Loading…
Quality work in higher education: a multi-stakeholder study
Quality in higher education has been at the top of the political agenda for years, motivating discussion of how to define quality and how standards and assessment can promote quality. However, the literature tends to overlook the processes and practices constituting 'every-day' quality. To...
Saved in:
Published in: | Quality in higher education 2023-09, Vol.29 (3), p.340-357 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-a7bea3ca86193ceeaf240e69a4f5562152e7969cf9a962b79e25b845177ae0853 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-a7bea3ca86193ceeaf240e69a4f5562152e7969cf9a962b79e25b845177ae0853 |
container_end_page | 357 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 340 |
container_title | Quality in higher education |
container_volume | 29 |
creator | Bloch, Carter Fuglsang, Simon Glavind, Johanne Grøndahl Bendtsen, Anna-Kathrine |
description | Quality in higher education has been at the top of the political agenda for years, motivating discussion of how to define quality and how standards and assessment can promote quality. However, the literature tends to overlook the processes and practices constituting 'every-day' quality. To improve quality, it is important to know how quality is perceived and enacted by the key stakeholders, namely the students, teachers, administrative staff and managers. Informed by the findings of a survey, this article aims to identify and compare the local practices of quality work at higher education institutions in Denmark. The analysis reveals that students, teachers and managers across sectors to a large extent share views on quality work highlighting practices that help develop students' academic skills, the ability to apply these to practice and the continuous development of teaching practices. Some differences are however also apparent, for example, concerning employability orientation in higher education. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/13538322.2022.2123267 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_13538322_2022_2123267</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1400983</ericid><sourcerecordid>2879461151</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-a7bea3ca86193ceeaf240e69a4f5562152e7969cf9a962b79e25b845177ae0853</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kFtLwzAYhoMoOKc_YVDwujOHJmn0RpF5YiCCXocsTV22rplJivTfm9LppTdJ4H3efB8PADME5wiW8AoRSkqC8RzD4UCYYMaPwAQVHOaJQMfpnZh8gE7BWQgbCCGimE7AzVunGhv77Nv5bWbbbG0_18Znpuq0ita115nKdl0TbR6i2pq1a6oUh9hV_Tk4qVUTzMXhnoKPh8X7_VO-fH18vr9b5powGHPFV0YRrUqGBNHGqBoX0DChippShtMehgsmdC2UYHjFhcF0VRYUca4MLCmZgsvx3713X50JUW5c59s0UuKSi4IhRFGi6Ehp70LwppZ7b3fK9xJBOXiSv57k4EkePKXebOwZb_VfZ_GCCghFSVJ-O-a2rZ3fqSSqqWRUfeN87VWrbZDk_xE_0ix3Cw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2879461151</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Quality work in higher education: a multi-stakeholder study</title><source>Taylor & Francis</source><source>ERIC</source><creator>Bloch, Carter ; Fuglsang, Simon ; Glavind, Johanne Grøndahl ; Bendtsen, Anna-Kathrine</creator><creatorcontrib>Bloch, Carter ; Fuglsang, Simon ; Glavind, Johanne Grøndahl ; Bendtsen, Anna-Kathrine</creatorcontrib><description>Quality in higher education has been at the top of the political agenda for years, motivating discussion of how to define quality and how standards and assessment can promote quality. However, the literature tends to overlook the processes and practices constituting 'every-day' quality. To improve quality, it is important to know how quality is perceived and enacted by the key stakeholders, namely the students, teachers, administrative staff and managers. Informed by the findings of a survey, this article aims to identify and compare the local practices of quality work at higher education institutions in Denmark. The analysis reveals that students, teachers and managers across sectors to a large extent share views on quality work highlighting practices that help develop students' academic skills, the ability to apply these to practice and the continuous development of teaching practices. Some differences are however also apparent, for example, concerning employability orientation in higher education.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1353-8322</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1470-1081</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/13538322.2022.2123267</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Abingdon: Routledge</publisher><subject>Administrator Attitudes ; Delphi method ; delphi study ; Educational Improvement ; Educational Practices ; Educational Quality ; Employment Potential ; Foreign Countries ; Higher Education ; Quality ; quality conceptualisation ; Quality of education ; quality work ; Skill Development ; Stakeholders ; Student Attitudes ; Teacher Attitudes ; Teaching Methods</subject><ispartof>Quality in higher education, 2023-09, Vol.29 (3), p.340-357</ispartof><rights>2022 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group 2022</rights><rights>2022 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-a7bea3ca86193ceeaf240e69a4f5562152e7969cf9a962b79e25b845177ae0853</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-a7bea3ca86193ceeaf240e69a4f5562152e7969cf9a962b79e25b845177ae0853</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4718-003X ; 0000-0002-1672-8536 ; 0000-0003-0393-0003</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1400983$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bloch, Carter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fuglsang, Simon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glavind, Johanne Grøndahl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bendtsen, Anna-Kathrine</creatorcontrib><title>Quality work in higher education: a multi-stakeholder study</title><title>Quality in higher education</title><description>Quality in higher education has been at the top of the political agenda for years, motivating discussion of how to define quality and how standards and assessment can promote quality. However, the literature tends to overlook the processes and practices constituting 'every-day' quality. To improve quality, it is important to know how quality is perceived and enacted by the key stakeholders, namely the students, teachers, administrative staff and managers. Informed by the findings of a survey, this article aims to identify and compare the local practices of quality work at higher education institutions in Denmark. The analysis reveals that students, teachers and managers across sectors to a large extent share views on quality work highlighting practices that help develop students' academic skills, the ability to apply these to practice and the continuous development of teaching practices. Some differences are however also apparent, for example, concerning employability orientation in higher education.</description><subject>Administrator Attitudes</subject><subject>Delphi method</subject><subject>delphi study</subject><subject>Educational Improvement</subject><subject>Educational Practices</subject><subject>Educational Quality</subject><subject>Employment Potential</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>Higher Education</subject><subject>Quality</subject><subject>quality conceptualisation</subject><subject>Quality of education</subject><subject>quality work</subject><subject>Skill Development</subject><subject>Stakeholders</subject><subject>Student Attitudes</subject><subject>Teacher Attitudes</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><issn>1353-8322</issn><issn>1470-1081</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kFtLwzAYhoMoOKc_YVDwujOHJmn0RpF5YiCCXocsTV22rplJivTfm9LppTdJ4H3efB8PADME5wiW8AoRSkqC8RzD4UCYYMaPwAQVHOaJQMfpnZh8gE7BWQgbCCGimE7AzVunGhv77Nv5bWbbbG0_18Znpuq0ita115nKdl0TbR6i2pq1a6oUh9hV_Tk4qVUTzMXhnoKPh8X7_VO-fH18vr9b5powGHPFV0YRrUqGBNHGqBoX0DChippShtMehgsmdC2UYHjFhcF0VRYUca4MLCmZgsvx3713X50JUW5c59s0UuKSi4IhRFGi6Ehp70LwppZ7b3fK9xJBOXiSv57k4EkePKXebOwZb_VfZ_GCCghFSVJ-O-a2rZ3fqSSqqWRUfeN87VWrbZDk_xE_0ix3Cw</recordid><startdate>20230902</startdate><enddate>20230902</enddate><creator>Bloch, Carter</creator><creator>Fuglsang, Simon</creator><creator>Glavind, Johanne Grøndahl</creator><creator>Bendtsen, Anna-Kathrine</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4718-003X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1672-8536</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0393-0003</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230902</creationdate><title>Quality work in higher education: a multi-stakeholder study</title><author>Bloch, Carter ; Fuglsang, Simon ; Glavind, Johanne Grøndahl ; Bendtsen, Anna-Kathrine</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-a7bea3ca86193ceeaf240e69a4f5562152e7969cf9a962b79e25b845177ae0853</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Administrator Attitudes</topic><topic>Delphi method</topic><topic>delphi study</topic><topic>Educational Improvement</topic><topic>Educational Practices</topic><topic>Educational Quality</topic><topic>Employment Potential</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>Higher Education</topic><topic>Quality</topic><topic>quality conceptualisation</topic><topic>Quality of education</topic><topic>quality work</topic><topic>Skill Development</topic><topic>Stakeholders</topic><topic>Student Attitudes</topic><topic>Teacher Attitudes</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bloch, Carter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fuglsang, Simon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glavind, Johanne Grøndahl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bendtsen, Anna-Kathrine</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Quality in higher education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bloch, Carter</au><au>Fuglsang, Simon</au><au>Glavind, Johanne Grøndahl</au><au>Bendtsen, Anna-Kathrine</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1400983</ericid><atitle>Quality work in higher education: a multi-stakeholder study</atitle><jtitle>Quality in higher education</jtitle><date>2023-09-02</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>340</spage><epage>357</epage><pages>340-357</pages><issn>1353-8322</issn><eissn>1470-1081</eissn><abstract>Quality in higher education has been at the top of the political agenda for years, motivating discussion of how to define quality and how standards and assessment can promote quality. However, the literature tends to overlook the processes and practices constituting 'every-day' quality. To improve quality, it is important to know how quality is perceived and enacted by the key stakeholders, namely the students, teachers, administrative staff and managers. Informed by the findings of a survey, this article aims to identify and compare the local practices of quality work at higher education institutions in Denmark. The analysis reveals that students, teachers and managers across sectors to a large extent share views on quality work highlighting practices that help develop students' academic skills, the ability to apply these to practice and the continuous development of teaching practices. Some differences are however also apparent, for example, concerning employability orientation in higher education.</abstract><cop>Abingdon</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/13538322.2022.2123267</doi><tpages>18</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4718-003X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1672-8536</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0393-0003</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1353-8322 |
ispartof | Quality in higher education, 2023-09, Vol.29 (3), p.340-357 |
issn | 1353-8322 1470-1081 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_13538322_2022_2123267 |
source | Taylor & Francis; ERIC |
subjects | Administrator Attitudes Delphi method delphi study Educational Improvement Educational Practices Educational Quality Employment Potential Foreign Countries Higher Education Quality quality conceptualisation Quality of education quality work Skill Development Stakeholders Student Attitudes Teacher Attitudes Teaching Methods |
title | Quality work in higher education: a multi-stakeholder study |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T03%3A31%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Quality%20work%20in%20higher%20education:%20a%20multi-stakeholder%20study&rft.jtitle=Quality%20in%20higher%20education&rft.au=Bloch,%20Carter&rft.date=2023-09-02&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=340&rft.epage=357&rft.pages=340-357&rft.issn=1353-8322&rft.eissn=1470-1081&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/13538322.2022.2123267&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2879461151%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-a7bea3ca86193ceeaf240e69a4f5562152e7969cf9a962b79e25b845177ae0853%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2879461151&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1400983&rfr_iscdi=true |