Digital rectal stimulation as an intervention in persons with spinal cord injury and upper motor neuron neurogenic bowel. An evidenced-based systematic review of the literature

Context: Need for evidential support of practice guideline recommendations for management of neurogenic bowel management in adults with spinal cord injury. Objective: To determine evidence for digital rectal stimulation (DRS) as an intervention in the management of upper motor neuron neurogenic bowe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The journal of spinal cord medicine 2021-07, Vol.44 (4), p.525-532
Main Authors: Nelson, Mary Elizabeth S., Orr, Merle
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Constipation
Digital rectal
Neurogenic bowel
Review
Reviews
Spinal cord injury
Upper motor neuron
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Context: Need for evidential support of practice guideline recommendations for management of neurogenic bowel management in adults with spinal cord injury. Objective: To determine evidence for digital rectal stimulation (DRS) as an intervention in the management of upper motor neuron neurogenic bowels (UMN-NB) in persons with spinal cord injury (SCI). Methods: A systematic review of the literature including research articles and practice guidelines evaluating upper motor neuron neurogenic bowel treatments and the use of digital rectal stimulation was performed using OvidMedline, PubMed and the Cochrane database and included research articles and practice guidelines. Limitations were made related to English language, patient age and focus on spinal cord injured patients. Strength of evidence was assessed using the Johns Hopkins Nursing evidence-based practice model. Results: Eleven articles were included in the systematic review. Only one used DRS as a primary intervention. There was moderate evidence for DRS in persons with SCI and UMN-NB. There was evidence of the physiologic effect of DRS and support for combining DRS with other treatment regimens. Conclusion: There is insufficient evidence to promote any one intervention for the management of UMN-NB. The promotion of DRS, and education as to the proper technique for DRS should remain an emphasis of education of home management of UMN-NB in persons with SCI. Future research should focus on the use of standardized, validated tools to evaluate management techniques for UMN-NB.
ISSN:1079-0268
2045-7723
DOI:10.1080/10790268.2019.1696077