Loading…

Assessing Online Library Guide Use and Open Educational Resource (OER) Potential: An Evidence-Based Decision-Making Approach

This research aims to measure the impact of an online guide on user learning experience and to gather evidence for staffing allocations and for conversion of the guide to an open educational resource (OER). It utilizes quantitative and qualitative methods by combining usage data (Google Analytics) w...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of web librarianship 2021-01, Vol.15 (3), p.128-153
Main Authors: Lauseng, Deborah L., Howard, Carmen, Scoulas, Jung Mi, Berry, Allan
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-eb2c97f014bf9db58781015e9ed0b013fa3079d664f962a6e4a1c330e85358933
container_end_page 153
container_issue 3
container_start_page 128
container_title Journal of web librarianship
container_volume 15
creator Lauseng, Deborah L.
Howard, Carmen
Scoulas, Jung Mi
Berry, Allan
description This research aims to measure the impact of an online guide on user learning experience and to gather evidence for staffing allocations and for conversion of the guide to an open educational resource (OER). It utilizes quantitative and qualitative methods by combining usage data (Google Analytics) with a web-based user survey that incorporates the Project Outcome Model. Google Analytics data for the guide from July through December 2019 indicates 45,324 Users for 67,405 Pageviews. For the same timeframe, survey data (N = 119) shows that the participants were primarily students (64%) and practicing health professionals (23%). The mean scores of confidence between first-time and repeat users have a statistically significant difference on three guide pages. Combining data sources provides a more robust assessment and a clearer understanding of who users are, their behavior, and guide impact on user learning and outcomes. The high number of nonaffiliated users and the self-reported success in achieving learning outcomes reinforce the value of converting the guide to an OER. This research benefits those working in the library and educational fields by providing insights into the use of online guides as OER, the need for library-based OER, and the use of evidence to support staffing allocations.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/19322909.2021.1935396
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_19322909_2021_1935396</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2565254768</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-eb2c97f014bf9db58781015e9ed0b013fa3079d664f962a6e4a1c330e85358933</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtKAzEUhgdRsFYfQQi40cXUXJrMxJW11ipUKsWuQyZzRlPHTE2mSsGHN6XVpatz4f_P5UuSU4J7BOf4kkhGqcSyRzElvVhxJsVe0tn0UypJtv-XY3mYHIWwwJgLKbJO8j0IAUKw7gVNXW0doIktvPZrNF7ZEtA8ANKuRNMlODQqV0a3tnG6RjMIzcobQOfT0ewCPTUtuNbq-goNovAzep2B9EYHKNEtGBuiLX3Ub5tNg-XSN9q8HicHla4DnOxiN5nfjZ6H9-lkOn4YDiapobloUyiokVmFSb-oZFnwPMsJJhwklLjAhFWa4UyWQvQrKagW0NfEMIYh54znkrFucradG9d-rCC0ahFvj18ERbnglPczkUcV36qMb0LwUKmlt-8RhSJYbUCrX9BqA1rtQEff9dZnXdX4d_3V-LpUrV7Xja-8dvF3xf4f8QPxiIO8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2565254768</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessing Online Library Guide Use and Open Educational Resource (OER) Potential: An Evidence-Based Decision-Making Approach</title><source>Library &amp; Information Science Abstracts (LISA)</source><source>Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection</source><creator>Lauseng, Deborah L. ; Howard, Carmen ; Scoulas, Jung Mi ; Berry, Allan</creator><creatorcontrib>Lauseng, Deborah L. ; Howard, Carmen ; Scoulas, Jung Mi ; Berry, Allan</creatorcontrib><description>This research aims to measure the impact of an online guide on user learning experience and to gather evidence for staffing allocations and for conversion of the guide to an open educational resource (OER). It utilizes quantitative and qualitative methods by combining usage data (Google Analytics) with a web-based user survey that incorporates the Project Outcome Model. Google Analytics data for the guide from July through December 2019 indicates 45,324 Users for 67,405 Pageviews. For the same timeframe, survey data (N = 119) shows that the participants were primarily students (64%) and practicing health professionals (23%). The mean scores of confidence between first-time and repeat users have a statistically significant difference on three guide pages. Combining data sources provides a more robust assessment and a clearer understanding of who users are, their behavior, and guide impact on user learning and outcomes. The high number of nonaffiliated users and the self-reported success in achieving learning outcomes reinforce the value of converting the guide to an OER. This research benefits those working in the library and educational fields by providing insights into the use of online guides as OER, the need for library-based OER, and the use of evidence to support staffing allocations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-2909</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-2917</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/19322909.2021.1935396</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Routledge</publisher><subject>analytics data ; Assessment ; decision making ; LibGuides ; Libraries ; OER ; Open educational resources ; Project Outcome Model ; user survey ; Workforce planning</subject><ispartof>Journal of web librarianship, 2021-01, Vol.15 (3), p.128-153</ispartof><rights>2021 Deborah L. Lauseng, Carmen Howard, Jung Mi Scoulas and Allan Berry 2021</rights><rights>2021 Deborah L. Lauseng, Carmen Howard, Jung Mi Scoulas and Allan Berry</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-eb2c97f014bf9db58781015e9ed0b013fa3079d664f962a6e4a1c330e85358933</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3460-5417 ; 0000-0001-9067-2932 ; 0000-0002-1012-8601 ; 0000-0002-7536-295X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,34112</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lauseng, Deborah L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Howard, Carmen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scoulas, Jung Mi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berry, Allan</creatorcontrib><title>Assessing Online Library Guide Use and Open Educational Resource (OER) Potential: An Evidence-Based Decision-Making Approach</title><title>Journal of web librarianship</title><description>This research aims to measure the impact of an online guide on user learning experience and to gather evidence for staffing allocations and for conversion of the guide to an open educational resource (OER). It utilizes quantitative and qualitative methods by combining usage data (Google Analytics) with a web-based user survey that incorporates the Project Outcome Model. Google Analytics data for the guide from July through December 2019 indicates 45,324 Users for 67,405 Pageviews. For the same timeframe, survey data (N = 119) shows that the participants were primarily students (64%) and practicing health professionals (23%). The mean scores of confidence between first-time and repeat users have a statistically significant difference on three guide pages. Combining data sources provides a more robust assessment and a clearer understanding of who users are, their behavior, and guide impact on user learning and outcomes. The high number of nonaffiliated users and the self-reported success in achieving learning outcomes reinforce the value of converting the guide to an OER. This research benefits those working in the library and educational fields by providing insights into the use of online guides as OER, the need for library-based OER, and the use of evidence to support staffing allocations.</description><subject>analytics data</subject><subject>Assessment</subject><subject>decision making</subject><subject>LibGuides</subject><subject>Libraries</subject><subject>OER</subject><subject>Open educational resources</subject><subject>Project Outcome Model</subject><subject>user survey</subject><subject>Workforce planning</subject><issn>1932-2909</issn><issn>1932-2917</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>F2A</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtKAzEUhgdRsFYfQQi40cXUXJrMxJW11ipUKsWuQyZzRlPHTE2mSsGHN6XVpatz4f_P5UuSU4J7BOf4kkhGqcSyRzElvVhxJsVe0tn0UypJtv-XY3mYHIWwwJgLKbJO8j0IAUKw7gVNXW0doIktvPZrNF7ZEtA8ANKuRNMlODQqV0a3tnG6RjMIzcobQOfT0ewCPTUtuNbq-goNovAzep2B9EYHKNEtGBuiLX3Ub5tNg-XSN9q8HicHla4DnOxiN5nfjZ6H9-lkOn4YDiapobloUyiokVmFSb-oZFnwPMsJJhwklLjAhFWa4UyWQvQrKagW0NfEMIYh54znkrFucradG9d-rCC0ahFvj18ERbnglPczkUcV36qMb0LwUKmlt-8RhSJYbUCrX9BqA1rtQEff9dZnXdX4d_3V-LpUrV7Xja-8dvF3xf4f8QPxiIO8</recordid><startdate>20210101</startdate><enddate>20210101</enddate><creator>Lauseng, Deborah L.</creator><creator>Howard, Carmen</creator><creator>Scoulas, Jung Mi</creator><creator>Berry, Allan</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis LLC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>E3H</scope><scope>F2A</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3460-5417</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9067-2932</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1012-8601</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7536-295X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210101</creationdate><title>Assessing Online Library Guide Use and Open Educational Resource (OER) Potential: An Evidence-Based Decision-Making Approach</title><author>Lauseng, Deborah L. ; Howard, Carmen ; Scoulas, Jung Mi ; Berry, Allan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-eb2c97f014bf9db58781015e9ed0b013fa3079d664f962a6e4a1c330e85358933</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>analytics data</topic><topic>Assessment</topic><topic>decision making</topic><topic>LibGuides</topic><topic>Libraries</topic><topic>OER</topic><topic>Open educational resources</topic><topic>Project Outcome Model</topic><topic>user survey</topic><topic>Workforce planning</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lauseng, Deborah L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Howard, Carmen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scoulas, Jung Mi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berry, Allan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Library &amp; Information Sciences Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>Library &amp; Information Science Abstracts (LISA)</collection><jtitle>Journal of web librarianship</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lauseng, Deborah L.</au><au>Howard, Carmen</au><au>Scoulas, Jung Mi</au><au>Berry, Allan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessing Online Library Guide Use and Open Educational Resource (OER) Potential: An Evidence-Based Decision-Making Approach</atitle><jtitle>Journal of web librarianship</jtitle><date>2021-01-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>128</spage><epage>153</epage><pages>128-153</pages><issn>1932-2909</issn><eissn>1932-2917</eissn><abstract>This research aims to measure the impact of an online guide on user learning experience and to gather evidence for staffing allocations and for conversion of the guide to an open educational resource (OER). It utilizes quantitative and qualitative methods by combining usage data (Google Analytics) with a web-based user survey that incorporates the Project Outcome Model. Google Analytics data for the guide from July through December 2019 indicates 45,324 Users for 67,405 Pageviews. For the same timeframe, survey data (N = 119) shows that the participants were primarily students (64%) and practicing health professionals (23%). The mean scores of confidence between first-time and repeat users have a statistically significant difference on three guide pages. Combining data sources provides a more robust assessment and a clearer understanding of who users are, their behavior, and guide impact on user learning and outcomes. The high number of nonaffiliated users and the self-reported success in achieving learning outcomes reinforce the value of converting the guide to an OER. This research benefits those working in the library and educational fields by providing insights into the use of online guides as OER, the need for library-based OER, and the use of evidence to support staffing allocations.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/19322909.2021.1935396</doi><tpages>26</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3460-5417</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9067-2932</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1012-8601</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7536-295X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-2909
ispartof Journal of web librarianship, 2021-01, Vol.15 (3), p.128-153
issn 1932-2909
1932-2917
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_19322909_2021_1935396
source Library & Information Science Abstracts (LISA); Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection
subjects analytics data
Assessment
decision making
LibGuides
Libraries
OER
Open educational resources
Project Outcome Model
user survey
Workforce planning
title Assessing Online Library Guide Use and Open Educational Resource (OER) Potential: An Evidence-Based Decision-Making Approach
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T23%3A13%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessing%20Online%20Library%20Guide%20Use%20and%20Open%20Educational%20Resource%20(OER)%20Potential:%20An%20Evidence-Based%20Decision-Making%20Approach&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20web%20librarianship&rft.au=Lauseng,%20Deborah%20L.&rft.date=2021-01-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=128&rft.epage=153&rft.pages=128-153&rft.issn=1932-2909&rft.eissn=1932-2917&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/19322909.2021.1935396&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2565254768%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-eb2c97f014bf9db58781015e9ed0b013fa3079d664f962a6e4a1c330e85358933%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2565254768&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true