysv-P1u_Ebqm5IaSltxSUtOqJYRTkkNUJa1P0IyWTVMwRqrTXGdFkSX1ObqI8TOraFOyGRqXwcdYRC2T9Q4GDE7hwbu1TVtlp4b0ztiwgeTDiA3InPHGKz1EbHKZPjRe6zx3OOmYMr-3Oo3Yup12E3OHF9OOmMJWJryDwSqYbl2iMwND1Fe_eY7eHx_els_F6vXpZblYFZJXLBXAG0OVUiDKvpSSKdVXqoWmki3TQpZQ9ao01HAhSM2NAdGy7L_vayYbzQWfI37YKyenQZvuK9gNhLGjpJu-1x35XqbEgbIuu9zAtw-D6hKMgw8mgJM2HuO6tE-Zvf-X5X8d_wH7qoxM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cross-sectional and longitudinal confirmatory factor models for the german test anxiety inventory: A construct validation</title><source>SPORTDiscus with Full Text</source><source>Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection</source><creator>Keith, Nina ; Hodapp, Volker ; Schermelleh-engel, Karin ; Moosbrugger, Helfried</creator><creatorcontrib>Keith, Nina ; Hodapp, Volker ; Schermelleh-engel, Karin ; Moosbrugger, Helfried</creatorcontrib><description>Construct validity of the German Test Anxiety Inventory (TAI-G) was tested in two respects. Firstly, the purported four-dimensional structure of the TAI-G (comprising subscales Emotionality, Worry, Interference, and Lack of Confidence) as well as relations of the test anxiety dimensions to self-efficacy were tested. Secondly, the trait conception of the TAI-G was tested within the framework of Latent State-Trait theory. The TAI-G was given to a student sample (N=302) on three occasions with a time interval of 2 weeks along with a study-specific self-efficacy scale on occasion 1. Dimensionality assumptions as well as relations with self-efficacy were tested using cross-sectional second-order confirmatory factor analysis. The trait conception was tested separately for TAI-G subscales by specifying longitudinal confirmatory factor models (Latent State-Trait models) and by calculating variance proportions of manifest variables (Latent State-Trait coefficients) referring to different sources of systematic variance (person, situation, and method) based on parameter estimates of the models. Results were supportive of both the purported four-dimensional structure and hypothesized relationships to self-efficacy (i.e., acceptable model fit) as well as of the trait conception of test anxiety (i.e., acceptable model fit and high proportion of variance due to person component). Implications for further validation studies were discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1061-5806</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1477-2205</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/1061580031000095416</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Taylor & Francis Group</publisher><subject>Confirmatory Factor Analysis ; Construct Validity ; Latent State-Trait Theory ; Longitudinal Analysis ; Test Anxiety</subject><ispartof>Anxiety, stress, and coping, 2003-09, Vol.16 (3), p.251-270</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 2003</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-a37f1ddda94b4cc2ddb5d8a75c82e9c4a5bd4f1f399063ffa982541bb62c7e393</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Keith, Nina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hodapp, Volker</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schermelleh-engel, Karin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moosbrugger, Helfried</creatorcontrib><title>Cross-sectional and longitudinal confirmatory factor models for the german test anxiety inventory: A construct validation</title><title>Anxiety, stress, and coping</title><description>Construct validity of the German Test Anxiety Inventory (TAI-G) was tested in two respects. Firstly, the purported four-dimensional structure of the TAI-G (comprising subscales Emotionality, Worry, Interference, and Lack of Confidence) as well as relations of the test anxiety dimensions to self-efficacy were tested. Secondly, the trait conception of the TAI-G was tested within the framework of Latent State-Trait theory. The TAI-G was given to a student sample (N=302) on three occasions with a time interval of 2 weeks along with a study-specific self-efficacy scale on occasion 1. Dimensionality assumptions as well as relations with self-efficacy were tested using cross-sectional second-order confirmatory factor analysis. The trait conception was tested separately for TAI-G subscales by specifying longitudinal confirmatory factor models (Latent State-Trait models) and by calculating variance proportions of manifest variables (Latent State-Trait coefficients) referring to different sources of systematic variance (person, situation, and method) based on parameter estimates of the models. Results were supportive of both the purported four-dimensional structure and hypothesized relationships to self-efficacy (i.e., acceptable model fit) as well as of the trait conception of test anxiety (i.e., acceptable model fit and high proportion of variance due to person component). Implications for further validation studies were discussed.</description><subject>Confirmatory Factor Analysis</subject><subject>Construct Validity</subject><subject>Latent State-Trait Theory</subject><subject>Longitudinal Analysis</subject><subject>Test Anxiety</subject><issn>1061-5806</issn><issn>1477-2205</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkMlOAzEMhiMEEqXwBFzyAgNZZgsHpKpikypxgfPIk6UETROUpKXz9mRUjhX4Ysv-P1u_Ebqm5IaSltxSUtOqJYRTkkNUJa1P0IyWTVMwRqrTXGdFkSX1ObqI8TOraFOyGRqXwcdYRC2T9Q4GDE7hwbu1TVtlp4b0ztiwgeTDiA3InPHGKz1EbHKZPjRe6zx3OOmYMr-3Oo3Yup12E3OHF9OOmMJWJryDwSqYbl2iMwND1Fe_eY7eHx_els_F6vXpZblYFZJXLBXAG0OVUiDKvpSSKdVXqoWmki3TQpZQ9ao01HAhSM2NAdGy7L_vayYbzQWfI37YKyenQZvuK9gNhLGjpJu-1x35XqbEgbIuu9zAtw-D6hKMgw8mgJM2HuO6tE-Zvf-X5X8d_wH7qoxM</recordid><startdate>20030901</startdate><enddate>20030901</enddate><creator>Keith, Nina</creator><creator>Hodapp, Volker</creator><creator>Schermelleh-engel, Karin</creator><creator>Moosbrugger, Helfried</creator><general>Taylor & Francis Group</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030901</creationdate><title>Cross-sectional and longitudinal confirmatory factor models for the german test anxiety inventory: A construct validation</title><author>Keith, Nina ; Hodapp, Volker ; Schermelleh-engel, Karin ; Moosbrugger, Helfried</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-a37f1ddda94b4cc2ddb5d8a75c82e9c4a5bd4f1f399063ffa982541bb62c7e393</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Confirmatory Factor Analysis</topic><topic>Construct Validity</topic><topic>Latent State-Trait Theory</topic><topic>Longitudinal Analysis</topic><topic>Test Anxiety</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Keith, Nina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hodapp, Volker</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schermelleh-engel, Karin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moosbrugger, Helfried</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Anxiety, stress, and coping</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Keith, Nina</au><au>Hodapp, Volker</au><au>Schermelleh-engel, Karin</au><au>Moosbrugger, Helfried</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cross-sectional and longitudinal confirmatory factor models for the german test anxiety inventory: A construct validation</atitle><jtitle>Anxiety, stress, and coping</jtitle><date>2003-09-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>251</spage><epage>270</epage><pages>251-270</pages><issn>1061-5806</issn><eissn>1477-2205</eissn><abstract>Construct validity of the German Test Anxiety Inventory (TAI-G) was tested in two respects. Firstly, the purported four-dimensional structure of the TAI-G (comprising subscales Emotionality, Worry, Interference, and Lack of Confidence) as well as relations of the test anxiety dimensions to self-efficacy were tested. Secondly, the trait conception of the TAI-G was tested within the framework of Latent State-Trait theory. The TAI-G was given to a student sample (N=302) on three occasions with a time interval of 2 weeks along with a study-specific self-efficacy scale on occasion 1. Dimensionality assumptions as well as relations with self-efficacy were tested using cross-sectional second-order confirmatory factor analysis. The trait conception was tested separately for TAI-G subscales by specifying longitudinal confirmatory factor models (Latent State-Trait models) and by calculating variance proportions of manifest variables (Latent State-Trait coefficients) referring to different sources of systematic variance (person, situation, and method) based on parameter estimates of the models. Results were supportive of both the purported four-dimensional structure and hypothesized relationships to self-efficacy (i.e., acceptable model fit) as well as of the trait conception of test anxiety (i.e., acceptable model fit and high proportion of variance due to person component). Implications for further validation studies were discussed.</abstract><pub>Taylor & Francis Group</pub><doi>10.1080/1061580031000095416</doi><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1061-5806 |
ispartof | Anxiety, stress, and coping, 2003-09, Vol.16 (3), p.251-270 |
issn | 1061-5806 1477-2205 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_1061580031000095416 |
source | SPORTDiscus with Full Text; Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection |
subjects | Confirmatory Factor Analysis Construct Validity Latent State-Trait Theory Longitudinal Analysis Test Anxiety |
title | Cross-sectional and longitudinal confirmatory factor models for the german test anxiety inventory: A construct validation |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T15%3A00%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cross-sectional%20and%20longitudinal%20confirmatory%20factor%20models%20for%20the%20german%20test%20anxiety%20inventory:%20A%20construct%20validation&rft.jtitle=Anxiety,%20stress,%20and%20coping&rft.au=Keith,%20Nina&rft.date=2003-09-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=251&rft.epage=270&rft.pages=251-270&rft.issn=1061-5806&rft.eissn=1477-2205&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/1061580031000095416&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref_infor%3E10_1080_1061580031000095416%3C/crossref_infor%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-a37f1ddda94b4cc2ddb5d8a75c82e9c4a5bd4f1f399063ffa982541bb62c7e393%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |