Loading…
Ecologically sustainable development in broader retrospect and prospect: evaluating national framework policies against climate adaptation imperatives
This article revisits four Australian framework policies with implications for ecologically sustainable development to consider lessons for climate change adaptation. The competition, disaster resilience, sustainable development and water policies examined underline the difficulty in developing and...
Saved in:
Published in: | Australasian journal of environmental management 2015-01, Vol.22 (1), p.62-76 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-170754c0684c9583620137772970c723b38f9029aac0bdf9ce4555e8e5c155e73 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-170754c0684c9583620137772970c723b38f9029aac0bdf9ce4555e8e5c155e73 |
container_end_page | 76 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 62 |
container_title | Australasian journal of environmental management |
container_volume | 22 |
creator | Pittock, Jamie Hussey, Karen Dovers, Stephen |
description | This article revisits four Australian framework policies with implications for ecologically sustainable development to consider lessons for climate change adaptation. The competition, disaster resilience, sustainable development and water policies examined underline the difficulty in developing and implementing effective policy frameworks. We find that to succeed, a national policy in this federation needs: a coalition of stakeholders advocating for their implementation; medium to long-term bipartisan support; a focus on a perceived urgent national issue; significant socio-economic benefits; a focus on a limited number of core principles and systemic legislative reform with incremental implementation over many years; the allocation by the federal government of substantial funds for state implementation; requirements to report to the Council of Australian Governments; and support from central government agencies rather than marginalisation in the environment portfolio. These qualities are not inherent in the 1992 National Strategy for Ecologically Sustainable Development and this explains why it is now moribund. These findings suggest that it will be particularly hard to develop and difficult to implement an effective national climate change adaptation policy. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/14486563.2014.999725 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_14486563_2014_999725</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1676360732</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-170754c0684c9583620137772970c723b38f9029aac0bdf9ce4555e8e5c155e73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUUtuFDEUbCEiERJugISXbGbw391sEIrCR4rEImRtvXG_HhncdmN7JpqL5Lw4dJDYsapnqaqsquq614xuGe3pOyZlr5UWW06Z3A7DYLh61p1zpoaNEko__-d-0b0s5QelShltzruHa5dC2nsHIZxIOZQKPsIuIBnxiCEtM8ZKfCS7nGDETDLWnMqCrhKII1meHu8JHiEcoPq4J7FBihDIlGHG-5R_kiUF7zwWAvv2QanEBT9DRQIjLPUPn_h5wdzOI5bL7myCUPDVE150d5-uv1992dx8-_z16uPNxkkh64YZapR0VPfSDaoXuhUgjDF8MNQZLnainwbKBwBHd-M0OJRKKexROdbQiIvu7erbcvw6YKl29sVhCBAxHYpl2mihqRG8UeVKdS1yyTjZJbcI-WQZtY8z2L8z2McZ7DpDk31YZT5OKc_Q2gijrXAKKbd6ovPFiv84vFkdJkgW9rkJ7m4bQVHKGaOai99MOJua</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1676360732</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ecologically sustainable development in broader retrospect and prospect: evaluating national framework policies against climate adaptation imperatives</title><source>Taylor and Francis Science and Technology Collection</source><creator>Pittock, Jamie ; Hussey, Karen ; Dovers, Stephen</creator><creatorcontrib>Pittock, Jamie ; Hussey, Karen ; Dovers, Stephen</creatorcontrib><description>This article revisits four Australian framework policies with implications for ecologically sustainable development to consider lessons for climate change adaptation. The competition, disaster resilience, sustainable development and water policies examined underline the difficulty in developing and implementing effective policy frameworks. We find that to succeed, a national policy in this federation needs: a coalition of stakeholders advocating for their implementation; medium to long-term bipartisan support; a focus on a perceived urgent national issue; significant socio-economic benefits; a focus on a limited number of core principles and systemic legislative reform with incremental implementation over many years; the allocation by the federal government of substantial funds for state implementation; requirements to report to the Council of Australian Governments; and support from central government agencies rather than marginalisation in the environment portfolio. These qualities are not inherent in the 1992 National Strategy for Ecologically Sustainable Development and this explains why it is now moribund. These findings suggest that it will be particularly hard to develop and difficult to implement an effective national climate change adaptation policy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2159-5356</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1448-6563</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2159-5356</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/14486563.2014.999725</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Taylor & Francis</publisher><subject>climate ; climate change ; climate change adaptation ; ecologically sustainable development ; federal governance ; federal government ; government agencies ; national policy ; socioeconomics ; stakeholders ; sustainable development ; water policy</subject><ispartof>Australasian journal of environmental management, 2015-01, Vol.22 (1), p.62-76</ispartof><rights>2015 Environment Institute of Australia and New Zealand Inc. 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-170754c0684c9583620137772970c723b38f9029aac0bdf9ce4555e8e5c155e73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-170754c0684c9583620137772970c723b38f9029aac0bdf9ce4555e8e5c155e73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pittock, Jamie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hussey, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dovers, Stephen</creatorcontrib><title>Ecologically sustainable development in broader retrospect and prospect: evaluating national framework policies against climate adaptation imperatives</title><title>Australasian journal of environmental management</title><description>This article revisits four Australian framework policies with implications for ecologically sustainable development to consider lessons for climate change adaptation. The competition, disaster resilience, sustainable development and water policies examined underline the difficulty in developing and implementing effective policy frameworks. We find that to succeed, a national policy in this federation needs: a coalition of stakeholders advocating for their implementation; medium to long-term bipartisan support; a focus on a perceived urgent national issue; significant socio-economic benefits; a focus on a limited number of core principles and systemic legislative reform with incremental implementation over many years; the allocation by the federal government of substantial funds for state implementation; requirements to report to the Council of Australian Governments; and support from central government agencies rather than marginalisation in the environment portfolio. These qualities are not inherent in the 1992 National Strategy for Ecologically Sustainable Development and this explains why it is now moribund. These findings suggest that it will be particularly hard to develop and difficult to implement an effective national climate change adaptation policy.</description><subject>climate</subject><subject>climate change</subject><subject>climate change adaptation</subject><subject>ecologically sustainable development</subject><subject>federal governance</subject><subject>federal government</subject><subject>government agencies</subject><subject>national policy</subject><subject>socioeconomics</subject><subject>stakeholders</subject><subject>sustainable development</subject><subject>water policy</subject><issn>2159-5356</issn><issn>1448-6563</issn><issn>2159-5356</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFUUtuFDEUbCEiERJugISXbGbw391sEIrCR4rEImRtvXG_HhncdmN7JpqL5Lw4dJDYsapnqaqsquq614xuGe3pOyZlr5UWW06Z3A7DYLh61p1zpoaNEko__-d-0b0s5QelShltzruHa5dC2nsHIZxIOZQKPsIuIBnxiCEtM8ZKfCS7nGDETDLWnMqCrhKII1meHu8JHiEcoPq4J7FBihDIlGHG-5R_kiUF7zwWAvv2QanEBT9DRQIjLPUPn_h5wdzOI5bL7myCUPDVE150d5-uv1992dx8-_z16uPNxkkh64YZapR0VPfSDaoXuhUgjDF8MNQZLnainwbKBwBHd-M0OJRKKexROdbQiIvu7erbcvw6YKl29sVhCBAxHYpl2mihqRG8UeVKdS1yyTjZJbcI-WQZtY8z2L8z2McZ7DpDk31YZT5OKc_Q2gijrXAKKbd6ovPFiv84vFkdJkgW9rkJ7m4bQVHKGaOai99MOJua</recordid><startdate>20150102</startdate><enddate>20150102</enddate><creator>Pittock, Jamie</creator><creator>Hussey, Karen</creator><creator>Dovers, Stephen</creator><general>Taylor & Francis</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150102</creationdate><title>Ecologically sustainable development in broader retrospect and prospect: evaluating national framework policies against climate adaptation imperatives</title><author>Pittock, Jamie ; Hussey, Karen ; Dovers, Stephen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-170754c0684c9583620137772970c723b38f9029aac0bdf9ce4555e8e5c155e73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>climate</topic><topic>climate change</topic><topic>climate change adaptation</topic><topic>ecologically sustainable development</topic><topic>federal governance</topic><topic>federal government</topic><topic>government agencies</topic><topic>national policy</topic><topic>socioeconomics</topic><topic>stakeholders</topic><topic>sustainable development</topic><topic>water policy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pittock, Jamie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hussey, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dovers, Stephen</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Australasian journal of environmental management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pittock, Jamie</au><au>Hussey, Karen</au><au>Dovers, Stephen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ecologically sustainable development in broader retrospect and prospect: evaluating national framework policies against climate adaptation imperatives</atitle><jtitle>Australasian journal of environmental management</jtitle><date>2015-01-02</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>62</spage><epage>76</epage><pages>62-76</pages><issn>2159-5356</issn><issn>1448-6563</issn><eissn>2159-5356</eissn><abstract>This article revisits four Australian framework policies with implications for ecologically sustainable development to consider lessons for climate change adaptation. The competition, disaster resilience, sustainable development and water policies examined underline the difficulty in developing and implementing effective policy frameworks. We find that to succeed, a national policy in this federation needs: a coalition of stakeholders advocating for their implementation; medium to long-term bipartisan support; a focus on a perceived urgent national issue; significant socio-economic benefits; a focus on a limited number of core principles and systemic legislative reform with incremental implementation over many years; the allocation by the federal government of substantial funds for state implementation; requirements to report to the Council of Australian Governments; and support from central government agencies rather than marginalisation in the environment portfolio. These qualities are not inherent in the 1992 National Strategy for Ecologically Sustainable Development and this explains why it is now moribund. These findings suggest that it will be particularly hard to develop and difficult to implement an effective national climate change adaptation policy.</abstract><pub>Taylor & Francis</pub><doi>10.1080/14486563.2014.999725</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2159-5356 |
ispartof | Australasian journal of environmental management, 2015-01, Vol.22 (1), p.62-76 |
issn | 2159-5356 1448-6563 2159-5356 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_14486563_2014_999725 |
source | Taylor and Francis Science and Technology Collection |
subjects | climate climate change climate change adaptation ecologically sustainable development federal governance federal government government agencies national policy socioeconomics stakeholders sustainable development water policy |
title | Ecologically sustainable development in broader retrospect and prospect: evaluating national framework policies against climate adaptation imperatives |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T15%3A53%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ecologically%20sustainable%20development%20in%20broader%20retrospect%20and%20prospect:%20evaluating%20national%20framework%20policies%20against%20climate%20adaptation%20imperatives&rft.jtitle=Australasian%20journal%20of%20environmental%20management&rft.au=Pittock,%20Jamie&rft.date=2015-01-02&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=62&rft.epage=76&rft.pages=62-76&rft.issn=2159-5356&rft.eissn=2159-5356&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/14486563.2014.999725&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1676360732%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-170754c0684c9583620137772970c723b38f9029aac0bdf9ce4555e8e5c155e73%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1676360732&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |