Critical review of the methane generation potential of municipal solid waste

• Published in: Critical reviews in environmental science and technology 2016-07, Vol.46 (13), p.1117-1182
• Main Authors: Krause, Max J., W. Chickering, Giles, Townsend, Timothy G., Reinhart, Debra R.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Aerobic conditions; Biodegradation; Concentration (composition); Degradation; Experimental methods; gas; Geography; Landfill; Landfills; Life cycle analysis; Mathematical models; Methane; methane potential; modeling; Municipal solid waste; Municipal waste management; solid waste; Solid waste management; Waste disposal sites; Wastes
• ISSN: 1064-3389; 1547-6537
• DOI: 10.1080/10643389.2016.1204812

The ultimate methane generation potential (L 0 ) of municipal solid waste (MSW) has been used in first-order decay models for the estimation of landfill gas (LFG) production for the previous 30 years. L 0 is an inherent property of the waste component, often a function of the lignocellulosic concentrations within. Methane yields of individual waste components can be measured in a controlled laboratory setting; however, the extent to which each portion degrades in a landfill is uncertain. Methane generation in a landfill is difficult to estimate due to the spatial and temporal variations among sites and the heterogeneous composition of MSW streams. Predicting LFG production is further complicated by prior aerobic degradation, fugitive gas emissions that escape into the atmosphere, and unforeseen chemical inhibition within the landfill environment. Published L 0 values are reviewed and compared to the methane yields of mixed-waste and waste components measured in the laboratory. Experimentally determined values of mixed MSW ranged from 35 to 167 m 3 CH 4 /Mg MSW. Modeled values and those based on biodegradability of individual components and waste composition data ranged from 20 to 223 m 3 CH 4 /Mg MSW. These data constitute a wide range of experimental methodologies and waste composition characteristics with respect to geography and time. The usefulness, comparability, and applicability of such data are discussed. The use of L 0 as a parameter in LFG generation models and life-cycle assessments is reviewed and discussed.