Loading…

Quality work in higher education: a multi-stakeholder study

Quality in higher education has been at the top of the political agenda for years, motivating discussion of how to define quality and how standards and assessment can promote quality. However, the literature tends to overlook the processes and practices constituting 'every-day' quality. To...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Quality in higher education 2023-09, Vol.29 (3), p.340-357
Main Authors: Bloch, Carter, Fuglsang, Simon, Glavind, Johanne Grøndahl, Bendtsen, Anna-Kathrine
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-a7bea3ca86193ceeaf240e69a4f5562152e7969cf9a962b79e25b845177ae0853
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-a7bea3ca86193ceeaf240e69a4f5562152e7969cf9a962b79e25b845177ae0853
container_end_page 357
container_issue 3
container_start_page 340
container_title Quality in higher education
container_volume 29
creator Bloch, Carter
Fuglsang, Simon
Glavind, Johanne Grøndahl
Bendtsen, Anna-Kathrine
description Quality in higher education has been at the top of the political agenda for years, motivating discussion of how to define quality and how standards and assessment can promote quality. However, the literature tends to overlook the processes and practices constituting 'every-day' quality. To improve quality, it is important to know how quality is perceived and enacted by the key stakeholders, namely the students, teachers, administrative staff and managers. Informed by the findings of a survey, this article aims to identify and compare the local practices of quality work at higher education institutions in Denmark. The analysis reveals that students, teachers and managers across sectors to a large extent share views on quality work highlighting practices that help develop students' academic skills, the ability to apply these to practice and the continuous development of teaching practices. Some differences are however also apparent, for example, concerning employability orientation in higher education.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/13538322.2022.2123267
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_13538322_2022_2123267</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1400983</ericid><sourcerecordid>2879461151</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-a7bea3ca86193ceeaf240e69a4f5562152e7969cf9a962b79e25b845177ae0853</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kFtLwzAYhoMoOKc_YVDwujOHJmn0RpF5YiCCXocsTV22rplJivTfm9LppTdJ4H3efB8PADME5wiW8AoRSkqC8RzD4UCYYMaPwAQVHOaJQMfpnZh8gE7BWQgbCCGimE7AzVunGhv77Nv5bWbbbG0_18Znpuq0ita115nKdl0TbR6i2pq1a6oUh9hV_Tk4qVUTzMXhnoKPh8X7_VO-fH18vr9b5powGHPFV0YRrUqGBNHGqBoX0DChippShtMehgsmdC2UYHjFhcF0VRYUca4MLCmZgsvx3713X50JUW5c59s0UuKSi4IhRFGi6Ehp70LwppZ7b3fK9xJBOXiSv57k4EkePKXebOwZb_VfZ_GCCghFSVJ-O-a2rZ3fqSSqqWRUfeN87VWrbZDk_xE_0ix3Cw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2879461151</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Quality work in higher education: a multi-stakeholder study</title><source>Taylor &amp; Francis</source><source>ERIC</source><creator>Bloch, Carter ; Fuglsang, Simon ; Glavind, Johanne Grøndahl ; Bendtsen, Anna-Kathrine</creator><creatorcontrib>Bloch, Carter ; Fuglsang, Simon ; Glavind, Johanne Grøndahl ; Bendtsen, Anna-Kathrine</creatorcontrib><description>Quality in higher education has been at the top of the political agenda for years, motivating discussion of how to define quality and how standards and assessment can promote quality. However, the literature tends to overlook the processes and practices constituting 'every-day' quality. To improve quality, it is important to know how quality is perceived and enacted by the key stakeholders, namely the students, teachers, administrative staff and managers. Informed by the findings of a survey, this article aims to identify and compare the local practices of quality work at higher education institutions in Denmark. The analysis reveals that students, teachers and managers across sectors to a large extent share views on quality work highlighting practices that help develop students' academic skills, the ability to apply these to practice and the continuous development of teaching practices. Some differences are however also apparent, for example, concerning employability orientation in higher education.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1353-8322</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1470-1081</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/13538322.2022.2123267</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Abingdon: Routledge</publisher><subject>Administrator Attitudes ; Delphi method ; delphi study ; Educational Improvement ; Educational Practices ; Educational Quality ; Employment Potential ; Foreign Countries ; Higher Education ; Quality ; quality conceptualisation ; Quality of education ; quality work ; Skill Development ; Stakeholders ; Student Attitudes ; Teacher Attitudes ; Teaching Methods</subject><ispartof>Quality in higher education, 2023-09, Vol.29 (3), p.340-357</ispartof><rights>2022 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor &amp; Francis Group 2022</rights><rights>2022 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor &amp; Francis Group</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-a7bea3ca86193ceeaf240e69a4f5562152e7969cf9a962b79e25b845177ae0853</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-a7bea3ca86193ceeaf240e69a4f5562152e7969cf9a962b79e25b845177ae0853</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4718-003X ; 0000-0002-1672-8536 ; 0000-0003-0393-0003</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1400983$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bloch, Carter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fuglsang, Simon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glavind, Johanne Grøndahl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bendtsen, Anna-Kathrine</creatorcontrib><title>Quality work in higher education: a multi-stakeholder study</title><title>Quality in higher education</title><description>Quality in higher education has been at the top of the political agenda for years, motivating discussion of how to define quality and how standards and assessment can promote quality. However, the literature tends to overlook the processes and practices constituting 'every-day' quality. To improve quality, it is important to know how quality is perceived and enacted by the key stakeholders, namely the students, teachers, administrative staff and managers. Informed by the findings of a survey, this article aims to identify and compare the local practices of quality work at higher education institutions in Denmark. The analysis reveals that students, teachers and managers across sectors to a large extent share views on quality work highlighting practices that help develop students' academic skills, the ability to apply these to practice and the continuous development of teaching practices. Some differences are however also apparent, for example, concerning employability orientation in higher education.</description><subject>Administrator Attitudes</subject><subject>Delphi method</subject><subject>delphi study</subject><subject>Educational Improvement</subject><subject>Educational Practices</subject><subject>Educational Quality</subject><subject>Employment Potential</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>Higher Education</subject><subject>Quality</subject><subject>quality conceptualisation</subject><subject>Quality of education</subject><subject>quality work</subject><subject>Skill Development</subject><subject>Stakeholders</subject><subject>Student Attitudes</subject><subject>Teacher Attitudes</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><issn>1353-8322</issn><issn>1470-1081</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kFtLwzAYhoMoOKc_YVDwujOHJmn0RpF5YiCCXocsTV22rplJivTfm9LppTdJ4H3efB8PADME5wiW8AoRSkqC8RzD4UCYYMaPwAQVHOaJQMfpnZh8gE7BWQgbCCGimE7AzVunGhv77Nv5bWbbbG0_18Znpuq0ita115nKdl0TbR6i2pq1a6oUh9hV_Tk4qVUTzMXhnoKPh8X7_VO-fH18vr9b5powGHPFV0YRrUqGBNHGqBoX0DChippShtMehgsmdC2UYHjFhcF0VRYUca4MLCmZgsvx3713X50JUW5c59s0UuKSi4IhRFGi6Ehp70LwppZ7b3fK9xJBOXiSv57k4EkePKXebOwZb_VfZ_GCCghFSVJ-O-a2rZ3fqSSqqWRUfeN87VWrbZDk_xE_0ix3Cw</recordid><startdate>20230902</startdate><enddate>20230902</enddate><creator>Bloch, Carter</creator><creator>Fuglsang, Simon</creator><creator>Glavind, Johanne Grøndahl</creator><creator>Bendtsen, Anna-Kathrine</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4718-003X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1672-8536</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0393-0003</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230902</creationdate><title>Quality work in higher education: a multi-stakeholder study</title><author>Bloch, Carter ; Fuglsang, Simon ; Glavind, Johanne Grøndahl ; Bendtsen, Anna-Kathrine</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-a7bea3ca86193ceeaf240e69a4f5562152e7969cf9a962b79e25b845177ae0853</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Administrator Attitudes</topic><topic>Delphi method</topic><topic>delphi study</topic><topic>Educational Improvement</topic><topic>Educational Practices</topic><topic>Educational Quality</topic><topic>Employment Potential</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>Higher Education</topic><topic>Quality</topic><topic>quality conceptualisation</topic><topic>Quality of education</topic><topic>quality work</topic><topic>Skill Development</topic><topic>Stakeholders</topic><topic>Student Attitudes</topic><topic>Teacher Attitudes</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bloch, Carter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fuglsang, Simon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glavind, Johanne Grøndahl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bendtsen, Anna-Kathrine</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Quality in higher education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bloch, Carter</au><au>Fuglsang, Simon</au><au>Glavind, Johanne Grøndahl</au><au>Bendtsen, Anna-Kathrine</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1400983</ericid><atitle>Quality work in higher education: a multi-stakeholder study</atitle><jtitle>Quality in higher education</jtitle><date>2023-09-02</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>340</spage><epage>357</epage><pages>340-357</pages><issn>1353-8322</issn><eissn>1470-1081</eissn><abstract>Quality in higher education has been at the top of the political agenda for years, motivating discussion of how to define quality and how standards and assessment can promote quality. However, the literature tends to overlook the processes and practices constituting 'every-day' quality. To improve quality, it is important to know how quality is perceived and enacted by the key stakeholders, namely the students, teachers, administrative staff and managers. Informed by the findings of a survey, this article aims to identify and compare the local practices of quality work at higher education institutions in Denmark. The analysis reveals that students, teachers and managers across sectors to a large extent share views on quality work highlighting practices that help develop students' academic skills, the ability to apply these to practice and the continuous development of teaching practices. Some differences are however also apparent, for example, concerning employability orientation in higher education.</abstract><cop>Abingdon</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/13538322.2022.2123267</doi><tpages>18</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4718-003X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1672-8536</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0393-0003</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1353-8322
ispartof Quality in higher education, 2023-09, Vol.29 (3), p.340-357
issn 1353-8322
1470-1081
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_13538322_2022_2123267
source Taylor & Francis; ERIC
subjects Administrator Attitudes
Delphi method
delphi study
Educational Improvement
Educational Practices
Educational Quality
Employment Potential
Foreign Countries
Higher Education
Quality
quality conceptualisation
Quality of education
quality work
Skill Development
Stakeholders
Student Attitudes
Teacher Attitudes
Teaching Methods
title Quality work in higher education: a multi-stakeholder study
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T03%3A31%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Quality%20work%20in%20higher%20education:%20a%20multi-stakeholder%20study&rft.jtitle=Quality%20in%20higher%20education&rft.au=Bloch,%20Carter&rft.date=2023-09-02&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=340&rft.epage=357&rft.pages=340-357&rft.issn=1353-8322&rft.eissn=1470-1081&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/13538322.2022.2123267&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2879461151%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-a7bea3ca86193ceeaf240e69a4f5562152e7969cf9a962b79e25b845177ae0853%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2879461151&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1400983&rfr_iscdi=true