Sonographic assessment of the lower uterine segment during active labor in women with or without a uterine scar - a prospective study

No study thus far has evaluated the LUS thickness in active labor. In this study, we endeavored to assess the LUS during active labor. Using transabdominal sonography in the mid-sagittal position with a full urinary bladder, the thickness of the LUS was measured during active labor phase in women wi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine 2018-07, Vol.31 (14), p.1885-1888
Main Authors: Barzilay, Eran, Shay, Amir, Lahav-Ezra, Hila, Shina, Avi, Perlman, Sharon, Achiron, Reuven, Gilboa, Yinon
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Adult
Cesarean Section - adverse effects
Cicatrix - diagnostic imaging
Cicatrix - etiology
Cicatrix - physiopathology
Female
Humans
Labor, Obstetric
Pregnancy
Prospective Studies
Ultrasonography, Prenatal
Uterine Contraction
Uterus - diagnostic imaging
Uterus - physiology
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c276t-365fcc4fcf9a93af3a93bcac8f6bfa19d58b85ba321f73c398c498aa104f678b3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c276t-365fcc4fcf9a93af3a93bcac8f6bfa19d58b85ba321f73c398c498aa104f678b3
container_end_page 1888
container_issue 14
container_start_page 1885
container_title The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine
container_volume 31
creator Barzilay, Eran
Shay, Amir
Lahav-Ezra, Hila
Shina, Avi
Perlman, Sharon
Achiron, Reuven
Gilboa, Yinon
description No study thus far has evaluated the LUS thickness in active labor. In this study, we endeavored to assess the LUS during active labor. Using transabdominal sonography in the mid-sagittal position with a full urinary bladder, the thickness of the LUS was measured during active labor phase in women with or without a history of a previous cesarean section. A total of 28 women with a previous cesarean delivery were compared to 29 women without a history of uterine surgery. The median LUS was significantly thinner in women with a uterine scar both during (4 versus 5 mm, p = .001) and between contractions (5 versus 7 mm, p = .011). Paired comparison of LUS thickness between and during contractions within each group showed that thinning of LUS during contraction was significant for both the previous CS group (p 
doi_str_mv 10.1080/14767058.2017.1331428
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_14767058_2017_1331428</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>28511577</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c276t-365fcc4fcf9a93af3a93bcac8f6bfa19d58b85ba321f73c398c498aa104f678b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkN9OwyAUh4nRuDl9BA0v0AkFCr00i_-SJV6o180pha1mKw1Qlz2A7y11U2848DvnOyEfQteUzClR5JZyWUgi1DwnVM4pY5Tn6gRNxzzjpeCnx_s4NEEXIXwQklNOxDma5EpQKqScoq9X17mVh37dagwhmBC2povYWRzXBm_czng8ROPbzuBgVj_NZkjPFQYd2880A7XzuO3wzqUu3rVxjVMwVjdEDP-4Bo-zFPTehd4c6BCHZn-Jzixsgrk61hl6f7h_Wzxly5fH58XdMtO5LGLGCmG15lbbEkoGlqWz1qCVLWoLtGyEqpWogeXUSqZZqTQvFQAl3BZS1WyGxGGvTj8I3tiq9-0W_L6ipBq1Vr9aq1FrddSauJsD1w_11jR_1K9H9g33D3ak</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sonographic assessment of the lower uterine segment during active labor in women with or without a uterine scar - a prospective study</title><source>Taylor and Francis:Jisc Collections:Taylor and Francis Read and Publish Agreement 2024-2025:Medical Collection (Reading list)</source><creator>Barzilay, Eran ; Shay, Amir ; Lahav-Ezra, Hila ; Shina, Avi ; Perlman, Sharon ; Achiron, Reuven ; Gilboa, Yinon</creator><creatorcontrib>Barzilay, Eran ; Shay, Amir ; Lahav-Ezra, Hila ; Shina, Avi ; Perlman, Sharon ; Achiron, Reuven ; Gilboa, Yinon</creatorcontrib><description>No study thus far has evaluated the LUS thickness in active labor. In this study, we endeavored to assess the LUS during active labor. Using transabdominal sonography in the mid-sagittal position with a full urinary bladder, the thickness of the LUS was measured during active labor phase in women with or without a history of a previous cesarean section. A total of 28 women with a previous cesarean delivery were compared to 29 women without a history of uterine surgery. The median LUS was significantly thinner in women with a uterine scar both during (4 versus 5 mm, p = .001) and between contractions (5 versus 7 mm, p = .011). Paired comparison of LUS thickness between and during contractions within each group showed that thinning of LUS during contraction was significant for both the previous CS group (p &lt; .001) and the control group (p &lt; .001). We found no correlation between LUS thickness and chances of successful TOLAC. In this study, we characterized for the first time the LUS during active labor. We found that LUS was significantly thinner in women after a previous CS and that the LUS was significantly thinner during contraction.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1476-7058</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1476-4954</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2017.1331428</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28511577</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>Adult ; Cesarean Section - adverse effects ; Cicatrix - diagnostic imaging ; Cicatrix - etiology ; Cicatrix - physiopathology ; Female ; Humans ; Labor, Obstetric ; Pregnancy ; Prospective Studies ; Ultrasonography, Prenatal ; Uterine Contraction ; Uterus - diagnostic imaging ; Uterus - physiology</subject><ispartof>The journal of maternal-fetal &amp; neonatal medicine, 2018-07, Vol.31 (14), p.1885-1888</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c276t-365fcc4fcf9a93af3a93bcac8f6bfa19d58b85ba321f73c398c498aa104f678b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c276t-365fcc4fcf9a93af3a93bcac8f6bfa19d58b85ba321f73c398c498aa104f678b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5496-4866</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28511577$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Barzilay, Eran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shay, Amir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lahav-Ezra, Hila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shina, Avi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perlman, Sharon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Achiron, Reuven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gilboa, Yinon</creatorcontrib><title>Sonographic assessment of the lower uterine segment during active labor in women with or without a uterine scar - a prospective study</title><title>The journal of maternal-fetal &amp; neonatal medicine</title><addtitle>J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med</addtitle><description>No study thus far has evaluated the LUS thickness in active labor. In this study, we endeavored to assess the LUS during active labor. Using transabdominal sonography in the mid-sagittal position with a full urinary bladder, the thickness of the LUS was measured during active labor phase in women with or without a history of a previous cesarean section. A total of 28 women with a previous cesarean delivery were compared to 29 women without a history of uterine surgery. The median LUS was significantly thinner in women with a uterine scar both during (4 versus 5 mm, p = .001) and between contractions (5 versus 7 mm, p = .011). Paired comparison of LUS thickness between and during contractions within each group showed that thinning of LUS during contraction was significant for both the previous CS group (p &lt; .001) and the control group (p &lt; .001). We found no correlation between LUS thickness and chances of successful TOLAC. In this study, we characterized for the first time the LUS during active labor. We found that LUS was significantly thinner in women after a previous CS and that the LUS was significantly thinner during contraction.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Cesarean Section - adverse effects</subject><subject>Cicatrix - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Cicatrix - etiology</subject><subject>Cicatrix - physiopathology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Labor, Obstetric</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Ultrasonography, Prenatal</subject><subject>Uterine Contraction</subject><subject>Uterus - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Uterus - physiology</subject><issn>1476-7058</issn><issn>1476-4954</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFkN9OwyAUh4nRuDl9BA0v0AkFCr00i_-SJV6o180pha1mKw1Qlz2A7y11U2848DvnOyEfQteUzClR5JZyWUgi1DwnVM4pY5Tn6gRNxzzjpeCnx_s4NEEXIXwQklNOxDma5EpQKqScoq9X17mVh37dagwhmBC2povYWRzXBm_czng8ROPbzuBgVj_NZkjPFQYd2880A7XzuO3wzqUu3rVxjVMwVjdEDP-4Bo-zFPTehd4c6BCHZn-Jzixsgrk61hl6f7h_Wzxly5fH58XdMtO5LGLGCmG15lbbEkoGlqWz1qCVLWoLtGyEqpWogeXUSqZZqTQvFQAl3BZS1WyGxGGvTj8I3tiq9-0W_L6ipBq1Vr9aq1FrddSauJsD1w_11jR_1K9H9g33D3ak</recordid><startdate>20180718</startdate><enddate>20180718</enddate><creator>Barzilay, Eran</creator><creator>Shay, Amir</creator><creator>Lahav-Ezra, Hila</creator><creator>Shina, Avi</creator><creator>Perlman, Sharon</creator><creator>Achiron, Reuven</creator><creator>Gilboa, Yinon</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5496-4866</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180718</creationdate><title>Sonographic assessment of the lower uterine segment during active labor in women with or without a uterine scar - a prospective study</title><author>Barzilay, Eran ; Shay, Amir ; Lahav-Ezra, Hila ; Shina, Avi ; Perlman, Sharon ; Achiron, Reuven ; Gilboa, Yinon</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c276t-365fcc4fcf9a93af3a93bcac8f6bfa19d58b85ba321f73c398c498aa104f678b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Cesarean Section - adverse effects</topic><topic>Cicatrix - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Cicatrix - etiology</topic><topic>Cicatrix - physiopathology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Labor, Obstetric</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Ultrasonography, Prenatal</topic><topic>Uterine Contraction</topic><topic>Uterus - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Uterus - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Barzilay, Eran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shay, Amir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lahav-Ezra, Hila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shina, Avi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perlman, Sharon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Achiron, Reuven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gilboa, Yinon</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>The journal of maternal-fetal &amp; neonatal medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Barzilay, Eran</au><au>Shay, Amir</au><au>Lahav-Ezra, Hila</au><au>Shina, Avi</au><au>Perlman, Sharon</au><au>Achiron, Reuven</au><au>Gilboa, Yinon</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sonographic assessment of the lower uterine segment during active labor in women with or without a uterine scar - a prospective study</atitle><jtitle>The journal of maternal-fetal &amp; neonatal medicine</jtitle><addtitle>J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med</addtitle><date>2018-07-18</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>14</issue><spage>1885</spage><epage>1888</epage><pages>1885-1888</pages><issn>1476-7058</issn><eissn>1476-4954</eissn><abstract>No study thus far has evaluated the LUS thickness in active labor. In this study, we endeavored to assess the LUS during active labor. Using transabdominal sonography in the mid-sagittal position with a full urinary bladder, the thickness of the LUS was measured during active labor phase in women with or without a history of a previous cesarean section. A total of 28 women with a previous cesarean delivery were compared to 29 women without a history of uterine surgery. The median LUS was significantly thinner in women with a uterine scar both during (4 versus 5 mm, p = .001) and between contractions (5 versus 7 mm, p = .011). Paired comparison of LUS thickness between and during contractions within each group showed that thinning of LUS during contraction was significant for both the previous CS group (p &lt; .001) and the control group (p &lt; .001). We found no correlation between LUS thickness and chances of successful TOLAC. In this study, we characterized for the first time the LUS during active labor. We found that LUS was significantly thinner in women after a previous CS and that the LUS was significantly thinner during contraction.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>28511577</pmid><doi>10.1080/14767058.2017.1331428</doi><tpages>4</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5496-4866</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1476-7058
ispartof The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine, 2018-07, Vol.31 (14), p.1885-1888
issn 1476-7058
1476-4954
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_14767058_2017_1331428
source Taylor and Francis:Jisc Collections:Taylor and Francis Read and Publish Agreement 2024-2025:Medical Collection (Reading list)
subjects Adult
Cesarean Section - adverse effects
Cicatrix - diagnostic imaging
Cicatrix - etiology
Cicatrix - physiopathology
Female
Humans
Labor, Obstetric
Pregnancy
Prospective Studies
Ultrasonography, Prenatal
Uterine Contraction
Uterus - diagnostic imaging
Uterus - physiology
title Sonographic assessment of the lower uterine segment during active labor in women with or without a uterine scar - a prospective study
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T20%3A56%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sonographic%20assessment%20of%20the%20lower%20uterine%20segment%20during%20active%20labor%20in%20women%20with%20or%20without%20a%20uterine%20scar%20-%20a%20prospective%20study&rft.jtitle=The%20journal%20of%20maternal-fetal%20&%20neonatal%20medicine&rft.au=Barzilay,%20Eran&rft.date=2018-07-18&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=14&rft.spage=1885&rft.epage=1888&rft.pages=1885-1888&rft.issn=1476-7058&rft.eissn=1476-4954&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/14767058.2017.1331428&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_cross%3E28511577%3C/pubmed_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c276t-365fcc4fcf9a93af3a93bcac8f6bfa19d58b85ba321f73c398c498aa104f678b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/28511577&rfr_iscdi=true