Loading…
Design requirements and potential target users for brain-computer interfaces - recommendations from rehabilitation professionals
It is an implicit assumption in the field of brain-computer interfacing (BCI) that BCIs can be satisfactorily used to access augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) methods by people with severe physical disabilities. A one-day workshop and focus group interview was held to investigate this...
Saved in:
Published in: | Brain computer interfaces (Abingdon, England) England), 2014-01, Vol.1 (1), p.50-61 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c307t-59a0da9bcc0c2f046e1878b1072ef13eb98781276f2cfa54ef693f5f8f0c0c023 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c307t-59a0da9bcc0c2f046e1878b1072ef13eb98781276f2cfa54ef693f5f8f0c0c023 |
container_end_page | 61 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 50 |
container_title | Brain computer interfaces (Abingdon, England) |
container_volume | 1 |
creator | Nijboer, Femke Plass-Oude Bos, Danny Blokland, Yvonne van Wijk, René Farquhar, Jason |
description | It is an implicit assumption in the field of brain-computer interfacing (BCI) that BCIs can be satisfactorily used to access augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) methods by people with severe physical disabilities. A one-day workshop and focus group interview was held to investigate this assumption. Rehabilitation professionals (N = 28) were asked to critically assess current BCI technology, recommend design requirements and identify target users. The individual answers were analyzed using the theoretical framework of grounded theory. None of the participants expressed a perception of added value of current BCIs over existing alternatives. A major criticism (and requirement) was that the usability of BCI systems should significantly improve. Target users are only those who can hardly or not at all use alternative access technologies. However, such persons often have concurrent physical, sensory, and cognitive problems, which could complicate BCI use. If successful BCI use continues to require a user to sit motionlessly and have intact cognition, then - as previously implicitly assumed - people in the locked-in state (resulting from late-stage amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, multiple sclerosis, spinal muscular atrophy type II or classic or total locked-in syndrome) and people with high spinal cord injury (C1/C2) could be target users. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/2326263X.2013.877210 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>crossref_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_2326263X_2013_877210</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1080_2326263X_2013_877210</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c307t-59a0da9bcc0c2f046e1878b1072ef13eb98781276f2cfa54ef693f5f8f0c0c023</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UE1LAzEQDaJg0f4DD_kDWydJux8nkfoJBS8KvYVsNqmR3WSdpEhv_nRTqx69zLx5M-_BPEIuGMwY1HDJBS95KdYzDkzM6qriDI7IZE8XecOO_7BYn5JpjG8AwJhoBGMT8nljott4iuZ969AMxqdIle_oGFLGTvU0KdyYRLfRYKQ2IG1ROV_oMIzbZJA6n6tV2kRaZJ_MZ5dOJRd8vscwZPJVta536ZukIwZrYsxQ9fGcnNjczPSnn5GXu9vn5UOxerp_XF6vCi2gSsWiUdCpptUaNLcwLw2rq7plUHFjmTBtk0fGq9JybdVibmzZCLuwtYWsAC7OyPzgqzHEiMbKEd2gcCcZyH2Q8jdIuQ9SHoLMsquDzPn8-qA-AvadTGrXB7SovHZRin8dvgCdaH5O</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Design requirements and potential target users for brain-computer interfaces - recommendations from rehabilitation professionals</title><source>Taylor and Francis Science and Technology Collection</source><creator>Nijboer, Femke ; Plass-Oude Bos, Danny ; Blokland, Yvonne ; van Wijk, René ; Farquhar, Jason</creator><creatorcontrib>Nijboer, Femke ; Plass-Oude Bos, Danny ; Blokland, Yvonne ; van Wijk, René ; Farquhar, Jason</creatorcontrib><description>It is an implicit assumption in the field of brain-computer interfacing (BCI) that BCIs can be satisfactorily used to access augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) methods by people with severe physical disabilities. A one-day workshop and focus group interview was held to investigate this assumption. Rehabilitation professionals (N = 28) were asked to critically assess current BCI technology, recommend design requirements and identify target users. The individual answers were analyzed using the theoretical framework of grounded theory. None of the participants expressed a perception of added value of current BCIs over existing alternatives. A major criticism (and requirement) was that the usability of BCI systems should significantly improve. Target users are only those who can hardly or not at all use alternative access technologies. However, such persons often have concurrent physical, sensory, and cognitive problems, which could complicate BCI use. If successful BCI use continues to require a user to sit motionlessly and have intact cognition, then - as previously implicitly assumed - people in the locked-in state (resulting from late-stage amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, multiple sclerosis, spinal muscular atrophy type II or classic or total locked-in syndrome) and people with high spinal cord injury (C1/C2) could be target users.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2326-263X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2326-2621</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/2326263X.2013.877210</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Taylor & Francis</publisher><subject>access technology ; amyotrophic lateral sclerosis ; assistive technology ; brain-computer interfaces ; focus group interviews ; locked-in syndrome ; spinal cord injury ; system requirements</subject><ispartof>Brain computer interfaces (Abingdon, England), 2014-01, Vol.1 (1), p.50-61</ispartof><rights>2014 Taylor & Francis 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c307t-59a0da9bcc0c2f046e1878b1072ef13eb98781276f2cfa54ef693f5f8f0c0c023</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c307t-59a0da9bcc0c2f046e1878b1072ef13eb98781276f2cfa54ef693f5f8f0c0c023</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nijboer, Femke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plass-Oude Bos, Danny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blokland, Yvonne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Wijk, René</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farquhar, Jason</creatorcontrib><title>Design requirements and potential target users for brain-computer interfaces - recommendations from rehabilitation professionals</title><title>Brain computer interfaces (Abingdon, England)</title><description>It is an implicit assumption in the field of brain-computer interfacing (BCI) that BCIs can be satisfactorily used to access augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) methods by people with severe physical disabilities. A one-day workshop and focus group interview was held to investigate this assumption. Rehabilitation professionals (N = 28) were asked to critically assess current BCI technology, recommend design requirements and identify target users. The individual answers were analyzed using the theoretical framework of grounded theory. None of the participants expressed a perception of added value of current BCIs over existing alternatives. A major criticism (and requirement) was that the usability of BCI systems should significantly improve. Target users are only those who can hardly or not at all use alternative access technologies. However, such persons often have concurrent physical, sensory, and cognitive problems, which could complicate BCI use. If successful BCI use continues to require a user to sit motionlessly and have intact cognition, then - as previously implicitly assumed - people in the locked-in state (resulting from late-stage amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, multiple sclerosis, spinal muscular atrophy type II or classic or total locked-in syndrome) and people with high spinal cord injury (C1/C2) could be target users.</description><subject>access technology</subject><subject>amyotrophic lateral sclerosis</subject><subject>assistive technology</subject><subject>brain-computer interfaces</subject><subject>focus group interviews</subject><subject>locked-in syndrome</subject><subject>spinal cord injury</subject><subject>system requirements</subject><issn>2326-263X</issn><issn>2326-2621</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UE1LAzEQDaJg0f4DD_kDWydJux8nkfoJBS8KvYVsNqmR3WSdpEhv_nRTqx69zLx5M-_BPEIuGMwY1HDJBS95KdYzDkzM6qriDI7IZE8XecOO_7BYn5JpjG8AwJhoBGMT8nljott4iuZ969AMxqdIle_oGFLGTvU0KdyYRLfRYKQ2IG1ROV_oMIzbZJA6n6tV2kRaZJ_MZ5dOJRd8vscwZPJVta536ZukIwZrYsxQ9fGcnNjczPSnn5GXu9vn5UOxerp_XF6vCi2gSsWiUdCpptUaNLcwLw2rq7plUHFjmTBtk0fGq9JybdVibmzZCLuwtYWsAC7OyPzgqzHEiMbKEd2gcCcZyH2Q8jdIuQ9SHoLMsquDzPn8-qA-AvadTGrXB7SovHZRin8dvgCdaH5O</recordid><startdate>20140102</startdate><enddate>20140102</enddate><creator>Nijboer, Femke</creator><creator>Plass-Oude Bos, Danny</creator><creator>Blokland, Yvonne</creator><creator>van Wijk, René</creator><creator>Farquhar, Jason</creator><general>Taylor & Francis</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140102</creationdate><title>Design requirements and potential target users for brain-computer interfaces - recommendations from rehabilitation professionals</title><author>Nijboer, Femke ; Plass-Oude Bos, Danny ; Blokland, Yvonne ; van Wijk, René ; Farquhar, Jason</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c307t-59a0da9bcc0c2f046e1878b1072ef13eb98781276f2cfa54ef693f5f8f0c0c023</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>access technology</topic><topic>amyotrophic lateral sclerosis</topic><topic>assistive technology</topic><topic>brain-computer interfaces</topic><topic>focus group interviews</topic><topic>locked-in syndrome</topic><topic>spinal cord injury</topic><topic>system requirements</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nijboer, Femke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plass-Oude Bos, Danny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blokland, Yvonne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Wijk, René</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farquhar, Jason</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Brain computer interfaces (Abingdon, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nijboer, Femke</au><au>Plass-Oude Bos, Danny</au><au>Blokland, Yvonne</au><au>van Wijk, René</au><au>Farquhar, Jason</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Design requirements and potential target users for brain-computer interfaces - recommendations from rehabilitation professionals</atitle><jtitle>Brain computer interfaces (Abingdon, England)</jtitle><date>2014-01-02</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>1</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>50</spage><epage>61</epage><pages>50-61</pages><issn>2326-263X</issn><eissn>2326-2621</eissn><abstract>It is an implicit assumption in the field of brain-computer interfacing (BCI) that BCIs can be satisfactorily used to access augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) methods by people with severe physical disabilities. A one-day workshop and focus group interview was held to investigate this assumption. Rehabilitation professionals (N = 28) were asked to critically assess current BCI technology, recommend design requirements and identify target users. The individual answers were analyzed using the theoretical framework of grounded theory. None of the participants expressed a perception of added value of current BCIs over existing alternatives. A major criticism (and requirement) was that the usability of BCI systems should significantly improve. Target users are only those who can hardly or not at all use alternative access technologies. However, such persons often have concurrent physical, sensory, and cognitive problems, which could complicate BCI use. If successful BCI use continues to require a user to sit motionlessly and have intact cognition, then - as previously implicitly assumed - people in the locked-in state (resulting from late-stage amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, multiple sclerosis, spinal muscular atrophy type II or classic or total locked-in syndrome) and people with high spinal cord injury (C1/C2) could be target users.</abstract><pub>Taylor & Francis</pub><doi>10.1080/2326263X.2013.877210</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2326-263X |
ispartof | Brain computer interfaces (Abingdon, England), 2014-01, Vol.1 (1), p.50-61 |
issn | 2326-263X 2326-2621 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_2326263X_2013_877210 |
source | Taylor and Francis Science and Technology Collection |
subjects | access technology amyotrophic lateral sclerosis assistive technology brain-computer interfaces focus group interviews locked-in syndrome spinal cord injury system requirements |
title | Design requirements and potential target users for brain-computer interfaces - recommendations from rehabilitation professionals |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T00%3A57%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Design%20requirements%20and%20potential%20target%20users%20for%20brain-computer%20interfaces%20-%20recommendations%20from%20rehabilitation%20professionals&rft.jtitle=Brain%20computer%20interfaces%20(Abingdon,%20England)&rft.au=Nijboer,%20Femke&rft.date=2014-01-02&rft.volume=1&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=50&rft.epage=61&rft.pages=50-61&rft.issn=2326-263X&rft.eissn=2326-2621&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/2326263X.2013.877210&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref_infor%3E10_1080_2326263X_2013_877210%3C/crossref_infor%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c307t-59a0da9bcc0c2f046e1878b1072ef13eb98781276f2cfa54ef693f5f8f0c0c023%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |