Loading…

Design requirements and potential target users for brain-computer interfaces - recommendations from rehabilitation professionals

It is an implicit assumption in the field of brain-computer interfacing (BCI) that BCIs can be satisfactorily used to access augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) methods by people with severe physical disabilities. A one-day workshop and focus group interview was held to investigate this...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Brain computer interfaces (Abingdon, England) England), 2014-01, Vol.1 (1), p.50-61
Main Authors: Nijboer, Femke, Plass-Oude Bos, Danny, Blokland, Yvonne, van Wijk, René, Farquhar, Jason
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c307t-59a0da9bcc0c2f046e1878b1072ef13eb98781276f2cfa54ef693f5f8f0c0c023
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c307t-59a0da9bcc0c2f046e1878b1072ef13eb98781276f2cfa54ef693f5f8f0c0c023
container_end_page 61
container_issue 1
container_start_page 50
container_title Brain computer interfaces (Abingdon, England)
container_volume 1
creator Nijboer, Femke
Plass-Oude Bos, Danny
Blokland, Yvonne
van Wijk, René
Farquhar, Jason
description It is an implicit assumption in the field of brain-computer interfacing (BCI) that BCIs can be satisfactorily used to access augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) methods by people with severe physical disabilities. A one-day workshop and focus group interview was held to investigate this assumption. Rehabilitation professionals (N = 28) were asked to critically assess current BCI technology, recommend design requirements and identify target users. The individual answers were analyzed using the theoretical framework of grounded theory. None of the participants expressed a perception of added value of current BCIs over existing alternatives. A major criticism (and requirement) was that the usability of BCI systems should significantly improve. Target users are only those who can hardly or not at all use alternative access technologies. However, such persons often have concurrent physical, sensory, and cognitive problems, which could complicate BCI use. If successful BCI use continues to require a user to sit motionlessly and have intact cognition, then - as previously implicitly assumed - people in the locked-in state (resulting from late-stage amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, multiple sclerosis, spinal muscular atrophy type II or classic or total locked-in syndrome) and people with high spinal cord injury (C1/C2) could be target users.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/2326263X.2013.877210
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_2326263X_2013_877210</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1080_2326263X_2013_877210</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c307t-59a0da9bcc0c2f046e1878b1072ef13eb98781276f2cfa54ef693f5f8f0c0c023</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UE1LAzEQDaJg0f4DD_kDWydJux8nkfoJBS8KvYVsNqmR3WSdpEhv_nRTqx69zLx5M-_BPEIuGMwY1HDJBS95KdYzDkzM6qriDI7IZE8XecOO_7BYn5JpjG8AwJhoBGMT8nljott4iuZ969AMxqdIle_oGFLGTvU0KdyYRLfRYKQ2IG1ROV_oMIzbZJA6n6tV2kRaZJ_MZ5dOJRd8vscwZPJVta536ZukIwZrYsxQ9fGcnNjczPSnn5GXu9vn5UOxerp_XF6vCi2gSsWiUdCpptUaNLcwLw2rq7plUHFjmTBtk0fGq9JybdVibmzZCLuwtYWsAC7OyPzgqzHEiMbKEd2gcCcZyH2Q8jdIuQ9SHoLMsquDzPn8-qA-AvadTGrXB7SovHZRin8dvgCdaH5O</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Design requirements and potential target users for brain-computer interfaces - recommendations from rehabilitation professionals</title><source>Taylor and Francis Science and Technology Collection</source><creator>Nijboer, Femke ; Plass-Oude Bos, Danny ; Blokland, Yvonne ; van Wijk, René ; Farquhar, Jason</creator><creatorcontrib>Nijboer, Femke ; Plass-Oude Bos, Danny ; Blokland, Yvonne ; van Wijk, René ; Farquhar, Jason</creatorcontrib><description>It is an implicit assumption in the field of brain-computer interfacing (BCI) that BCIs can be satisfactorily used to access augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) methods by people with severe physical disabilities. A one-day workshop and focus group interview was held to investigate this assumption. Rehabilitation professionals (N = 28) were asked to critically assess current BCI technology, recommend design requirements and identify target users. The individual answers were analyzed using the theoretical framework of grounded theory. None of the participants expressed a perception of added value of current BCIs over existing alternatives. A major criticism (and requirement) was that the usability of BCI systems should significantly improve. Target users are only those who can hardly or not at all use alternative access technologies. However, such persons often have concurrent physical, sensory, and cognitive problems, which could complicate BCI use. If successful BCI use continues to require a user to sit motionlessly and have intact cognition, then - as previously implicitly assumed - people in the locked-in state (resulting from late-stage amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, multiple sclerosis, spinal muscular atrophy type II or classic or total locked-in syndrome) and people with high spinal cord injury (C1/C2) could be target users.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2326-263X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2326-2621</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/2326263X.2013.877210</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Taylor &amp; Francis</publisher><subject>access technology ; amyotrophic lateral sclerosis ; assistive technology ; brain-computer interfaces ; focus group interviews ; locked-in syndrome ; spinal cord injury ; system requirements</subject><ispartof>Brain computer interfaces (Abingdon, England), 2014-01, Vol.1 (1), p.50-61</ispartof><rights>2014 Taylor &amp; Francis 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c307t-59a0da9bcc0c2f046e1878b1072ef13eb98781276f2cfa54ef693f5f8f0c0c023</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c307t-59a0da9bcc0c2f046e1878b1072ef13eb98781276f2cfa54ef693f5f8f0c0c023</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nijboer, Femke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plass-Oude Bos, Danny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blokland, Yvonne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Wijk, René</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farquhar, Jason</creatorcontrib><title>Design requirements and potential target users for brain-computer interfaces - recommendations from rehabilitation professionals</title><title>Brain computer interfaces (Abingdon, England)</title><description>It is an implicit assumption in the field of brain-computer interfacing (BCI) that BCIs can be satisfactorily used to access augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) methods by people with severe physical disabilities. A one-day workshop and focus group interview was held to investigate this assumption. Rehabilitation professionals (N = 28) were asked to critically assess current BCI technology, recommend design requirements and identify target users. The individual answers were analyzed using the theoretical framework of grounded theory. None of the participants expressed a perception of added value of current BCIs over existing alternatives. A major criticism (and requirement) was that the usability of BCI systems should significantly improve. Target users are only those who can hardly or not at all use alternative access technologies. However, such persons often have concurrent physical, sensory, and cognitive problems, which could complicate BCI use. If successful BCI use continues to require a user to sit motionlessly and have intact cognition, then - as previously implicitly assumed - people in the locked-in state (resulting from late-stage amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, multiple sclerosis, spinal muscular atrophy type II or classic or total locked-in syndrome) and people with high spinal cord injury (C1/C2) could be target users.</description><subject>access technology</subject><subject>amyotrophic lateral sclerosis</subject><subject>assistive technology</subject><subject>brain-computer interfaces</subject><subject>focus group interviews</subject><subject>locked-in syndrome</subject><subject>spinal cord injury</subject><subject>system requirements</subject><issn>2326-263X</issn><issn>2326-2621</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UE1LAzEQDaJg0f4DD_kDWydJux8nkfoJBS8KvYVsNqmR3WSdpEhv_nRTqx69zLx5M-_BPEIuGMwY1HDJBS95KdYzDkzM6qriDI7IZE8XecOO_7BYn5JpjG8AwJhoBGMT8nljott4iuZ969AMxqdIle_oGFLGTvU0KdyYRLfRYKQ2IG1ROV_oMIzbZJA6n6tV2kRaZJ_MZ5dOJRd8vscwZPJVta536ZukIwZrYsxQ9fGcnNjczPSnn5GXu9vn5UOxerp_XF6vCi2gSsWiUdCpptUaNLcwLw2rq7plUHFjmTBtk0fGq9JybdVibmzZCLuwtYWsAC7OyPzgqzHEiMbKEd2gcCcZyH2Q8jdIuQ9SHoLMsquDzPn8-qA-AvadTGrXB7SovHZRin8dvgCdaH5O</recordid><startdate>20140102</startdate><enddate>20140102</enddate><creator>Nijboer, Femke</creator><creator>Plass-Oude Bos, Danny</creator><creator>Blokland, Yvonne</creator><creator>van Wijk, René</creator><creator>Farquhar, Jason</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140102</creationdate><title>Design requirements and potential target users for brain-computer interfaces - recommendations from rehabilitation professionals</title><author>Nijboer, Femke ; Plass-Oude Bos, Danny ; Blokland, Yvonne ; van Wijk, René ; Farquhar, Jason</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c307t-59a0da9bcc0c2f046e1878b1072ef13eb98781276f2cfa54ef693f5f8f0c0c023</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>access technology</topic><topic>amyotrophic lateral sclerosis</topic><topic>assistive technology</topic><topic>brain-computer interfaces</topic><topic>focus group interviews</topic><topic>locked-in syndrome</topic><topic>spinal cord injury</topic><topic>system requirements</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nijboer, Femke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plass-Oude Bos, Danny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blokland, Yvonne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Wijk, René</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farquhar, Jason</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Brain computer interfaces (Abingdon, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nijboer, Femke</au><au>Plass-Oude Bos, Danny</au><au>Blokland, Yvonne</au><au>van Wijk, René</au><au>Farquhar, Jason</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Design requirements and potential target users for brain-computer interfaces - recommendations from rehabilitation professionals</atitle><jtitle>Brain computer interfaces (Abingdon, England)</jtitle><date>2014-01-02</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>1</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>50</spage><epage>61</epage><pages>50-61</pages><issn>2326-263X</issn><eissn>2326-2621</eissn><abstract>It is an implicit assumption in the field of brain-computer interfacing (BCI) that BCIs can be satisfactorily used to access augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) methods by people with severe physical disabilities. A one-day workshop and focus group interview was held to investigate this assumption. Rehabilitation professionals (N = 28) were asked to critically assess current BCI technology, recommend design requirements and identify target users. The individual answers were analyzed using the theoretical framework of grounded theory. None of the participants expressed a perception of added value of current BCIs over existing alternatives. A major criticism (and requirement) was that the usability of BCI systems should significantly improve. Target users are only those who can hardly or not at all use alternative access technologies. However, such persons often have concurrent physical, sensory, and cognitive problems, which could complicate BCI use. If successful BCI use continues to require a user to sit motionlessly and have intact cognition, then - as previously implicitly assumed - people in the locked-in state (resulting from late-stage amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, multiple sclerosis, spinal muscular atrophy type II or classic or total locked-in syndrome) and people with high spinal cord injury (C1/C2) could be target users.</abstract><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis</pub><doi>10.1080/2326263X.2013.877210</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2326-263X
ispartof Brain computer interfaces (Abingdon, England), 2014-01, Vol.1 (1), p.50-61
issn 2326-263X
2326-2621
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_2326263X_2013_877210
source Taylor and Francis Science and Technology Collection
subjects access technology
amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
assistive technology
brain-computer interfaces
focus group interviews
locked-in syndrome
spinal cord injury
system requirements
title Design requirements and potential target users for brain-computer interfaces - recommendations from rehabilitation professionals
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T00%3A57%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Design%20requirements%20and%20potential%20target%20users%20for%20brain-computer%20interfaces%20-%20recommendations%20from%20rehabilitation%20professionals&rft.jtitle=Brain%20computer%20interfaces%20(Abingdon,%20England)&rft.au=Nijboer,%20Femke&rft.date=2014-01-02&rft.volume=1&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=50&rft.epage=61&rft.pages=50-61&rft.issn=2326-263X&rft.eissn=2326-2621&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/2326263X.2013.877210&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref_infor%3E10_1080_2326263X_2013_877210%3C/crossref_infor%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c307t-59a0da9bcc0c2f046e1878b1072ef13eb98781276f2cfa54ef693f5f8f0c0c023%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true