Responses to Debating Becoming Zimbabwe

Here, Alois Mlambo and Brian Raftopoulos, as editors of Becoming Zimbabwe, offer their responses to the comments, issues and concerns raised by the other contributors, and express their thanks for their engaging interventions. As they explain, for them 'Becoming Zimbabwe combines two purposes....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Critical African studies 2011-12, Vol.4 (6), p.109-113
Main Authors: Mlambo, Alois, Raftopoulos, Brian
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Here, Alois Mlambo and Brian Raftopoulos, as editors of Becoming Zimbabwe, offer their responses to the comments, issues and concerns raised by the other contributors, and express their thanks for their engaging interventions. As they explain, for them 'Becoming Zimbabwe combines two purposes. It is an attempt to draw on and synthesise the impressive and growing historiography on Zimbabwe, and in this sense the book is a certain kind of culmination. However, it is also an occasion to raise new kinds of questions, which may, in part, derive from the book's own silences, and this the contributions to this volume have done admirably'.
ISSN:2168-1392
2040-7211
DOI:10.1080/20407211.2011.10530768