Empathy, morality, and criminality: the legitimation narratives of U.S. Border Patrol agents

Border enforcement is a morally ambiguous and politically contentious state practice. Frontline enforcers experience this contentiousness as a threat to their moral authority. This article draws on interviews with U.S. Border Patrol agents to examine their legitimation work, the justificatory narrat...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of ethnic and migration studies 2018-11, Vol.44 (15), p.2544-2561
Main Author: Vega, Irene I.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Agents
Ambiguity
Authority
Border patrol
Borders
Bureaucracy
Coercion
Criminality
Criminalization
Discourses
emotion
Empathy
Enforcement
Ethics
Function
Immigrants
Immigration
Legitimacy
Legitimation
Migrants
Morality
Narratives
Social categories
Social function
Sympathy
Uncertainty
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Border enforcement is a morally ambiguous and politically contentious state practice. Frontline enforcers experience this contentiousness as a threat to their moral authority. This article draws on interviews with U.S. Border Patrol agents to examine their legitimation work, the justificatory narratives they deploy to establish their moral authority and legitimacy of the system they represent. Agents' legitimation narratives centre on two strategies: disputing immigrants' morality (i.e. 'criminalisation' and 'uncertainty') and establishing their own morality through compassionate discourses ('caring control'). By helping agents resolve moral ambiguities and reputational issues, these narratives restore the legitimacy of the U.S. immigration control system. In turn, this legitimacy serves as the normative foundation for agents to continue with an uncritical performance of their professional mandates. While the narratives function similarly across agents' social categories, Latinos cluster in the caring control narrative. This patterns reveals how legitimacy issues can be racialised, incentivising different legitimation strategies within the same organisation. Overall, this analysis provides a window into the normative principles that guide agents' actions and shape migrants' interactions with the coercive arm of the state.
ISSN:1369-183X
1469-9451
DOI:10.1080/1369183X.2017.1396888