Loading…

Ambulance sphygmomanometers are frequently inaccurate

Objective. To determine the accuracy and reliability of sphygmomanometers used in a metropolitan emergency medical services (EMS) system. Methods. As a cross-sectional, convenience sample, 150 sphygmomanometers used by EMS personnel in Milwaukee County, Wisconsin, were evaluated. Each sphygmomanomet...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Prehospital emergency care 1997, Vol.1 (3), p.136-139
Main Authors: Cady, Charles E., Pirrallo, Ronald G., Grim, Clarence E.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c345t-5024479638222752320e2dd150059a8464accb337602a852af63f9b8048d6a563
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c345t-5024479638222752320e2dd150059a8464accb337602a852af63f9b8048d6a563
container_end_page 139
container_issue 3
container_start_page 136
container_title Prehospital emergency care
container_volume 1
creator Cady, Charles E.
Pirrallo, Ronald G.
Grim, Clarence E.
description Objective. To determine the accuracy and reliability of sphygmomanometers used in a metropolitan emergency medical services (EMS) system. Methods. As a cross-sectional, convenience sample, 150 sphygmomanometers used by EMS personnel in Milwaukee County, Wisconsin, were evaluated. Each sphygmomanometer was checked for accuracy by connecting the manometer to a new, standard mercury manometer using a "Y" connector. Pressure was checked at readings of 60,90,120, and 200 mm Hg. The integrity of the device (leaking) was checked by inflating the cuff around a can to 300 mm Hg and measuring the pressure lost in 1 minute. Devices were determined to be inaccurate if the average of the absolute differences at each pressure deviated by more than 3 mm Hg. The device was determined to be unreliable (leaked) if it lost pressure greater than 15 mm Hg in 1 minute. Results. Twenty-eight percent (41/149) of the devices were inaccurate at 90 mm Hg and 25% (37/149) were inaccurate overall. The overall and 90 mm Hg average deviations were ±6.6 and ±6.0 mm Hg, respectively. Sixty-three percent (94/150) of the devices were unreliable (leaked). When considering both accuracy and reliability at 90 mm Hg, a total of 73% (109/150) of the devices failed one or both of the criteria. Conclusion. This study suggests that an accurate blood pressure measurement may not be reliably obtained with 73% of the sphygmomanometers currently used in the county's EMS system.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/10903129708958806
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_10903129708958806</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>79606981</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c345t-5024479638222752320e2dd150059a8464accb337602a852af63f9b8048d6a563</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LwzAYx4Moc04_gAehJ2_VJ0mTJuhlDN9g4EXPIW1T19E0M2mRfnsjK4IIOz0P_F_480PoEsMNBgG3GCRQTGQOQjIhgB-hOWYZSwE4P45_1NNoyE_RWQhbAMwJ5TM0iwlJGZsjtrTF0OquNEnYbcYP66zunDW98SHR3iS1N5-D6fp2TJpOl-XgdW_O0Umt22AuprtA748Pb6vndP369LJartOSZqxPGZAsyyWnghCSM0IJGFJVmAEwqUXGs1hYUJpzIFowomtOa1kIyETFNeN0ga73vTvv4orQK9uE0rRxsHFDULEbuBQ4GvHeWHoXgje12vnGaj8qDOoHlfqHKmaupvKhsKb6TUxson6_15uudt7qL-fbSvV6bJ2vfUTWBEUP1d_9iW-MbvtNGZmqrRt8F7kdGPcNblCHXg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>79606981</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ambulance sphygmomanometers are frequently inaccurate</title><source>Taylor and Francis:Jisc Collections:Taylor and Francis Read and Publish Agreement 2024-2025:Medical Collection (Reading list)</source><creator>Cady, Charles E. ; Pirrallo, Ronald G. ; Grim, Clarence E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Cady, Charles E. ; Pirrallo, Ronald G. ; Grim, Clarence E.</creatorcontrib><description>Objective. To determine the accuracy and reliability of sphygmomanometers used in a metropolitan emergency medical services (EMS) system. Methods. As a cross-sectional, convenience sample, 150 sphygmomanometers used by EMS personnel in Milwaukee County, Wisconsin, were evaluated. Each sphygmomanometer was checked for accuracy by connecting the manometer to a new, standard mercury manometer using a "Y" connector. Pressure was checked at readings of 60,90,120, and 200 mm Hg. The integrity of the device (leaking) was checked by inflating the cuff around a can to 300 mm Hg and measuring the pressure lost in 1 minute. Devices were determined to be inaccurate if the average of the absolute differences at each pressure deviated by more than 3 mm Hg. The device was determined to be unreliable (leaked) if it lost pressure greater than 15 mm Hg in 1 minute. Results. Twenty-eight percent (41/149) of the devices were inaccurate at 90 mm Hg and 25% (37/149) were inaccurate overall. The overall and 90 mm Hg average deviations were ±6.6 and ±6.0 mm Hg, respectively. Sixty-three percent (94/150) of the devices were unreliable (leaked). When considering both accuracy and reliability at 90 mm Hg, a total of 73% (109/150) of the devices failed one or both of the criteria. Conclusion. This study suggests that an accurate blood pressure measurement may not be reliably obtained with 73% of the sphygmomanometers currently used in the county's EMS system.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1090-3127</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1545-0066</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/10903129708958806</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9709355</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Informa UK Ltd</publisher><subject>accuracy ; ambulance ; Ambulances - standards ; blood pressure determination ; emergency medical services ; Equipment and Supplies ; Equipment Failure Analysis ; Humans ; Quality Control ; sphygmomanometer ; Sphygmomanometers - standards ; Wisconsin</subject><ispartof>Prehospital emergency care, 1997, Vol.1 (3), p.136-139</ispartof><rights>1997 Informa UK Ltd All rights reserved: reproduction in whole or part not permitted 1997</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c345t-5024479638222752320e2dd150059a8464accb337602a852af63f9b8048d6a563</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c345t-5024479638222752320e2dd150059a8464accb337602a852af63f9b8048d6a563</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,27923,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9709355$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cady, Charles E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pirrallo, Ronald G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grim, Clarence E.</creatorcontrib><title>Ambulance sphygmomanometers are frequently inaccurate</title><title>Prehospital emergency care</title><addtitle>Prehosp Emerg Care</addtitle><description>Objective. To determine the accuracy and reliability of sphygmomanometers used in a metropolitan emergency medical services (EMS) system. Methods. As a cross-sectional, convenience sample, 150 sphygmomanometers used by EMS personnel in Milwaukee County, Wisconsin, were evaluated. Each sphygmomanometer was checked for accuracy by connecting the manometer to a new, standard mercury manometer using a "Y" connector. Pressure was checked at readings of 60,90,120, and 200 mm Hg. The integrity of the device (leaking) was checked by inflating the cuff around a can to 300 mm Hg and measuring the pressure lost in 1 minute. Devices were determined to be inaccurate if the average of the absolute differences at each pressure deviated by more than 3 mm Hg. The device was determined to be unreliable (leaked) if it lost pressure greater than 15 mm Hg in 1 minute. Results. Twenty-eight percent (41/149) of the devices were inaccurate at 90 mm Hg and 25% (37/149) were inaccurate overall. The overall and 90 mm Hg average deviations were ±6.6 and ±6.0 mm Hg, respectively. Sixty-three percent (94/150) of the devices were unreliable (leaked). When considering both accuracy and reliability at 90 mm Hg, a total of 73% (109/150) of the devices failed one or both of the criteria. Conclusion. This study suggests that an accurate blood pressure measurement may not be reliably obtained with 73% of the sphygmomanometers currently used in the county's EMS system.</description><subject>accuracy</subject><subject>ambulance</subject><subject>Ambulances - standards</subject><subject>blood pressure determination</subject><subject>emergency medical services</subject><subject>Equipment and Supplies</subject><subject>Equipment Failure Analysis</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Quality Control</subject><subject>sphygmomanometer</subject><subject>Sphygmomanometers - standards</subject><subject>Wisconsin</subject><issn>1090-3127</issn><issn>1545-0066</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1LwzAYx4Moc04_gAehJ2_VJ0mTJuhlDN9g4EXPIW1T19E0M2mRfnsjK4IIOz0P_F_480PoEsMNBgG3GCRQTGQOQjIhgB-hOWYZSwE4P45_1NNoyE_RWQhbAMwJ5TM0iwlJGZsjtrTF0OquNEnYbcYP66zunDW98SHR3iS1N5-D6fp2TJpOl-XgdW_O0Umt22AuprtA748Pb6vndP369LJartOSZqxPGZAsyyWnghCSM0IJGFJVmAEwqUXGs1hYUJpzIFowomtOa1kIyETFNeN0ga73vTvv4orQK9uE0rRxsHFDULEbuBQ4GvHeWHoXgje12vnGaj8qDOoHlfqHKmaupvKhsKb6TUxson6_15uudt7qL-fbSvV6bJ2vfUTWBEUP1d_9iW-MbvtNGZmqrRt8F7kdGPcNblCHXg</recordid><startdate>1997</startdate><enddate>1997</enddate><creator>Cady, Charles E.</creator><creator>Pirrallo, Ronald G.</creator><creator>Grim, Clarence E.</creator><general>Informa UK Ltd</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1997</creationdate><title>Ambulance sphygmomanometers are frequently inaccurate</title><author>Cady, Charles E. ; Pirrallo, Ronald G. ; Grim, Clarence E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c345t-5024479638222752320e2dd150059a8464accb337602a852af63f9b8048d6a563</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>accuracy</topic><topic>ambulance</topic><topic>Ambulances - standards</topic><topic>blood pressure determination</topic><topic>emergency medical services</topic><topic>Equipment and Supplies</topic><topic>Equipment Failure Analysis</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Quality Control</topic><topic>sphygmomanometer</topic><topic>Sphygmomanometers - standards</topic><topic>Wisconsin</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cady, Charles E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pirrallo, Ronald G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grim, Clarence E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Prehospital emergency care</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cady, Charles E.</au><au>Pirrallo, Ronald G.</au><au>Grim, Clarence E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ambulance sphygmomanometers are frequently inaccurate</atitle><jtitle>Prehospital emergency care</jtitle><addtitle>Prehosp Emerg Care</addtitle><date>1997</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>1</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>136</spage><epage>139</epage><pages>136-139</pages><issn>1090-3127</issn><eissn>1545-0066</eissn><abstract>Objective. To determine the accuracy and reliability of sphygmomanometers used in a metropolitan emergency medical services (EMS) system. Methods. As a cross-sectional, convenience sample, 150 sphygmomanometers used by EMS personnel in Milwaukee County, Wisconsin, were evaluated. Each sphygmomanometer was checked for accuracy by connecting the manometer to a new, standard mercury manometer using a "Y" connector. Pressure was checked at readings of 60,90,120, and 200 mm Hg. The integrity of the device (leaking) was checked by inflating the cuff around a can to 300 mm Hg and measuring the pressure lost in 1 minute. Devices were determined to be inaccurate if the average of the absolute differences at each pressure deviated by more than 3 mm Hg. The device was determined to be unreliable (leaked) if it lost pressure greater than 15 mm Hg in 1 minute. Results. Twenty-eight percent (41/149) of the devices were inaccurate at 90 mm Hg and 25% (37/149) were inaccurate overall. The overall and 90 mm Hg average deviations were ±6.6 and ±6.0 mm Hg, respectively. Sixty-three percent (94/150) of the devices were unreliable (leaked). When considering both accuracy and reliability at 90 mm Hg, a total of 73% (109/150) of the devices failed one or both of the criteria. Conclusion. This study suggests that an accurate blood pressure measurement may not be reliably obtained with 73% of the sphygmomanometers currently used in the county's EMS system.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Informa UK Ltd</pub><pmid>9709355</pmid><doi>10.1080/10903129708958806</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1090-3127
ispartof Prehospital emergency care, 1997, Vol.1 (3), p.136-139
issn 1090-3127
1545-0066
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_10903129708958806
source Taylor and Francis:Jisc Collections:Taylor and Francis Read and Publish Agreement 2024-2025:Medical Collection (Reading list)
subjects accuracy
ambulance
Ambulances - standards
blood pressure determination
emergency medical services
Equipment and Supplies
Equipment Failure Analysis
Humans
Quality Control
sphygmomanometer
Sphygmomanometers - standards
Wisconsin
title Ambulance sphygmomanometers are frequently inaccurate
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T02%3A32%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ambulance%20sphygmomanometers%20are%20frequently%20inaccurate&rft.jtitle=Prehospital%20emergency%20care&rft.au=Cady,%20Charles%20E.&rft.date=1997&rft.volume=1&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=136&rft.epage=139&rft.pages=136-139&rft.issn=1090-3127&rft.eissn=1545-0066&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/10903129708958806&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E79606981%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c345t-5024479638222752320e2dd150059a8464accb337602a852af63f9b8048d6a563%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=79606981&rft_id=info:pmid/9709355&rfr_iscdi=true