Loading…

Advocacy journalism and climate justice in a Global Southern country

Being among the world's most affected countries by climate change, Pakistan is facing a variety of cases of climate injustice committed by internal and external drivers. Waisbord's referred "Advocate-journalist" model carries a good potential to advocate these injustices to stimu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Local environment 2023-04, Vol.28 (4), p.412-432
Main Authors: Kamboh, Shafiq Ahmad, Ittefaq, Muhammad
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-9422317a3b6f95a7ceb250482d8dbbd3d44774dd85766c584ef2c7f9a498c0293
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-9422317a3b6f95a7ceb250482d8dbbd3d44774dd85766c584ef2c7f9a498c0293
container_end_page 432
container_issue 4
container_start_page 412
container_title Local environment
container_volume 28
creator Kamboh, Shafiq Ahmad
Ittefaq, Muhammad
description Being among the world's most affected countries by climate change, Pakistan is facing a variety of cases of climate injustice committed by internal and external drivers. Waisbord's referred "Advocate-journalist" model carries a good potential to advocate these injustices to stimulate democratic dialogue among the audience that eventually pushes leadership to make eco-friendly policies. This study critically analyses advocacy journalism coverage of cases of local and regional climate injustice in the editorial contents of mainstream Pakistani newspapers by using the quantitative content analysis method. Results reveal that selected newspapers gave inappropriate coverage to climate injustice issues both in quantity and quality. Besides muddled local and regional climate injustice issues' priorities, editorialists also excessively recommended dirty energy solutions to the policymakers. The final analysis suggests that the findings of climate and energy-related scientific studies were not being reflected in the advocacy journalism contents as well. This failure of "advocate-journalist" model to perform its normative role of potentially advocating the cases of climate injustice with compelling scientific evidence seems to attribute to the political economy of the press or editorial inattention. As a way out of this journalistic lack, Waisbord's endorsed "civic advocacy" groups must intervene to plug the loopholes.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/13549839.2022.2155937
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_13549839_2022_2155937</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2789601905</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-9422317a3b6f95a7ceb250482d8dbbd3d44774dd85766c584ef2c7f9a498c0293</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtKAzEUhoMoWKuPIARcT811kuwsXqpQcKGuQyYXnDJNajKjzNs7pXXr6pzF9_-c8wFwjdECI4luMeVMSaoWBBGyIJhzRcUJmGFWq6oWGJ9O-8RUe-gcXJSyQQhTwtkMPCzdd7LGjnCThhxN15YtNNFB27Vb03u4GUrfWg_bCA1cdakxHXxLQ__pc4Q2DbHP4yU4C6Yr_uo45-Dj6fH9_rlav65e7pfrylLJ-0oxQigWhjZ1UNwI6xvCEZPESdc0jjrGhGDOSS7q2nLJfCBWBGWm7ywiis7BzaF3l9PX4Euvj0cXTYRUNcIK8YniB8rmVEr2Qe_y9EseNUZ6L0z_CdN7YfoobMrdHXJtDClvzU_KndO9GbuUQzbRtkXT_yt-AVexcTs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2789601905</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Advocacy journalism and climate justice in a Global Southern country</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Taylor and Francis:Jisc Collections:Taylor and Francis Read and Publish Agreement 2024-2025:Social Sciences and Humanities Collection (Reading list)</source><creator>Kamboh, Shafiq Ahmad ; Ittefaq, Muhammad</creator><creatorcontrib>Kamboh, Shafiq Ahmad ; Ittefaq, Muhammad</creatorcontrib><description>Being among the world's most affected countries by climate change, Pakistan is facing a variety of cases of climate injustice committed by internal and external drivers. Waisbord's referred "Advocate-journalist" model carries a good potential to advocate these injustices to stimulate democratic dialogue among the audience that eventually pushes leadership to make eco-friendly policies. This study critically analyses advocacy journalism coverage of cases of local and regional climate injustice in the editorial contents of mainstream Pakistani newspapers by using the quantitative content analysis method. Results reveal that selected newspapers gave inappropriate coverage to climate injustice issues both in quantity and quality. Besides muddled local and regional climate injustice issues' priorities, editorialists also excessively recommended dirty energy solutions to the policymakers. The final analysis suggests that the findings of climate and energy-related scientific studies were not being reflected in the advocacy journalism contents as well. This failure of "advocate-journalist" model to perform its normative role of potentially advocating the cases of climate injustice with compelling scientific evidence seems to attribute to the political economy of the press or editorial inattention. As a way out of this journalistic lack, Waisbord's endorsed "civic advocacy" groups must intervene to plug the loopholes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1354-9839</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-6711</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/13549839.2022.2155937</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Abingdon: Routledge</publisher><subject>Advocacy ; Advocacy journalism ; Attention deficits ; civic advocacy ; Climate change ; climate change policies ; Climate justice ; Content analysis ; Energy ; energy crisis ; GHG emissions ; global south ; Inappropriateness ; Injustice ; Journalism ; Journalists ; Justice ; Leadership ; Policy making ; Political economy ; Regions ; Scientific evidence</subject><ispartof>Local environment, 2023-04, Vol.28 (4), p.412-432</ispartof><rights>2022 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor &amp; Francis Group 2022</rights><rights>2022 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor &amp; Francis Group</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-9422317a3b6f95a7ceb250482d8dbbd3d44774dd85766c584ef2c7f9a498c0293</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-9422317a3b6f95a7ceb250482d8dbbd3d44774dd85766c584ef2c7f9a498c0293</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5334-7567 ; 0000-0003-1063-0850</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27845,27903,27904,33202</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kamboh, Shafiq Ahmad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ittefaq, Muhammad</creatorcontrib><title>Advocacy journalism and climate justice in a Global Southern country</title><title>Local environment</title><description>Being among the world's most affected countries by climate change, Pakistan is facing a variety of cases of climate injustice committed by internal and external drivers. Waisbord's referred "Advocate-journalist" model carries a good potential to advocate these injustices to stimulate democratic dialogue among the audience that eventually pushes leadership to make eco-friendly policies. This study critically analyses advocacy journalism coverage of cases of local and regional climate injustice in the editorial contents of mainstream Pakistani newspapers by using the quantitative content analysis method. Results reveal that selected newspapers gave inappropriate coverage to climate injustice issues both in quantity and quality. Besides muddled local and regional climate injustice issues' priorities, editorialists also excessively recommended dirty energy solutions to the policymakers. The final analysis suggests that the findings of climate and energy-related scientific studies were not being reflected in the advocacy journalism contents as well. This failure of "advocate-journalist" model to perform its normative role of potentially advocating the cases of climate injustice with compelling scientific evidence seems to attribute to the political economy of the press or editorial inattention. As a way out of this journalistic lack, Waisbord's endorsed "civic advocacy" groups must intervene to plug the loopholes.</description><subject>Advocacy</subject><subject>Advocacy journalism</subject><subject>Attention deficits</subject><subject>civic advocacy</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>climate change policies</subject><subject>Climate justice</subject><subject>Content analysis</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>energy crisis</subject><subject>GHG emissions</subject><subject>global south</subject><subject>Inappropriateness</subject><subject>Injustice</subject><subject>Journalism</subject><subject>Journalists</subject><subject>Justice</subject><subject>Leadership</subject><subject>Policy making</subject><subject>Political economy</subject><subject>Regions</subject><subject>Scientific evidence</subject><issn>1354-9839</issn><issn>1469-6711</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtKAzEUhoMoWKuPIARcT811kuwsXqpQcKGuQyYXnDJNajKjzNs7pXXr6pzF9_-c8wFwjdECI4luMeVMSaoWBBGyIJhzRcUJmGFWq6oWGJ9O-8RUe-gcXJSyQQhTwtkMPCzdd7LGjnCThhxN15YtNNFB27Vb03u4GUrfWg_bCA1cdakxHXxLQ__pc4Q2DbHP4yU4C6Yr_uo45-Dj6fH9_rlav65e7pfrylLJ-0oxQigWhjZ1UNwI6xvCEZPESdc0jjrGhGDOSS7q2nLJfCBWBGWm7ywiis7BzaF3l9PX4Euvj0cXTYRUNcIK8YniB8rmVEr2Qe_y9EseNUZ6L0z_CdN7YfoobMrdHXJtDClvzU_KndO9GbuUQzbRtkXT_yt-AVexcTs</recordid><startdate>20230403</startdate><enddate>20230403</enddate><creator>Kamboh, Shafiq Ahmad</creator><creator>Ittefaq, Muhammad</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5334-7567</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1063-0850</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230403</creationdate><title>Advocacy journalism and climate justice in a Global Southern country</title><author>Kamboh, Shafiq Ahmad ; Ittefaq, Muhammad</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-9422317a3b6f95a7ceb250482d8dbbd3d44774dd85766c584ef2c7f9a498c0293</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Advocacy</topic><topic>Advocacy journalism</topic><topic>Attention deficits</topic><topic>civic advocacy</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>climate change policies</topic><topic>Climate justice</topic><topic>Content analysis</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>energy crisis</topic><topic>GHG emissions</topic><topic>global south</topic><topic>Inappropriateness</topic><topic>Injustice</topic><topic>Journalism</topic><topic>Journalists</topic><topic>Justice</topic><topic>Leadership</topic><topic>Policy making</topic><topic>Political economy</topic><topic>Regions</topic><topic>Scientific evidence</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kamboh, Shafiq Ahmad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ittefaq, Muhammad</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Local environment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kamboh, Shafiq Ahmad</au><au>Ittefaq, Muhammad</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Advocacy journalism and climate justice in a Global Southern country</atitle><jtitle>Local environment</jtitle><date>2023-04-03</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>412</spage><epage>432</epage><pages>412-432</pages><issn>1354-9839</issn><eissn>1469-6711</eissn><abstract>Being among the world's most affected countries by climate change, Pakistan is facing a variety of cases of climate injustice committed by internal and external drivers. Waisbord's referred "Advocate-journalist" model carries a good potential to advocate these injustices to stimulate democratic dialogue among the audience that eventually pushes leadership to make eco-friendly policies. This study critically analyses advocacy journalism coverage of cases of local and regional climate injustice in the editorial contents of mainstream Pakistani newspapers by using the quantitative content analysis method. Results reveal that selected newspapers gave inappropriate coverage to climate injustice issues both in quantity and quality. Besides muddled local and regional climate injustice issues' priorities, editorialists also excessively recommended dirty energy solutions to the policymakers. The final analysis suggests that the findings of climate and energy-related scientific studies were not being reflected in the advocacy journalism contents as well. This failure of "advocate-journalist" model to perform its normative role of potentially advocating the cases of climate injustice with compelling scientific evidence seems to attribute to the political economy of the press or editorial inattention. As a way out of this journalistic lack, Waisbord's endorsed "civic advocacy" groups must intervene to plug the loopholes.</abstract><cop>Abingdon</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/13549839.2022.2155937</doi><tpages>21</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5334-7567</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1063-0850</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1354-9839
ispartof Local environment, 2023-04, Vol.28 (4), p.412-432
issn 1354-9839
1469-6711
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_13549839_2022_2155937
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); PAIS Index; Taylor and Francis:Jisc Collections:Taylor and Francis Read and Publish Agreement 2024-2025:Social Sciences and Humanities Collection (Reading list)
subjects Advocacy
Advocacy journalism
Attention deficits
civic advocacy
Climate change
climate change policies
Climate justice
Content analysis
Energy
energy crisis
GHG emissions
global south
Inappropriateness
Injustice
Journalism
Journalists
Justice
Leadership
Policy making
Political economy
Regions
Scientific evidence
title Advocacy journalism and climate justice in a Global Southern country
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T10%3A22%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Advocacy%20journalism%20and%20climate%20justice%20in%20a%20Global%20Southern%20country&rft.jtitle=Local%20environment&rft.au=Kamboh,%20Shafiq%20Ahmad&rft.date=2023-04-03&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=412&rft.epage=432&rft.pages=412-432&rft.issn=1354-9839&rft.eissn=1469-6711&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/13549839.2022.2155937&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2789601905%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-9422317a3b6f95a7ceb250482d8dbbd3d44774dd85766c584ef2c7f9a498c0293%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2789601905&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true