A co-citation analysis of purpose: trends and (potential) troubles in the foundation of purpose scholarship

This article represents the first document co-citation on the purpose construct. Document co-citation is a bibliometric methodology that provides a clear, systematic structure for examining the intellectual foundations of a field or construct. Our analysis yielded several novel insights, including a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The journal of positive psychology 2023-11, Vol.18 (6), p.1012-1026
Main Authors: Bronk, Kendall Cotton, Reichard, Rebecca J., Qi Li, Jia
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
bibliometric method
Bibliometrics
Citation analysis
document co-citation
positive aging
Psychology
Purpose in life
youth purpose
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This article represents the first document co-citation on the purpose construct. Document co-citation is a bibliometric methodology that provides a clear, systematic structure for examining the intellectual foundations of a field or construct. Our analysis yielded several novel insights, including a few potentially troubling ones. For instance, it revealed that the origins of purpose, a construct that has deep roots in philosophy and significant implications for a variety of fields, derived almost exclusively from the study of psychology. Foundational work was primarily conducted by scholars in North America, and early conceptualizations of purpose were inconsistent. Originating documents often used the term interchangeably with meaning. These practices, which have persisted at least to some degree, are likely to yield inconsistent and unreliable conclusions. Implications of our findings as well as cautions and directions for future research are addressed.
ISSN:1743-9760
1743-9779
DOI:10.1080/17439760.2023.2168563