Loading…

An Analysis of Human Response to the Irritancy of Acetone Vapors

Studies on the irritative effects of acetone vapor in humans and experimental animals have revealed large differences in the lowest acetone concentration found to be irritative to the respiratory tract and eyes. This has brought on much confusion in the process of setting occupational exposure limit...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Critical reviews in toxicology 2002, Vol.32 (1), p.43-66
Main Authors: Arts, J.H.E., Mojet, J., Gemert, L.J. van, Emmen, H.H., Lammers, J.H.C.M., Marquart, J., Woutersen, R.A., Feron, V.J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c580t-c2eba6537aab796b3aa02852f82036c5688439a9d5b2e37c539f7832fcf702493
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c580t-c2eba6537aab796b3aa02852f82036c5688439a9d5b2e37c539f7832fcf702493
container_end_page 66
container_issue 1
container_start_page 43
container_title Critical reviews in toxicology
container_volume 32
creator Arts, J.H.E.
Mojet, J.
Gemert, L.J. van
Emmen, H.H.
Lammers, J.H.C.M.
Marquart, J.
Woutersen, R.A.
Feron, V.J.
description Studies on the irritative effects of acetone vapor in humans and experimental animals have revealed large differences in the lowest acetone concentration found to be irritative to the respiratory tract and eyes. This has brought on much confusion in the process of setting occupational exposure limits for acetone. A literature survey was carried out focusing on the differences in results between studies using subjective (neuro)behavioral methods (questionnaires) and studies using objective measurements to detect odor and irritation thresholds. A critical review of published studies revealed that the odor detection threshold of acetone ranges from about 20 to about 400 ppm. Loss of sensitivity due to adaptation and or habituation to acetone odor may occur, as was shown in studies comparing workers previously exposed to acetone with previously unexposed subjects. It further appeared that the sensory irritation threshold of acetone lies between 10,000 and 40,000 ppm. Thus, the threshold for sensory irritation is much higher than the odor detection limit, a conclusion that is supported by observations in anosmics, showing a ten times higher irritation threshold level than the odor threshold found in normosmics. The two-times higher sensory irritation threshold observed in acetone-exposed workers compared with previously nonexposed controls can apart from adaptation be ascribed to habituation. An evaluation of studies on subjectively reported irritation at acetone concentrations
doi_str_mv 10.1080/20024091064174
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_20024091064174</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>18301929</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c580t-c2eba6537aab796b3aa02852f82036c5688439a9d5b2e37c539f7832fcf702493</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1r3DAQxUVpadK01x6LKbQ3J6Nv6ZYltEkgEAhpr2aslVgH29pINmX_-2q7W5YEQk7S4ffevJlHyGcKpxQMnDEAJsBSUIJq8YYcUyl0rYw1b8sfBNRGCHFEPuT8AACaGfmeHFFqJLOUH5PzxVgtRuw3uctVDNXVPOBY3fm8jmP21RSraeWr65S6CUe32SIL56c4-uo3rmPKH8m7gH32n_bvCfn188f9xVV9c3t5fbG4qZ00MNWO-RaV5Bqx1Va1HBFKFhYMA66cVMYIbtEuZcs8105yG7ThLLigy4aWn5DvO991io-zz1MzdNn5vsfRxzk3XAkrBdBXQUap0szKV0FqOFDLtqO_PgMf4pzK0bZmxihZwhbodAe5FHNOPjTr1A2YNg2FZltV87SqIviyd53bwS8P-L6bAnzbA5gd9iGVArp84Lgoc__FszuuG0NMA_6JqV82E276mP6L-IshzBPtymM_rRwmf9jxBelfcUK7Tg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>218865539</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An Analysis of Human Response to the Irritancy of Acetone Vapors</title><source>Taylor and Francis:Jisc Collections:Taylor and Francis Read and Publish Agreement 2024-2025:Medical Collection (Reading list)</source><creator>Arts, J.H.E. ; Mojet, J. ; Gemert, L.J. van ; Emmen, H.H. ; Lammers, J.H.C.M. ; Marquart, J. ; Woutersen, R.A. ; Feron, V.J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Arts, J.H.E. ; Mojet, J. ; Gemert, L.J. van ; Emmen, H.H. ; Lammers, J.H.C.M. ; Marquart, J. ; Woutersen, R.A. ; Feron, V.J.</creatorcontrib><description>Studies on the irritative effects of acetone vapor in humans and experimental animals have revealed large differences in the lowest acetone concentration found to be irritative to the respiratory tract and eyes. This has brought on much confusion in the process of setting occupational exposure limits for acetone. A literature survey was carried out focusing on the differences in results between studies using subjective (neuro)behavioral methods (questionnaires) and studies using objective measurements to detect odor and irritation thresholds. A critical review of published studies revealed that the odor detection threshold of acetone ranges from about 20 to about 400 ppm. Loss of sensitivity due to adaptation and or habituation to acetone odor may occur, as was shown in studies comparing workers previously exposed to acetone with previously unexposed subjects. It further appeared that the sensory irritation threshold of acetone lies between 10,000 and 40,000 ppm. Thus, the threshold for sensory irritation is much higher than the odor detection limit, a conclusion that is supported by observations in anosmics, showing a ten times higher irritation threshold level than the odor threshold found in normosmics. The two-times higher sensory irritation threshold observed in acetone-exposed workers compared with previously nonexposed controls can apart from adaptation be ascribed to habituation. An evaluation of studies on subjectively reported irritation at acetone concentrations &lt;1000 ppm shows that perception of odor intensity, information bias, and exposure history (i.e., habituation) are confounding factors in the reporting of irritation thresholds and health symptoms. In conclusion, subjective measures alone are inappropriate for establishing sensory irritation effects and sensory irritation threshold levels of odorants such as acetone. Clearly, the sensory irritation threshold of acetone should be based on objective measurements.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1040-8444</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1547-6898</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/20024091064174</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11852913</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Colchester: Informa UK Ltd</publisher><subject>(neuro)behavior ; acetone ; Acetone - adverse effects ; adaptation ; Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Animals ; Biological and medical sciences ; Chemical and industrial products toxicology. Toxic occupational diseases ; chemosensory aspects ; Female ; habituation ; Humans ; irritancy ; Irritants - adverse effects ; irritation ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Occupational Exposure - adverse effects ; Odorants ; Sensory Thresholds - drug effects ; Smell - drug effects ; Solvents ; Toxicology</subject><ispartof>Critical reviews in toxicology, 2002, Vol.32 (1), p.43-66</ispartof><rights>2002 Informa UK Ltd All rights reserved: reproduction in whole or part not permitted 2002</rights><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright CRC Press 2002</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c580t-c2eba6537aab796b3aa02852f82036c5688439a9d5b2e37c539f7832fcf702493</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c580t-c2eba6537aab796b3aa02852f82036c5688439a9d5b2e37c539f7832fcf702493</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,27923,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=13453929$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11852913$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Arts, J.H.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mojet, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gemert, L.J. van</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Emmen, H.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lammers, J.H.C.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marquart, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woutersen, R.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feron, V.J.</creatorcontrib><title>An Analysis of Human Response to the Irritancy of Acetone Vapors</title><title>Critical reviews in toxicology</title><addtitle>Crit Rev Toxicol</addtitle><description>Studies on the irritative effects of acetone vapor in humans and experimental animals have revealed large differences in the lowest acetone concentration found to be irritative to the respiratory tract and eyes. This has brought on much confusion in the process of setting occupational exposure limits for acetone. A literature survey was carried out focusing on the differences in results between studies using subjective (neuro)behavioral methods (questionnaires) and studies using objective measurements to detect odor and irritation thresholds. A critical review of published studies revealed that the odor detection threshold of acetone ranges from about 20 to about 400 ppm. Loss of sensitivity due to adaptation and or habituation to acetone odor may occur, as was shown in studies comparing workers previously exposed to acetone with previously unexposed subjects. It further appeared that the sensory irritation threshold of acetone lies between 10,000 and 40,000 ppm. Thus, the threshold for sensory irritation is much higher than the odor detection limit, a conclusion that is supported by observations in anosmics, showing a ten times higher irritation threshold level than the odor threshold found in normosmics. The two-times higher sensory irritation threshold observed in acetone-exposed workers compared with previously nonexposed controls can apart from adaptation be ascribed to habituation. An evaluation of studies on subjectively reported irritation at acetone concentrations &lt;1000 ppm shows that perception of odor intensity, information bias, and exposure history (i.e., habituation) are confounding factors in the reporting of irritation thresholds and health symptoms. In conclusion, subjective measures alone are inappropriate for establishing sensory irritation effects and sensory irritation threshold levels of odorants such as acetone. Clearly, the sensory irritation threshold of acetone should be based on objective measurements.</description><subject>(neuro)behavior</subject><subject>acetone</subject><subject>Acetone - adverse effects</subject><subject>adaptation</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Chemical and industrial products toxicology. Toxic occupational diseases</subject><subject>chemosensory aspects</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>habituation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>irritancy</subject><subject>Irritants - adverse effects</subject><subject>irritation</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Occupational Exposure - adverse effects</subject><subject>Odorants</subject><subject>Sensory Thresholds - drug effects</subject><subject>Smell - drug effects</subject><subject>Solvents</subject><subject>Toxicology</subject><issn>1040-8444</issn><issn>1547-6898</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkc1r3DAQxUVpadK01x6LKbQ3J6Nv6ZYltEkgEAhpr2aslVgH29pINmX_-2q7W5YEQk7S4ffevJlHyGcKpxQMnDEAJsBSUIJq8YYcUyl0rYw1b8sfBNRGCHFEPuT8AACaGfmeHFFqJLOUH5PzxVgtRuw3uctVDNXVPOBY3fm8jmP21RSraeWr65S6CUe32SIL56c4-uo3rmPKH8m7gH32n_bvCfn188f9xVV9c3t5fbG4qZ00MNWO-RaV5Bqx1Va1HBFKFhYMA66cVMYIbtEuZcs8105yG7ThLLigy4aWn5DvO991io-zz1MzdNn5vsfRxzk3XAkrBdBXQUap0szKV0FqOFDLtqO_PgMf4pzK0bZmxihZwhbodAe5FHNOPjTr1A2YNg2FZltV87SqIviyd53bwS8P-L6bAnzbA5gd9iGVArp84Lgoc__FszuuG0NMA_6JqV82E276mP6L-IshzBPtymM_rRwmf9jxBelfcUK7Tg</recordid><startdate>2002</startdate><enddate>2002</enddate><creator>Arts, J.H.E.</creator><creator>Mojet, J.</creator><creator>Gemert, L.J. van</creator><creator>Emmen, H.H.</creator><creator>Lammers, J.H.C.M.</creator><creator>Marquart, J.</creator><creator>Woutersen, R.A.</creator><creator>Feron, V.J.</creator><general>Informa UK Ltd</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><general>Informa Healthcare</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2002</creationdate><title>An Analysis of Human Response to the Irritancy of Acetone Vapors</title><author>Arts, J.H.E. ; Mojet, J. ; Gemert, L.J. van ; Emmen, H.H. ; Lammers, J.H.C.M. ; Marquart, J. ; Woutersen, R.A. ; Feron, V.J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c580t-c2eba6537aab796b3aa02852f82036c5688439a9d5b2e37c539f7832fcf702493</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>(neuro)behavior</topic><topic>acetone</topic><topic>Acetone - adverse effects</topic><topic>adaptation</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Chemical and industrial products toxicology. Toxic occupational diseases</topic><topic>chemosensory aspects</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>habituation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>irritancy</topic><topic>Irritants - adverse effects</topic><topic>irritation</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Occupational Exposure - adverse effects</topic><topic>Odorants</topic><topic>Sensory Thresholds - drug effects</topic><topic>Smell - drug effects</topic><topic>Solvents</topic><topic>Toxicology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Arts, J.H.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mojet, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gemert, L.J. van</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Emmen, H.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lammers, J.H.C.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marquart, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woutersen, R.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feron, V.J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Critical reviews in toxicology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Arts, J.H.E.</au><au>Mojet, J.</au><au>Gemert, L.J. van</au><au>Emmen, H.H.</au><au>Lammers, J.H.C.M.</au><au>Marquart, J.</au><au>Woutersen, R.A.</au><au>Feron, V.J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An Analysis of Human Response to the Irritancy of Acetone Vapors</atitle><jtitle>Critical reviews in toxicology</jtitle><addtitle>Crit Rev Toxicol</addtitle><date>2002</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>43</spage><epage>66</epage><pages>43-66</pages><issn>1040-8444</issn><eissn>1547-6898</eissn><abstract>Studies on the irritative effects of acetone vapor in humans and experimental animals have revealed large differences in the lowest acetone concentration found to be irritative to the respiratory tract and eyes. This has brought on much confusion in the process of setting occupational exposure limits for acetone. A literature survey was carried out focusing on the differences in results between studies using subjective (neuro)behavioral methods (questionnaires) and studies using objective measurements to detect odor and irritation thresholds. A critical review of published studies revealed that the odor detection threshold of acetone ranges from about 20 to about 400 ppm. Loss of sensitivity due to adaptation and or habituation to acetone odor may occur, as was shown in studies comparing workers previously exposed to acetone with previously unexposed subjects. It further appeared that the sensory irritation threshold of acetone lies between 10,000 and 40,000 ppm. Thus, the threshold for sensory irritation is much higher than the odor detection limit, a conclusion that is supported by observations in anosmics, showing a ten times higher irritation threshold level than the odor threshold found in normosmics. The two-times higher sensory irritation threshold observed in acetone-exposed workers compared with previously nonexposed controls can apart from adaptation be ascribed to habituation. An evaluation of studies on subjectively reported irritation at acetone concentrations &lt;1000 ppm shows that perception of odor intensity, information bias, and exposure history (i.e., habituation) are confounding factors in the reporting of irritation thresholds and health symptoms. In conclusion, subjective measures alone are inappropriate for establishing sensory irritation effects and sensory irritation threshold levels of odorants such as acetone. Clearly, the sensory irritation threshold of acetone should be based on objective measurements.</abstract><cop>Colchester</cop><pub>Informa UK Ltd</pub><pmid>11852913</pmid><doi>10.1080/20024091064174</doi><tpages>24</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1040-8444
ispartof Critical reviews in toxicology, 2002, Vol.32 (1), p.43-66
issn 1040-8444
1547-6898
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_20024091064174
source Taylor and Francis:Jisc Collections:Taylor and Francis Read and Publish Agreement 2024-2025:Medical Collection (Reading list)
subjects (neuro)behavior
acetone
Acetone - adverse effects
adaptation
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Animals
Biological and medical sciences
Chemical and industrial products toxicology. Toxic occupational diseases
chemosensory aspects
Female
habituation
Humans
irritancy
Irritants - adverse effects
irritation
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Occupational Exposure - adverse effects
Odorants
Sensory Thresholds - drug effects
Smell - drug effects
Solvents
Toxicology
title An Analysis of Human Response to the Irritancy of Acetone Vapors
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T19%3A54%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20Analysis%20of%20Human%20Response%20to%20the%20Irritancy%20of%20Acetone%20Vapors&rft.jtitle=Critical%20reviews%20in%20toxicology&rft.au=Arts,%20J.H.E.&rft.date=2002&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=43&rft.epage=66&rft.pages=43-66&rft.issn=1040-8444&rft.eissn=1547-6898&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/20024091064174&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E18301929%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c580t-c2eba6537aab796b3aa02852f82036c5688439a9d5b2e37c539f7832fcf702493%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=218865539&rft_id=info:pmid/11852913&rfr_iscdi=true