Determining the (non-)membership degrees in the range (0,1) independently of the decision-makers for bipolar soft sets

Bipolar soft sets, which are a generalization of soft sets, are a very useful mathematical model for performing complex data analysis correctly since each parameter also takes into account the NOT parameter. However, in bipolar soft sets, we can express membership degrees as 0 or 1, and we cannot pr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Taibah University for Science 2021-01, Vol.15 (1), p.609-618
Main Author: Dalkılıç, Orhan
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
(NOT) bipolar relational membership degree
(NOT) bipolar relational non-membership degree
Bipolar soft set
Decision making
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-ee43a16b6cafd8823bb738f2d570ecdfe5d2c7fba6846a327c09078a6fe71b013
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-ee43a16b6cafd8823bb738f2d570ecdfe5d2c7fba6846a327c09078a6fe71b013
container_end_page 618
container_issue 1
container_start_page 609
container_title Journal of Taibah University for Science
container_volume 15
creator Dalkılıç, Orhan
description Bipolar soft sets, which are a generalization of soft sets, are a very useful mathematical model for performing complex data analysis correctly since each parameter also takes into account the NOT parameter. However, in bipolar soft sets, we can express membership degrees as 0 or 1, and we cannot process data about non-membership degrees. In all proposed mathematical models, the task of expressing a (non-)membership degree in the range (0, 1) focuses on the decision-maker. In this paper, these values in (0, 1) were tried to be determined in an objective way independent of the decision-maker. For this purpose, the concepts of (NOT) bipolar relational membership degree and (NOT) bipolar relational non-membership degree have been proposed. Moreover, using these concepts, a decision-making algorithm focusing on selecting the best object is proposed. Finally, a comparison is given for the proposed algorithm by emphasizing some important points.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/16583655.2021.1996800
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>doaj_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_16583655_2021_1996800</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_616fe0ade3ce4f5596912250a5e2cd82</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>oai_doaj_org_article_616fe0ade3ce4f5596912250a5e2cd82</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-ee43a16b6cafd8823bb738f2d570ecdfe5d2c7fba6846a327c09078a6fe71b013</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUFr3DAQhUVpIWGTnxDQsYF6O5JWsn1rSZM0EOilPYuxNNoota1FMi3776vdTUtOvUjizbxP8B5jVwLWAjr4KIzulNF6LUGKteh70wG8YecHvTkM3r56n7HLUp4BQEArNZhz9usLLZSnOMd5y5cn4u_nNDfXE00D5fIUd9zTNhMVHufjPOO8rVvwQVxXydOO6jEv456ncFzw5GKJFTLhz4rgIWU-xF0aMfOSwsILLeWCvQs4Frp8uVfsx93t95uvzeO3-4ebz4-NU1otDdFGoTCDcRh810k1DK3qgvS6BXI-kPbStWFA020MKtk66KHt0ARqxQBCrdjDiesTPttdjhPmvU0Y7VFIeWsxL9GNZI2oLkBPytEmaN2bXsgaEmqSzte_V0yfWC6nUjKFfzwB9tCF_duFPXRhX7qovk8nX5xrFhP-Tnn0dsH9mHKocda4rPo_4g_ZjJEX</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Determining the (non-)membership degrees in the range (0,1) independently of the decision-makers for bipolar soft sets</title><source>Taylor &amp; Francis</source><creator>Dalkılıç, Orhan</creator><creatorcontrib>Dalkılıç, Orhan</creatorcontrib><description>Bipolar soft sets, which are a generalization of soft sets, are a very useful mathematical model for performing complex data analysis correctly since each parameter also takes into account the NOT parameter. However, in bipolar soft sets, we can express membership degrees as 0 or 1, and we cannot process data about non-membership degrees. In all proposed mathematical models, the task of expressing a (non-)membership degree in the range (0, 1) focuses on the decision-maker. In this paper, these values in (0, 1) were tried to be determined in an objective way independent of the decision-maker. For this purpose, the concepts of (NOT) bipolar relational membership degree and (NOT) bipolar relational non-membership degree have been proposed. Moreover, using these concepts, a decision-making algorithm focusing on selecting the best object is proposed. Finally, a comparison is given for the proposed algorithm by emphasizing some important points.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1658-3655</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1658-3655</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/16583655.2021.1996800</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Taylor &amp; Francis</publisher><subject>(NOT) bipolar relational membership degree ; (NOT) bipolar relational non-membership degree ; Bipolar soft set ; Decision making</subject><ispartof>Journal of Taibah University for Science, 2021-01, Vol.15 (1), p.609-618</ispartof><rights>2021 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor &amp; Francis Group. 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-ee43a16b6cafd8823bb738f2d570ecdfe5d2c7fba6846a327c09078a6fe71b013</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-ee43a16b6cafd8823bb738f2d570ecdfe5d2c7fba6846a327c09078a6fe71b013</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3875-1398</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/16583655.2021.1996800$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/16583655.2021.1996800$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27481,27903,27904,59120,59121</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dalkılıç, Orhan</creatorcontrib><title>Determining the (non-)membership degrees in the range (0,1) independently of the decision-makers for bipolar soft sets</title><title>Journal of Taibah University for Science</title><description>Bipolar soft sets, which are a generalization of soft sets, are a very useful mathematical model for performing complex data analysis correctly since each parameter also takes into account the NOT parameter. However, in bipolar soft sets, we can express membership degrees as 0 or 1, and we cannot process data about non-membership degrees. In all proposed mathematical models, the task of expressing a (non-)membership degree in the range (0, 1) focuses on the decision-maker. In this paper, these values in (0, 1) were tried to be determined in an objective way independent of the decision-maker. For this purpose, the concepts of (NOT) bipolar relational membership degree and (NOT) bipolar relational non-membership degree have been proposed. Moreover, using these concepts, a decision-making algorithm focusing on selecting the best object is proposed. Finally, a comparison is given for the proposed algorithm by emphasizing some important points.</description><subject>(NOT) bipolar relational membership degree</subject><subject>(NOT) bipolar relational non-membership degree</subject><subject>Bipolar soft set</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><issn>1658-3655</issn><issn>1658-3655</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>0YH</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUFr3DAQhUVpIWGTnxDQsYF6O5JWsn1rSZM0EOilPYuxNNoota1FMi3776vdTUtOvUjizbxP8B5jVwLWAjr4KIzulNF6LUGKteh70wG8YecHvTkM3r56n7HLUp4BQEArNZhz9usLLZSnOMd5y5cn4u_nNDfXE00D5fIUd9zTNhMVHufjPOO8rVvwQVxXydOO6jEv456ncFzw5GKJFTLhz4rgIWU-xF0aMfOSwsILLeWCvQs4Frp8uVfsx93t95uvzeO3-4ebz4-NU1otDdFGoTCDcRh810k1DK3qgvS6BXI-kPbStWFA020MKtk66KHt0ARqxQBCrdjDiesTPttdjhPmvU0Y7VFIeWsxL9GNZI2oLkBPytEmaN2bXsgaEmqSzte_V0yfWC6nUjKFfzwB9tCF_duFPXRhX7qovk8nX5xrFhP-Tnn0dsH9mHKocda4rPo_4g_ZjJEX</recordid><startdate>20210101</startdate><enddate>20210101</enddate><creator>Dalkılıç, Orhan</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</general><scope>0YH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3875-1398</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210101</creationdate><title>Determining the (non-)membership degrees in the range (0,1) independently of the decision-makers for bipolar soft sets</title><author>Dalkılıç, Orhan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-ee43a16b6cafd8823bb738f2d570ecdfe5d2c7fba6846a327c09078a6fe71b013</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>(NOT) bipolar relational membership degree</topic><topic>(NOT) bipolar relational non-membership degree</topic><topic>Bipolar soft set</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dalkılıç, Orhan</creatorcontrib><collection>Taylor &amp; Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Journal of Taibah University for Science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dalkılıç, Orhan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Determining the (non-)membership degrees in the range (0,1) independently of the decision-makers for bipolar soft sets</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Taibah University for Science</jtitle><date>2021-01-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>609</spage><epage>618</epage><pages>609-618</pages><issn>1658-3655</issn><eissn>1658-3655</eissn><abstract>Bipolar soft sets, which are a generalization of soft sets, are a very useful mathematical model for performing complex data analysis correctly since each parameter also takes into account the NOT parameter. However, in bipolar soft sets, we can express membership degrees as 0 or 1, and we cannot process data about non-membership degrees. In all proposed mathematical models, the task of expressing a (non-)membership degree in the range (0, 1) focuses on the decision-maker. In this paper, these values in (0, 1) were tried to be determined in an objective way independent of the decision-maker. For this purpose, the concepts of (NOT) bipolar relational membership degree and (NOT) bipolar relational non-membership degree have been proposed. Moreover, using these concepts, a decision-making algorithm focusing on selecting the best object is proposed. Finally, a comparison is given for the proposed algorithm by emphasizing some important points.</abstract><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis</pub><doi>10.1080/16583655.2021.1996800</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3875-1398</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1658-3655
ispartof Journal of Taibah University for Science, 2021-01, Vol.15 (1), p.609-618
issn 1658-3655
1658-3655
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_16583655_2021_1996800
source Taylor & Francis
subjects (NOT) bipolar relational membership degree
(NOT) bipolar relational non-membership degree
Bipolar soft set
Decision making
title Determining the (non-)membership degrees in the range (0,1) independently of the decision-makers for bipolar soft sets
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T12%3A48%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-doaj_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Determining%20the%20(non-)membership%20degrees%20in%20the%20range%20(0,1)%20independently%20of%20the%20decision-makers%20for%20bipolar%20soft%20sets&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Taibah%20University%20for%20Science&rft.au=Dalk%C4%B1l%C4%B1%C3%A7,%20Orhan&rft.date=2021-01-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=609&rft.epage=618&rft.pages=609-618&rft.issn=1658-3655&rft.eissn=1658-3655&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/16583655.2021.1996800&rft_dat=%3Cdoaj_cross%3Eoai_doaj_org_article_616fe0ade3ce4f5596912250a5e2cd82%3C/doaj_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-ee43a16b6cafd8823bb738f2d570ecdfe5d2c7fba6846a327c09078a6fe71b013%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true