Loading…
Freedom of religion: lifting the veils of power and prejudice
This paper brings together case-law of the European Court of Human Rights and the Court of Justice of the European Union, for purposes of assessing the extent to which pluralism underpins decisions involving religious manifestation in the form of the Christian cross, on the one hand, and the Islamic...
Saved in:
Published in: | The international journal of human rights 2020-05, Vol.24 (5), p.509-530 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3580-33ceaef49a40fa9348f128df165a620a8c024d0bb6f56be15f4ad47a12257eb93 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 530 |
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 509 |
container_title | The international journal of human rights |
container_volume | 24 |
creator | Alkiviadou, Natalie |
description | This paper brings together case-law of the European Court of Human Rights and the Court of Justice of the European Union, for purposes of assessing the extent to which pluralism underpins decisions involving religious manifestation in the form of the Christian cross, on the one hand, and the Islamic veil on the other. The discussion of the jurisprudence reflects that the two Courts have not set adequate benchmarks of protection for religious minorities and have not conceptualised themselves as key players to fight the growing Islamoprejudice marking a plethora of European realms. Instead, they have either reiterated negative narratives or hidden behind the acceptable shield of neutrality. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/13642987.2019.1648260 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_13642987_2019_1648260</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2414440672</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3580-33ceaef49a40fa9348f128df165a620a8c024d0bb6f56be15f4ad47a12257eb93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1Lw0AQhhdRsFZ_ghDwnDr7kc1GEJRiVSh4UfC2bJLZuiXNxt3U0n9vQuvV0wzM874DDyHXFGYUFNxSLgUrVD5jQIsZlUIxCSdkQnMhUsj45-mwD0w6QufkIsY1AGNFDhNyvwiItd8k3iYBG7dyvr1LGmd7166S_guTH3RNHM-d32FITFsnXcD1tnYVXpIza5qIV8c5JR-Lp_f5S7p8e36dPy7TimcKUs4rNGhFYQRYU3ChLGWqtlRmRjIwqgImaihLaTNZIs2sMLXIDWUsy7Es-JTcHHq74L-3GHu99tvQDi81E1QIATJnA5UdqCr4GANa3QW3MWGvKejRlP4zpUdT-mhqyD0ccq61PmzMzoem1r3ZNz7YYNrKRc3_r_gFgqpukg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2414440672</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Freedom of religion: lifting the veils of power and prejudice</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Taylor & Francis</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><creator>Alkiviadou, Natalie</creator><creatorcontrib>Alkiviadou, Natalie</creatorcontrib><description>This paper brings together case-law of the European Court of Human Rights and the Court of Justice of the European Union, for purposes of assessing the extent to which pluralism underpins decisions involving religious manifestation in the form of the Christian cross, on the one hand, and the Islamic veil on the other. The discussion of the jurisprudence reflects that the two Courts have not set adequate benchmarks of protection for religious minorities and have not conceptualised themselves as key players to fight the growing Islamoprejudice marking a plethora of European realms. Instead, they have either reiterated negative narratives or hidden behind the acceptable shield of neutrality.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1364-2987</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1744-053X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/13642987.2019.1648260</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Abingdon: Routledge</publisher><subject>Benchmarks ; Court of Justice of the European Union ; Courts ; Decision making ; European Court of Human Rights ; Freedom of religion ; Human rights ; Islam ; Jurisprudence ; Lifting ; Minority & ethnic groups ; Minority groups ; Neutrality ; Prejudice ; Religion ; religious dress ; Religious minorities ; Veils</subject><ispartof>The international journal of human rights, 2020-05, Vol.24 (5), p.509-530</ispartof><rights>2019 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group 2019</rights><rights>2019 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3580-33ceaef49a40fa9348f128df165a620a8c024d0bb6f56be15f4ad47a12257eb93</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906,33204</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Alkiviadou, Natalie</creatorcontrib><title>Freedom of religion: lifting the veils of power and prejudice</title><title>The international journal of human rights</title><description>This paper brings together case-law of the European Court of Human Rights and the Court of Justice of the European Union, for purposes of assessing the extent to which pluralism underpins decisions involving religious manifestation in the form of the Christian cross, on the one hand, and the Islamic veil on the other. The discussion of the jurisprudence reflects that the two Courts have not set adequate benchmarks of protection for religious minorities and have not conceptualised themselves as key players to fight the growing Islamoprejudice marking a plethora of European realms. Instead, they have either reiterated negative narratives or hidden behind the acceptable shield of neutrality.</description><subject>Benchmarks</subject><subject>Court of Justice of the European Union</subject><subject>Courts</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>European Court of Human Rights</subject><subject>Freedom of religion</subject><subject>Human rights</subject><subject>Islam</subject><subject>Jurisprudence</subject><subject>Lifting</subject><subject>Minority & ethnic groups</subject><subject>Minority groups</subject><subject>Neutrality</subject><subject>Prejudice</subject><subject>Religion</subject><subject>religious dress</subject><subject>Religious minorities</subject><subject>Veils</subject><issn>1364-2987</issn><issn>1744-053X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1Lw0AQhhdRsFZ_ghDwnDr7kc1GEJRiVSh4UfC2bJLZuiXNxt3U0n9vQuvV0wzM874DDyHXFGYUFNxSLgUrVD5jQIsZlUIxCSdkQnMhUsj45-mwD0w6QufkIsY1AGNFDhNyvwiItd8k3iYBG7dyvr1LGmd7166S_guTH3RNHM-d32FITFsnXcD1tnYVXpIza5qIV8c5JR-Lp_f5S7p8e36dPy7TimcKUs4rNGhFYQRYU3ChLGWqtlRmRjIwqgImaihLaTNZIs2sMLXIDWUsy7Es-JTcHHq74L-3GHu99tvQDi81E1QIATJnA5UdqCr4GANa3QW3MWGvKejRlP4zpUdT-mhqyD0ccq61PmzMzoem1r3ZNz7YYNrKRc3_r_gFgqpukg</recordid><startdate>20200527</startdate><enddate>20200527</enddate><creator>Alkiviadou, Natalie</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200527</creationdate><title>Freedom of religion: lifting the veils of power and prejudice</title><author>Alkiviadou, Natalie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3580-33ceaef49a40fa9348f128df165a620a8c024d0bb6f56be15f4ad47a12257eb93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Benchmarks</topic><topic>Court of Justice of the European Union</topic><topic>Courts</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>European Court of Human Rights</topic><topic>Freedom of religion</topic><topic>Human rights</topic><topic>Islam</topic><topic>Jurisprudence</topic><topic>Lifting</topic><topic>Minority & ethnic groups</topic><topic>Minority groups</topic><topic>Neutrality</topic><topic>Prejudice</topic><topic>Religion</topic><topic>religious dress</topic><topic>Religious minorities</topic><topic>Veils</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Alkiviadou, Natalie</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>The international journal of human rights</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Alkiviadou, Natalie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Freedom of religion: lifting the veils of power and prejudice</atitle><jtitle>The international journal of human rights</jtitle><date>2020-05-27</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>509</spage><epage>530</epage><pages>509-530</pages><issn>1364-2987</issn><eissn>1744-053X</eissn><abstract>This paper brings together case-law of the European Court of Human Rights and the Court of Justice of the European Union, for purposes of assessing the extent to which pluralism underpins decisions involving religious manifestation in the form of the Christian cross, on the one hand, and the Islamic veil on the other. The discussion of the jurisprudence reflects that the two Courts have not set adequate benchmarks of protection for religious minorities and have not conceptualised themselves as key players to fight the growing Islamoprejudice marking a plethora of European realms. Instead, they have either reiterated negative narratives or hidden behind the acceptable shield of neutrality.</abstract><cop>Abingdon</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/13642987.2019.1648260</doi><tpages>22</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1364-2987 |
ispartof | The international journal of human rights, 2020-05, Vol.24 (5), p.509-530 |
issn | 1364-2987 1744-053X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_13642987_2019_1648260 |
source | International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Taylor & Francis; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts |
subjects | Benchmarks Court of Justice of the European Union Courts Decision making European Court of Human Rights Freedom of religion Human rights Islam Jurisprudence Lifting Minority & ethnic groups Minority groups Neutrality Prejudice Religion religious dress Religious minorities Veils |
title | Freedom of religion: lifting the veils of power and prejudice |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T17%3A42%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Freedom%20of%20religion:%20lifting%20the%20veils%20of%20power%20and%20prejudice&rft.jtitle=The%20international%20journal%20of%20human%20rights&rft.au=Alkiviadou,%20Natalie&rft.date=2020-05-27&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=509&rft.epage=530&rft.pages=509-530&rft.issn=1364-2987&rft.eissn=1744-053X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/13642987.2019.1648260&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2414440672%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3580-33ceaef49a40fa9348f128df165a620a8c024d0bb6f56be15f4ad47a12257eb93%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2414440672&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |