Loading…
Do social and environmental capabilities improve bank stability? Evidence from transition countries
Financial institutions have embraced the idea of corporate social responsibility (CSR) over the past decade, particularly in the banking sector, even as they have faced challenges in their core business model and an uncertain economic environment. Has the addition of CSR helped banks in their effort...
Saved in:
Published in: | Post-communist economies 2022-07, Vol.34 (5), p.624-646 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-ff4254138206869ed6e2a64c1075f5bf4f8adb8f412afd050198bdd368cdc0d23 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-ff4254138206869ed6e2a64c1075f5bf4f8adb8f412afd050198bdd368cdc0d23 |
container_end_page | 646 |
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 624 |
container_title | Post-communist economies |
container_volume | 34 |
creator | Djalilov, Khurshid Hartwell, Christopher |
description | Financial institutions have embraced the idea of corporate social responsibility (CSR) over the past decade, particularly in the banking sector, even as they have faced challenges in their core business model and an uncertain economic environment. Has the addition of CSR helped banks in their effort to become more stable via diversification, or has it squandered resources which could be utilised elsewhere? Using a sample of 319 commercial banks from 21 transition countries in Central and Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union from 2002 to 2014, we find that there is a heterogeneous effect of CSR on bank stability, with total commitment to CSR contributing to the stability the most. Environmental capabilities, on the other hand, appear to influence stability only for those firms which are already the highest performing. We conjecture that, for financial sector firms in a transition environment, CSR is a further commitment for firms which have attained a certain level of stability but can be destabilising for weaker banks. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/14631377.2021.1965359 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_14631377_2021_1965359</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2715628086</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-ff4254138206869ed6e2a64c1075f5bf4f8adb8f412afd050198bdd368cdc0d23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UMtOwzAQjBBIlMInIFninOJ3nBOgUh5SJS5wthw_JJfELnZa1L_HpeXKaVezM7O7U1XXCM4QFPAWUU4QaZoZhhjNUMsZYe1JNSk4q0nLxOlvT-o96by6yHkFIcQUokmlHyPIUXvVAxUMsGHrUwyDDWNBtFqrzvd-9DYDP6xT3FrQqfAJ8ngY7O7AYuuNDdoCl-IAxqRCLoIYgI6bMKYivazOnOqzvTrWafXxtHifv9TLt-fX-cOy1pSSsXaOYkYRERhywVtruMWKU41gwxzrHHVCmU44irByBjKIWtEZQ7jQRkODybS6OfiWQ782No9yFTcplJUSN4hxLKDghcUOLJ1izsk6uU5-UGknEZT7POVfnnKfpzzmWXT3B50PLqZBfcfUGzmqXR-TK19rnyX53-IH0t59_A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2715628086</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Do social and environmental capabilities improve bank stability? Evidence from transition countries</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Business Source Ultimate</source><source>EBSCOhost Econlit with Full Text</source><source>Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection</source><creator>Djalilov, Khurshid ; Hartwell, Christopher</creator><creatorcontrib>Djalilov, Khurshid ; Hartwell, Christopher</creatorcontrib><description>Financial institutions have embraced the idea of corporate social responsibility (CSR) over the past decade, particularly in the banking sector, even as they have faced challenges in their core business model and an uncertain economic environment. Has the addition of CSR helped banks in their effort to become more stable via diversification, or has it squandered resources which could be utilised elsewhere? Using a sample of 319 commercial banks from 21 transition countries in Central and Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union from 2002 to 2014, we find that there is a heterogeneous effect of CSR on bank stability, with total commitment to CSR contributing to the stability the most. Environmental capabilities, on the other hand, appear to influence stability only for those firms which are already the highest performing. We conjecture that, for financial sector firms in a transition environment, CSR is a further commitment for firms which have attained a certain level of stability but can be destabilising for weaker banks.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1463-1377</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1465-3958</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/14631377.2021.1965359</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Abingdon: Routledge</publisher><subject>Banks ; Commercial banks ; Companies ; corporate social responsibility ; Diversification ; Environmental protection ; Financial institutions ; financial sector stability ; Social responsibility ; Trade ; transition</subject><ispartof>Post-communist economies, 2022-07, Vol.34 (5), p.624-646</ispartof><rights>2021 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group 2021</rights><rights>2021 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-ff4254138206869ed6e2a64c1075f5bf4f8adb8f412afd050198bdd368cdc0d23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-ff4254138206869ed6e2a64c1075f5bf4f8adb8f412afd050198bdd368cdc0d23</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2903-9123</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,33223</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Djalilov, Khurshid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hartwell, Christopher</creatorcontrib><title>Do social and environmental capabilities improve bank stability? Evidence from transition countries</title><title>Post-communist economies</title><description>Financial institutions have embraced the idea of corporate social responsibility (CSR) over the past decade, particularly in the banking sector, even as they have faced challenges in their core business model and an uncertain economic environment. Has the addition of CSR helped banks in their effort to become more stable via diversification, or has it squandered resources which could be utilised elsewhere? Using a sample of 319 commercial banks from 21 transition countries in Central and Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union from 2002 to 2014, we find that there is a heterogeneous effect of CSR on bank stability, with total commitment to CSR contributing to the stability the most. Environmental capabilities, on the other hand, appear to influence stability only for those firms which are already the highest performing. We conjecture that, for financial sector firms in a transition environment, CSR is a further commitment for firms which have attained a certain level of stability but can be destabilising for weaker banks.</description><subject>Banks</subject><subject>Commercial banks</subject><subject>Companies</subject><subject>corporate social responsibility</subject><subject>Diversification</subject><subject>Environmental protection</subject><subject>Financial institutions</subject><subject>financial sector stability</subject><subject>Social responsibility</subject><subject>Trade</subject><subject>transition</subject><issn>1463-1377</issn><issn>1465-3958</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UMtOwzAQjBBIlMInIFninOJ3nBOgUh5SJS5wthw_JJfELnZa1L_HpeXKaVezM7O7U1XXCM4QFPAWUU4QaZoZhhjNUMsZYe1JNSk4q0nLxOlvT-o96by6yHkFIcQUokmlHyPIUXvVAxUMsGHrUwyDDWNBtFqrzvd-9DYDP6xT3FrQqfAJ8ngY7O7AYuuNDdoCl-IAxqRCLoIYgI6bMKYivazOnOqzvTrWafXxtHifv9TLt-fX-cOy1pSSsXaOYkYRERhywVtruMWKU41gwxzrHHVCmU44irByBjKIWtEZQ7jQRkODybS6OfiWQ782No9yFTcplJUSN4hxLKDghcUOLJ1izsk6uU5-UGknEZT7POVfnnKfpzzmWXT3B50PLqZBfcfUGzmqXR-TK19rnyX53-IH0t59_A</recordid><startdate>20220704</startdate><enddate>20220704</enddate><creator>Djalilov, Khurshid</creator><creator>Hartwell, Christopher</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2903-9123</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220704</creationdate><title>Do social and environmental capabilities improve bank stability? Evidence from transition countries</title><author>Djalilov, Khurshid ; Hartwell, Christopher</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-ff4254138206869ed6e2a64c1075f5bf4f8adb8f412afd050198bdd368cdc0d23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Banks</topic><topic>Commercial banks</topic><topic>Companies</topic><topic>corporate social responsibility</topic><topic>Diversification</topic><topic>Environmental protection</topic><topic>Financial institutions</topic><topic>financial sector stability</topic><topic>Social responsibility</topic><topic>Trade</topic><topic>transition</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Djalilov, Khurshid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hartwell, Christopher</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Post-communist economies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Djalilov, Khurshid</au><au>Hartwell, Christopher</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Do social and environmental capabilities improve bank stability? Evidence from transition countries</atitle><jtitle>Post-communist economies</jtitle><date>2022-07-04</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>624</spage><epage>646</epage><pages>624-646</pages><issn>1463-1377</issn><eissn>1465-3958</eissn><abstract>Financial institutions have embraced the idea of corporate social responsibility (CSR) over the past decade, particularly in the banking sector, even as they have faced challenges in their core business model and an uncertain economic environment. Has the addition of CSR helped banks in their effort to become more stable via diversification, or has it squandered resources which could be utilised elsewhere? Using a sample of 319 commercial banks from 21 transition countries in Central and Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union from 2002 to 2014, we find that there is a heterogeneous effect of CSR on bank stability, with total commitment to CSR contributing to the stability the most. Environmental capabilities, on the other hand, appear to influence stability only for those firms which are already the highest performing. We conjecture that, for financial sector firms in a transition environment, CSR is a further commitment for firms which have attained a certain level of stability but can be destabilising for weaker banks.</abstract><cop>Abingdon</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/14631377.2021.1965359</doi><tpages>23</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2903-9123</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1463-1377 |
ispartof | Post-communist economies, 2022-07, Vol.34 (5), p.624-646 |
issn | 1463-1377 1465-3958 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_14631377_2021_1965359 |
source | International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Business Source Ultimate; EBSCOhost Econlit with Full Text; Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection |
subjects | Banks Commercial banks Companies corporate social responsibility Diversification Environmental protection Financial institutions financial sector stability Social responsibility Trade transition |
title | Do social and environmental capabilities improve bank stability? Evidence from transition countries |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T04%3A53%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Do%20social%20and%20environmental%20capabilities%20improve%20bank%20stability?%20Evidence%20from%20transition%20countries&rft.jtitle=Post-communist%20economies&rft.au=Djalilov,%20Khurshid&rft.date=2022-07-04&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=624&rft.epage=646&rft.pages=624-646&rft.issn=1463-1377&rft.eissn=1465-3958&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/14631377.2021.1965359&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2715628086%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-ff4254138206869ed6e2a64c1075f5bf4f8adb8f412afd050198bdd368cdc0d23%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2715628086&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |