Loading…

Freedom of religion: lifting the veils of power and prejudice

This paper brings together case-law of the European Court of Human Rights and the Court of Justice of the European Union, for purposes of assessing the extent to which pluralism underpins decisions involving religious manifestation in the form of the Christian cross, on the one hand, and the Islamic...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The international journal of human rights 2020-05, Vol.24 (5), p.509-530
Main Author: Alkiviadou, Natalie
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3580-33ceaef49a40fa9348f128df165a620a8c024d0bb6f56be15f4ad47a12257eb93
cites
container_end_page 530
container_issue 5
container_start_page 509
container_title The international journal of human rights
container_volume 24
creator Alkiviadou, Natalie
description This paper brings together case-law of the European Court of Human Rights and the Court of Justice of the European Union, for purposes of assessing the extent to which pluralism underpins decisions involving religious manifestation in the form of the Christian cross, on the one hand, and the Islamic veil on the other. The discussion of the jurisprudence reflects that the two Courts have not set adequate benchmarks of protection for religious minorities and have not conceptualised themselves as key players to fight the growing Islamoprejudice marking a plethora of European realms. Instead, they have either reiterated negative narratives or hidden behind the acceptable shield of neutrality.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/13642987.2019.1648260
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_13642987_2019_1648260</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2414440672</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3580-33ceaef49a40fa9348f128df165a620a8c024d0bb6f56be15f4ad47a12257eb93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1Lw0AQhhdRsFZ_ghDwnDr7kc1GEJRiVSh4UfC2bJLZuiXNxt3U0n9vQuvV0wzM874DDyHXFGYUFNxSLgUrVD5jQIsZlUIxCSdkQnMhUsj45-mwD0w6QufkIsY1AGNFDhNyvwiItd8k3iYBG7dyvr1LGmd7166S_guTH3RNHM-d32FITFsnXcD1tnYVXpIza5qIV8c5JR-Lp_f5S7p8e36dPy7TimcKUs4rNGhFYQRYU3ChLGWqtlRmRjIwqgImaihLaTNZIs2sMLXIDWUsy7Es-JTcHHq74L-3GHu99tvQDi81E1QIATJnA5UdqCr4GANa3QW3MWGvKejRlP4zpUdT-mhqyD0ccq61PmzMzoem1r3ZNz7YYNrKRc3_r_gFgqpukg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2414440672</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Freedom of religion: lifting the veils of power and prejudice</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Taylor &amp; Francis</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><creator>Alkiviadou, Natalie</creator><creatorcontrib>Alkiviadou, Natalie</creatorcontrib><description>This paper brings together case-law of the European Court of Human Rights and the Court of Justice of the European Union, for purposes of assessing the extent to which pluralism underpins decisions involving religious manifestation in the form of the Christian cross, on the one hand, and the Islamic veil on the other. The discussion of the jurisprudence reflects that the two Courts have not set adequate benchmarks of protection for religious minorities and have not conceptualised themselves as key players to fight the growing Islamoprejudice marking a plethora of European realms. Instead, they have either reiterated negative narratives or hidden behind the acceptable shield of neutrality.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1364-2987</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1744-053X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/13642987.2019.1648260</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Abingdon: Routledge</publisher><subject>Benchmarks ; Court of Justice of the European Union ; Courts ; Decision making ; European Court of Human Rights ; Freedom of religion ; Human rights ; Islam ; Jurisprudence ; Lifting ; Minority &amp; ethnic groups ; Minority groups ; Neutrality ; Prejudice ; Religion ; religious dress ; Religious minorities ; Veils</subject><ispartof>The international journal of human rights, 2020-05, Vol.24 (5), p.509-530</ispartof><rights>2019 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor &amp; Francis Group 2019</rights><rights>2019 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor &amp; Francis Group</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3580-33ceaef49a40fa9348f128df165a620a8c024d0bb6f56be15f4ad47a12257eb93</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906,33204</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Alkiviadou, Natalie</creatorcontrib><title>Freedom of religion: lifting the veils of power and prejudice</title><title>The international journal of human rights</title><description>This paper brings together case-law of the European Court of Human Rights and the Court of Justice of the European Union, for purposes of assessing the extent to which pluralism underpins decisions involving religious manifestation in the form of the Christian cross, on the one hand, and the Islamic veil on the other. The discussion of the jurisprudence reflects that the two Courts have not set adequate benchmarks of protection for religious minorities and have not conceptualised themselves as key players to fight the growing Islamoprejudice marking a plethora of European realms. Instead, they have either reiterated negative narratives or hidden behind the acceptable shield of neutrality.</description><subject>Benchmarks</subject><subject>Court of Justice of the European Union</subject><subject>Courts</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>European Court of Human Rights</subject><subject>Freedom of religion</subject><subject>Human rights</subject><subject>Islam</subject><subject>Jurisprudence</subject><subject>Lifting</subject><subject>Minority &amp; ethnic groups</subject><subject>Minority groups</subject><subject>Neutrality</subject><subject>Prejudice</subject><subject>Religion</subject><subject>religious dress</subject><subject>Religious minorities</subject><subject>Veils</subject><issn>1364-2987</issn><issn>1744-053X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1Lw0AQhhdRsFZ_ghDwnDr7kc1GEJRiVSh4UfC2bJLZuiXNxt3U0n9vQuvV0wzM874DDyHXFGYUFNxSLgUrVD5jQIsZlUIxCSdkQnMhUsj45-mwD0w6QufkIsY1AGNFDhNyvwiItd8k3iYBG7dyvr1LGmd7166S_guTH3RNHM-d32FITFsnXcD1tnYVXpIza5qIV8c5JR-Lp_f5S7p8e36dPy7TimcKUs4rNGhFYQRYU3ChLGWqtlRmRjIwqgImaihLaTNZIs2sMLXIDWUsy7Es-JTcHHq74L-3GHu99tvQDi81E1QIATJnA5UdqCr4GANa3QW3MWGvKejRlP4zpUdT-mhqyD0ccq61PmzMzoem1r3ZNz7YYNrKRc3_r_gFgqpukg</recordid><startdate>20200527</startdate><enddate>20200527</enddate><creator>Alkiviadou, Natalie</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200527</creationdate><title>Freedom of religion: lifting the veils of power and prejudice</title><author>Alkiviadou, Natalie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3580-33ceaef49a40fa9348f128df165a620a8c024d0bb6f56be15f4ad47a12257eb93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Benchmarks</topic><topic>Court of Justice of the European Union</topic><topic>Courts</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>European Court of Human Rights</topic><topic>Freedom of religion</topic><topic>Human rights</topic><topic>Islam</topic><topic>Jurisprudence</topic><topic>Lifting</topic><topic>Minority &amp; ethnic groups</topic><topic>Minority groups</topic><topic>Neutrality</topic><topic>Prejudice</topic><topic>Religion</topic><topic>religious dress</topic><topic>Religious minorities</topic><topic>Veils</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Alkiviadou, Natalie</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>The international journal of human rights</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Alkiviadou, Natalie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Freedom of religion: lifting the veils of power and prejudice</atitle><jtitle>The international journal of human rights</jtitle><date>2020-05-27</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>509</spage><epage>530</epage><pages>509-530</pages><issn>1364-2987</issn><eissn>1744-053X</eissn><abstract>This paper brings together case-law of the European Court of Human Rights and the Court of Justice of the European Union, for purposes of assessing the extent to which pluralism underpins decisions involving religious manifestation in the form of the Christian cross, on the one hand, and the Islamic veil on the other. The discussion of the jurisprudence reflects that the two Courts have not set adequate benchmarks of protection for religious minorities and have not conceptualised themselves as key players to fight the growing Islamoprejudice marking a plethora of European realms. Instead, they have either reiterated negative narratives or hidden behind the acceptable shield of neutrality.</abstract><cop>Abingdon</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/13642987.2019.1648260</doi><tpages>22</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1364-2987
ispartof The international journal of human rights, 2020-05, Vol.24 (5), p.509-530
issn 1364-2987
1744-053X
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_13642987_2019_1648260
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Taylor & Francis; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts
subjects Benchmarks
Court of Justice of the European Union
Courts
Decision making
European Court of Human Rights
Freedom of religion
Human rights
Islam
Jurisprudence
Lifting
Minority & ethnic groups
Minority groups
Neutrality
Prejudice
Religion
religious dress
Religious minorities
Veils
title Freedom of religion: lifting the veils of power and prejudice
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T17%3A42%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Freedom%20of%20religion:%20lifting%20the%20veils%20of%20power%20and%20prejudice&rft.jtitle=The%20international%20journal%20of%20human%20rights&rft.au=Alkiviadou,%20Natalie&rft.date=2020-05-27&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=509&rft.epage=530&rft.pages=509-530&rft.issn=1364-2987&rft.eissn=1744-053X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/13642987.2019.1648260&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2414440672%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3580-33ceaef49a40fa9348f128df165a620a8c024d0bb6f56be15f4ad47a12257eb93%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2414440672&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true