Loading…
Why the "transgender" bathroom controversy should make us rethink sex-segregated public bathrooms
This article draws a theoretical distinction between "transgender" as an identity, and "transgender" as a form of discrimination, in order to better understand the political stakes of recent and ongoing "bathroom bills" that restrict access to sex-segregated public rest...
Saved in:
Published in: | Politics, groups & identities groups & identities, 2018-04, Vol.6 (2), p.199-216 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c268t-2ffca23c95deb4eecda41395466d1f5c0f667c1ef873fd1f2fdca7fef49247b13 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c268t-2ffca23c95deb4eecda41395466d1f5c0f667c1ef873fd1f2fdca7fef49247b13 |
container_end_page | 216 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 199 |
container_title | Politics, groups & identities |
container_volume | 6 |
creator | Davis, Heath Fogg |
description | This article draws a theoretical distinction between "transgender" as an identity, and "transgender" as a form of discrimination, in order to better understand the political stakes of recent and ongoing "bathroom bills" that restrict access to sex-segregated public restrooms to our "biological sex." Some, but not all, transgender people encounter discrimination in sex-segregated bathrooms. And many people who do not self-identify as transgender are in fact harmed by this institutionalized social custom. This includes masculine-appearing cisgender women, feminine-appearing cisgender men, as well as all people who are directed to use female-designated bathrooms. I describe this far-reaching sexism as sex-identity discrimination. And because sex-segregated public restrooms, by their very nature, always prompt and enable this kind of discrimination, I argue that we should eliminate them, and use inclusive design to build no-gender public restrooms that meet our reasonable expectations for personal privacy and safety. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/21565503.2017.1338971 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_21565503_2017_1338971</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2571083715</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c268t-2ffca23c95deb4eecda41395466d1f5c0f667c1ef873fd1f2fdca7fef49247b13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kN1LwzAUxYsoOOb-BCHM5858NE37pgy_YOCL4mNI05u1W9vMJFX739uxuUfvy70czjkXflF0TfCC4AzfUsJTzjFbUEzEgjCW5YKcRZO9HnNOyPnpxuwymnm_weNknBJBJpH6qAYUKkDz4FTn19CV4OaoUKFy1rZI2y44-wXOD8hXtm9K1KotoN4jB6Gquy3y8BN7WDtYqwAl2vVFU-tTg7-KLoxqPMyOexq9Pz68LZ_j1evTy_J-FWuaZiGmxmhFmc55CUUCoEuVEJbzJE1LYrjGJk2FJmAywcyoUFNqJQyYJKeJKAibRjeH3p2znz34IDe2d934UlIuRlZMED66-MGlnfXegZE7V7fKDZJguQcq_4DKPVB5BDrm7g65ujPWterbuqaUQQ2NdWYkp2sv2f8VvzNnfps</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2571083715</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Why the "transgender" bathroom controversy should make us rethink sex-segregated public bathrooms</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Taylor & Francis</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Davis, Heath Fogg</creator><creatorcontrib>Davis, Heath Fogg</creatorcontrib><description>This article draws a theoretical distinction between "transgender" as an identity, and "transgender" as a form of discrimination, in order to better understand the political stakes of recent and ongoing "bathroom bills" that restrict access to sex-segregated public restrooms to our "biological sex." Some, but not all, transgender people encounter discrimination in sex-segregated bathrooms. And many people who do not self-identify as transgender are in fact harmed by this institutionalized social custom. This includes masculine-appearing cisgender women, feminine-appearing cisgender men, as well as all people who are directed to use female-designated bathrooms. I describe this far-reaching sexism as sex-identity discrimination. And because sex-segregated public restrooms, by their very nature, always prompt and enable this kind of discrimination, I argue that we should eliminate them, and use inclusive design to build no-gender public restrooms that meet our reasonable expectations for personal privacy and safety.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2156-5503</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2156-5511</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/21565503.2017.1338971</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Abingdon: Routledge</publisher><subject>Bathrooms ; Cisgender ; Discrimination ; Feminism ; gender identity ; gender studies ; Identity ; Intersectionality ; Masculinity ; Privacy ; restrooms ; Sex discrimination ; Sexism ; trans ; Transgender persons</subject><ispartof>Politics, groups & identities, 2018-04, Vol.6 (2), p.199-216</ispartof><rights>2017 Western Political Science Association 2017</rights><rights>2017 Western Political Science Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c268t-2ffca23c95deb4eecda41395466d1f5c0f667c1ef873fd1f2fdca7fef49247b13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c268t-2ffca23c95deb4eecda41395466d1f5c0f667c1ef873fd1f2fdca7fef49247b13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,33223,33774</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Davis, Heath Fogg</creatorcontrib><title>Why the "transgender" bathroom controversy should make us rethink sex-segregated public bathrooms</title><title>Politics, groups & identities</title><description>This article draws a theoretical distinction between "transgender" as an identity, and "transgender" as a form of discrimination, in order to better understand the political stakes of recent and ongoing "bathroom bills" that restrict access to sex-segregated public restrooms to our "biological sex." Some, but not all, transgender people encounter discrimination in sex-segregated bathrooms. And many people who do not self-identify as transgender are in fact harmed by this institutionalized social custom. This includes masculine-appearing cisgender women, feminine-appearing cisgender men, as well as all people who are directed to use female-designated bathrooms. I describe this far-reaching sexism as sex-identity discrimination. And because sex-segregated public restrooms, by their very nature, always prompt and enable this kind of discrimination, I argue that we should eliminate them, and use inclusive design to build no-gender public restrooms that meet our reasonable expectations for personal privacy and safety.</description><subject>Bathrooms</subject><subject>Cisgender</subject><subject>Discrimination</subject><subject>Feminism</subject><subject>gender identity</subject><subject>gender studies</subject><subject>Identity</subject><subject>Intersectionality</subject><subject>Masculinity</subject><subject>Privacy</subject><subject>restrooms</subject><subject>Sex discrimination</subject><subject>Sexism</subject><subject>trans</subject><subject>Transgender persons</subject><issn>2156-5503</issn><issn>2156-5511</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kN1LwzAUxYsoOOb-BCHM5858NE37pgy_YOCL4mNI05u1W9vMJFX739uxuUfvy70czjkXflF0TfCC4AzfUsJTzjFbUEzEgjCW5YKcRZO9HnNOyPnpxuwymnm_weNknBJBJpH6qAYUKkDz4FTn19CV4OaoUKFy1rZI2y44-wXOD8hXtm9K1KotoN4jB6Gquy3y8BN7WDtYqwAl2vVFU-tTg7-KLoxqPMyOexq9Pz68LZ_j1evTy_J-FWuaZiGmxmhFmc55CUUCoEuVEJbzJE1LYrjGJk2FJmAywcyoUFNqJQyYJKeJKAibRjeH3p2znz34IDe2d934UlIuRlZMED66-MGlnfXegZE7V7fKDZJguQcq_4DKPVB5BDrm7g65ujPWterbuqaUQQ2NdWYkp2sv2f8VvzNnfps</recordid><startdate>20180403</startdate><enddate>20180403</enddate><creator>Davis, Heath Fogg</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180403</creationdate><title>Why the "transgender" bathroom controversy should make us rethink sex-segregated public bathrooms</title><author>Davis, Heath Fogg</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c268t-2ffca23c95deb4eecda41395466d1f5c0f667c1ef873fd1f2fdca7fef49247b13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Bathrooms</topic><topic>Cisgender</topic><topic>Discrimination</topic><topic>Feminism</topic><topic>gender identity</topic><topic>gender studies</topic><topic>Identity</topic><topic>Intersectionality</topic><topic>Masculinity</topic><topic>Privacy</topic><topic>restrooms</topic><topic>Sex discrimination</topic><topic>Sexism</topic><topic>trans</topic><topic>Transgender persons</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Davis, Heath Fogg</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Politics, groups & identities</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Davis, Heath Fogg</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Why the "transgender" bathroom controversy should make us rethink sex-segregated public bathrooms</atitle><jtitle>Politics, groups & identities</jtitle><date>2018-04-03</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>199</spage><epage>216</epage><pages>199-216</pages><issn>2156-5503</issn><eissn>2156-5511</eissn><abstract>This article draws a theoretical distinction between "transgender" as an identity, and "transgender" as a form of discrimination, in order to better understand the political stakes of recent and ongoing "bathroom bills" that restrict access to sex-segregated public restrooms to our "biological sex." Some, but not all, transgender people encounter discrimination in sex-segregated bathrooms. And many people who do not self-identify as transgender are in fact harmed by this institutionalized social custom. This includes masculine-appearing cisgender women, feminine-appearing cisgender men, as well as all people who are directed to use female-designated bathrooms. I describe this far-reaching sexism as sex-identity discrimination. And because sex-segregated public restrooms, by their very nature, always prompt and enable this kind of discrimination, I argue that we should eliminate them, and use inclusive design to build no-gender public restrooms that meet our reasonable expectations for personal privacy and safety.</abstract><cop>Abingdon</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/21565503.2017.1338971</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2156-5503 |
ispartof | Politics, groups & identities, 2018-04, Vol.6 (2), p.199-216 |
issn | 2156-5503 2156-5511 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_21565503_2017_1338971 |
source | International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Taylor & Francis; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | Bathrooms Cisgender Discrimination Feminism gender identity gender studies Identity Intersectionality Masculinity Privacy restrooms Sex discrimination Sexism trans Transgender persons |
title | Why the "transgender" bathroom controversy should make us rethink sex-segregated public bathrooms |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T15%3A35%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Why%20the%20%22transgender%22%20bathroom%20controversy%20should%20make%20us%20rethink%20sex-segregated%20public%20bathrooms&rft.jtitle=Politics,%20groups%20&%20identities&rft.au=Davis,%20Heath%20Fogg&rft.date=2018-04-03&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=199&rft.epage=216&rft.pages=199-216&rft.issn=2156-5503&rft.eissn=2156-5511&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/21565503.2017.1338971&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2571083715%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c268t-2ffca23c95deb4eecda41395466d1f5c0f667c1ef873fd1f2fdca7fef49247b13%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2571083715&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |