Loading…
Procedure for the Implementation of the Precautionary Principle in Biosafety Commissions
In order to fulfil their responsibilities under the precautionary principle, biosafety commissions should lay down guidelines concerning the understanding and application of this principle and work towards an operational procedure. With this contribution, we propose a step-wise procedure that aims t...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of risk research 2007-06, Vol.10 (4), p.487-501 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-76ce747b56210105bd6b0ff52b16dffd48ff8400c47adfa48c21cc7ad49b22063 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-76ce747b56210105bd6b0ff52b16dffd48ff8400c47adfa48c21cc7ad49b22063 |
container_end_page | 501 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 487 |
container_title | Journal of risk research |
container_volume | 10 |
creator | Ammann, Daniel Hilbeck, Angelika Lanzrein, Beatrice Hübner, Philipp Oehen, Bernadette |
description | In order to fulfil their responsibilities under the precautionary principle, biosafety commissions should lay down guidelines concerning the understanding and application of this principle and work towards an operational procedure. With this contribution, we propose a step-wise procedure that aims to establish the understanding of the precautionary principle within biosafety commissions and to provide a methodological approach for the application of this principle to specific cases in the course of risk assessment. This approach is based on systematically investigating the consensus view within a group of 15 biosafety experts with the help of sets of checklists. For step 1, we propose a checklist of 13 criteria aimed at defining the understanding of the precautionary principle. For step 2, we propose 4 criteria for the decision on whether or not to use the precautionary principle. For step 3, 11 criteria for the use of the precautionary principle are presented. In step 4, additional criteria for specific applications could be included. In step 5, possible recommendations to decision-making authorities are proposed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/13669870701424740 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_13669870701424740</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>36818325</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-76ce747b56210105bd6b0ff52b16dffd48ff8400c47adfa48c21cc7ad49b22063</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM1OAyEURonRxFp9AHezcjd6YRigiRtt_Eua2IUm7gjDQMTMDBWYaN9eat01pisul3OA-yF0juESg4ArXDE2Exw4YEoop3CAJpgyVlLK8GGu83mZAX6MTmL8AMCiwmSC3pbBa9OOwRTWhyK9m-KpX3WmN0NSyfmh8Pa3uwxGq3HTUWGdd27QLnOFG4pb56OyJq2Lue97F2OG4ik6sqqL5uxvnaLX-7uX-WO5eH54mt8sSk1BpJIzbTjlTc0IBgx107IGrK1Jg1lrbUuFtYICaMpVaxUVmmCtc01nDSHAqim62N67Cv5zNDHJ_ANtuk4Nxo9RVkzkUUm9F8QzzgjjIoN4C-rgYwzGylVwfZ5aYpCbsOVO2NnhW8cNOcZeffnQtTKpdeeDDSpnFXctmb5TNq_3mtX_D_8AxQyYKQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>19762678</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Procedure for the Implementation of the Precautionary Principle in Biosafety Commissions</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Business Source Ultimate</source><source>Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection</source><creator>Ammann, Daniel ; Hilbeck, Angelika ; Lanzrein, Beatrice ; Hübner, Philipp ; Oehen, Bernadette</creator><creatorcontrib>Ammann, Daniel ; Hilbeck, Angelika ; Lanzrein, Beatrice ; Hübner, Philipp ; Oehen, Bernadette</creatorcontrib><description>In order to fulfil their responsibilities under the precautionary principle, biosafety commissions should lay down guidelines concerning the understanding and application of this principle and work towards an operational procedure. With this contribution, we propose a step-wise procedure that aims to establish the understanding of the precautionary principle within biosafety commissions and to provide a methodological approach for the application of this principle to specific cases in the course of risk assessment. This approach is based on systematically investigating the consensus view within a group of 15 biosafety experts with the help of sets of checklists. For step 1, we propose a checklist of 13 criteria aimed at defining the understanding of the precautionary principle. For step 2, we propose 4 criteria for the decision on whether or not to use the precautionary principle. For step 3, 11 criteria for the use of the precautionary principle are presented. In step 4, additional criteria for specific applications could be included. In step 5, possible recommendations to decision-making authorities are proposed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1366-9877</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1466-4461</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/13669870701424740</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Taylor & Francis</publisher><subject>biosafety commissions ; Biotechnology ; Decision making ; Genetically modified organisms ; non-knowledge ; Precautionary principle ; Regulatory policy ; risk analysis ; Risk management ; Uncertainty</subject><ispartof>Journal of risk research, 2007-06, Vol.10 (4), p.487-501</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-76ce747b56210105bd6b0ff52b16dffd48ff8400c47adfa48c21cc7ad49b22063</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-76ce747b56210105bd6b0ff52b16dffd48ff8400c47adfa48c21cc7ad49b22063</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,33203</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ammann, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hilbeck, Angelika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lanzrein, Beatrice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hübner, Philipp</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oehen, Bernadette</creatorcontrib><title>Procedure for the Implementation of the Precautionary Principle in Biosafety Commissions</title><title>Journal of risk research</title><description>In order to fulfil their responsibilities under the precautionary principle, biosafety commissions should lay down guidelines concerning the understanding and application of this principle and work towards an operational procedure. With this contribution, we propose a step-wise procedure that aims to establish the understanding of the precautionary principle within biosafety commissions and to provide a methodological approach for the application of this principle to specific cases in the course of risk assessment. This approach is based on systematically investigating the consensus view within a group of 15 biosafety experts with the help of sets of checklists. For step 1, we propose a checklist of 13 criteria aimed at defining the understanding of the precautionary principle. For step 2, we propose 4 criteria for the decision on whether or not to use the precautionary principle. For step 3, 11 criteria for the use of the precautionary principle are presented. In step 4, additional criteria for specific applications could be included. In step 5, possible recommendations to decision-making authorities are proposed.</description><subject>biosafety commissions</subject><subject>Biotechnology</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Genetically modified organisms</subject><subject>non-knowledge</subject><subject>Precautionary principle</subject><subject>Regulatory policy</subject><subject>risk analysis</subject><subject>Risk management</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><issn>1366-9877</issn><issn>1466-4461</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkM1OAyEURonRxFp9AHezcjd6YRigiRtt_Eua2IUm7gjDQMTMDBWYaN9eat01pisul3OA-yF0juESg4ArXDE2Exw4YEoop3CAJpgyVlLK8GGu83mZAX6MTmL8AMCiwmSC3pbBa9OOwRTWhyK9m-KpX3WmN0NSyfmh8Pa3uwxGq3HTUWGdd27QLnOFG4pb56OyJq2Lue97F2OG4ik6sqqL5uxvnaLX-7uX-WO5eH54mt8sSk1BpJIzbTjlTc0IBgx107IGrK1Jg1lrbUuFtYICaMpVaxUVmmCtc01nDSHAqim62N67Cv5zNDHJ_ANtuk4Nxo9RVkzkUUm9F8QzzgjjIoN4C-rgYwzGylVwfZ5aYpCbsOVO2NnhW8cNOcZeffnQtTKpdeeDDSpnFXctmb5TNq_3mtX_D_8AxQyYKQ</recordid><startdate>200706</startdate><enddate>200706</enddate><creator>Ammann, Daniel</creator><creator>Hilbeck, Angelika</creator><creator>Lanzrein, Beatrice</creator><creator>Hübner, Philipp</creator><creator>Oehen, Bernadette</creator><general>Taylor & Francis</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U1</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200706</creationdate><title>Procedure for the Implementation of the Precautionary Principle in Biosafety Commissions</title><author>Ammann, Daniel ; Hilbeck, Angelika ; Lanzrein, Beatrice ; Hübner, Philipp ; Oehen, Bernadette</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-76ce747b56210105bd6b0ff52b16dffd48ff8400c47adfa48c21cc7ad49b22063</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>biosafety commissions</topic><topic>Biotechnology</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Genetically modified organisms</topic><topic>non-knowledge</topic><topic>Precautionary principle</topic><topic>Regulatory policy</topic><topic>risk analysis</topic><topic>Risk management</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ammann, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hilbeck, Angelika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lanzrein, Beatrice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hübner, Philipp</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oehen, Bernadette</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Risk Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Journal of risk research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ammann, Daniel</au><au>Hilbeck, Angelika</au><au>Lanzrein, Beatrice</au><au>Hübner, Philipp</au><au>Oehen, Bernadette</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Procedure for the Implementation of the Precautionary Principle in Biosafety Commissions</atitle><jtitle>Journal of risk research</jtitle><date>2007-06</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>487</spage><epage>501</epage><pages>487-501</pages><issn>1366-9877</issn><eissn>1466-4461</eissn><abstract>In order to fulfil their responsibilities under the precautionary principle, biosafety commissions should lay down guidelines concerning the understanding and application of this principle and work towards an operational procedure. With this contribution, we propose a step-wise procedure that aims to establish the understanding of the precautionary principle within biosafety commissions and to provide a methodological approach for the application of this principle to specific cases in the course of risk assessment. This approach is based on systematically investigating the consensus view within a group of 15 biosafety experts with the help of sets of checklists. For step 1, we propose a checklist of 13 criteria aimed at defining the understanding of the precautionary principle. For step 2, we propose 4 criteria for the decision on whether or not to use the precautionary principle. For step 3, 11 criteria for the use of the precautionary principle are presented. In step 4, additional criteria for specific applications could be included. In step 5, possible recommendations to decision-making authorities are proposed.</abstract><pub>Taylor & Francis</pub><doi>10.1080/13669870701424740</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1366-9877 |
ispartof | Journal of risk research, 2007-06, Vol.10 (4), p.487-501 |
issn | 1366-9877 1466-4461 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_13669870701424740 |
source | International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Business Source Ultimate; Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection |
subjects | biosafety commissions Biotechnology Decision making Genetically modified organisms non-knowledge Precautionary principle Regulatory policy risk analysis Risk management Uncertainty |
title | Procedure for the Implementation of the Precautionary Principle in Biosafety Commissions |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T15%3A19%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Procedure%20for%20the%20Implementation%20of%20the%20Precautionary%20Principle%20in%20Biosafety%20Commissions&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20risk%20research&rft.au=Ammann,%20Daniel&rft.date=2007-06&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=487&rft.epage=501&rft.pages=487-501&rft.issn=1366-9877&rft.eissn=1466-4461&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/13669870701424740&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E36818325%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-76ce747b56210105bd6b0ff52b16dffd48ff8400c47adfa48c21cc7ad49b22063%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=19762678&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |