Comparison between Single- and Group-housed Pregnant Sows for Direct and Indirect Physiological, Reproductive, Welfare Indicators and Gene Expression Profiling

Single- and group-housed pregnant sows were assessed during 8 weeks (4th and 8th to 14th) with regard to physiological, reproductive, welfare indicators and gene expression profiling. Compared to single-housed sows, group-housed sows had decreased non-return to estrus at 56 days after artificial ins...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of applied animal welfare science 2021-07, Vol.24 (3), p.246-259
Main Authors: Capoferri, Rossana, Parati, Katia, Puglisi, Roberto, Moscati, Livia, Sensi, Marco, Lombardi, Guerino, Sandri, Gianpietro, Briani, Carlo, Galli, Andrea
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
adaptation
Alanine
Albumins
Alkaline phosphatase
animal husbandry
Artificial insemination
Bilirubin
C-reactive protein
Estrus
Gene expression
Genes
Immune response
Immune system
Immunomodulation
Indicators
Lysozyme
Physiology
Pig
Reproduction (biology)
stress
wellbeing
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-9545f567add774d160f8ba76d4206823c8cc8b1e46c0f4b19d4119e0f354cf183
container_end_page 259
container_issue 3
container_start_page 246
container_title Journal of applied animal welfare science
container_volume 24
creator Capoferri, Rossana
Parati, Katia
Puglisi, Roberto
Moscati, Livia
Sensi, Marco
Lombardi, Guerino
Sandri, Gianpietro
Briani, Carlo
Galli, Andrea
description Single- and group-housed pregnant sows were assessed during 8 weeks (4th and 8th to 14th) with regard to physiological, reproductive, welfare indicators and gene expression profiling. Compared to single-housed sows, group-housed sows had decreased non-return to estrus at 56 days after artificial insemination (AI) (83% vs 92%) and farrowing rate (78% vs 88%), respectively. Furthermore, group-housed sows showed a higher degree (p 
doi_str_mv 10.1080/10888705.2020.1790369
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_10888705_2020_1790369</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2483361831</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-9545f567add774d160f8ba76d4206823c8cc8b1e46c0f4b19d4119e0f354cf183</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kctu1DAUhiMEoqXwCCBLbFg0xbckzg40lFKpEhUFsbQc-3jqyrEHO2GYp-FV8TRTFizY-KbvnPNbX1W9JPiMYIHflkWIDjdnFNPy1PWYtf2j6pg0jNZdi_njci5MvYeOqmc532GMKeX0aXXEqOh5L_rj6vcqjhuVXI4BDTBtAQK6cWHtoUYqGHSR4rypb-OcwaDrBOugwoRu4jYjGxP64BLo6Z68DGa5XN_usos-rp1W_hR9gU2KZtaT-wmn6Dt4qxLc01pNMeVlDARA5782CXKpDWVStM6XHM-rJ1b5DC8O-0n17eP519Wn-urzxeXq_VWtGadT3Te8sU3bKWO6jhvSYisG1bWGU9wKyrTQWgwEeKux5QPpDSekB2xZw7Ulgp1Ub5a-JeyPGfIkR5c1eK8ClM9LygVjbQFJQV__g97FOYWSTtKGc9a0xUWhmoXSKeacwMpNcqNKO0mw3BuUDwbl3qA8GCx1rw7d52EE87fqQVkB3i2AC8XAqLYxeSMntfMx2aSCdlmy_8_4A0uGq_g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2544356903</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison between Single- and Group-housed Pregnant Sows for Direct and Indirect Physiological, Reproductive, Welfare Indicators and Gene Expression Profiling</title><source>Taylor and Francis Science and Technology Collection</source><creator>Capoferri, Rossana ; Parati, Katia ; Puglisi, Roberto ; Moscati, Livia ; Sensi, Marco ; Lombardi, Guerino ; Sandri, Gianpietro ; Briani, Carlo ; Galli, Andrea</creator><creatorcontrib>Capoferri, Rossana ; Parati, Katia ; Puglisi, Roberto ; Moscati, Livia ; Sensi, Marco ; Lombardi, Guerino ; Sandri, Gianpietro ; Briani, Carlo ; Galli, Andrea</creatorcontrib><description>Single- and group-housed pregnant sows were assessed during 8 weeks (4th and 8th to 14th) with regard to physiological, reproductive, welfare indicators and gene expression profiling. Compared to single-housed sows, group-housed sows had decreased non-return to estrus at 56 days after artificial insemination (AI) (83% vs 92%) and farrowing rate (78% vs 88%), respectively. Furthermore, group-housed sows showed a higher degree (p &lt; 0.01) of advantageous physiological indicators, such as albumin (odds ratio [OR] = 4.4), alkaline phosphatase (OR = 1.5), bactericidal (OR = 3.2) and complement (OR = 24.3), and disadvantageous for alanine amino transferase (OR = 0.5), bilirubin (OR = 0.4), lysozyme (OR = 0.3) and C-reactive protein compared to single-housed. Eighty-seven genes related to immune response were underexpressed (log fold change ≤ 1.5; p &lt; 0.05) during the 8th to 14th weeks in the group compared to single-housed sows, which in turn showed an immunomodulatory reduction on the expression of 43 genes during the 11th to 14th compared to the 4th week. Overall, the results were interpreted as indicative of greater comfort state of the group compared to single-housed sows.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1088-8705</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-7604</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/10888705.2020.1790369</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32894989</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Taylor &amp; Francis</publisher><subject>adaptation ; Alanine ; Albumins ; Alkaline phosphatase ; animal husbandry ; Artificial insemination ; Bilirubin ; C-reactive protein ; Estrus ; Gene expression ; Genes ; Immune response ; Immune system ; Immunomodulation ; Indicators ; Lysozyme ; Physiology ; Pig ; Reproduction (biology) ; stress ; wellbeing</subject><ispartof>Journal of applied animal welfare science, 2021-07, Vol.24 (3), p.246-259</ispartof><rights>2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor &amp; Francis Group 2020</rights><rights>2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor &amp; Francis Group</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-9545f567add774d160f8ba76d4206823c8cc8b1e46c0f4b19d4119e0f354cf183</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0373-503X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32894989$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Capoferri, Rossana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parati, Katia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Puglisi, Roberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moscati, Livia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sensi, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lombardi, Guerino</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sandri, Gianpietro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Briani, Carlo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galli, Andrea</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison between Single- and Group-housed Pregnant Sows for Direct and Indirect Physiological, Reproductive, Welfare Indicators and Gene Expression Profiling</title><title>Journal of applied animal welfare science</title><addtitle>J Appl Anim Welf Sci</addtitle><description>Single- and group-housed pregnant sows were assessed during 8 weeks (4th and 8th to 14th) with regard to physiological, reproductive, welfare indicators and gene expression profiling. Compared to single-housed sows, group-housed sows had decreased non-return to estrus at 56 days after artificial insemination (AI) (83% vs 92%) and farrowing rate (78% vs 88%), respectively. Furthermore, group-housed sows showed a higher degree (p &lt; 0.01) of advantageous physiological indicators, such as albumin (odds ratio [OR] = 4.4), alkaline phosphatase (OR = 1.5), bactericidal (OR = 3.2) and complement (OR = 24.3), and disadvantageous for alanine amino transferase (OR = 0.5), bilirubin (OR = 0.4), lysozyme (OR = 0.3) and C-reactive protein compared to single-housed. Eighty-seven genes related to immune response were underexpressed (log fold change ≤ 1.5; p &lt; 0.05) during the 8th to 14th weeks in the group compared to single-housed sows, which in turn showed an immunomodulatory reduction on the expression of 43 genes during the 11th to 14th compared to the 4th week. Overall, the results were interpreted as indicative of greater comfort state of the group compared to single-housed sows.</description><subject>adaptation</subject><subject>Alanine</subject><subject>Albumins</subject><subject>Alkaline phosphatase</subject><subject>animal husbandry</subject><subject>Artificial insemination</subject><subject>Bilirubin</subject><subject>C-reactive protein</subject><subject>Estrus</subject><subject>Gene expression</subject><subject>Genes</subject><subject>Immune response</subject><subject>Immune system</subject><subject>Immunomodulation</subject><subject>Indicators</subject><subject>Lysozyme</subject><subject>Physiology</subject><subject>Pig</subject><subject>Reproduction (biology)</subject><subject>stress</subject><subject>wellbeing</subject><issn>1088-8705</issn><issn>1532-7604</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kctu1DAUhiMEoqXwCCBLbFg0xbckzg40lFKpEhUFsbQc-3jqyrEHO2GYp-FV8TRTFizY-KbvnPNbX1W9JPiMYIHflkWIDjdnFNPy1PWYtf2j6pg0jNZdi_njci5MvYeOqmc532GMKeX0aXXEqOh5L_rj6vcqjhuVXI4BDTBtAQK6cWHtoUYqGHSR4rypb-OcwaDrBOugwoRu4jYjGxP64BLo6Z68DGa5XN_usos-rp1W_hR9gU2KZtaT-wmn6Dt4qxLc01pNMeVlDARA5782CXKpDWVStM6XHM-rJ1b5DC8O-0n17eP519Wn-urzxeXq_VWtGadT3Te8sU3bKWO6jhvSYisG1bWGU9wKyrTQWgwEeKux5QPpDSekB2xZw7Ulgp1Ub5a-JeyPGfIkR5c1eK8ClM9LygVjbQFJQV__g97FOYWSTtKGc9a0xUWhmoXSKeacwMpNcqNKO0mw3BuUDwbl3qA8GCx1rw7d52EE87fqQVkB3i2AC8XAqLYxeSMntfMx2aSCdlmy_8_4A0uGq_g</recordid><startdate>20210703</startdate><enddate>20210703</enddate><creator>Capoferri, Rossana</creator><creator>Parati, Katia</creator><creator>Puglisi, Roberto</creator><creator>Moscati, Livia</creator><creator>Sensi, Marco</creator><creator>Lombardi, Guerino</creator><creator>Sandri, Gianpietro</creator><creator>Briani, Carlo</creator><creator>Galli, Andrea</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0373-503X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210703</creationdate><title>Comparison between Single- and Group-housed Pregnant Sows for Direct and Indirect Physiological, Reproductive, Welfare Indicators and Gene Expression Profiling</title><author>Capoferri, Rossana ; Parati, Katia ; Puglisi, Roberto ; Moscati, Livia ; Sensi, Marco ; Lombardi, Guerino ; Sandri, Gianpietro ; Briani, Carlo ; Galli, Andrea</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-9545f567add774d160f8ba76d4206823c8cc8b1e46c0f4b19d4119e0f354cf183</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>adaptation</topic><topic>Alanine</topic><topic>Albumins</topic><topic>Alkaline phosphatase</topic><topic>animal husbandry</topic><topic>Artificial insemination</topic><topic>Bilirubin</topic><topic>C-reactive protein</topic><topic>Estrus</topic><topic>Gene expression</topic><topic>Genes</topic><topic>Immune response</topic><topic>Immune system</topic><topic>Immunomodulation</topic><topic>Indicators</topic><topic>Lysozyme</topic><topic>Physiology</topic><topic>Pig</topic><topic>Reproduction (biology)</topic><topic>stress</topic><topic>wellbeing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Capoferri, Rossana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parati, Katia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Puglisi, Roberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moscati, Livia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sensi, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lombardi, Guerino</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sandri, Gianpietro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Briani, Carlo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galli, Andrea</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of applied animal welfare science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Capoferri, Rossana</au><au>Parati, Katia</au><au>Puglisi, Roberto</au><au>Moscati, Livia</au><au>Sensi, Marco</au><au>Lombardi, Guerino</au><au>Sandri, Gianpietro</au><au>Briani, Carlo</au><au>Galli, Andrea</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison between Single- and Group-housed Pregnant Sows for Direct and Indirect Physiological, Reproductive, Welfare Indicators and Gene Expression Profiling</atitle><jtitle>Journal of applied animal welfare science</jtitle><addtitle>J Appl Anim Welf Sci</addtitle><date>2021-07-03</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>246</spage><epage>259</epage><pages>246-259</pages><issn>1088-8705</issn><eissn>1532-7604</eissn><abstract>Single- and group-housed pregnant sows were assessed during 8 weeks (4th and 8th to 14th) with regard to physiological, reproductive, welfare indicators and gene expression profiling. Compared to single-housed sows, group-housed sows had decreased non-return to estrus at 56 days after artificial insemination (AI) (83% vs 92%) and farrowing rate (78% vs 88%), respectively. Furthermore, group-housed sows showed a higher degree (p &lt; 0.01) of advantageous physiological indicators, such as albumin (odds ratio [OR] = 4.4), alkaline phosphatase (OR = 1.5), bactericidal (OR = 3.2) and complement (OR = 24.3), and disadvantageous for alanine amino transferase (OR = 0.5), bilirubin (OR = 0.4), lysozyme (OR = 0.3) and C-reactive protein compared to single-housed. Eighty-seven genes related to immune response were underexpressed (log fold change ≤ 1.5; p &lt; 0.05) during the 8th to 14th weeks in the group compared to single-housed sows, which in turn showed an immunomodulatory reduction on the expression of 43 genes during the 11th to 14th compared to the 4th week. Overall, the results were interpreted as indicative of greater comfort state of the group compared to single-housed sows.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis</pub><pmid>32894989</pmid><doi>10.1080/10888705.2020.1790369</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0373-503X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1088-8705
ispartof Journal of applied animal welfare science, 2021-07, Vol.24 (3), p.246-259
issn 1088-8705
1532-7604
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_10888705_2020_1790369
source Taylor and Francis Science and Technology Collection
subjects adaptation
Alanine
Albumins
Alkaline phosphatase
animal husbandry
Artificial insemination
Bilirubin
C-reactive protein
Estrus
Gene expression
Genes
Immune response
Immune system
Immunomodulation
Indicators
Lysozyme
Physiology
Pig
Reproduction (biology)
stress
wellbeing
title Comparison between Single- and Group-housed Pregnant Sows for Direct and Indirect Physiological, Reproductive, Welfare Indicators and Gene Expression Profiling
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T01%3A23%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20between%20Single-%20and%20Group-housed%20Pregnant%20Sows%20for%20Direct%20and%20Indirect%20Physiological,%20Reproductive,%20Welfare%20Indicators%20and%20Gene%20Expression%20Profiling&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20applied%20animal%20welfare%20science&rft.au=Capoferri,%20Rossana&rft.date=2021-07-03&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=246&rft.epage=259&rft.pages=246-259&rft.issn=1088-8705&rft.eissn=1532-7604&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/10888705.2020.1790369&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2483361831%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-9545f567add774d160f8ba76d4206823c8cc8b1e46c0f4b19d4119e0f354cf183%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2544356903&rft_id=info:pmid/32894989&rfr_iscdi=true