Core beliefs/content accommodation policies and teaching practice

After nearly five years of litigation and public debate, the University of Utah now follows a Content Accommodations policy that outlines how students may ask for university curriculum to be altered based on their sincerely held beliefs. This essay is written about experiences teaching at another pu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:First amendment studies 2018-07, Vol.52 (1-2), p.126-136
Main Author: Steimel, Sarah
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
content accommodations
First Amendment
Higher education
trigger warnings
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 136
container_issue 1-2
container_start_page 126
container_title First amendment studies
container_volume 52
creator Steimel, Sarah
description After nearly five years of litigation and public debate, the University of Utah now follows a Content Accommodations policy that outlines how students may ask for university curriculum to be altered based on their sincerely held beliefs. This essay is written about experiences teaching at another public university in Utah (Weber State), which has a similar Core Beliefs policy written in the aftermath of the University of Utah lawsuit. Teaching under a core beliefs policy has resulted in at least three notable influences on my own teaching practices: tensions between planning and spontaneity, vagaries surrounding reasonable accommodation, and pre-curation (or self-censorship) strategies.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/21689725.2018.1507833
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_21689725_2018_1507833</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1080_21689725_2018_1507833</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c173t-cb5c5884b5ae8cd59d0476bd087978ccf66bd4bbe623ed8014f4e88ce6103fff3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1qwzAQhEVpoSHNIxT8Ak4ky7LkW0PoHwR6ac9CXq1aFVsKkqDk7ZuQtMfsZXYGZg4fIfeMLhlVdNWwTvWyEcuGMrVkgkrF-RWZHfO6l5xf__-NuCWLnL_p4VQj-o7OyHoTE1YDjh5dXkEMBUOpDECcpmhN8TFUuzh68JgrE2xV0MCXD5_VLhkoHvCO3DgzZlycdU4-nh7fNy_19u35dbPe1sAkLzUMAoRS7SAMKrCit7SV3WCpkr1UAK47mHYYsGs4WkVZ61pUCrBjlDvn-JyI0y6kmHNCp3fJTybtNaP6iEL_odBHFPqM4tB7OPV8cDFN5iem0epi9mNMLpkAPmt-eeIXhNBmcg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Core beliefs/content accommodation policies and teaching practice</title><source>Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection</source><creator>Steimel, Sarah</creator><creatorcontrib>Steimel, Sarah</creatorcontrib><description>After nearly five years of litigation and public debate, the University of Utah now follows a Content Accommodations policy that outlines how students may ask for university curriculum to be altered based on their sincerely held beliefs. This essay is written about experiences teaching at another public university in Utah (Weber State), which has a similar Core Beliefs policy written in the aftermath of the University of Utah lawsuit. Teaching under a core beliefs policy has resulted in at least three notable influences on my own teaching practices: tensions between planning and spontaneity, vagaries surrounding reasonable accommodation, and pre-curation (or self-censorship) strategies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2168-9725</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2168-9733</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/21689725.2018.1507833</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Routledge</publisher><subject>content accommodations ; First Amendment ; Higher education ; trigger warnings</subject><ispartof>First amendment studies, 2018-07, Vol.52 (1-2), p.126-136</ispartof><rights>2018 National Communication Association 2018</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Steimel, Sarah</creatorcontrib><title>Core beliefs/content accommodation policies and teaching practice</title><title>First amendment studies</title><description>After nearly five years of litigation and public debate, the University of Utah now follows a Content Accommodations policy that outlines how students may ask for university curriculum to be altered based on their sincerely held beliefs. This essay is written about experiences teaching at another public university in Utah (Weber State), which has a similar Core Beliefs policy written in the aftermath of the University of Utah lawsuit. Teaching under a core beliefs policy has resulted in at least three notable influences on my own teaching practices: tensions between planning and spontaneity, vagaries surrounding reasonable accommodation, and pre-curation (or self-censorship) strategies.</description><subject>content accommodations</subject><subject>First Amendment</subject><subject>Higher education</subject><subject>trigger warnings</subject><issn>2168-9725</issn><issn>2168-9733</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM1qwzAQhEVpoSHNIxT8Ak4ky7LkW0PoHwR6ac9CXq1aFVsKkqDk7ZuQtMfsZXYGZg4fIfeMLhlVdNWwTvWyEcuGMrVkgkrF-RWZHfO6l5xf__-NuCWLnL_p4VQj-o7OyHoTE1YDjh5dXkEMBUOpDECcpmhN8TFUuzh68JgrE2xV0MCXD5_VLhkoHvCO3DgzZlycdU4-nh7fNy_19u35dbPe1sAkLzUMAoRS7SAMKrCit7SV3WCpkr1UAK47mHYYsGs4WkVZ61pUCrBjlDvn-JyI0y6kmHNCp3fJTybtNaP6iEL_odBHFPqM4tB7OPV8cDFN5iem0epi9mNMLpkAPmt-eeIXhNBmcg</recordid><startdate>20180703</startdate><enddate>20180703</enddate><creator>Steimel, Sarah</creator><general>Routledge</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180703</creationdate><title>Core beliefs/content accommodation policies and teaching practice</title><author>Steimel, Sarah</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c173t-cb5c5884b5ae8cd59d0476bd087978ccf66bd4bbe623ed8014f4e88ce6103fff3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>content accommodations</topic><topic>First Amendment</topic><topic>Higher education</topic><topic>trigger warnings</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Steimel, Sarah</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>First amendment studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Steimel, Sarah</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Core beliefs/content accommodation policies and teaching practice</atitle><jtitle>First amendment studies</jtitle><date>2018-07-03</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>52</volume><issue>1-2</issue><spage>126</spage><epage>136</epage><pages>126-136</pages><issn>2168-9725</issn><eissn>2168-9733</eissn><abstract>After nearly five years of litigation and public debate, the University of Utah now follows a Content Accommodations policy that outlines how students may ask for university curriculum to be altered based on their sincerely held beliefs. This essay is written about experiences teaching at another public university in Utah (Weber State), which has a similar Core Beliefs policy written in the aftermath of the University of Utah lawsuit. Teaching under a core beliefs policy has resulted in at least three notable influences on my own teaching practices: tensions between planning and spontaneity, vagaries surrounding reasonable accommodation, and pre-curation (or self-censorship) strategies.</abstract><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/21689725.2018.1507833</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2168-9725
ispartof First amendment studies, 2018-07, Vol.52 (1-2), p.126-136
issn 2168-9725
2168-9733
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_21689725_2018_1507833
source Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection
subjects content accommodations
First Amendment
Higher education
trigger warnings
title Core beliefs/content accommodation policies and teaching practice
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T04%3A54%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Core%20beliefs/content%20accommodation%20policies%20and%20teaching%20practice&rft.jtitle=First%20amendment%20studies&rft.au=Steimel,%20Sarah&rft.date=2018-07-03&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=1-2&rft.spage=126&rft.epage=136&rft.pages=126-136&rft.issn=2168-9725&rft.eissn=2168-9733&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/21689725.2018.1507833&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref_infor%3E10_1080_21689725_2018_1507833%3C/crossref_infor%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c173t-cb5c5884b5ae8cd59d0476bd087978ccf66bd4bbe623ed8014f4e88ce6103fff3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true