Loading…
Assessing Online Library Guide Use and Open Educational Resource (OER) Potential: An Evidence-Based Decision-Making Approach
This research aims to measure the impact of an online guide on user learning experience and to gather evidence for staffing allocations and for conversion of the guide to an open educational resource (OER). It utilizes quantitative and qualitative methods by combining usage data (Google Analytics) w...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of web librarianship 2021-01, Vol.15 (3), p.128-153 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-eb2c97f014bf9db58781015e9ed0b013fa3079d664f962a6e4a1c330e85358933 |
container_end_page | 153 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 128 |
container_title | Journal of web librarianship |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | Lauseng, Deborah L. Howard, Carmen Scoulas, Jung Mi Berry, Allan |
description | This research aims to measure the impact of an online guide on user learning experience and to gather evidence for staffing allocations and for conversion of the guide to an open educational resource (OER). It utilizes quantitative and qualitative methods by combining usage data (Google Analytics) with a web-based user survey that incorporates the Project Outcome Model. Google Analytics data for the guide from July through December 2019 indicates 45,324 Users for 67,405 Pageviews. For the same timeframe, survey data (N = 119) shows that the participants were primarily students (64%) and practicing health professionals (23%). The mean scores of confidence between first-time and repeat users have a statistically significant difference on three guide pages. Combining data sources provides a more robust assessment and a clearer understanding of who users are, their behavior, and guide impact on user learning and outcomes. The high number of nonaffiliated users and the self-reported success in achieving learning outcomes reinforce the value of converting the guide to an OER. This research benefits those working in the library and educational fields by providing insights into the use of online guides as OER, the need for library-based OER, and the use of evidence to support staffing allocations. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/19322909.2021.1935396 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_19322909_2021_1935396</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2565254768</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-eb2c97f014bf9db58781015e9ed0b013fa3079d664f962a6e4a1c330e85358933</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtKAzEUhgdRsFYfQQi40cXUXJrMxJW11ipUKsWuQyZzRlPHTE2mSsGHN6XVpatz4f_P5UuSU4J7BOf4kkhGqcSyRzElvVhxJsVe0tn0UypJtv-XY3mYHIWwwJgLKbJO8j0IAUKw7gVNXW0doIktvPZrNF7ZEtA8ANKuRNMlODQqV0a3tnG6RjMIzcobQOfT0ewCPTUtuNbq-goNovAzep2B9EYHKNEtGBuiLX3Ub5tNg-XSN9q8HicHla4DnOxiN5nfjZ6H9-lkOn4YDiapobloUyiokVmFSb-oZFnwPMsJJhwklLjAhFWa4UyWQvQrKagW0NfEMIYh54znkrFucradG9d-rCC0ahFvj18ERbnglPczkUcV36qMb0LwUKmlt-8RhSJYbUCrX9BqA1rtQEff9dZnXdX4d_3V-LpUrV7Xja-8dvF3xf4f8QPxiIO8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2565254768</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessing Online Library Guide Use and Open Educational Resource (OER) Potential: An Evidence-Based Decision-Making Approach</title><source>Library & Information Science Abstracts (LISA)</source><source>Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection</source><creator>Lauseng, Deborah L. ; Howard, Carmen ; Scoulas, Jung Mi ; Berry, Allan</creator><creatorcontrib>Lauseng, Deborah L. ; Howard, Carmen ; Scoulas, Jung Mi ; Berry, Allan</creatorcontrib><description>This research aims to measure the impact of an online guide on user learning experience and to gather evidence for staffing allocations and for conversion of the guide to an open educational resource (OER). It utilizes quantitative and qualitative methods by combining usage data (Google Analytics) with a web-based user survey that incorporates the Project Outcome Model. Google Analytics data for the guide from July through December 2019 indicates 45,324 Users for 67,405 Pageviews. For the same timeframe, survey data (N = 119) shows that the participants were primarily students (64%) and practicing health professionals (23%). The mean scores of confidence between first-time and repeat users have a statistically significant difference on three guide pages. Combining data sources provides a more robust assessment and a clearer understanding of who users are, their behavior, and guide impact on user learning and outcomes. The high number of nonaffiliated users and the self-reported success in achieving learning outcomes reinforce the value of converting the guide to an OER. This research benefits those working in the library and educational fields by providing insights into the use of online guides as OER, the need for library-based OER, and the use of evidence to support staffing allocations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-2909</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-2917</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/19322909.2021.1935396</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Routledge</publisher><subject>analytics data ; Assessment ; decision making ; LibGuides ; Libraries ; OER ; Open educational resources ; Project Outcome Model ; user survey ; Workforce planning</subject><ispartof>Journal of web librarianship, 2021-01, Vol.15 (3), p.128-153</ispartof><rights>2021 Deborah L. Lauseng, Carmen Howard, Jung Mi Scoulas and Allan Berry 2021</rights><rights>2021 Deborah L. Lauseng, Carmen Howard, Jung Mi Scoulas and Allan Berry</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-eb2c97f014bf9db58781015e9ed0b013fa3079d664f962a6e4a1c330e85358933</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3460-5417 ; 0000-0001-9067-2932 ; 0000-0002-1012-8601 ; 0000-0002-7536-295X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,34112</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lauseng, Deborah L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Howard, Carmen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scoulas, Jung Mi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berry, Allan</creatorcontrib><title>Assessing Online Library Guide Use and Open Educational Resource (OER) Potential: An Evidence-Based Decision-Making Approach</title><title>Journal of web librarianship</title><description>This research aims to measure the impact of an online guide on user learning experience and to gather evidence for staffing allocations and for conversion of the guide to an open educational resource (OER). It utilizes quantitative and qualitative methods by combining usage data (Google Analytics) with a web-based user survey that incorporates the Project Outcome Model. Google Analytics data for the guide from July through December 2019 indicates 45,324 Users for 67,405 Pageviews. For the same timeframe, survey data (N = 119) shows that the participants were primarily students (64%) and practicing health professionals (23%). The mean scores of confidence between first-time and repeat users have a statistically significant difference on three guide pages. Combining data sources provides a more robust assessment and a clearer understanding of who users are, their behavior, and guide impact on user learning and outcomes. The high number of nonaffiliated users and the self-reported success in achieving learning outcomes reinforce the value of converting the guide to an OER. This research benefits those working in the library and educational fields by providing insights into the use of online guides as OER, the need for library-based OER, and the use of evidence to support staffing allocations.</description><subject>analytics data</subject><subject>Assessment</subject><subject>decision making</subject><subject>LibGuides</subject><subject>Libraries</subject><subject>OER</subject><subject>Open educational resources</subject><subject>Project Outcome Model</subject><subject>user survey</subject><subject>Workforce planning</subject><issn>1932-2909</issn><issn>1932-2917</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>F2A</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtKAzEUhgdRsFYfQQi40cXUXJrMxJW11ipUKsWuQyZzRlPHTE2mSsGHN6XVpatz4f_P5UuSU4J7BOf4kkhGqcSyRzElvVhxJsVe0tn0UypJtv-XY3mYHIWwwJgLKbJO8j0IAUKw7gVNXW0doIktvPZrNF7ZEtA8ANKuRNMlODQqV0a3tnG6RjMIzcobQOfT0ewCPTUtuNbq-goNovAzep2B9EYHKNEtGBuiLX3Ub5tNg-XSN9q8HicHla4DnOxiN5nfjZ6H9-lkOn4YDiapobloUyiokVmFSb-oZFnwPMsJJhwklLjAhFWa4UyWQvQrKagW0NfEMIYh54znkrFucradG9d-rCC0ahFvj18ERbnglPczkUcV36qMb0LwUKmlt-8RhSJYbUCrX9BqA1rtQEff9dZnXdX4d_3V-LpUrV7Xja-8dvF3xf4f8QPxiIO8</recordid><startdate>20210101</startdate><enddate>20210101</enddate><creator>Lauseng, Deborah L.</creator><creator>Howard, Carmen</creator><creator>Scoulas, Jung Mi</creator><creator>Berry, Allan</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor & Francis LLC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>E3H</scope><scope>F2A</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3460-5417</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9067-2932</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1012-8601</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7536-295X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210101</creationdate><title>Assessing Online Library Guide Use and Open Educational Resource (OER) Potential: An Evidence-Based Decision-Making Approach</title><author>Lauseng, Deborah L. ; Howard, Carmen ; Scoulas, Jung Mi ; Berry, Allan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-eb2c97f014bf9db58781015e9ed0b013fa3079d664f962a6e4a1c330e85358933</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>analytics data</topic><topic>Assessment</topic><topic>decision making</topic><topic>LibGuides</topic><topic>Libraries</topic><topic>OER</topic><topic>Open educational resources</topic><topic>Project Outcome Model</topic><topic>user survey</topic><topic>Workforce planning</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lauseng, Deborah L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Howard, Carmen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scoulas, Jung Mi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berry, Allan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Library & Information Sciences Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>Library & Information Science Abstracts (LISA)</collection><jtitle>Journal of web librarianship</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lauseng, Deborah L.</au><au>Howard, Carmen</au><au>Scoulas, Jung Mi</au><au>Berry, Allan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessing Online Library Guide Use and Open Educational Resource (OER) Potential: An Evidence-Based Decision-Making Approach</atitle><jtitle>Journal of web librarianship</jtitle><date>2021-01-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>128</spage><epage>153</epage><pages>128-153</pages><issn>1932-2909</issn><eissn>1932-2917</eissn><abstract>This research aims to measure the impact of an online guide on user learning experience and to gather evidence for staffing allocations and for conversion of the guide to an open educational resource (OER). It utilizes quantitative and qualitative methods by combining usage data (Google Analytics) with a web-based user survey that incorporates the Project Outcome Model. Google Analytics data for the guide from July through December 2019 indicates 45,324 Users for 67,405 Pageviews. For the same timeframe, survey data (N = 119) shows that the participants were primarily students (64%) and practicing health professionals (23%). The mean scores of confidence between first-time and repeat users have a statistically significant difference on three guide pages. Combining data sources provides a more robust assessment and a clearer understanding of who users are, their behavior, and guide impact on user learning and outcomes. The high number of nonaffiliated users and the self-reported success in achieving learning outcomes reinforce the value of converting the guide to an OER. This research benefits those working in the library and educational fields by providing insights into the use of online guides as OER, the need for library-based OER, and the use of evidence to support staffing allocations.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/19322909.2021.1935396</doi><tpages>26</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3460-5417</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9067-2932</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1012-8601</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7536-295X</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-2909 |
ispartof | Journal of web librarianship, 2021-01, Vol.15 (3), p.128-153 |
issn | 1932-2909 1932-2917 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_19322909_2021_1935396 |
source | Library & Information Science Abstracts (LISA); Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection |
subjects | analytics data Assessment decision making LibGuides Libraries OER Open educational resources Project Outcome Model user survey Workforce planning |
title | Assessing Online Library Guide Use and Open Educational Resource (OER) Potential: An Evidence-Based Decision-Making Approach |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T23%3A13%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessing%20Online%20Library%20Guide%20Use%20and%20Open%20Educational%20Resource%20(OER)%20Potential:%20An%20Evidence-Based%20Decision-Making%20Approach&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20web%20librarianship&rft.au=Lauseng,%20Deborah%20L.&rft.date=2021-01-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=128&rft.epage=153&rft.pages=128-153&rft.issn=1932-2909&rft.eissn=1932-2917&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/19322909.2021.1935396&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2565254768%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-eb2c97f014bf9db58781015e9ed0b013fa3079d664f962a6e4a1c330e85358933%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2565254768&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |