Tracking lives, forging markets

In the insurance industry, digital technologies have been harnessed in pursuit of three goals: personalising services for customers, obtaining information about them and nudging them towards behaviour that diminishes their risks. This article examines two Finnish companies that use self-tracking pra...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of cultural economy 2021-07, Vol.14 (4), p.449-463
Main Authors: Tanninen, Maiju, Lehtonen, Turo-Kimmo, Ruckenstein, Minna
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Customer services
Customization
Digital technology
Insurance
Insurance industry
Life insurance
market regulation
nudging
self-tracking
service design
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:In the insurance industry, digital technologies have been harnessed in pursuit of three goals: personalising services for customers, obtaining information about them and nudging them towards behaviour that diminishes their risks. This article examines two Finnish companies that use self-tracking practices and sensor-generated data in life insurance products. It investigates the knowledges and practices mobilised in a design process that aims to transform the customer relationship from reactive to proactive. Insurers use three main strategies, educating, incentivising and partnering, in striving to align their aims with those of their customers. Instead of confirming narratives of 'digital disruption', this study argues that insurance should be understood as a historically specific technology within regulatory constraints and market frictions. The new policies' most distinctive disruptive feature is the technological mediation of the customer relationship. Critical voices rightly point out that behaviour-based insurance carries the potential for discrimination and dataveillance. Our study shows, however, that critique remains abstract or even hypothetical if it does not consider existing practices and the difficulties that insurers face when implementing their ideas.
ISSN:1753-0350
1753-0369
DOI:10.1080/17530350.2020.1852949