Loading…

Comparison of standard versus population-specific handgrip strength cut-off points in the detection of probable sarcopenia after launch of EWGSOP2

We aimed to compare European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP2)-suggested and population-specific handgrip strength (HGS) thresholds to detect probable sarcopenia and their associations with physical-performance measures and frailty. A retrospective cross-sectional observational-s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The aging male 2020-12, Vol.23 (5), p.1564-1569
Main Authors: Bahat, Gulistan, Kilic, Cihan, Altinkaynak, Mustafa, Akif Karan, Mehmet
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-dd5be9aebdfe61a1f6ed365d4fddaa43a61bcdb196493b3dc9b0c76899b7cfaf3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-dd5be9aebdfe61a1f6ed365d4fddaa43a61bcdb196493b3dc9b0c76899b7cfaf3
container_end_page 1569
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1564
container_title The aging male
container_volume 23
creator Bahat, Gulistan
Kilic, Cihan
Altinkaynak, Mustafa
Akif Karan, Mehmet
description We aimed to compare European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP2)-suggested and population-specific handgrip strength (HGS) thresholds to detect probable sarcopenia and their associations with physical-performance measures and frailty. A retrospective cross-sectional observational-study included geriatrics outpatients applied to a university-hospital. HGS, timed up and go test (TUG), and usual gait speed (UGS) were assessed. Frailty was screened by FRAIL-scale. A total of 1825 older adults were included (mean age, 74.5 + 7.0 years; 68.8% female). Prevalence of low-HGS were 12.2% by the EWGSOP2-recommended (27/16 kg) cut-offs and 37.5% by population-specific cut-offs (35/20 kg) (p
doi_str_mv 10.1080/13685538.2020.1870038
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_13685538_2020_1870038</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2515552137</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-dd5be9aebdfe61a1f6ed365d4fddaa43a61bcdb196493b3dc9b0c76899b7cfaf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1rFTEUhoMotl79CUrAjZupyWQmmdkpl1qFQgUVl-HkqzdlJhmTjNK_4S82w7114cJsEsLzvufAg9BLSi4oGchbyvjQ92y4aElbvwZBCBseoXPaCdYQMZLH9V2ZZoPO0LOc7wihrRDiKTpjrGPtwMU5-r2P8wLJ5xhwdDgXCAaSwT9tymvGS1zWCYqPocmL1d55jQ8VuU1-qXCy4bYcsF5LE52rtA8lYx9wOVhsbLF6i27FS4oK1GRxhqTjYoMHDK7YhCdYgz5szOX3qy83n9vn6ImDKdsXp3uHvn24_Lr_2FzfXH3av79uNBu70hjTKzuCVcZZToE6bg3jvemcMQAdA06VNoqOvBuZYkaPimjBh3FUQjtwbIfeHHvrbj9Wm4ucfdZ2miDYuGbZdkK0nLB6duj1P-hdXFOo28m2p33ft5SJSvVHSqeYc7JOLsnPkO4lJXKTJh-kyU2aPEmruVen9lXN1vxNPViqwLsj4IOLaYZfMU1GFrifYnIJgvZZsv_P-AP_mKnl</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2515552137</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of standard versus population-specific handgrip strength cut-off points in the detection of probable sarcopenia after launch of EWGSOP2</title><source>SPORTDiscus</source><creator>Bahat, Gulistan ; Kilic, Cihan ; Altinkaynak, Mustafa ; Akif Karan, Mehmet</creator><creatorcontrib>Bahat, Gulistan ; Kilic, Cihan ; Altinkaynak, Mustafa ; Akif Karan, Mehmet</creatorcontrib><description><![CDATA[We aimed to compare European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP2)-suggested and population-specific handgrip strength (HGS) thresholds to detect probable sarcopenia and their associations with physical-performance measures and frailty. A retrospective cross-sectional observational-study included geriatrics outpatients applied to a university-hospital. HGS, timed up and go test (TUG), and usual gait speed (UGS) were assessed. Frailty was screened by FRAIL-scale. A total of 1825 older adults were included (mean age, 74.5 + 7.0 years; 68.8% female). Prevalence of low-HGS were 12.2% by the EWGSOP2-recommended (27/16 kg) cut-offs and 37.5% by population-specific cut-offs (35/20 kg) (p<.001). When low-HGS was defined by EWGSOP2 suggested cut-offs, low-HGS was associated with impaired UGS, (odds ratio [OR] = 3.8, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.0-6.9, p<.001); impaired TUG, (OR = 4.6, 95% CI: 2.4-8.8, p<.001); and frailty (OR = 20.9, 95% CI: 8.3-53.0, p<.001). Similarly, low HGS determined by population-specific cut-off points was associated with impaired UGS (OR = 3.1, 95% CI: 2.1-6.9, p<.001); impaired TUG (OR = 6.0, 95% CI: 3.0-11.8, p<.001); and frailty (OR = 7.3, 95% CI: 4.1-13.0, p<.001). Application of EWGSOP2-recommended standard HGS-cut-offs showed successful application in-practice. However, use of standard HGS cut-offs may result in underdiagnosis of probable sarcopenia. Therefore, we suggest that, whenever available, use of population-specific cut-offs for HGS may be better for correctly identifying older adults at risk.]]></description><identifier>ISSN: 1368-5538</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1473-0790</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/13685538.2020.1870038</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33432867</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Taylor &amp; Francis</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Aging ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; cut-offs ; EWGSOP ; Female ; Frailty ; Hand Strength ; Handgrip strength ; Humans ; Male ; Older people ; Population ; population-specific ; Postural Balance ; Prevalence ; Retrospective Studies ; Sarcopenia ; Sarcopenia - diagnosis ; Sarcopenia - epidemiology ; Time and Motion Studies</subject><ispartof>The aging male, 2020-12, Vol.23 (5), p.1564-1569</ispartof><rights>2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor &amp; Francis Group 2020</rights><rights>2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor &amp; Francis Group</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-dd5be9aebdfe61a1f6ed365d4fddaa43a61bcdb196493b3dc9b0c76899b7cfaf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-dd5be9aebdfe61a1f6ed365d4fddaa43a61bcdb196493b3dc9b0c76899b7cfaf3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7768-2746 ; 0000-0002-1246-3622 ; 0000-0001-5343-9795 ; 0000-0002-9080-404X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33432867$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bahat, Gulistan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kilic, Cihan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Altinkaynak, Mustafa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akif Karan, Mehmet</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of standard versus population-specific handgrip strength cut-off points in the detection of probable sarcopenia after launch of EWGSOP2</title><title>The aging male</title><addtitle>Aging Male</addtitle><description><![CDATA[We aimed to compare European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP2)-suggested and population-specific handgrip strength (HGS) thresholds to detect probable sarcopenia and their associations with physical-performance measures and frailty. A retrospective cross-sectional observational-study included geriatrics outpatients applied to a university-hospital. HGS, timed up and go test (TUG), and usual gait speed (UGS) were assessed. Frailty was screened by FRAIL-scale. A total of 1825 older adults were included (mean age, 74.5 + 7.0 years; 68.8% female). Prevalence of low-HGS were 12.2% by the EWGSOP2-recommended (27/16 kg) cut-offs and 37.5% by population-specific cut-offs (35/20 kg) (p<.001). When low-HGS was defined by EWGSOP2 suggested cut-offs, low-HGS was associated with impaired UGS, (odds ratio [OR] = 3.8, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.0-6.9, p<.001); impaired TUG, (OR = 4.6, 95% CI: 2.4-8.8, p<.001); and frailty (OR = 20.9, 95% CI: 8.3-53.0, p<.001). Similarly, low HGS determined by population-specific cut-off points was associated with impaired UGS (OR = 3.1, 95% CI: 2.1-6.9, p<.001); impaired TUG (OR = 6.0, 95% CI: 3.0-11.8, p<.001); and frailty (OR = 7.3, 95% CI: 4.1-13.0, p<.001). Application of EWGSOP2-recommended standard HGS-cut-offs showed successful application in-practice. However, use of standard HGS cut-offs may result in underdiagnosis of probable sarcopenia. Therefore, we suggest that, whenever available, use of population-specific cut-offs for HGS may be better for correctly identifying older adults at risk.]]></description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Aging</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>cut-offs</subject><subject>EWGSOP</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Frailty</subject><subject>Hand Strength</subject><subject>Handgrip strength</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>population-specific</subject><subject>Postural Balance</subject><subject>Prevalence</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Sarcopenia</subject><subject>Sarcopenia - diagnosis</subject><subject>Sarcopenia - epidemiology</subject><subject>Time and Motion Studies</subject><issn>1368-5538</issn><issn>1473-0790</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kU1rFTEUhoMotl79CUrAjZupyWQmmdkpl1qFQgUVl-HkqzdlJhmTjNK_4S82w7114cJsEsLzvufAg9BLSi4oGchbyvjQ92y4aElbvwZBCBseoXPaCdYQMZLH9V2ZZoPO0LOc7wihrRDiKTpjrGPtwMU5-r2P8wLJ5xhwdDgXCAaSwT9tymvGS1zWCYqPocmL1d55jQ8VuU1-qXCy4bYcsF5LE52rtA8lYx9wOVhsbLF6i27FS4oK1GRxhqTjYoMHDK7YhCdYgz5szOX3qy83n9vn6ImDKdsXp3uHvn24_Lr_2FzfXH3av79uNBu70hjTKzuCVcZZToE6bg3jvemcMQAdA06VNoqOvBuZYkaPimjBh3FUQjtwbIfeHHvrbj9Wm4ucfdZ2miDYuGbZdkK0nLB6duj1P-hdXFOo28m2p33ft5SJSvVHSqeYc7JOLsnPkO4lJXKTJh-kyU2aPEmruVen9lXN1vxNPViqwLsj4IOLaYZfMU1GFrifYnIJgvZZsv_P-AP_mKnl</recordid><startdate>202012</startdate><enddate>202012</enddate><creator>Bahat, Gulistan</creator><creator>Kilic, Cihan</creator><creator>Altinkaynak, Mustafa</creator><creator>Akif Karan, Mehmet</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7768-2746</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1246-3622</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5343-9795</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9080-404X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202012</creationdate><title>Comparison of standard versus population-specific handgrip strength cut-off points in the detection of probable sarcopenia after launch of EWGSOP2</title><author>Bahat, Gulistan ; Kilic, Cihan ; Altinkaynak, Mustafa ; Akif Karan, Mehmet</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-dd5be9aebdfe61a1f6ed365d4fddaa43a61bcdb196493b3dc9b0c76899b7cfaf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Aging</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>cut-offs</topic><topic>EWGSOP</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Frailty</topic><topic>Hand Strength</topic><topic>Handgrip strength</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>population-specific</topic><topic>Postural Balance</topic><topic>Prevalence</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Sarcopenia</topic><topic>Sarcopenia - diagnosis</topic><topic>Sarcopenia - epidemiology</topic><topic>Time and Motion Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bahat, Gulistan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kilic, Cihan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Altinkaynak, Mustafa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akif Karan, Mehmet</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The aging male</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bahat, Gulistan</au><au>Kilic, Cihan</au><au>Altinkaynak, Mustafa</au><au>Akif Karan, Mehmet</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of standard versus population-specific handgrip strength cut-off points in the detection of probable sarcopenia after launch of EWGSOP2</atitle><jtitle>The aging male</jtitle><addtitle>Aging Male</addtitle><date>2020-12</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1564</spage><epage>1569</epage><pages>1564-1569</pages><issn>1368-5538</issn><eissn>1473-0790</eissn><abstract><![CDATA[We aimed to compare European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP2)-suggested and population-specific handgrip strength (HGS) thresholds to detect probable sarcopenia and their associations with physical-performance measures and frailty. A retrospective cross-sectional observational-study included geriatrics outpatients applied to a university-hospital. HGS, timed up and go test (TUG), and usual gait speed (UGS) were assessed. Frailty was screened by FRAIL-scale. A total of 1825 older adults were included (mean age, 74.5 + 7.0 years; 68.8% female). Prevalence of low-HGS were 12.2% by the EWGSOP2-recommended (27/16 kg) cut-offs and 37.5% by population-specific cut-offs (35/20 kg) (p<.001). When low-HGS was defined by EWGSOP2 suggested cut-offs, low-HGS was associated with impaired UGS, (odds ratio [OR] = 3.8, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.0-6.9, p<.001); impaired TUG, (OR = 4.6, 95% CI: 2.4-8.8, p<.001); and frailty (OR = 20.9, 95% CI: 8.3-53.0, p<.001). Similarly, low HGS determined by population-specific cut-off points was associated with impaired UGS (OR = 3.1, 95% CI: 2.1-6.9, p<.001); impaired TUG (OR = 6.0, 95% CI: 3.0-11.8, p<.001); and frailty (OR = 7.3, 95% CI: 4.1-13.0, p<.001). Application of EWGSOP2-recommended standard HGS-cut-offs showed successful application in-practice. However, use of standard HGS cut-offs may result in underdiagnosis of probable sarcopenia. Therefore, we suggest that, whenever available, use of population-specific cut-offs for HGS may be better for correctly identifying older adults at risk.]]></abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis</pub><pmid>33432867</pmid><doi>10.1080/13685538.2020.1870038</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7768-2746</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1246-3622</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5343-9795</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9080-404X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1368-5538
ispartof The aging male, 2020-12, Vol.23 (5), p.1564-1569
issn 1368-5538
1473-0790
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_13685538_2020_1870038
source SPORTDiscus
subjects Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Aging
Cross-Sectional Studies
cut-offs
EWGSOP
Female
Frailty
Hand Strength
Handgrip strength
Humans
Male
Older people
Population
population-specific
Postural Balance
Prevalence
Retrospective Studies
Sarcopenia
Sarcopenia - diagnosis
Sarcopenia - epidemiology
Time and Motion Studies
title Comparison of standard versus population-specific handgrip strength cut-off points in the detection of probable sarcopenia after launch of EWGSOP2
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T19%3A21%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20standard%20versus%20population-specific%20handgrip%20strength%20cut-off%20points%20in%20the%20detection%20of%20probable%20sarcopenia%20after%20launch%20of%20EWGSOP2&rft.jtitle=The%20aging%20male&rft.au=Bahat,%20Gulistan&rft.date=2020-12&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1564&rft.epage=1569&rft.pages=1564-1569&rft.issn=1368-5538&rft.eissn=1473-0790&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/13685538.2020.1870038&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2515552137%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-dd5be9aebdfe61a1f6ed365d4fddaa43a61bcdb196493b3dc9b0c76899b7cfaf3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2515552137&rft_id=info:pmid/33432867&rfr_iscdi=true