Loading…

Ecologically sustainable development in broader retrospect and prospect: evaluating national framework policies against climate adaptation imperatives

This article revisits four Australian framework policies with implications for ecologically sustainable development to consider lessons for climate change adaptation. The competition, disaster resilience, sustainable development and water policies examined underline the difficulty in developing and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Australasian journal of environmental management 2015-01, Vol.22 (1), p.62-76
Main Authors: Pittock, Jamie, Hussey, Karen, Dovers, Stephen
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-170754c0684c9583620137772970c723b38f9029aac0bdf9ce4555e8e5c155e73
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-170754c0684c9583620137772970c723b38f9029aac0bdf9ce4555e8e5c155e73
container_end_page 76
container_issue 1
container_start_page 62
container_title Australasian journal of environmental management
container_volume 22
creator Pittock, Jamie
Hussey, Karen
Dovers, Stephen
description This article revisits four Australian framework policies with implications for ecologically sustainable development to consider lessons for climate change adaptation. The competition, disaster resilience, sustainable development and water policies examined underline the difficulty in developing and implementing effective policy frameworks. We find that to succeed, a national policy in this federation needs: a coalition of stakeholders advocating for their implementation; medium to long-term bipartisan support; a focus on a perceived urgent national issue; significant socio-economic benefits; a focus on a limited number of core principles and systemic legislative reform with incremental implementation over many years; the allocation by the federal government of substantial funds for state implementation; requirements to report to the Council of Australian Governments; and support from central government agencies rather than marginalisation in the environment portfolio. These qualities are not inherent in the 1992 National Strategy for Ecologically Sustainable Development and this explains why it is now moribund. These findings suggest that it will be particularly hard to develop and difficult to implement an effective national climate change adaptation policy.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/14486563.2014.999725
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_14486563_2014_999725</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1676360732</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-170754c0684c9583620137772970c723b38f9029aac0bdf9ce4555e8e5c155e73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUUtuFDEUbCEiERJugISXbGbw391sEIrCR4rEImRtvXG_HhncdmN7JpqL5Lw4dJDYsapnqaqsquq614xuGe3pOyZlr5UWW06Z3A7DYLh61p1zpoaNEko__-d-0b0s5QelShltzruHa5dC2nsHIZxIOZQKPsIuIBnxiCEtM8ZKfCS7nGDETDLWnMqCrhKII1meHu8JHiEcoPq4J7FBihDIlGHG-5R_kiUF7zwWAvv2QanEBT9DRQIjLPUPn_h5wdzOI5bL7myCUPDVE150d5-uv1992dx8-_z16uPNxkkh64YZapR0VPfSDaoXuhUgjDF8MNQZLnainwbKBwBHd-M0OJRKKexROdbQiIvu7erbcvw6YKl29sVhCBAxHYpl2mihqRG8UeVKdS1yyTjZJbcI-WQZtY8z2L8z2McZ7DpDk31YZT5OKc_Q2gijrXAKKbd6ovPFiv84vFkdJkgW9rkJ7m4bQVHKGaOai99MOJua</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1676360732</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ecologically sustainable development in broader retrospect and prospect: evaluating national framework policies against climate adaptation imperatives</title><source>Taylor and Francis Science and Technology Collection</source><creator>Pittock, Jamie ; Hussey, Karen ; Dovers, Stephen</creator><creatorcontrib>Pittock, Jamie ; Hussey, Karen ; Dovers, Stephen</creatorcontrib><description>This article revisits four Australian framework policies with implications for ecologically sustainable development to consider lessons for climate change adaptation. The competition, disaster resilience, sustainable development and water policies examined underline the difficulty in developing and implementing effective policy frameworks. We find that to succeed, a national policy in this federation needs: a coalition of stakeholders advocating for their implementation; medium to long-term bipartisan support; a focus on a perceived urgent national issue; significant socio-economic benefits; a focus on a limited number of core principles and systemic legislative reform with incremental implementation over many years; the allocation by the federal government of substantial funds for state implementation; requirements to report to the Council of Australian Governments; and support from central government agencies rather than marginalisation in the environment portfolio. These qualities are not inherent in the 1992 National Strategy for Ecologically Sustainable Development and this explains why it is now moribund. These findings suggest that it will be particularly hard to develop and difficult to implement an effective national climate change adaptation policy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2159-5356</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1448-6563</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2159-5356</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/14486563.2014.999725</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Taylor &amp; Francis</publisher><subject>climate ; climate change ; climate change adaptation ; ecologically sustainable development ; federal governance ; federal government ; government agencies ; national policy ; socioeconomics ; stakeholders ; sustainable development ; water policy</subject><ispartof>Australasian journal of environmental management, 2015-01, Vol.22 (1), p.62-76</ispartof><rights>2015 Environment Institute of Australia and New Zealand Inc. 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-170754c0684c9583620137772970c723b38f9029aac0bdf9ce4555e8e5c155e73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-170754c0684c9583620137772970c723b38f9029aac0bdf9ce4555e8e5c155e73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pittock, Jamie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hussey, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dovers, Stephen</creatorcontrib><title>Ecologically sustainable development in broader retrospect and prospect: evaluating national framework policies against climate adaptation imperatives</title><title>Australasian journal of environmental management</title><description>This article revisits four Australian framework policies with implications for ecologically sustainable development to consider lessons for climate change adaptation. The competition, disaster resilience, sustainable development and water policies examined underline the difficulty in developing and implementing effective policy frameworks. We find that to succeed, a national policy in this federation needs: a coalition of stakeholders advocating for their implementation; medium to long-term bipartisan support; a focus on a perceived urgent national issue; significant socio-economic benefits; a focus on a limited number of core principles and systemic legislative reform with incremental implementation over many years; the allocation by the federal government of substantial funds for state implementation; requirements to report to the Council of Australian Governments; and support from central government agencies rather than marginalisation in the environment portfolio. These qualities are not inherent in the 1992 National Strategy for Ecologically Sustainable Development and this explains why it is now moribund. These findings suggest that it will be particularly hard to develop and difficult to implement an effective national climate change adaptation policy.</description><subject>climate</subject><subject>climate change</subject><subject>climate change adaptation</subject><subject>ecologically sustainable development</subject><subject>federal governance</subject><subject>federal government</subject><subject>government agencies</subject><subject>national policy</subject><subject>socioeconomics</subject><subject>stakeholders</subject><subject>sustainable development</subject><subject>water policy</subject><issn>2159-5356</issn><issn>1448-6563</issn><issn>2159-5356</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFUUtuFDEUbCEiERJugISXbGbw391sEIrCR4rEImRtvXG_HhncdmN7JpqL5Lw4dJDYsapnqaqsquq614xuGe3pOyZlr5UWW06Z3A7DYLh61p1zpoaNEko__-d-0b0s5QelShltzruHa5dC2nsHIZxIOZQKPsIuIBnxiCEtM8ZKfCS7nGDETDLWnMqCrhKII1meHu8JHiEcoPq4J7FBihDIlGHG-5R_kiUF7zwWAvv2QanEBT9DRQIjLPUPn_h5wdzOI5bL7myCUPDVE150d5-uv1992dx8-_z16uPNxkkh64YZapR0VPfSDaoXuhUgjDF8MNQZLnainwbKBwBHd-M0OJRKKexROdbQiIvu7erbcvw6YKl29sVhCBAxHYpl2mihqRG8UeVKdS1yyTjZJbcI-WQZtY8z2L8z2McZ7DpDk31YZT5OKc_Q2gijrXAKKbd6ovPFiv84vFkdJkgW9rkJ7m4bQVHKGaOai99MOJua</recordid><startdate>20150102</startdate><enddate>20150102</enddate><creator>Pittock, Jamie</creator><creator>Hussey, Karen</creator><creator>Dovers, Stephen</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150102</creationdate><title>Ecologically sustainable development in broader retrospect and prospect: evaluating national framework policies against climate adaptation imperatives</title><author>Pittock, Jamie ; Hussey, Karen ; Dovers, Stephen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-170754c0684c9583620137772970c723b38f9029aac0bdf9ce4555e8e5c155e73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>climate</topic><topic>climate change</topic><topic>climate change adaptation</topic><topic>ecologically sustainable development</topic><topic>federal governance</topic><topic>federal government</topic><topic>government agencies</topic><topic>national policy</topic><topic>socioeconomics</topic><topic>stakeholders</topic><topic>sustainable development</topic><topic>water policy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pittock, Jamie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hussey, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dovers, Stephen</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Australasian journal of environmental management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pittock, Jamie</au><au>Hussey, Karen</au><au>Dovers, Stephen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ecologically sustainable development in broader retrospect and prospect: evaluating national framework policies against climate adaptation imperatives</atitle><jtitle>Australasian journal of environmental management</jtitle><date>2015-01-02</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>62</spage><epage>76</epage><pages>62-76</pages><issn>2159-5356</issn><issn>1448-6563</issn><eissn>2159-5356</eissn><abstract>This article revisits four Australian framework policies with implications for ecologically sustainable development to consider lessons for climate change adaptation. The competition, disaster resilience, sustainable development and water policies examined underline the difficulty in developing and implementing effective policy frameworks. We find that to succeed, a national policy in this federation needs: a coalition of stakeholders advocating for their implementation; medium to long-term bipartisan support; a focus on a perceived urgent national issue; significant socio-economic benefits; a focus on a limited number of core principles and systemic legislative reform with incremental implementation over many years; the allocation by the federal government of substantial funds for state implementation; requirements to report to the Council of Australian Governments; and support from central government agencies rather than marginalisation in the environment portfolio. These qualities are not inherent in the 1992 National Strategy for Ecologically Sustainable Development and this explains why it is now moribund. These findings suggest that it will be particularly hard to develop and difficult to implement an effective national climate change adaptation policy.</abstract><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis</pub><doi>10.1080/14486563.2014.999725</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2159-5356
ispartof Australasian journal of environmental management, 2015-01, Vol.22 (1), p.62-76
issn 2159-5356
1448-6563
2159-5356
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_14486563_2014_999725
source Taylor and Francis Science and Technology Collection
subjects climate
climate change
climate change adaptation
ecologically sustainable development
federal governance
federal government
government agencies
national policy
socioeconomics
stakeholders
sustainable development
water policy
title Ecologically sustainable development in broader retrospect and prospect: evaluating national framework policies against climate adaptation imperatives
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T15%3A53%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ecologically%20sustainable%20development%20in%20broader%20retrospect%20and%20prospect:%20evaluating%20national%20framework%20policies%20against%20climate%20adaptation%20imperatives&rft.jtitle=Australasian%20journal%20of%20environmental%20management&rft.au=Pittock,%20Jamie&rft.date=2015-01-02&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=62&rft.epage=76&rft.pages=62-76&rft.issn=2159-5356&rft.eissn=2159-5356&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/14486563.2014.999725&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1676360732%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-170754c0684c9583620137772970c723b38f9029aac0bdf9ce4555e8e5c155e73%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1676360732&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true