Loading…
Advocacy journalism and climate justice in a Global Southern country
Being among the world's most affected countries by climate change, Pakistan is facing a variety of cases of climate injustice committed by internal and external drivers. Waisbord's referred "Advocate-journalist" model carries a good potential to advocate these injustices to stimu...
Saved in:
Published in: | Local environment 2023-04, Vol.28 (4), p.412-432 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-9422317a3b6f95a7ceb250482d8dbbd3d44774dd85766c584ef2c7f9a498c0293 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-9422317a3b6f95a7ceb250482d8dbbd3d44774dd85766c584ef2c7f9a498c0293 |
container_end_page | 432 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 412 |
container_title | Local environment |
container_volume | 28 |
creator | Kamboh, Shafiq Ahmad Ittefaq, Muhammad |
description | Being among the world's most affected countries by climate change, Pakistan is facing a variety of cases of climate injustice committed by internal and external drivers. Waisbord's referred "Advocate-journalist" model carries a good potential to advocate these injustices to stimulate democratic dialogue among the audience that eventually pushes leadership to make eco-friendly policies. This study critically analyses advocacy journalism coverage of cases of local and regional climate injustice in the editorial contents of mainstream Pakistani newspapers by using the quantitative content analysis method. Results reveal that selected newspapers gave inappropriate coverage to climate injustice issues both in quantity and quality. Besides muddled local and regional climate injustice issues' priorities, editorialists also excessively recommended dirty energy solutions to the policymakers. The final analysis suggests that the findings of climate and energy-related scientific studies were not being reflected in the advocacy journalism contents as well. This failure of "advocate-journalist" model to perform its normative role of potentially advocating the cases of climate injustice with compelling scientific evidence seems to attribute to the political economy of the press or editorial inattention. As a way out of this journalistic lack, Waisbord's endorsed "civic advocacy" groups must intervene to plug the loopholes. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/13549839.2022.2155937 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_13549839_2022_2155937</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2789601905</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-9422317a3b6f95a7ceb250482d8dbbd3d44774dd85766c584ef2c7f9a498c0293</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtKAzEUhoMoWKuPIARcT811kuwsXqpQcKGuQyYXnDJNajKjzNs7pXXr6pzF9_-c8wFwjdECI4luMeVMSaoWBBGyIJhzRcUJmGFWq6oWGJ9O-8RUe-gcXJSyQQhTwtkMPCzdd7LGjnCThhxN15YtNNFB27Vb03u4GUrfWg_bCA1cdakxHXxLQ__pc4Q2DbHP4yU4C6Yr_uo45-Dj6fH9_rlav65e7pfrylLJ-0oxQigWhjZ1UNwI6xvCEZPESdc0jjrGhGDOSS7q2nLJfCBWBGWm7ywiis7BzaF3l9PX4Euvj0cXTYRUNcIK8YniB8rmVEr2Qe_y9EseNUZ6L0z_CdN7YfoobMrdHXJtDClvzU_KndO9GbuUQzbRtkXT_yt-AVexcTs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2789601905</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Advocacy journalism and climate justice in a Global Southern country</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Taylor and Francis:Jisc Collections:Taylor and Francis Read and Publish Agreement 2024-2025:Social Sciences and Humanities Collection (Reading list)</source><creator>Kamboh, Shafiq Ahmad ; Ittefaq, Muhammad</creator><creatorcontrib>Kamboh, Shafiq Ahmad ; Ittefaq, Muhammad</creatorcontrib><description>Being among the world's most affected countries by climate change, Pakistan is facing a variety of cases of climate injustice committed by internal and external drivers. Waisbord's referred "Advocate-journalist" model carries a good potential to advocate these injustices to stimulate democratic dialogue among the audience that eventually pushes leadership to make eco-friendly policies. This study critically analyses advocacy journalism coverage of cases of local and regional climate injustice in the editorial contents of mainstream Pakistani newspapers by using the quantitative content analysis method. Results reveal that selected newspapers gave inappropriate coverage to climate injustice issues both in quantity and quality. Besides muddled local and regional climate injustice issues' priorities, editorialists also excessively recommended dirty energy solutions to the policymakers. The final analysis suggests that the findings of climate and energy-related scientific studies were not being reflected in the advocacy journalism contents as well. This failure of "advocate-journalist" model to perform its normative role of potentially advocating the cases of climate injustice with compelling scientific evidence seems to attribute to the political economy of the press or editorial inattention. As a way out of this journalistic lack, Waisbord's endorsed "civic advocacy" groups must intervene to plug the loopholes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1354-9839</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-6711</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/13549839.2022.2155937</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Abingdon: Routledge</publisher><subject>Advocacy ; Advocacy journalism ; Attention deficits ; civic advocacy ; Climate change ; climate change policies ; Climate justice ; Content analysis ; Energy ; energy crisis ; GHG emissions ; global south ; Inappropriateness ; Injustice ; Journalism ; Journalists ; Justice ; Leadership ; Policy making ; Political economy ; Regions ; Scientific evidence</subject><ispartof>Local environment, 2023-04, Vol.28 (4), p.412-432</ispartof><rights>2022 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group 2022</rights><rights>2022 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-9422317a3b6f95a7ceb250482d8dbbd3d44774dd85766c584ef2c7f9a498c0293</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-9422317a3b6f95a7ceb250482d8dbbd3d44774dd85766c584ef2c7f9a498c0293</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5334-7567 ; 0000-0003-1063-0850</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27845,27903,27904,33202</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kamboh, Shafiq Ahmad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ittefaq, Muhammad</creatorcontrib><title>Advocacy journalism and climate justice in a Global Southern country</title><title>Local environment</title><description>Being among the world's most affected countries by climate change, Pakistan is facing a variety of cases of climate injustice committed by internal and external drivers. Waisbord's referred "Advocate-journalist" model carries a good potential to advocate these injustices to stimulate democratic dialogue among the audience that eventually pushes leadership to make eco-friendly policies. This study critically analyses advocacy journalism coverage of cases of local and regional climate injustice in the editorial contents of mainstream Pakistani newspapers by using the quantitative content analysis method. Results reveal that selected newspapers gave inappropriate coverage to climate injustice issues both in quantity and quality. Besides muddled local and regional climate injustice issues' priorities, editorialists also excessively recommended dirty energy solutions to the policymakers. The final analysis suggests that the findings of climate and energy-related scientific studies were not being reflected in the advocacy journalism contents as well. This failure of "advocate-journalist" model to perform its normative role of potentially advocating the cases of climate injustice with compelling scientific evidence seems to attribute to the political economy of the press or editorial inattention. As a way out of this journalistic lack, Waisbord's endorsed "civic advocacy" groups must intervene to plug the loopholes.</description><subject>Advocacy</subject><subject>Advocacy journalism</subject><subject>Attention deficits</subject><subject>civic advocacy</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>climate change policies</subject><subject>Climate justice</subject><subject>Content analysis</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>energy crisis</subject><subject>GHG emissions</subject><subject>global south</subject><subject>Inappropriateness</subject><subject>Injustice</subject><subject>Journalism</subject><subject>Journalists</subject><subject>Justice</subject><subject>Leadership</subject><subject>Policy making</subject><subject>Political economy</subject><subject>Regions</subject><subject>Scientific evidence</subject><issn>1354-9839</issn><issn>1469-6711</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtKAzEUhoMoWKuPIARcT811kuwsXqpQcKGuQyYXnDJNajKjzNs7pXXr6pzF9_-c8wFwjdECI4luMeVMSaoWBBGyIJhzRcUJmGFWq6oWGJ9O-8RUe-gcXJSyQQhTwtkMPCzdd7LGjnCThhxN15YtNNFB27Vb03u4GUrfWg_bCA1cdakxHXxLQ__pc4Q2DbHP4yU4C6Yr_uo45-Dj6fH9_rlav65e7pfrylLJ-0oxQigWhjZ1UNwI6xvCEZPESdc0jjrGhGDOSS7q2nLJfCBWBGWm7ywiis7BzaF3l9PX4Euvj0cXTYRUNcIK8YniB8rmVEr2Qe_y9EseNUZ6L0z_CdN7YfoobMrdHXJtDClvzU_KndO9GbuUQzbRtkXT_yt-AVexcTs</recordid><startdate>20230403</startdate><enddate>20230403</enddate><creator>Kamboh, Shafiq Ahmad</creator><creator>Ittefaq, Muhammad</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5334-7567</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1063-0850</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230403</creationdate><title>Advocacy journalism and climate justice in a Global Southern country</title><author>Kamboh, Shafiq Ahmad ; Ittefaq, Muhammad</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-9422317a3b6f95a7ceb250482d8dbbd3d44774dd85766c584ef2c7f9a498c0293</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Advocacy</topic><topic>Advocacy journalism</topic><topic>Attention deficits</topic><topic>civic advocacy</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>climate change policies</topic><topic>Climate justice</topic><topic>Content analysis</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>energy crisis</topic><topic>GHG emissions</topic><topic>global south</topic><topic>Inappropriateness</topic><topic>Injustice</topic><topic>Journalism</topic><topic>Journalists</topic><topic>Justice</topic><topic>Leadership</topic><topic>Policy making</topic><topic>Political economy</topic><topic>Regions</topic><topic>Scientific evidence</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kamboh, Shafiq Ahmad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ittefaq, Muhammad</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Local environment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kamboh, Shafiq Ahmad</au><au>Ittefaq, Muhammad</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Advocacy journalism and climate justice in a Global Southern country</atitle><jtitle>Local environment</jtitle><date>2023-04-03</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>412</spage><epage>432</epage><pages>412-432</pages><issn>1354-9839</issn><eissn>1469-6711</eissn><abstract>Being among the world's most affected countries by climate change, Pakistan is facing a variety of cases of climate injustice committed by internal and external drivers. Waisbord's referred "Advocate-journalist" model carries a good potential to advocate these injustices to stimulate democratic dialogue among the audience that eventually pushes leadership to make eco-friendly policies. This study critically analyses advocacy journalism coverage of cases of local and regional climate injustice in the editorial contents of mainstream Pakistani newspapers by using the quantitative content analysis method. Results reveal that selected newspapers gave inappropriate coverage to climate injustice issues both in quantity and quality. Besides muddled local and regional climate injustice issues' priorities, editorialists also excessively recommended dirty energy solutions to the policymakers. The final analysis suggests that the findings of climate and energy-related scientific studies were not being reflected in the advocacy journalism contents as well. This failure of "advocate-journalist" model to perform its normative role of potentially advocating the cases of climate injustice with compelling scientific evidence seems to attribute to the political economy of the press or editorial inattention. As a way out of this journalistic lack, Waisbord's endorsed "civic advocacy" groups must intervene to plug the loopholes.</abstract><cop>Abingdon</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/13549839.2022.2155937</doi><tpages>21</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5334-7567</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1063-0850</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1354-9839 |
ispartof | Local environment, 2023-04, Vol.28 (4), p.412-432 |
issn | 1354-9839 1469-6711 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_13549839_2022_2155937 |
source | International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); PAIS Index; Taylor and Francis:Jisc Collections:Taylor and Francis Read and Publish Agreement 2024-2025:Social Sciences and Humanities Collection (Reading list) |
subjects | Advocacy Advocacy journalism Attention deficits civic advocacy Climate change climate change policies Climate justice Content analysis Energy energy crisis GHG emissions global south Inappropriateness Injustice Journalism Journalists Justice Leadership Policy making Political economy Regions Scientific evidence |
title | Advocacy journalism and climate justice in a Global Southern country |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T10%3A22%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Advocacy%20journalism%20and%20climate%20justice%20in%20a%20Global%20Southern%20country&rft.jtitle=Local%20environment&rft.au=Kamboh,%20Shafiq%20Ahmad&rft.date=2023-04-03&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=412&rft.epage=432&rft.pages=412-432&rft.issn=1354-9839&rft.eissn=1469-6711&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/13549839.2022.2155937&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2789601905%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-9422317a3b6f95a7ceb250482d8dbbd3d44774dd85766c584ef2c7f9a498c0293%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2789601905&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |