Loading…

Measuring the economic value of deer hunting: comparing estimates from survey and harvest check-in data

Economists typically estimate the economic value of wildlife-associated recreation by applying valuation methods to individual data collected from mail and internet surveys, however, surveys are limited to what respondents choose to report as well as who chooses to respond. Government records and mo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Human dimensions of wildlife 2024-11, Vol.29 (6), p.545-561
Main Authors: Boehm, Luke, Chakraborti, Lopamudra, Melstrom, Richard T., Piccolo, Nicolina, Reeling, Carson
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-87286bcafbc24e1aced708f615efaacaba5aeb589dd28ec4789c5b68e5200acd3
container_end_page 561
container_issue 6
container_start_page 545
container_title Human dimensions of wildlife
container_volume 29
creator Boehm, Luke
Chakraborti, Lopamudra
Melstrom, Richard T.
Piccolo, Nicolina
Reeling, Carson
description Economists typically estimate the economic value of wildlife-associated recreation by applying valuation methods to individual data collected from mail and internet surveys, however, surveys are limited to what respondents choose to report as well as who chooses to respond. Government records and mobile applications that track recreational activity can also provide data for economic valuation if activities can be linked back to individual decision-makers. One particularly intriguing source of government information is harvest check-in data, which tracks hunting success. In this paper, we examine the comparability of economic values based on surveys and harvest check-in data using a site choice model. While we find evidence the datasets yield different models, large and substantial differences are the exception rather than the rule, especially once we accurately account for individual trip costs. Our findings support the conclusion that data generated through surveys and harvest records are capable of producing similar valuation estimates.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/10871209.2023.2283070
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_10871209_2023_2283070</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3118583139</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-87286bcafbc24e1aced708f615efaacaba5aeb589dd28ec4789c5b68e5200acd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRSMEEqXwCUiWWKf4UScOK1DFSypiAxI7a-KM25QkLnZS1L_HpWXLZu4sztyZuUlyyeiEUUWvY8kZp8WEUy4mnCtBc3qUjJgUImVSfRzHPjLpDjpNzkJYUcqEzLJRsnhBCIOvuwXpl0jQuM61tSEbaAYkzpIK0ZPl0PURuSHGtWv4pTH0dQs9BmK9a0n02OCWQFeRJcQ29MQs0XymdUcq6OE8ObHQBLw46Dh5f7h_mz2l89fH59ndPDVcZX2q8iilAVsaPkUGBqucKpsxiRbAQAkSsJSqqCqu0ExzVRhZZgolpxRMJcbJ1d537d3XEM_QKzf4Lq7UgjEllWCiiJTcU8a7EDxavfbxG7_VjOpdpvovU73LVB8yjXO3-7m6s8638O18U-keto3z1kNn6t2afy1-AI-MgA8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3118583139</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Measuring the economic value of deer hunting: comparing estimates from survey and harvest check-in data</title><source>Taylor and Francis Science and Technology Collection</source><creator>Boehm, Luke ; Chakraborti, Lopamudra ; Melstrom, Richard T. ; Piccolo, Nicolina ; Reeling, Carson</creator><creatorcontrib>Boehm, Luke ; Chakraborti, Lopamudra ; Melstrom, Richard T. ; Piccolo, Nicolina ; Reeling, Carson</creatorcontrib><description>Economists typically estimate the economic value of wildlife-associated recreation by applying valuation methods to individual data collected from mail and internet surveys, however, surveys are limited to what respondents choose to report as well as who chooses to respond. Government records and mobile applications that track recreational activity can also provide data for economic valuation if activities can be linked back to individual decision-makers. One particularly intriguing source of government information is harvest check-in data, which tracks hunting success. In this paper, we examine the comparability of economic values based on surveys and harvest check-in data using a site choice model. While we find evidence the datasets yield different models, large and substantial differences are the exception rather than the rule, especially once we accurately account for individual trip costs. Our findings support the conclusion that data generated through surveys and harvest records are capable of producing similar valuation estimates.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1087-1209</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1533-158X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/10871209.2023.2283070</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Philadelphia: Routledge</publisher><subject>Agriculture ; Applications programs ; discrete choice model ; Economics ; Estimates ; habitat conservation ; Hunting ; Mobile computing ; nonmarket valuation ; Polls &amp; surveys ; Surveys ; Trip estimation ; Wildlife</subject><ispartof>Human dimensions of wildlife, 2024-11, Vol.29 (6), p.545-561</ispartof><rights>2023 Taylor &amp; Francis Group, LLC 2023</rights><rights>2023 Taylor &amp; Francis Group, LLC</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-87286bcafbc24e1aced708f615efaacaba5aeb589dd28ec4789c5b68e5200acd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Boehm, Luke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chakraborti, Lopamudra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Melstrom, Richard T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piccolo, Nicolina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reeling, Carson</creatorcontrib><title>Measuring the economic value of deer hunting: comparing estimates from survey and harvest check-in data</title><title>Human dimensions of wildlife</title><description>Economists typically estimate the economic value of wildlife-associated recreation by applying valuation methods to individual data collected from mail and internet surveys, however, surveys are limited to what respondents choose to report as well as who chooses to respond. Government records and mobile applications that track recreational activity can also provide data for economic valuation if activities can be linked back to individual decision-makers. One particularly intriguing source of government information is harvest check-in data, which tracks hunting success. In this paper, we examine the comparability of economic values based on surveys and harvest check-in data using a site choice model. While we find evidence the datasets yield different models, large and substantial differences are the exception rather than the rule, especially once we accurately account for individual trip costs. Our findings support the conclusion that data generated through surveys and harvest records are capable of producing similar valuation estimates.</description><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Applications programs</subject><subject>discrete choice model</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Estimates</subject><subject>habitat conservation</subject><subject>Hunting</subject><subject>Mobile computing</subject><subject>nonmarket valuation</subject><subject>Polls &amp; surveys</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Trip estimation</subject><subject>Wildlife</subject><issn>1087-1209</issn><issn>1533-158X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRSMEEqXwCUiWWKf4UScOK1DFSypiAxI7a-KM25QkLnZS1L_HpWXLZu4sztyZuUlyyeiEUUWvY8kZp8WEUy4mnCtBc3qUjJgUImVSfRzHPjLpDjpNzkJYUcqEzLJRsnhBCIOvuwXpl0jQuM61tSEbaAYkzpIK0ZPl0PURuSHGtWv4pTH0dQs9BmK9a0n02OCWQFeRJcQ29MQs0XymdUcq6OE8ObHQBLw46Dh5f7h_mz2l89fH59ndPDVcZX2q8iilAVsaPkUGBqucKpsxiRbAQAkSsJSqqCqu0ExzVRhZZgolpxRMJcbJ1d537d3XEM_QKzf4Lq7UgjEllWCiiJTcU8a7EDxavfbxG7_VjOpdpvovU73LVB8yjXO3-7m6s8638O18U-keto3z1kNn6t2afy1-AI-MgA8</recordid><startdate>20241101</startdate><enddate>20241101</enddate><creator>Boehm, Luke</creator><creator>Chakraborti, Lopamudra</creator><creator>Melstrom, Richard T.</creator><creator>Piccolo, Nicolina</creator><creator>Reeling, Carson</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20241101</creationdate><title>Measuring the economic value of deer hunting: comparing estimates from survey and harvest check-in data</title><author>Boehm, Luke ; Chakraborti, Lopamudra ; Melstrom, Richard T. ; Piccolo, Nicolina ; Reeling, Carson</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-87286bcafbc24e1aced708f615efaacaba5aeb589dd28ec4789c5b68e5200acd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Applications programs</topic><topic>discrete choice model</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Estimates</topic><topic>habitat conservation</topic><topic>Hunting</topic><topic>Mobile computing</topic><topic>nonmarket valuation</topic><topic>Polls &amp; surveys</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Trip estimation</topic><topic>Wildlife</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Boehm, Luke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chakraborti, Lopamudra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Melstrom, Richard T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piccolo, Nicolina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reeling, Carson</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Human dimensions of wildlife</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Boehm, Luke</au><au>Chakraborti, Lopamudra</au><au>Melstrom, Richard T.</au><au>Piccolo, Nicolina</au><au>Reeling, Carson</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Measuring the economic value of deer hunting: comparing estimates from survey and harvest check-in data</atitle><jtitle>Human dimensions of wildlife</jtitle><date>2024-11-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>545</spage><epage>561</epage><pages>545-561</pages><issn>1087-1209</issn><eissn>1533-158X</eissn><abstract>Economists typically estimate the economic value of wildlife-associated recreation by applying valuation methods to individual data collected from mail and internet surveys, however, surveys are limited to what respondents choose to report as well as who chooses to respond. Government records and mobile applications that track recreational activity can also provide data for economic valuation if activities can be linked back to individual decision-makers. One particularly intriguing source of government information is harvest check-in data, which tracks hunting success. In this paper, we examine the comparability of economic values based on surveys and harvest check-in data using a site choice model. While we find evidence the datasets yield different models, large and substantial differences are the exception rather than the rule, especially once we accurately account for individual trip costs. Our findings support the conclusion that data generated through surveys and harvest records are capable of producing similar valuation estimates.</abstract><cop>Philadelphia</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/10871209.2023.2283070</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1087-1209
ispartof Human dimensions of wildlife, 2024-11, Vol.29 (6), p.545-561
issn 1087-1209
1533-158X
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_10871209_2023_2283070
source Taylor and Francis Science and Technology Collection
subjects Agriculture
Applications programs
discrete choice model
Economics
Estimates
habitat conservation
Hunting
Mobile computing
nonmarket valuation
Polls & surveys
Surveys
Trip estimation
Wildlife
title Measuring the economic value of deer hunting: comparing estimates from survey and harvest check-in data
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T01%3A14%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Measuring%20the%20economic%20value%20of%20deer%20hunting:%20comparing%20estimates%20from%20survey%20and%20harvest%20check-in%20data&rft.jtitle=Human%20dimensions%20of%20wildlife&rft.au=Boehm,%20Luke&rft.date=2024-11-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=545&rft.epage=561&rft.pages=545-561&rft.issn=1087-1209&rft.eissn=1533-158X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/10871209.2023.2283070&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3118583139%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-87286bcafbc24e1aced708f615efaacaba5aeb589dd28ec4789c5b68e5200acd3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3118583139&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true