Loading…

Cross-sectional and longitudinal confirmatory factor models for the german test anxiety inventory: A construct validation

Construct validity of the German Test Anxiety Inventory (TAI-G) was tested in two respects. Firstly, the purported four-dimensional structure of the TAI-G (comprising subscales Emotionality, Worry, Interference, and Lack of Confidence) as well as relations of the test anxiety dimensions to self-effi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Anxiety, stress, and coping stress, and coping, 2003-09, Vol.16 (3), p.251-270
Main Authors: Keith, Nina, Hodapp, Volker, Schermelleh-engel, Karin, Moosbrugger, Helfried
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-a37f1ddda94b4cc2ddb5d8a75c82e9c4a5bd4f1f399063ffa982541bb62c7e393
cites
container_end_page 270
container_issue 3
container_start_page 251
container_title Anxiety, stress, and coping
container_volume 16
creator Keith, Nina
Hodapp, Volker
Schermelleh-engel, Karin
Moosbrugger, Helfried
description Construct validity of the German Test Anxiety Inventory (TAI-G) was tested in two respects. Firstly, the purported four-dimensional structure of the TAI-G (comprising subscales Emotionality, Worry, Interference, and Lack of Confidence) as well as relations of the test anxiety dimensions to self-efficacy were tested. Secondly, the trait conception of the TAI-G was tested within the framework of Latent State-Trait theory. The TAI-G was given to a student sample (N=302) on three occasions with a time interval of 2 weeks along with a study-specific self-efficacy scale on occasion 1. Dimensionality assumptions as well as relations with self-efficacy were tested using cross-sectional second-order confirmatory factor analysis. The trait conception was tested separately for TAI-G subscales by specifying longitudinal confirmatory factor models (Latent State-Trait models) and by calculating variance proportions of manifest variables (Latent State-Trait coefficients) referring to different sources of systematic variance (person, situation, and method) based on parameter estimates of the models. Results were supportive of both the purported four-dimensional structure and hypothesized relationships to self-efficacy (i.e., acceptable model fit) as well as of the trait conception of test anxiety (i.e., acceptable model fit and high proportion of variance due to person component). Implications for further validation studies were discussed.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/1061580031000095416
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_1061580031000095416</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1080_1061580031000095416</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-a37f1ddda94b4cc2ddb5d8a75c82e9c4a5bd4f1f399063ffa982541bb62c7e393</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMlOAzEMhiMEEqXwBFzyAgNZZgsHpKpikypxgfPIk6UETROUpKXz9mRUjhX4Ysv-P1u_Ebqm5IaSltxSUtOqJYRTkkNUJa1P0IyWTVMwRqrTXGdFkSX1ObqI8TOraFOyGRqXwcdYRC2T9Q4GDE7hwbu1TVtlp4b0ztiwgeTDiA3InPHGKz1EbHKZPjRe6zx3OOmYMr-3Oo3Yup12E3OHF9OOmMJWJryDwSqYbl2iMwND1Fe_eY7eHx_els_F6vXpZblYFZJXLBXAG0OVUiDKvpSSKdVXqoWmki3TQpZQ9ao01HAhSM2NAdGy7L_vayYbzQWfI37YKyenQZvuK9gNhLGjpJu-1x35XqbEgbIuu9zAtw-D6hKMgw8mgJM2HuO6tE-Zvf-X5X8d_wH7qoxM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cross-sectional and longitudinal confirmatory factor models for the german test anxiety inventory: A construct validation</title><source>SPORTDiscus with Full Text</source><source>Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection</source><creator>Keith, Nina ; Hodapp, Volker ; Schermelleh-engel, Karin ; Moosbrugger, Helfried</creator><creatorcontrib>Keith, Nina ; Hodapp, Volker ; Schermelleh-engel, Karin ; Moosbrugger, Helfried</creatorcontrib><description>Construct validity of the German Test Anxiety Inventory (TAI-G) was tested in two respects. Firstly, the purported four-dimensional structure of the TAI-G (comprising subscales Emotionality, Worry, Interference, and Lack of Confidence) as well as relations of the test anxiety dimensions to self-efficacy were tested. Secondly, the trait conception of the TAI-G was tested within the framework of Latent State-Trait theory. The TAI-G was given to a student sample (N=302) on three occasions with a time interval of 2 weeks along with a study-specific self-efficacy scale on occasion 1. Dimensionality assumptions as well as relations with self-efficacy were tested using cross-sectional second-order confirmatory factor analysis. The trait conception was tested separately for TAI-G subscales by specifying longitudinal confirmatory factor models (Latent State-Trait models) and by calculating variance proportions of manifest variables (Latent State-Trait coefficients) referring to different sources of systematic variance (person, situation, and method) based on parameter estimates of the models. Results were supportive of both the purported four-dimensional structure and hypothesized relationships to self-efficacy (i.e., acceptable model fit) as well as of the trait conception of test anxiety (i.e., acceptable model fit and high proportion of variance due to person component). Implications for further validation studies were discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1061-5806</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1477-2205</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/1061580031000095416</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</publisher><subject>Confirmatory Factor Analysis ; Construct Validity ; Latent State-Trait Theory ; Longitudinal Analysis ; Test Anxiety</subject><ispartof>Anxiety, stress, and coping, 2003-09, Vol.16 (3), p.251-270</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor &amp; Francis Group, LLC 2003</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-a37f1ddda94b4cc2ddb5d8a75c82e9c4a5bd4f1f399063ffa982541bb62c7e393</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Keith, Nina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hodapp, Volker</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schermelleh-engel, Karin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moosbrugger, Helfried</creatorcontrib><title>Cross-sectional and longitudinal confirmatory factor models for the german test anxiety inventory: A construct validation</title><title>Anxiety, stress, and coping</title><description>Construct validity of the German Test Anxiety Inventory (TAI-G) was tested in two respects. Firstly, the purported four-dimensional structure of the TAI-G (comprising subscales Emotionality, Worry, Interference, and Lack of Confidence) as well as relations of the test anxiety dimensions to self-efficacy were tested. Secondly, the trait conception of the TAI-G was tested within the framework of Latent State-Trait theory. The TAI-G was given to a student sample (N=302) on three occasions with a time interval of 2 weeks along with a study-specific self-efficacy scale on occasion 1. Dimensionality assumptions as well as relations with self-efficacy were tested using cross-sectional second-order confirmatory factor analysis. The trait conception was tested separately for TAI-G subscales by specifying longitudinal confirmatory factor models (Latent State-Trait models) and by calculating variance proportions of manifest variables (Latent State-Trait coefficients) referring to different sources of systematic variance (person, situation, and method) based on parameter estimates of the models. Results were supportive of both the purported four-dimensional structure and hypothesized relationships to self-efficacy (i.e., acceptable model fit) as well as of the trait conception of test anxiety (i.e., acceptable model fit and high proportion of variance due to person component). Implications for further validation studies were discussed.</description><subject>Confirmatory Factor Analysis</subject><subject>Construct Validity</subject><subject>Latent State-Trait Theory</subject><subject>Longitudinal Analysis</subject><subject>Test Anxiety</subject><issn>1061-5806</issn><issn>1477-2205</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkMlOAzEMhiMEEqXwBFzyAgNZZgsHpKpikypxgfPIk6UETROUpKXz9mRUjhX4Ysv-P1u_Ebqm5IaSltxSUtOqJYRTkkNUJa1P0IyWTVMwRqrTXGdFkSX1ObqI8TOraFOyGRqXwcdYRC2T9Q4GDE7hwbu1TVtlp4b0ztiwgeTDiA3InPHGKz1EbHKZPjRe6zx3OOmYMr-3Oo3Yup12E3OHF9OOmMJWJryDwSqYbl2iMwND1Fe_eY7eHx_els_F6vXpZblYFZJXLBXAG0OVUiDKvpSSKdVXqoWmki3TQpZQ9ao01HAhSM2NAdGy7L_vayYbzQWfI37YKyenQZvuK9gNhLGjpJu-1x35XqbEgbIuu9zAtw-D6hKMgw8mgJM2HuO6tE-Zvf-X5X8d_wH7qoxM</recordid><startdate>20030901</startdate><enddate>20030901</enddate><creator>Keith, Nina</creator><creator>Hodapp, Volker</creator><creator>Schermelleh-engel, Karin</creator><creator>Moosbrugger, Helfried</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030901</creationdate><title>Cross-sectional and longitudinal confirmatory factor models for the german test anxiety inventory: A construct validation</title><author>Keith, Nina ; Hodapp, Volker ; Schermelleh-engel, Karin ; Moosbrugger, Helfried</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-a37f1ddda94b4cc2ddb5d8a75c82e9c4a5bd4f1f399063ffa982541bb62c7e393</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Confirmatory Factor Analysis</topic><topic>Construct Validity</topic><topic>Latent State-Trait Theory</topic><topic>Longitudinal Analysis</topic><topic>Test Anxiety</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Keith, Nina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hodapp, Volker</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schermelleh-engel, Karin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moosbrugger, Helfried</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Anxiety, stress, and coping</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Keith, Nina</au><au>Hodapp, Volker</au><au>Schermelleh-engel, Karin</au><au>Moosbrugger, Helfried</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cross-sectional and longitudinal confirmatory factor models for the german test anxiety inventory: A construct validation</atitle><jtitle>Anxiety, stress, and coping</jtitle><date>2003-09-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>251</spage><epage>270</epage><pages>251-270</pages><issn>1061-5806</issn><eissn>1477-2205</eissn><abstract>Construct validity of the German Test Anxiety Inventory (TAI-G) was tested in two respects. Firstly, the purported four-dimensional structure of the TAI-G (comprising subscales Emotionality, Worry, Interference, and Lack of Confidence) as well as relations of the test anxiety dimensions to self-efficacy were tested. Secondly, the trait conception of the TAI-G was tested within the framework of Latent State-Trait theory. The TAI-G was given to a student sample (N=302) on three occasions with a time interval of 2 weeks along with a study-specific self-efficacy scale on occasion 1. Dimensionality assumptions as well as relations with self-efficacy were tested using cross-sectional second-order confirmatory factor analysis. The trait conception was tested separately for TAI-G subscales by specifying longitudinal confirmatory factor models (Latent State-Trait models) and by calculating variance proportions of manifest variables (Latent State-Trait coefficients) referring to different sources of systematic variance (person, situation, and method) based on parameter estimates of the models. Results were supportive of both the purported four-dimensional structure and hypothesized relationships to self-efficacy (i.e., acceptable model fit) as well as of the trait conception of test anxiety (i.e., acceptable model fit and high proportion of variance due to person component). Implications for further validation studies were discussed.</abstract><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</pub><doi>10.1080/1061580031000095416</doi><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1061-5806
ispartof Anxiety, stress, and coping, 2003-09, Vol.16 (3), p.251-270
issn 1061-5806
1477-2205
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_1061580031000095416
source SPORTDiscus with Full Text; Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection
subjects Confirmatory Factor Analysis
Construct Validity
Latent State-Trait Theory
Longitudinal Analysis
Test Anxiety
title Cross-sectional and longitudinal confirmatory factor models for the german test anxiety inventory: A construct validation
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T15%3A00%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cross-sectional%20and%20longitudinal%20confirmatory%20factor%20models%20for%20the%20german%20test%20anxiety%20inventory:%20A%20construct%20validation&rft.jtitle=Anxiety,%20stress,%20and%20coping&rft.au=Keith,%20Nina&rft.date=2003-09-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=251&rft.epage=270&rft.pages=251-270&rft.issn=1061-5806&rft.eissn=1477-2205&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/1061580031000095416&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref_infor%3E10_1080_1061580031000095416%3C/crossref_infor%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-a37f1ddda94b4cc2ddb5d8a75c82e9c4a5bd4f1f399063ffa982541bb62c7e393%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true